Reinforced concrete (RC) structures, widely used in mid- to high-rise construction, face significant challenges related to sustainability, durability, and seismic resilience. Despite extensive experimental research on RC walls, studies specifically focusing on their torsional response remain limited. To address these gaps, the ERIES-ALL4wALL project investigates the torsional and bidirectional flexural behavior of RC U-shaped walls, a key structural feature in contemporary and future high-rise buildings. This article presents experimental findings from shake-table tests on two slender U-shaped walls, evaluating their nonlinear flexural and torsional performance under realistic seismic ground motions. Advanced instrumentation techniques—such as camera-based vibration measurements—are introduced to capture detailed performance data. The accompanying open-access data are then outlined, enabling further research and development of models to improve the resilience and sustainability of RC core walls in urban environments.
ACI (2019) ACI CODE-318-19(22): Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary (Reapproved 2022). Farmington Hills, MI: American Concrete Institute.
2.
AndrewRM (2018) Global CO2 emissions from cement production. Earth System Science Data10: 195–217.
BarriasACasasJRVillalbaS (2018) Embedded distributed optical fiber sensors in reinforced concrete structures—A case study. Sensors18(4): 980.
5.
BerrocalCGFernandezIRemplingR (2021) Crack monitoring in reinforced concrete beams by distributed optical fiber sensors. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering17(1): 124–139.
6.
BeyerKDazioAPriestleyMJN (2008) Quasi-static cyclic tests of two U-shaped reinforced concrete walls. Journal of Earthquake Engineering12(7): 1023–1053.
7.
BSI (2009) Stainless Steel Bars for the Reinforcement of and Use in Concrete — Requirements and Test Methods. London: British Standards.
8.
CandeiasPXCorreiaAATekesteGG (2023) Shake table testing techniques: Current challenges and new trends. In: ChastreCNevesJRibeiroDNevesMGFariaP (eds) Advances on Testing and Experimentation in Civil Engineering: Materials, Structures and Buildings. Cham: Springer, pp. 173–197.
9.
CEN (2004a) Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures, Part 1-1, EN 1992-1-1. Brussels: CEN.
10.
CEN (2004b) Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance (Part 1, EN 1998-1). Brussels: CEN.
11.
CEN (2005) Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance—Part 3: Assessment and Retrofitting of Buildings. Brussels: CEN.
12.
CheloniDDe NovellisVAlbanoMAntonioliAAnzideiMAtzoriSAvalloneABignamiCBonanoMCalcaterraSCastaldoRCasuFCecereGDe LucaCDevotiRDi BucciDEspositoAGalvaniAGambinoPGiulianiRLanariRManuntaMManzoMMattoneMMontuoriAPepeAPepeSPezzoGPietrantonioGPolcariMRiguzziFSalviSSepeVSerpelloniESolaroGStramondoSTizzaniPTolomeiCTrasattiEValerioEZinnoIDoglioniC (2017) Geodetic model of the 2016 Central Italy earthquake sequence inferred from InSAR and GPS data. Geophysical Research Letters44(13): 6778–6787.
13.
ConstantinRBeyerK (2016) Behaviour of U-shaped RC walls under quasi-static cyclic diagonal loading. Engineering Structures106: 36–52.
14.
De AlmeidaJPHoultR (2025) Seismic residual displacements of RC U-shaped core walls: Preliminary findings (ERIES-IW2025). In: Paper presented at the 2025 international workshop in engineering research infrastructures for European synergies, Lisbon, 31 July.
15.
De AlmeidaJPHoultRBertholetACandeiasPCarvalhoACorreiaAACumunelGDoneuxCHanYIsakovićTLo FeudoSMihaylovBOrgnoniAPayenBPalermoDPinhoRRibeiroFSimarASousaML (2024) Shake-table testing of two U-shaped RC walls: Overview of the project ERIES-ALL4wALL. In: Paper presented at the 8th World conference on earthquake engineering (WCEE2024), Milan.
16.
FawazGMurcia-DelsoJ (2020) Bond behavior of iron-based shape memory alloy reinforcing bars embedded in concrete. Materials and Structures53(5): 114.
17.
FlattRJRousselNCheesemanCR (2012) Concrete: An eco material that needs to be improved. Journal of the European Ceramic Society32(11): 2787–2798.
18.
GuX-LChenZ-YYuQ-QGhafooriE (2021) Stress recovery behavior of an Fe-Mn-Si shape memory alloy. Engineering Structures243: 112710.
HoultRDe AlmeidaJP (2024a) Flexure-torsion response of compressed open reinforced-concrete cores: Experimental strain gradients, numerical methods, and interaction diagrams. Journal of Structural Engineering150: 13147.
21.
HoultRDe AlmeidaJP (2024b) Modified compression field theory and disturbed stress field model on the simulation of the global and local behaviour of non-planar reinforced concrete walls under cyclic and dynamic loading. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering. Epub ahead of print 13August. DOI: 10.1007/s10518-024-01982-1.
22.
HoultRDe AlmeidaJP (2024c) Ongoing experimental programmes on RC walls reinforced with iron-based shape memory alloy rebars (WCEE2024). In: Paper presented at the 8th world conference on earthquake engineering, Milan, 30 June–5 July.
23.
HoultRDe AlmeidaJPCorreiaAACandeiasPXCumunelGHanYLo FeudoSRibeiroFBertholetA (2025) Dataset: shake-table tests on two 40-ton reinforced concrete U-shaped walls with uniaxial and bidirectional-torsional response. Available at: https://doi.org/10.14428/DVN/MSDSWS (accessed 24 September 2025).
24.
HoultRBeyerK (2020) Decay of torsional stiffness in RC U-shaped walls. Journal of Structural Engineering146(9): 2733.
25.
HoultRAppelleAAlmeidaJBeyerK (2020) Seismic performance of slender RC U-shaped walls with a single-layer of reinforcement. Engineering Structures225: 111257.
26.
HoultRBertholetADe AlmeidaJP (2023a) Core versus surface sensors for reinforced concrete structures: A comparison of fiber-optic strain sensing to conventional instrumentation. Sensors23(3): 1745.
27.
HoultRDoneuxCDe AlmeidaJP (2023b) Tests on reinforced concrete U-shaped walls subjected to torsion and flexure. Earthquake Spectra39(4): 2685–2710.
28.
HoultRDDe AlmeidaJP (2022) Residual displacements of reinforced concrete walls detailed with conventional steel and shape memory alloy rebars. Engineering Structures256: 114002.
29.
HoultRDLumantarnaEGoldsworthyHM (2015) Torsional displacement for asymmetric low-rise buildings with RC C-shaped cores. In: Paper Presented at the proceedings of the tenth pacific conference on earthquake engineering, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 6–8 November.
30.
IleNReynouardJM (2005) Behaviour of U-shaped walls subjected to uniaxial and biaxial cyclic lateral loading. Journal of Earthquake Engineering9(1): 67–94.
31.
IleNPlumierCReynouardJM (2002) Test program on U-shaped walls leading to model validation and implications to design. In: Paper presented at the 12th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, London.
32.
IsakovićTGamsMJanevskiARakićevićZBogdanovićAJekićGKolozvariKWallaceJEFischingerM (2021) Shake table test of RC walls’ coupling provided by slabs. Građevinski materijali i konstrukcije64(4): 225–234.
33.
JanevskiAIsakovićT (2025) Seismic response of RC walls coupled by slabs without coupling beams. Engineering Structures329: 119861.
34.
KawashimaKTirasitP (2008) Effect of nonlinear seismic torsion on the performance of skewed bridge piers. Journal of Earthquake Engineering12(6): 980–998.
35.
LiossatouEFardisMN (2015) Residual displacements of RC structures as SDOF systems. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics44(5): 713–734.
36.
LiuZDongZSunYZhuHWuGSunCSohC-K (2023) Effect of resistive heating on the bond properties between iron-based shape memory bars and cement mortar. Journal of Building Engineering66: 105895.
37.
Lo FeudoSHanYCumunelGHoultRBertholetAGarnierDDe AlmeidaJP (2025) Video tracking of targets for vibration measurement of large-scale structures under seismic excitation. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics54: 2106–2120.
38.
LuziLLanzanoGFelicettaCD’AmicoMCRussoESgobbaSPacorFORFEUS Working Group 5 (2020) Engineering strong motion database (ESM) (Version 2.0). Available at: https://doi.org/10.13127/ESM.2 (accessed 24 September 2025).
39.
MahinSABerteroVV (1981) An evaluation of inelastic seismic design spectra. Journal of the Structural Division107(9): 1777–1795.
40.
MáliaMde BritoJPinheiroMDBravoM (2013) Construction and demolition waste indicators. Waste Management & Research31(3): 241–255.
41.
MarquisFKimJJElwoodKJChangSE (2017) Understanding post-earthquake decisions on multi-storey concrete buildings in Christchurch, New Zealand. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering15(2): 731–758.
42.
MarutaMSuzukiNMiyashitaTNishiokaT (2000) Structural Capacities of H-shaped RC Core Wall Subjected to Lateral Load and Torsion (Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 12th WCEE). Wellington, New Zealand: The New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering.
43.
McCormickJAburanoHIkenagaMNakashimaM (2008) Permissible residual deformation levels for building structures considering both safety and human elements. In: Paper presented at the 14th world conference on earthquake engineering, Beijing, China.
44.
MichelsJShahverdiMCzaderskiC (2018) Flexural strengthening of structural concrete with iron-based shape memory alloy strips. Structural Concrete19(3): 876–891.
45.
MichouAHilaireABenboudjemaFNahasGWynieckiPBerthaudY (2015) Reinforcement–concrete bond behavior: Experimentation in drying conditions and meso-scale modeling. Engineering Structures101: 570–582.
46.
Muir-WoodR (2015) The Christchurch earthquakes of 2010 and 2011. The Geneva Risk Reports. Risk and Insurance Research. Extreme Events and Insurance: 2011 Annus Horribilis. Courbage C, Stahel WR, Geneva.
47.
OrgnoniA (2025) Accurate and computationally affordable estimation of the global and local response of RC wall cores subjected to seismic loading. PhD, Scuola Universitaria Superiore IUSS Pavia, Pavia.
48.
PengX-NWongY-L (2011) Behavior of reinforced concrete walls subjected to monotonic pure torsion—An experimental study. Engineering Structures33(9): 2495–2508.
49.
PinhoR (2000) Shaking table testing of RC walls. ISET Journal of Earthquake Technology37(4): 119–142.
50.
QuiertantMBabyFKhadourAMarchandPRivillonPBilloJCordierJ (2012) Deformation monitoring of reinforcement bars with a distributed fiber optic sensor for the SHM of reinforced concrete structures. In: Paper presented at the 9th international conference on NDE in relation to structural integrity for nuclear and pressurized components, Seattle, WA, 22–24 May.
51.
RazaSMichelsJSchranzBShahverdiM (2022a) Anchorage behavior of Fe-SMA rebars Post-Installed into concrete. Engineering Structures272: 114960.
52.
RazaSShafeiBSaiid SaiidiMMotavalliMShahverdiM (2022b) Shape memory alloy reinforcement for strengthening and self-centering of concrete structures—State of the art. Construction and Building Materials324: 126628.
53.
RazaSWidmannRMichelsJSaiid SaiidiMMotavalliMShahverdiM (2023) Self-centering technique for existing concrete bridge columns using prestressed iron-based shape memory alloy reinforcement. Engineering Structures294: 116799.
54.
re-fer (2025) re-bar method for concrete structures. Available at: https://www.re-fer.eu/en/re-bar/ (accessed 24 September 2025).
55.
SextosADe RisiRPagliaroliAFotiSPasseriFAusilioECairoRCapattiMCChiabrandoFChiaradonnaADashtiSDe SilvaFDeziFDuranteMGGialliniSLanzoGSicaSSimonelliALZimmaroP (2018) Local site effects and incremental damage of buildings during the 2016 central Italy earthquake sequence. Earthquake Spectra34(4): 1639–1669.
56.
ShahverdiMMichelsJCzaderskiCMotavalliM (2018) Iron-based shape memory alloy strips for strengthening RC members: Material behavior and characterization. Construction and Building Materials173: 586–599.
57.
SmilV (2013) Making the Modern World: Materials and Dematerialization. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
58.
SoroushianPOstowariKNossoniAChowdhuryH (2001) Repair and strengthening of concrete structures through application of corrective posttensioning forces with shape memory alloys. Transportation Research Record1770(1): 20–26.
59.
SritharanSBeyerKHenryRSChaiYHKowalskyMBullD (2014) Understanding poor seismic performance of concrete walls and design implications. Earthquake Spectra30(1): 307–334.
60.
Standards Association NZ (2006) NZS 3101: Part1:2006, “Concrete Structures Standard—The Design of Concrete Structures.” Wellington, New Zealand: Standards Association NZ.
61.
StewartJPZimmaroPLanzoGMazzoniSAusilioEAversaSBozzoniFCairoRCapattiMCCastigliaMChiabrandoFChiaradonnaAd’OnofrioADashtiSDe RisiRDe SilvaFdella PasquaFDeziFDi DomenicaADi SarnoLDuranteMGFalcucciEFotiSFrankeKEGaladiniFGialliniSGoriSKayenREKishidaTLinguaALingwallBMucciacciaroMPagliaroliAPasseriFPelekisPPizziAReimschiisselBSantoADe MagistrisFSScasserraGSextosASicaVSilvestriFSimonelliALSpanòATommasiPTropeanoG (2018) Reconnaissance of 2016 Central Italy earthquake sequence. Earthquake Spectra34(4): 1547–1555.
62.
TürkayAAltunF (2022) Experimental study of seismic torsional behavior of reinforced concrete walls. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering20: 4213–4235.
63.
UN Environment (2017) Global status report 2017: Towards a zero-emission, efficient, and resilient building and construction sector. Available at: www.globalabc.org (accessed 24 September 2025).
64.
United Nations (2025) Department of economic and social affairs, Sustainable Development. Available at: https://sdgs.un.org/
65.
VahediMZolfagharysaraviSEbrahimianHSaiid SaiidiM (2024) Experimental-analytical investigation of accelerated bridge construction concrete columns with self-centering Fe-SMA bars subjected to near-fault ground motions. Engineering Structures299: 117127.
66.
VarsamisCDPapanikolaouVK (2021) Evaluation of current Eurocode 8 provisions on R/C ductile wall design. Structures33: 368–377.
67.
ZhangSLiuHCoulibalyAASDeJongM (2021) Fiber optic sensing of concrete cracking and rebar deformation using several types of cable. Structural Control and Health Monitoring28(2): e2664.
