Preparation of high quality personnel to provide educational services to students with disabilities living in rural areas is, at best, challenging. Findings from a comprehensive study concerning the status of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) in rural settings and the issues such implementation presents to teacher education programs in these areas are discussed. Members of the American Council on Rural Special Education (ACRES) participated in the study. Results indicated that strategies for enhancing personnel preparation, recruitment, and retention of individuals to institutions of higher education and K-12 schools in rural settings include distance learning, on-site professional development opportunities, salary incentives/increments, and benefits. Linking evaluation data to the general education curriculum and determining how the student's disabilities affect his/her progress in general education are issues for practitioners implementing IDEA in rural settings. Recommendations are provided for enhancing personnel preparation and service delivery based on the results.
American Council on Education. (1999). To touch the future: Transforming the way teachers are taught. An action agenda for college and university presidents. Washington, DC: Author.
3.
BarkerB., & DicksonM. (1996). Factors in determining rural school readiness to use distance learning. Rural Educator, 17(3), 14–18.
4.
BoyerL., & GillespieP. (2000). Keeping the committed: The importance of induction and support programs for new special educators. Teaching Exceptional Children, 33(6), 10–15.
5.
BullK.S., WinterowdC.L., & KimballS.L. (1999). Uses of the internet: Rural special education materials for teachers and parents. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 18(1), 12–22.
6.
ButeraG., McMullenL., & HendersonJ. (1997). IEPs, students with behavior problems and school discipline policies: A collision course. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 406 103.
7.
ChowS., TynerK., EstrinE.T., & KoelschN. (1994). Building professional practice consortia: Strategies for systemic reform in rural schools. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 377 020).
8.
CollinsT. (1999). Attracting and retaining teachers in rural areas. Charleston, WV: The ERIC Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Small Schools. EDO-RC-99–7.
9.
CorbettN.L., KilgoreK.L., & SindelarP.T. (1998). “Making sense” in a collaborative teacher education program: Lessons from Project PART students. Teacher Education and Special Education, 21(4), 293–305.
10.
DeweesS. (1999). Improving rural school facilities for teaching and learning. Charleston, WV: The ERIC Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Small Schools. EDO-RC-99–8.
11.
DuncanC.M. (1999). Worlds apart: Why poverty persists in rural America. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
12.
Education Commission of the States. (1999). Teacher recruitment. Clearinghouse Notes.Denver, CO: Author.
13.
FerrellK., WrightC., PersichitteK., & LowellN. (2000). Capitalizing on distance technologies to benefit rural children and youth with vision impairments. In LemkeJ. (Ed.). Capitalizing on leadership in rurals special education: Making a difference for children and families. (pp. 153–157). Proceedings of the Annual National Conference of the American Council on Rural Special Education (ACRES) Conference held in Alexandria, VA, March 16–18, 2000.
14.
HillkirkK., ChangV., OettingerL.A., SabanA., & VilletC. (1998). Supporting ongoing professional learning in rural schools. Rural Educator, 19(3), 20–24.
15.
HowleyC., & BarkerB. (1997). The national information infrastructure: Keeping rural values and purposes in mind. Charleston, WV: Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Small Schools. EDO-RC-97–4.
16.
HuefnerD.S. (2000). The risks and opportunities of the IEP requirements under IDEA ′97. The Journal of Special Education, 33(4), 195–204.
17.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997. (1997). 111 Statute 37.
18.
LesarS., BennerS.M., HabelJ., & ColemanL. (1997). Preparing general education teachers for inclusive settings: A constructivist teacher education program. Teacher Education and Special Education, 20(3), 204–220.
19.
LowenbraunS., & NolenS.B. (1998). Implementing change in a research university: Constructivist team teaching in a general education teacher education program. Teacher Education and Special Education, 21(1), 34–46.
20.
MorganC.R., & DemchakM. (1998). Involving building administrators in planning for inclusive educational programs. Rural Educator, 20(2), 26–30.
21.
MullinsF., MorrisS., & ReinoehlK. (1997). Recruitment and retention of special educators and related services personnel: State plan and state strategic plan provisions. Reston, VA: The Council for Exceptional Children, National Clearinghouse for Professions in Special Education.
22.
NachtigalP., & ParkerS.D. (1990). Clustering: Working together for better schools. Aurora, CO: Mid-continent Regional Educational Laboratory. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 338 459.)
23.
National Council on Disability. (2000, January 25). Back to school on civil rights: Advancing the federal commitment to leave no child behind. Washington, DC: Author.
24.
PetersonM., & BeloinK.S. (1998). Teaching the inclusive teacher: Restructuring mainstreaming course in teacher education. Teacher Education and Special Education, 21(4), 306–318.
25.
Quality counts: Who should teach? (2000). Education Week, XIX(18), Bethesda, MD.SackJ. (2000). Segregated schools are more likely to include disabled students in regular classrooms out of financial necessity. Education Week, XIX, (32), 12.
26.
Special education teacher shortage hits districts hard. (2000). Special Education Report, 26(19). Alexandria, VA: Capitol Publications, 1–2.
27.
SternJ. D. (Ed.). (1994). The condition of education in rural schools. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Education Research and Improvement, Programs for the Improvement of Practice, PIP94-1106. (ERIC Document Repoduction Service No. ED 371 935.
28.
United States Department of Education. (1996). To assure the free appropriate public education of all children with disabilities: Eighteenth annual report to Congress on the implementation of The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: Author.
29.
United States Department of Education. (1997). The seven priorities of the U. S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: Author.
30.
United States Department of Education. (1999a). Distance education at postsecondary education institutes: 1997–98. Washington, DC: NCES Statistical Analysis Report, NCES 2000–13.
31.
United States Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement. (1999b). Teacher quality: A report on the preparation and qualifications of public school teachers. Washington, DC: Author.
32.
United States Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement. (2000). Overview of elementary and secondary schools and districts: School year 1998–99. National Center for Education Statistics. Statistics in Brief. 2000–333. Washington, DC: Author.
33.
United States General Accounting Office. (1994). Rural children: Increasing poverty rates pose educational challenges. Washington, DC: Author. GAO/HEHS 94-75BR.
34.
United States General Accounting Office. (1996). School facilities: America's schools report differing conditions (GAO Report No. GAO/HEHS-96–103). Gaithersburg, MD: Author. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 397 508).
35.
WaldJ.L. (1998). Retention of special education professionals: A practical guide of strategies and activities for educators and administrators. Reston, VA: The Councill for Exceptional Children, The National Clearinghouse for Professions in Special Education.
36.
WestlingD.L., & WhittenT.M. (1996). Rural special education teachers' plans to continue or leave their teaching positions. Exceptional Children, 62(4), 319–335.
37.
WhitakerS.D. (2000). Mentoring beginning special education teachers and the relationship to attribution. Exceptional Children, 66(4), 546–566. (Footnotes)
