The following discussion describes and evaluates an innovative training approach in which one hundred sixteen general educators (64 elementary and 52 middle/secondary) were educated in instructional and behavioral strategies to better serve students with disabilities. For a period of ten weeks a collaborative consultation intern and a university coordinator were assigned to teams of four to five general educators and a special educator at six elementary, four middle and two secondary schools. All schools served predominately rural students from North Central West Virginia. Each team attended weekly problem-solving seminars at their home schools. Prior to participation in the teacher preparation project, general educators rated their ability to work with students with disabilities. They again rated their ability to work with students with disabilities after their involvement in the project. The skill ratings of elementary and middle/secondary educators were analyzed and compared using the Assessment of Skills for Teachers (Morsink, Thomas, & Correa, 1991). Significant differences and improvements in perception of skills between and within elementary and middle/secondary educator groups were found. Elementary educators generally self-rated their skills higher than middle/secondary educators prior to and after participation in the training program. The findings are discussed and recommendations for policy and research are provided along with implications for training general educators.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (1992). Educational Leadership, 50(2), Author.
2.
BishopP., & StevensonC. (2000). When smaller is greater: Two or three person partner teams. Middle School Journal, 31(3), 12–17.
3.
BoudahD.J., DeshlerD.D., SchumakerJ.B., LenzB.K., & CookB. (1997). Student-centered or content-centered? A case study of a middle school teacher's lesson planning and instruction in inclusive classes. Teacher Education and Special Education, 20(3), 189–203.
4.
BradleyD.F., & WestJ.F. (1994). Staff training for the inclusion of students with disabilities: Visions from school-based educators. Teacher Education and Special Education, 17, 112–118.
5.
BrantlingerE. (1996). Influence of preservice teachers beliefs about pupil achievement on attitudes toward inclusion. Teacher Education and Special Education, 19(1), 17–33.
6.
ColemanT.J., Thompson-Smith,T., PruittG.D., & RichardsL.D. (1999). Rural service delivery: Unique challenges, creative solutions. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, 41(1), 40–46.
7.
CondonM., ZimmermanS., & BeaneA. (1989). Personnel preparation in special education: A synthesis of distance education and on-campus instruction.. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 9(1), 16–20.
8.
CookL. (1991). Collaboration in special education: Coming of age in the 1990s. Preventing School Failure, 35(1), 43–46.
9.
Fuchs,D, & FuchsL. (1994). Inclusive schools movement and the radicalization of special education reform. Exceptional Children, 60(4), 294–309.
10.
GableR.A., HendersonJ.M., EvansS.S., FryeB., & BryantK. (1993). Cooperative planning for regular classroom instruction of students with disabilities. Preventing School Failure, 37(4), 16–20.
11.
GableR.A., YoungC.C., & HendricksonJ.M. (1987). Content of special education teacher preparation: Are we headed in the right direction? Teacher Education and Special Education, 10, 135–139.
12.
GreenwoodC.R., & MaheadyL. (1997). Measurable change in student performance: Forgotten standard in teacher preparation? Teacher Education and Special Education, 20(3), 265–275.
13.
GuernseyM.A. (1988). Practical solutions for rural educators. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 9(3), 2–6.
14.
HammondH., OlsonJ., EdsonF., GreenfieldR., & IngallsL. (1995). Rural education teams: A team building project. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 14(1), 3–10.
15.
HelgeD.I. (1984). The state of the art of rural special education. Exceptional Children, 50(4), 294–305.
KearneyC.C., & DurandV.M. (1992). How prepared are out teachers for mainstreamed classroom settings? A survey of postsecondary schools of education in New York state. Exceptional Children, 59, 6–11.
18.
KnapczykD., RodesP., & BrushT. (1994). Improving staff development in rural communities using distance education and communication technology. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 13(2), 19–24.
19.
, LanierJ.E., & LittleJ.W. (1986). Research on teacher education. In WittrockMerlin C. (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching (3rd. ed.) (pp. 527–569). New York: Macmillan.
20.
LesarS., BennerS.M., HabelJ., & ColemanL. (1997). Preparing general education teachers for inclusive settings: A constructivist teacher education program. Teacher Education and Special Education, 20 (3), 204–220.
21.
, LipskyD.K., & GartnerA. (1996). The evaluation of inclusive programs. NCERI Bulletin, 2, 1–7.
22.
MaheadyL., MalletteB., & HarperO.F. (1997). The Pair Tutoring Program: An early field-experience to prepare preservice general educators to work with children with special learning needs. Teacher Education and Special Education, 19, 277–297.
23.
McIntoshD.K., & RaymondG.I. (1988). Training special education teachers in rural areas: A viable model. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 9(1), 2–5.
24.
MorsinkC., ThomasC., & CorreaV. (1991). Interactive teaming: Consultation and collaboration in special programs. New York: Macmillan.
25.
National Association of State Board of Education, (1992). Winners all: A call for inclusive school. Alexandria, VA: Author.
26.
National Center on Educational Restructuring and Inclusion. (1994). National study on inclusion: Overview and summary report, 2, 1–8.
27.
OakesJ., GamoranA., & PageR.N. (1996). Curriculum differentiation: Opportunities, outcomes, and meanings. In JacksonPhilip W. (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Curriculum (pp. 570–608). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
28.
OsborneA.G.Jr., & DimattiaP. (1994). The IDEA's least restrictive environment mandate: Legal implications. Exceptional Children, 61, 6–14.
29.
PollawayE.A., SmithJ.D., PattonJ.R., & SmithT. (1996). Historic changes in mental retardation and developmental disabilities. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 31,3–12.
30.
ReganE.M., & WeiningerO. (1988). Toward defining and defending child centered curriculum and practice. International Journal of Early Childhood, 20(2), 1–10.
31.
RosenbergM.S. (1996). Current issues facing teacher education and special education. Teacher Education and Special Education, 19 (3), 209–210.
32.
RogersJ. (1994). Inclusion: Moving beyond our fears. Center for Evaluation, Development, Research: Phi Delta Kappa.
33.
, SalendS.J., & SalendS. (1984). Consulting with the regular teacher: Guidelines for special educators. The Pointer, 28, 25–28.
34.
SavageL.B., & WienkeW.D. (1989). Attitudes of secondary teachers toward mainstreaming. The Secondary School Journal. 73, 70–73.
35.
, SchulzJ.B., & CarpenterC.D. (1995). Mainstreaming exceptional students: A guide for classroom teachers. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
36.
SchumakerJ.B., & DeshlerD.D. (1988). Implementing the regular education initiative in secondary schools: A different ballgame. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 36–42.
37.
SchummJ.S., VaughnS., HaagerD., McDowellJ., RotheinL., & SaumellL. (1995). General education teacher planning: What can students with learning disabilities expect? Exceptional Children, 61, 335–352.
38.
SmithT.E.C., & HiltonA. (1994). Program design for students with mental retardation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 29,3–8.
39.
StorerJ.H., & CrosswaitD.J. (1995). Delivering staff development to the small rural school. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 14(3), 23–30.
40.
U.S. Department of Education (1998). Twentieth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Act. Washington, DC: Author.
41.
VaughnS., & SchummJ.S. (1994). Middle school teachers' planning for students with learning disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 15(3), 152–161.
42.
WestJ.F., & IdolL. (1990). Collaborative consultation in the education of mildly handicapped and at-risk students. Remedial and Special Education, 11(1), 22–31.
