Poly(methyl methacrylate) is an important acrylic thermoplastic polymer. Poly(methyl methacrylate) is a transparent and rigid synthetic plastic. There has been growing interest in developing high performance poly(methyl methacrylate)-based nanocomposites. This article reviews a few important poly(methyl methacrylate)-based nanocomposites and composites. An extended account of the poly(methyl methacrylate) nanocomposites with carbonaceous nanofillers and fillers is given. The physical properties and how to manufacture poly(methyl methacrylate)/carbon nanotube, poly(methyl methacrylate)/carbon black, and poly(methyl methacrylate)/carbon fiber materials are appraised. The research so far shows that the mechanical, thermal, conducting, and microstructural performances improved compared with pure poly(methyl methacrylate). In order to further enhance the poly(methyl methacrylate) material performance, chemically modifying the carbonaceous fillers and chemical affinity with the polymer matrix are necessary. The main challenges here are to obtain well-dispersed, aligned, and easily processable poly(methyl methacrylate)-based composites. Poly(methyl methacrylate)-based nanocomposite applications are also reviewed in an attempt to facilitate progress in this emerging area. These materials are potential candidates in electromagnetic interference shielding, gas sensors, separation membranes, tissue engineering, and drug delivery applications.
AliUKarimKJBuangNA.A review of the properties and applications of poly(methyl methacrylate)(PMMA). Polym Rev2015;
55: 678–705.
2.
ShahRKausarAMuhammadB.Exploration of polythiophene/graphene, poly(methyl methacrylate)/graphene and polythiophene-co-poly(methyl methacrylate)/graphene nanocomposite obtained via in-situ technique. J Plast Film Sheet2015;
31: 144–157.
3.
DashtizadehAAbdoussMKhorassaniM, et al.
Preparation of silica-filled water-based acrylic nanocomposite paints with improved scratch resistance. J Plast Film Sheet2012;
28: 120–135.
4.
PavlinecJNovákIRychlýJ, et al.
Hot melt adhesives prepared by grafting of acrylic and crotonic acids onto metallocene ethylene–octene copolymers. J Plast Film Sheet2019;
35: 239–259.
5.
HussienMSMohammedMIYahiaIS.Multifunctional applications of graphene-doped PMMA nanocomposite membranes for environmental photocatalytic. J Inorg Organomet Polym Mater2020;
8: 1–2.
6.
AbulyaziedDEAbomostafaHM.Magnetic structured nickel core-shell@ silica/PMMA nanocomposites from synthesis to applications. J Inorg Organomet Polym Mater2020;
17: 1–2.
7.
Abdel-KaderMHMohamedMB.Exploring the direct effect of intermediate band semiconductor materials on the structural, thermal and optical properties of PMMA nanocomposite. Appl Phys A2020;
126: 1–11.
8.
StojanovićDBBrajovićLObradovićV, et al.
Hybrid acrylic nanocomposites with excellent transparency and hardness/toughness balance. Prog Org Coat2020;
139: 105437.
9.
SethyDMakireddiSVargheseFV, et al.
Piezoresistive behaviour of graphene nanoplatelet (GNP)/PMMA spray coated sensors on a polymer matrix composite beam. Exp Polym Lett2019;
13: 1018–1025.
10.
NayakDChoudharyRBKandulnaR, et al. Investigation of structural, optical and electrical performance of ZnS sensitized PMMA nanocomposite as an emissive layer for OLED application. In: AIP conference proceedings, 2019, Vol. 2100, p.020017. Melville, NY: AIP Publishing LLC.
11.
ZidanSSilikasNAlhotanA, et al.
Investigating the mechanical properties of ZrO2-impregnated PMMA nanocomposite for denture-based applications. Materials2019;
12: 1344.
12.
AroraMChanEKGuptaS, et al.
Polymethylmethacrylate bone cements and additives: a review of the literature. World J Orthop2013;
4: 67.
BeadieGBrindzaMFlynnRA, et al.
Refractive index measurements of poly(methyl methacrylate)(PMMA) from 0.4–1.6 µm. Appl Opt2015;
54: F139–F143.
15.
WanXDengWZhangQ, et al.
Magnesia-supported gold nanoparticles as efficient catalysts for oxidative esterification of aldehydes or alcohols with methanol to methyl esters. Catal Today2014;
233: 147–154.
16.
LiYGuoH.Crosslinked poly(methyl methacrylate) with perfluorocyclobutyl aryl ether moiety as crosslinking unit: thermally stable polymer with high glass transition temperature. RSC Adv2020;
10: 1981–1988.
17.
PetersmannSSpoerkMVan De SteeneW, et al.
Mechanical properties of polymeric implant materials produced by extrusion-based additive manufacturing. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2020;
104: 103611.
18.
BergamontiLBondioliFAlfieriI, et al.
Weathering resistance of PMMA/SiO2/ZrO2 hybrid coatings for sandstone conservation. Polym Degrad Stab2018;
147: 274–283.
19.
ParthasarathyVNakandhrakumarRSMahalakshmiS, et al.
Structural, optical, thermal and non-isothermal decomposition behavior of PMMA nanocomposites. J Inorg Organomet Polym Mater2020. DOI: 10.1007/s10904-020-01453-5.
20.
BoraMÖ.The influence of heat treatment on scratch behavior of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA). Tribol Int2014;
78: 75–83.
21.
GadMMAbualsaudRRahomaA, et al.
Effect of zirconium oxide nanoparticles addition on the optical and tensile properties of polymethyl methacrylate denture base material. Int J Nanomed2018;
13: 283.
22.
HuLYangZZhangX, et al.
Fabrication and evaluation of dual function PMMA/nano-carbon composite particles for UV curable anti-glare coating. Prog Org Coat2016;
101: 81–89.
23.
BrigandiPJCogenJMWolfCA, et al.
Kinetic and thermodynamic control in conductive PP/PMMA/EAA carbon black composites. J Appl Polym Sci2015;
132. DOI: 10.1002/app.42134.
24.
FengJChanCMLiJX.A method to control the dispersion of carbon black in an immiscible polymer blend. Polym Eng Sci2003;
43: 1058–1063.
25.
LinGLiDLiuM, et al.
Rheology, non-isothermal crystallization behavior, mechanical and thermal properties of PMMA-modified carbon fiber-reinforced poly(ethylene terephthalate) composites. Polymers2018;
10: 594.
26.
PunethaVDRanaSYooHJ, et al.
Functionalization of carbon nanomaterials for advanced polymer nanocomposites: a comparison study between CNT and graphene. Prog Polym Sci2017;
67: 1–47.
27.
AndrewsRWeisenbergerMC.Carbon nanotube polymer composites. Curr Opin Sol Stat Mater Sci2004;
8: 31–37.
28.
MathurRBPandeSSinghBP. Properties of PMMA/carbon nanotubes nanocomposites. In: Thomas S, Datta J, Haponiuk JT and Reghunadhan A (eds) Polymer nanotube nanocomposites: synthesis properties, and applications. Amsterdam: Elsevier 2010, Vol. 11, p.177.
29.
KimKSParkSJ.Influence of amine-grafted multi-walled carbon nanotubes on physical and rheological properties of PMMA-based nanocomposites. J Sol Stat Chem2011;
184: 3021–3027.
30.
ZengCHossienyNZhangC, et al.
Synthesis and processing of PMMA carbon nanotube nanocomposite foams. Polymer2010;
51: 655–664.
31.
ZengJSaltysiakBJohnsonWS, et al.
Processing and properties of poly(methyl methacrylate)/carbon nanofiber composites. Compos B Eng2004;
35: 245–249.
32.
ZengCHossienyNZhangC, et al.
Morphology and tensile properties of PMMA carbon nanotubes nanocomposites and nanocomposites foams. Compos Sci Technol2013;
82: 29–37.
33.
ChenLOzisikRSchadlerLS.The influence of carbon nanotube aspect ratio on the foam morphology of MWNT/PMMA nanocomposite foams. Polymer2010;
51: 2368–2375.
34.
StephanCNguyenTPDe La ChapelleML, et al.
Characterization of singlewalled carbon nanotubes-PMMA composites. Syn Met2000;
108: 139–149.
35.
JimenezGAJanaSC.Electrically conductive polymer nanocomposites of polymethylmethacrylate and carbon nanofibers prepared by chaotic mixing. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf2007;
38: 983–993.
PandolfoAGHollenkampAF.Carbon properties and their role in supercapacitors. J Power Sources2006;
157: 11–27.
38.
El HasnaouiMBelattarJAchourME, et al.
Electrical transport properties of CB/epoxy polymer composites. Optoelectron Adv Mater Rapid Commun2012;
6: 610–613.
39.
KonishiYCakmakM.Nanoparticle induced network self-assembly in polymer–carbon black composites. Polymer2006;
47: 5371–5391.
40.
LiangTYanCZhouS, et al.
Carbon black reinforced polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA)-based composite particles: preparation, characterization, and application. J Geophys Eng2017;
14: 1225–1232.
41.
ElimatZM.AC electrical conductivity of poly(methyl methacrylate)/carbon black composite. J Phys D Appl Phys2006;
39: 2824.
42.
ElimatZMZihlifAMRagostaG.DC electrical conductivity of poly(methyl methacrylate)/carbon black composites at low temperatures. J Mater Sci Mater Electron2008;
19: 1035–1038.
43.
PanYLiuXKaschtaJ, et al.
Viscoelastic and electrical behavior of poly(methyl methacrylate)/carbon black composites prior to and after annealing. Polymer2017;
113: 34–38.
44.
QuMNilssonFQinY, et al.
Electrical conductivity and mechanical properties of melt-spun ternary composites comprising PMMA, carbon fibers and carbon black. Compos Sci Technol2017;
150: 24–31.
45.
LiuXPanYZhengG, et al.
Rheological and electrical behavior of poly(methyl methacrylate)/carbon black composites as investigated by creep recovery in shear. Compos Sci Technol2016;
128: 1–7.
46.
LiuXLiCPanY, et al.
Shear-induced rheological and electrical properties of molten poly(methyl methacrylate)/carbon black nanocomposites. Compos B Eng2019;
164: 37–44.
47.
MohanKDoluiSNathBC, et al.
A highly stable and efficient quasi solid state dye sensitized solar cell based on polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA)/carbon black (CB) polymer gel electrolyte with improved open circuit voltage. Electrochim Acta2017;
247: 216–228.
48.
KrückelJStarýZTriebelC, et al.
Conductivity of polymethylmethacrylate filled with carbon black or carbon fibres under oscillatory shear. Polymer2012;
53: 395–402.
49.
KrückelJStarýZSchubertDW.Oscillations of the electrical resistance induced by shear deformation in molten carbon black composites. Polymer2013;
54: 1106–1113.
50.
StarýZKrückelJSchubertDW.Conductivity of carbon black-based polymer composites under creep in the molten state. Polymer2014;
55: 3980–3986.
51.
SharmaMGaoSMäderE, et al.
Carbon fiber surfaces and composite interphases. Compos Sci Technol2014;
102: 35–50.
52.
Karger-KocsisJMahmoodHPegorettiA.Recent advances in fiber/matrix interphase engineering for polymer composites. Prog Mater Sci2015;
73: 1–43.
53.
GonzálezCVilatelaJJMolina-AldareguíaJM, et al.
Structural composites for multifunctional applications: current challenges and future trends. Prog Mater Sci2017;
89: 194–251.
54.
QuMSchubertDW.Conductivity of melt spun PMMA composites with aligned carbon fibers. Compos Sci Technol2016;
136: 111–118.
55.
QuMNilssonFSchubertDW.Effect of filler orientation on the electrical conductivity of carbon fiber/PMMA composites. Fibers2018;
6: 3.
56.
YamamotoTMakinoYUematsuK.Improved mechanical properties of PMMA composites: dispersion, diffusion and surface adhesion of recycled carbon fiber fillers from CFRP with adsorbed particulate PMMA. Adv Pow Technol2017;
28: 2774–2278.
57.
OliveuxGDandyLOLeekeGA.Current status of recycling of fibre reinforced polymers: review of technologies, reuse and resulting properties. Prog Mater Sci2015;
72: 61–99.
58.
ZabihiOAhmadiMShafeiS, et al.
One-step amino-functionalization of milled carbon fibre for enhancement of thermophysical properties of epoxy composites. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf2016;
88: 243–252.
59.
RazaMAWestwoodAVKStirlingC, et al.
Transport and mechanical properties of vapour grown carbon nanofibre/silicone composites. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf2011;
42: 1335–1343.
60.
JenY-MWangY-C.Stress concentration effect on the fatigue properties of carbon nanotube/epoxy composites. Compos B Eng2012;
43: 1687–1694.
61.
LiuZBaiGHuangY, et al.
Reflection and absorption contributions to the electromagnetic interference shielding of single-walled carbon nanotube/polyurethane composites. Carbon2007;
45: 821–827.
ChungDD.Electromagnetic interference shielding effectiveness of carbon materials. Carbon2001;
39: 279–285.
64.
ThostensonETLiCChouT-W.Nanocomposites in context. Compos Sci Technol2005;
65: 491–516.
65.
SkotheimTAElsenbaumerRLReynoldsJR.In handbook of conducting polymers.
New York:
CRC Press, 1997.
66.
KimHMKimKLeeCY, et al.
Electrical conductivity and electromagnetic interference shielding of multiwalled carbon nanotube composites containing Fe catalyst. Appl Phys Lett2004;
84: 589–591.
67.
YuenS-MMaC-CChuangC-Y, et al.
Effect of processing method on the shielding effectiveness of electromagnetic interference of MWCNT/PMMA composites. Compos Sci Technol2008;
68: 963–968.
68.
HayashidaKMatsuokaY.Electromagnetic interference shielding properties of polymer-grafted carbon nanotube composites with high electrical resistance. Carbon2015;
85: 363–371.
69.
HuangYLYuenSMMaCCChuangCY, et al.
Morphological, electrical, electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding, and tribological properties of functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotube/poly methyl methacrylate (PMMA) composites. Compos Sci Technol2009;
69: 1991–1996.
70.
ZhangHZhangGLiJ, et al.
Lightweight, multifunctional microcellular PMMA/Fe3O4@ MWCNTs nanocomposite foams with efficient electromagnetic interference shielding. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf2017;
100: 128–138.
71.
RostamiAMasoomiMFayaziMJ, et al.
Role of multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) on rheological, thermal and electrical properties of PC/ABS blend. RSC Adv2015;
5: 32880–32890.
72.
RahmanMMHusseinMAAlamryKA, et al.
Sensitive methanol sensor based on PMMA-G-CNTs nanocomposites deposited onto glassy carbon electrodes. Talanta2016;
150: 71–80.
73.
BakyarovaEDavisMBurchT, et al.
Chemically functionalized single-walled carbon nanotubes as ammonia sensors. J Phys Chem B2004;
108: 19717–19720.
74.
PhilipBAbrahamJKChandrasekharA, et al.
Carbon nanotube/PMMA composite thin films for gas-sensing applications. Smart Mater Struct2003;
12: 935.
75.
LiYWangHCYangMJ.n-Type gas sensing characteristics of chemically modified multi-walled carbon nanotubes and PMMA composite. Sens Actuat B Chem2007;
121: 496–500.
76.
FellerJFLuJZhangK, et al.
Novel architecture of carbon nanotube decorated poly(methyl methacrylate) microbead vapour sensors assembled by spray layer by layer. J Mater Chem2011;
21: 4142–4149.
77.
ShuklaPBhatiaVGaurV, et al.
Electrostatically functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotube/PMMA composite thin films for organic vapor detection. Polym Plast Technol Eng2011;
50: 1179–1184.
78.
XueLWangWGuoY, et al.
Flexible polyaniline/carbon nanotube nanocomposite film-based electronic gas sensors. Sens Actuat B Chem2017;
244: 47–53.
79.
IsmailAFGohPSSanipSM, et al.
Transport and separation properties of carbon nanotube-mixed matrix membrane. Sep Purif Technol2009;
70: 12–26.
80.
ZhangYSunarsoJLiuS, et al.
Current status and development of membranes for CO2/CH4 separation: a review. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control2013;
12: 84–107.
81.
Vinh-ThangHKaliaguineS.Predictive models for mixed-matrix membrane performance: a review. Chem Rev2013;
113: 4980–5028.
82.
DongGLiHChenV.Challenges and opportunities for mixed-matrix membranes for gas separation. J Mater Chem A2013;
1: 4610–4630.
83.
MaWZhaoYLiY, et al.
Synthesis of hydrophilic carbon nanotubes by grafting poly(methyl methacrylate) via click reaction and its effect on poly(vinylidene fluoride)-carbon nanotube composite membrane properties. Appl Surf Sci2018;
435: 79–90.
84.
SungJHKimHSJinHJ, et al.
Nanofibrous membranes prepared by multiwalled carbon nanotube/poly(methyl methacrylate) composites. Macromolecules2004;
37: 9899–9902.
85.
KumarSSharmaATripathiB, et al.
Enhancement of hydrogen gas permeability in electrically aligned MWCNT-PMMA composite membranes. Micron2010;
41: 909–914.
86.
SharmaAKumarSTripathiB, et al.
Aligned CNT/polymer nanocomposite membranes for hydrogen separation. Int J Hydrogen Energy2009;
34: 3977–3982.
87.
BettencourtAAlmeidaAJ.Poly(methyl methacrylate) particulate carriers in drug delivery. J Microencapsul2012;
29: 353–367.
88.
HildDNSchwartzP.Plasma-treated ultra-high strength polyethylene fibers. Part II. Increased adhesion to poly(methyl methacrylate). J Adhes Sci Technol1992;
6: 897–917.
89.
LiXFanYWatariF.Current investigations into carbon nanotubes for biomedical application. Biomed Mater2010;
5: 022001.
90.
GonçalvesGPortolésMTRamírez-SantillánC, et al.
Evaluation of the in vitro biocompatibility of PMMA/high-load HA/carbon nanostructures bone cement formulations. J Mater Sci Mater Med2013;
24: 2787–2796.
91.
EsmiAJahaniYYousefiAA, et al.
PMMA-CNT-HAp nanocomposites optimized for 3D-printing applications. Mater Res Express2019;
6: 085405.
92.
OrmsbyRMcNallyTMitchellC, et al.
Influence of multiwall carbon nanotube functionality and loading on mechanical properties of PMMA/MWCNT bone cements. J Mater Sci Mater Med2010;
21: 2287–2292.
93.
GonçalvesGCruzSMRamalhoA, et al.
Graphene oxide versus functionalized carbon nanotubes as a reinforcing agent in a PMMA/HA bone cement. Nanoscale2012;
4: 2937–2945.
94.
ZhuXZhangSZhangL, et al.
Interfacial synthesis of magnetic PMMA@Fe3 O4/Cu3(BTC)2 hollow microspheres through one-pot Pickering emulsion and their application as drug delivery. RSC Adv2016;
6: 58511–58515.
95.
McInnesSJIraniYWilliamsKA, et al.
Controlled drug delivery from composites of nanostructured porous silicon and poly(l-lactide). Nanomedicine2012;
7: 995–1016.
96.
TanHYLokeWKNguyenNT.A reliable method for bonding polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) to polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) and its application in micropumps. Sens Actuat B Chem2010;
151: 133–139.
97.
BaeHSHaiderASelimKK, et al.
Fabrication of highly porous PMMA electrospun fibers and their application in the removal of phenol and iodine. J Polym Res2013;
2: 158.
98.
ManiyaNHPatelSRMurthyZV.Fabrication and application of porous silicon multilayered microparticles in sustained drug delivery. Superlatt Microstruct2015;
85: 34–42.
ThavasiVSinghGRamakrishnaS.Electrospun nanofibers in energy and environmental applications. Energy Environ Sci2008;
1: 205–221.
101.
TeoAJMishraAParkI, et al.
Polymeric biomaterials for medical implants and devices. ACS Biomater Sci Eng2016;
2: 454–472.
102.
de LeonACChenQPalaganasNB, et al.
High performance polymer nanocomposites for additive manufacturing applications. React Funct Polym2016;
103: 141–155.
103.
TofailSAKoumoulosEPBandyopadhyayA, et al.
Additive manufacturing: scientific and technological challenges, market uptake and opportunities. Mater Today2018;
21: 22–37.
104.
LohGHPeiEHarrisonD, et al.
An overview of functionally graded additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf2018;
23: 34–44.
105.
HarunWSKamariahMSMuhamadN, et al.
A review of powder additive manufacturing processes for metallic biomaterials. Powder Technol2018;
327: 128–151.
