The main objective of this study is to estimate seismological parameters in Central and Eastern North America (CENA), including the geometrical spreading, anelastic attenuation, stress parameter, and site attenuation parameters. In this study, we use particle swarm optimization (PSO) to invert a weighted average of the median 5%-damped pseudo-spectral acceleration (PSA) predicted from the Next Generation Attenuation-East (NGA-East) ground-motion models (GMMs) to develop a point-source stochastic GMM with a well-constrained set of ground-motion parameters. Magnitude-specific inversions are performed for moment magnitude ranges M = 4.0–8.0, rupture distances Rrup = 1–1000 km, and periods T = 0.01–10 s, and National Earthquake Hazard Reduction Program site class A conditions. The result of this study yields a single stochastic GMM that yields PSA values similar to the median NGA-East GMMs. The parameters derived from this study can be used for the hybrid empirical method (HEM) applications. This study is the first to perform a formal inversion using the GMMs developed for the NGA-East project. The approach has been validated using simulated small-to-moderate magnitude and large-magnitude data derived from the NGA-West2 GMMs.
AkiK (1967) Scaling law of seismic spectrum. Journal of Geophysical Research72: 1217–1231.
2.
AkimaH (1970) A new method of interpolation and smooth curve fitting based on local procedures. Journal of the ACM17: 589–602.
3.
Al AtikL (2015) NGA-east: Ground-motion standard deviation models for central and eastern North America. PEER reports 2015/07. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California.
4.
AleardiM (2018) Using orthogonal legendre polynomials to parameterize global geophysical optimizations: Applications to seismic-petrophysical inversion and 1D elastic full-waveform inversion. Geophysical Prospecting67(2): 331–348.
5.
AndersonJG (1986) Implication of attenuation for studies of the earthquake source. In: DasSBoatwrightJScholzCH (eds) Earthquake Source Mechanics (Geophysics Monograph Series), vol. 37. Washington, DC: American Geophysical Union, pp. 311−318.
6.
AndersonJG (1991) A preliminary descriptive model for the distance dependence of the spectral decay parameter in southern California. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America81(6): 2186–2193.
7.
AndersonJGHoughSE (1984) A model for the shape of the Fourier amplitude spectrum of acceleration at high frequencies. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America74(5): 1969–1993.
8.
AndersonJGLeeYZengYDayS (1996) Control of strong motion by the upper 30 meters. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America86(6): 1749–1759.
9.
AtkinsonGM (1993) Earthquake source spectra in eastern North America. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America83(6): 1778–1798.
10.
AtkinsonGM (2004) Empirical attenuation of ground-motion spectral amplitudes in southeastern Canada and the northeastern United States. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America94: 1079–1095.
11.
AtkinsonGMBooreDM (2014) The attenuation of Fourier amplitudes for rock sites in eastern North America. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America104: 513–528.
12.
BoatwrightJSeekinsL (2011) Regional spectral analysis of three moderate earthquakes in northeastern North America. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America101(4): 1769–1782.
13.
BooreDM (2003) Prediction of ground motion using the stochastic method. Pure Applied Geophysics160: 635–676.
14.
BooreDM (2012) Updated determination of stress parameters for nine well-recorded earthquakes in eastern North America. Seismological Research Letters83(1): 190–199.
15.
BooreDM (2015) Adjusting ground-motion intensity measures to a reference site for which VS30=3000 m/s. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER) report 2015/06. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
16.
BooreDMThompsonEM (2015) Revisions to some parameters used in stochastic method simulations of ground motion. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America105: 1029–1041.
17.
BooreDMCampbellKWAtkinsonGM (2010) Determination of stress parameters for eight well-recorded earthquake in eastern North America. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America100(4): 1632–1645.
18.
BooreDMJoynerWBFumalTE (1997) Equations for estimating horizontal response spectra and peak acceleration from western North American earthquakes: A summary of recent work. Seismological Research Letters68: 128–153.
19.
BruneJN (1970) Tectonic stress and the spectra of seismic shear waves from earthquakes. Journal of Geophysical Research75: 4997–5009.
20.
BruneJN (1971) Correction. Journal of Geophysical Research76: 5002.
21.
CampbellKW (2003) Prediction of strong ground motion using the hybrid empirical method and its use in the development of ground-motion (attenuation) relations in eastern North America. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America93: 1012–1033.
22.
CampbellKWHashashYMAKimBKottkeARRathjeEMSilvaWJStewartJP (2014) Reference—rock site conditions for central and eastern North America: Part II—Attenuation definition. PEER report 2014/12. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California.
23.
CartwrightDELonguet-HigginsMS (1956) The statistical distribution of the maxima of a random function. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences237(1209): 212–232.
24.
EngelbrechtAP (2007) Computational Intelligence: An Introduction. 2nd ed.Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
25.
FrankelAMuellerCBarnhardTPerkinsDLeyendeckerEVDickmanNHansonSHopperM (1996) National seismic-hazard maps: Documentation June 1996. Open-File report 96-532. Reston, VA: US Geological Survey.
26.
GouletCABozorgniaYAbrahamsonNAKuehnNAtikLAYoungsRGravesR (2018) NGA-east ground motion characterization tool (GMC). Software. Available at: https://www.risksciences.ucla.edu/nhr3/ngaeast-gmtools (accessed 7 October 2022).
27.
GouletCABozorgniaYAbrahamsonNA (2015) PEER NGA-east: Median ground motion models for the central and eastern North America region. Technical Report Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER) 2015/04. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
28.
GouletCAKishidaTAnchetaTDCramerCHDarraghRBSilvaWJHashashYMAHarmonJStewartJPWooddellKEYoungsRR (2014) PEER NGA-east database. Technical Report Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER) 2014/17. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
29.
HanksTCKanamoriH (1979) A moment magnitude scale. Journal of Geophysical Research84(5): 2348–2350.
KottkeARRathjeEM (2008) Technical manual for strata. PEER report no. 2008/10. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California.
32.
KramerSL (1996) Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, pp. 86–93.
33.
LagosSRVelisDR (2018) Microseismic event location using global optimization algorithms: An integrated and automated workflow. Journal of Applied Geophysics149: 18–24.
PaceFSantilanoAGodioA (2021) A review of geophysical modeling based on particle swarm optimization. Surveys in Geophysics42: 505–549.
36.
PezeshkSSedaghatiFNazemiN (2018) Near source attenuation of high-frequency body waves beneath the new Madrid seismic zone. Journal of Seismology22(2): 455–470.
37.
PezeshkSZandiehATavakoliB (2011) Hybrid empirical ground-motion prediction equations for eastern North America using NGA models and updated seismological parameters. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America101(4): 1859–1870.
38.
PezeshkSZandiehACampbellKWTavakoliB (2015) Ground-motion prediction equations for CENA using the hybrid empirical method in conjunction with NGA-West2 empirical ground-motion models. In: NGA-East: Median Ground-Motion Models for the Central and Eastern North America Region (PEER Report no. 2015/04, Chapter 5). Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, pp. 119–147.
39.
PzeshkSZandiehACampbellKWTavakoliB. (2018) Ground Motion Prediction Equations for Eastern North America Using the Hybrid Empirical Method and NGA-West2 Empirical Ground-Motion Models. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America108(4): 2278–2304.
40.
SongXGuHLiuJZhangX (2007) Estimation of shallow subsurface shear-wave velocity by inverting fundamental and higher-mode Rayleigh waves. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering (27)7: 599–607.
41.
TavakoliBPezeshkS (2005) Empirical-stochastic ground-motion prediction for eastern North America. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America95(6): 2283–2296.
42.
YenierEAtkinsonGM (2014) Equivalent Point-Source Modelling of Moderate - to -Large Magnitude Earthquakes and Associated Ground-Motion Saturation Effects. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of Ameria104: 1458–1478.
43.
YenierEAtkinsonGM (2015) Regionally adjustable generic ground-motion prediction equation based on equivalent point-source simulations: Application to central and eastern North America. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America105: 1989–2009.
44.
ZandiehAPezeshkSCampbellKW (2018) An equivalent point-source stochastic simulation of the NGA-West2 ground-motion prediction equations. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America108(2): 815–835.
45.
ZhangWMaDWeiJLiangH (2014) A parameter selection strategy for particle swarm optimization based on particle positions. Expert Systems with Applications41(7): 3576–4174.
