The Dabaghi and Der Kiureghian stochastic near-fault ground motion model requires information about the source, site, and source-to-site geometry, including directivity parameters. Directivity parameters entail often unavailable knowledge of the rupture geometry and hypocenter location. This article presents methods to randomize the directivity parameters required to simulate near-fault ground motions. A first procedure is proposed where only the contributing fault, earthquake magnitude, and site location are known. Possible rupture directivity conditions are accounted for by randomizing the rupture geometry and hypocenter location. For this purpose, new predictive models of the rupture geometry parameters are developed for shallow crustal earthquakes with magnitudes between 5.2 and 7.9. To allow validation of synthetic motions with NGA-West2 models, a second procedure randomizes the rupture geometry and both hypocenter and site locations. Results show a general agreement between the two methods.
AbrahamsonNASilvaWJKamaiR (2014) Summary of the ASK14 ground motion relation for active crustal regions. Earthquake Spectra30(3): 1025–1055.
2.
BooreDM (2010) Orientation-independent, nongeometric-mean measures of seismic intensity from two horizontal components of motion. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America100(4): 1830–1835.
3.
BooreD. M.StewartJ. P.SeyhanE.AtkinsonG. M., 2014. Nga-west2 equations for predicting pga, pgv, and 5% damped psa for shallow crustal earthquakes, Earthquake Spectra30(3), 1057–1085.
4.
BozorgniaYAbrahamsonNAAtikLAAnchetaTDAtkinsonGMBakerJWBaltayABooreDMCampbellKWChiouBSJDarraghRDaySMDonahueJLGravesRWGregorNHanksTCIdrissIMKamaiRKishidaTKottkeAMahinSARezaeianSRowshandelBSeyhanEShahiSKShantzTSilvaWSpudichPStewartJPWatson-LampreyJWooddellKYoungsR (2014) NGA-West2 research project. Earthquake Spectra30(3): 973–987.
5.
CampbellKWAbrahamsonNPowerMChiouBSJBozorgniaYShantzTRobleeC (2009) Next Generation Attenuation (NGA) project: Empirical ground motion prediction equations for active tectonic regions. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on urban earthquake engineering, Tokyo, Japan, 3–4 March.
6.
CampbellKWBozorgniaY (2014) NGA-West2 ground motion model for the average horizontal components of PGA, PGV, and 5% damped linear acceleration response spectra. Earthquake Spectra30(3): 1087–1115.
7.
ChiouBSJYoungsRR (2014) Update of the Chiou and Youngs NGA model for the average horizontal component of peak ground motion and response spectra. Earthquake Spectra30(3): 1117–1153.
8.
DabaghiMDer KiureghianA (2014) Stochastic modeling and simulation of near-fault ground motions for performance-based earthquake engineering. PEER report no. 2014/20, December. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley.
9.
DabaghiMDer KiureghianA (2017) Stochastic model for simulation of near-fault ground motions. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics46(6): 963–984.
10.
DabaghiMDer KiureghianA (2018) Simulation of orthogonal horizontal components of near-fault ground motion for specified earthquake source and site characteristics. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics47: 1369–1393.
11.
DalguerLAMiyakeHDaySMIrikuraK (2008) Surface rupturing and buried dynamic-rupture models calibrated with statistical observations of past earthquakes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America98(3): 1147–1161.
12.
DaoudYDabaghiMDer KiureghianA (forthcoming) Chapter 3: Simulation of near-fault ground motions for randomized directivity parameters. In: PEER Report: Improvements to the Stochastic Modeling and Simulation of Ground Motions for Use in PBEE.
EllsworthWL (2003). Appendix D: Magnitude and area data for strike slip earthquakes in: US Geological Survey Open File Report no. 03-214: Earthquake Probabilities in San Francisco Bay Region: 2002–2031, by Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities, Menlo Park, CA.
15.
FieldEHDawsonTEFelzerKRFrankelADGuptaVJordanTHParsonsTPetersenMDSteinRSWeldonRWillsCJ (2009) Uniform California earthquake rupture forecast, version 2 (UCERF 2). Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America99(4): 2053–2107.
16.
GodaKYasudaTMoriNMaruyamaT (2016) New scaling relationships of earthquake source parameters for stochastic tsunami simulation. Coastal Engineering Journal58(3): 1650010-1–1650010-40.
17.
GravesRPitarkaA (2016) Kinematic ground-motion simulations on rough faults including effects of 3D stochastic velocity perturbations. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America106(5): 2136–2153.
18.
GravesRJordanTHCallaghanSDeelmanEFieldEJuveGKesselmanCMaechlingPMehtaGMilnerKOkayaDSmallPVahiK (2011) CyberShake: A physics-based seismic hazard model for Southern California. Pure and Applied Geophysics168(3–4): 367–381.
19.
GuptaID (2006) Defining source-to-site distances for evaluation of design earthquake ground motion. In: Proceedings of the 13th symposium on earthquake engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, India, 18–20 December.
20.
HanksTCBakunWH (2002) A bilinear source-scaling model for M-log a observations of continental earthquakes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America92(5): 1841–1846.
21.
HartzellSGuatteriMMaiPMLiuP-CFiskMR (2005) Calculation of broadband time histories of ground motion, Part II: Kinematic and dynamic modeling using theoretical Green’s functions and comparison with the 1994 northridge earthquake. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America95(2): 614–645.
22.
IdrissIM (2014) An NGA-West2 empirical model for estimating the horizontal spectral values generated by shallow crustal earthquakes. Earthquake Spectra30(3): 1155–1177.
23.
KagawaTIrikuraKSomervillePG (2004) Differences in ground motion and fault rupture process between the surface and buried rupture earthquakes. Earth, Planets and Space56(1): 3–14.
24.
KaklamanosJBaiseLGBooreDM (2011) Estimating unknown input parameters when implementing the NGA ground-motion prediction equations in engineering practice. Earthquake Spectra27(4): 1219–1235.
25.
LeonardM (2010) Earthquake fault scaling: Self-consistent relating of rupture length, width, average displacement, and moment release. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America100(5A): 1971–1988.
26.
MaiPMSpudichPBoatwrightJ (2005) Hypocenter locations in finite-source rupture models. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America95(3): 965–980.
27.
MavroeidisGPPapageorgiouAS (2003) A mathematical representation of near-fault ground motions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America93(3): 1099–1131.
PitarkaAGravesRIrikuraKMiyakeHRodgersA (2017) Performance of Irikura recipe rupture model generator in earthquake ground motion simulations with Graves and Pitarka hybrid approach. Pure and Applied Geophysics174(9): 3537–3555.
30.
RezaeianSDer KiureghianA (2008) A stochastic ground motion model with separable temporal and spectral nonstationarities. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics37(13): 1565–1584.
31.
RezaeianSPetersenMDMoschettiMPPowersPHarmsenSCFrankelAD (2014) Implementation of NGA-West2 ground motion models in the 2014 U.S. National Seismic Hazard Maps. Earthquake Spectra30(3): 1319–1333.
32.
SchwartzDP (2018) Review: Past and future fault rupture lengths in seismic source characterization—The long and short of it. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America108(5A): 2493–2520.
33.
ShahiSKBakerJW (2014) An efficient algorithm to identify strong-velocity pulses in multicomponent ground motions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America104(5): 2456–2466.
34.
ShapiroSSWilkMB (1965) An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples)†. Biometrika52(3–4): 591–611.
35.
ShawBE (2009) Constant stress drop from small to great earthquakes in magnitude-area scaling. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America99(2A): 871–875.
36.
SomervillePGSmithNFGravesRWAbrahamsonNA (1997) Modification of empirical strong ground motion attenuation relations to include the amplitude and duration effects of rupture directivity. Seismological Research Letters68(1): 199–222.
SpudichPBaylessJRBakerJWChiouBSJRowshandelBShahiSKSomervillePG (2013) Final report of the NGA-West2 directivity working group. PEER report no. 2013/09, May. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley.
39.
SpudichPRowshandelBShahiSKBakerJWChiouBSJ (2014) Comparison of NGA-West2 directivity models. Earthquake Spectra30(3): 1199–1221.
40.
ThingbaijamKKSMaiPMGodaK (2017) New empirical earthquake source-scaling laws. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America107(5): 2225–2246.
WattsABBurovEB (2003) Lithospheric strength and its relationship to the elastic and seismogenic layer thickness. Earth and Planetary Science Letters213(1–2): 113–131.
43.
WellsDLCoppersmithKJ (1994) New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America84(4): 974–1002.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
