We present an evaluation of the 2018 Northern Southeast Asia Seismic Hazard Model (NSAHM18) based on a combination of smoothed seismicity, subduction zone, and fault models. The smoothed seismicity is used to model observed distributed seismicity from largely unknown sources in the current study area. In addition, due to a short instrumental earthquake catalog, slip rate and characteristic earthquake magnitudes are incorporated through the fault model. To achieve this objective, the compiled earthquake catalogs and updated active fault databases in this region were reexamined with consistent use of these input parameters. To take into account epistemic uncertainty, logic tree analysis has been implemented incorporating basic quantities such as ground-motion models (GMMs) for three different tectonic regions (shallow active, subduction interface, and subduction intraslab), maximum magnitude, and earthquake magnitude frequency relationships. The seismic hazard results are presented in peak ground acceleration maps at 475- and 2475-year return periods.
AbrahamsonNGregorNAddoK (2016) BC hydro ground motion prediction equations for subduction earthquakes. Earthquake Spectra2016; 32: 23–44.
2.
AllenCGillespieAYuanHSiehKBuchunZChengnanZ (1984) Red river and associated faults, Yunnan Province, China: Quaternary geology, slip rates, and seismic hazard. Geological Society of America Bulletin95: 686–700.
3.
AndersonJG (1979) Estimating the seismicity from geological structures for seismic-risk studies. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America69: 135–158.
4.
AtkinsonGMBooreDM (2003) Empirical ground-motion relations for Subduction-zone earthquakes and their application to Cascadia and other regions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America93: 1703–1729.
5.
AtkinsonGMBooreDM (2008) Erratum to empirical ground-motion relations for subduction zone earthquakes and their application to Cascadia and other regions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America98: 2567–2569.
6.
BilhamR (2004) Earthquakes in India and the Himalaya: Tectonics, geodesy and history. Annals of Geophysics47(2): 839–858.
7.
BirdP (2003) An updated digital model of plate boundaries. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems4(3): 1027.
8.
BommerJJCrowleyH (2017) The purpose and definition of the minimum magnitude limit in PSHA calculations. Seismological Research Letters88(4): 1097–1106.
9.
BommerJJDouglasJScherbaumFCottonFBungumHFahD (2010) On the selection of ground-motion prediction equations for seismic hazard analysis. Seismological Research Letters81(5): 783–793.
10.
BooreDM (2010) Orientation-independent, non geometric-mean measures of seismic intensity from two horizontal components of motion. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America100: 1830–1835.
11.
BooreDMStewartJPSeyhanEAtkinsonGM (2014) NGA-West 2 equations for predicting PGA, PGV, and 5%-damped PSA for shallow crustal earthquakes. Earthquake Spectra31: 1057–1085.
12.
BoydOSMuellerCSRukstalesKS (2007) Preliminary probabilistic seismic hazard map for Afghanistan. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2007-1137. Reston, VA: U.S. Geological Survey.
13.
CampbellKWBozorgniaY (2014) NGA-West2 ground motion model for the average horizontal components of PGA, PGV, and 5% damped linear acceleration response spectra. Earthquake Spectra: 30(3): 1087–1115.
14.
ChanCHWangYShiXOrnthammarathTWarnitchaiPNguyenPHNguyenLMKosuwanSThantMSiehK (2017) Toward uniform probabilistic seismic hazard assessments for Northern Southeast Asia. In: AGU fall meeting San Francisco, New Orleans, LA, 11–15December.
15.
ChiouBYoungsRR (2014) Update of the Chiou and Youngs NGA model for the average horizontal component of peak ground motion and response spectra. Earthquake Spectra2014; 30: 1117–1153.
16.
CornellCA (1968) Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America58: 1583–1606.
17.
CottonFScherbaumFBommerJJBungumH (2006) Criteria for selecting and adjusting ground-motion models for specific target applications: Applications to Central Europe and rock sites. Journal of Seismology10(2): 137–156.
18.
Di GiacomoDEngdahlERStorchakDA (2018) The ISC-GEM earthquake catalog (1904–2014): Status after the extension project. Earth System Science Data10: 1877–1899. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-1877-2018.
19.
DouglasJUlrichTBertilDReyJ (2014) Comparison of the ranges of uncertainty captured in different seismic-hazard studies. Seismological Research Letters85(5): 977–985.
20.
EngdahlREVillasenorADeshonRHThurberCH (2007) Teleseismic relocation and assessment of seismicity (1918–2005) in the region of the 2004 Mw 9.0 Sumatra-Andaman and 2005 MW 8.6 Nias Island Great Earthquakes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America97(1A): S43–S61.
21.
FentonCHCharusiriPWoodSH (2003) Recent paleoseismic investigations in northern and western Thailand. Annals of Geophysics46: 957–981.
22.
FrankelA (1995) Mapping seismic hazard in the Central and Eastern United States. Seismological Research Letters66: 8–21.
23.
GardnerJKKnopoffL (1974) Is the sequence of earthquakes in southern California, with aftershocks removed, Poissonian?Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America64: 1363–1367.
24.
GutenbergBRichterC (1954) Seismicity of the Earth and Associated Phenomena. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
25.
HeatonTHTajimaFMoriAW (1986) Estimating ground motions using recorded accelerograms. Surveys in Geophysics8: 25–83.
26.
MaurinTRanginC (2010) Structure and kinematics of the Indo-BurmeseWedge: Recent and fast growth of the outer wedge. Tectonics28: TC2010.
27.
MurotaniSMiyakeHKoketsuK (2008) Scaling of characterized slip models for plate-boundary earthquakes. Earth Planets Space60: 987–991.
28.
NielsenCChamot-RookeNRanginC (2004) From partial to full strain partitioning along the Indo-Burmese hyper-oblique subduction. Marine Geology209: 303–327.
29.
NutalayaPSodsriSArnoldEP (1985) SEASEE Series on Seismology, vol. II—Thailand, Southeast Asia Association of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering and USGS. Denver, CO: United States Geological Survey.
30.
OrnthammarathT (2013) A note on the strong ground motion recorded during the Mw 6.8 earthquake in Myanmar on 24 March 2011. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering11: 241–254.
31.
OrnthammarathT (2019) Seismic damage to ancient monuments in Chiang Saen (Northern Thailand): Implication for historical earthquakes in Golden Triangle area. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A377: 2018025.
32.
OrnthammarathTWarnitchaiP (2016) The 5 May 2014 MW 6.1 Mae Lao (Northern Thailand) earthquake: Interpretations of recorded ground motion and structural damage. Earthquake Spectra32: 1209–1238.
33.
OrnthammarathTWarnitchaiPWorakanchanaKZamanSSigbjörnssonRLaiCG (2011) Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for Thailand. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering9: 367–394.
34.
PapazachosBScordilisEPanagiotopoulosDPapazachosCKarakaisisG (2004) Global relations between seismic fault parameters and moment magnitude of earthquakes. Bulletin of the geological society of Greece36(3): 1482–1489. doi:https://doi.org/10.12681/bgsg.16538
35.
PetersenMHarmsenSMuellerCHallerKDeweyJLucoNCroneALidkeDRukstalesK (2007) Documentation for the Southeast Asia Seismic Hazard Maps. Administrative Report, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA, 65 pp.
36.
PetersenMDMoschettiMPPowersPMMuellerCSHallerKMFrankelADZengYRezaeianSHarmsenSCBoydOSFieldNChenRRukstalesKSLucoNWheelerRLWilliamsRAOlsenAH (2014) Documentation for the 2014 update of the United States national seismic hazard maps. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2014–1091. Denver, CO: U.S. Geological Survey, 243 pp.
37.
PhoungNH (1991) Probabilistic assessment of earthquake hazard in Vietnam based on seismotectonic regionalization. Tectonophysics198: 81–93.
38.
RajendranCPRajendranKAnuREarnestAMachadoTMohanPMFreymuellerJ (2007) Crustal deformation and seismic history associated with the 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake—A perspective from the Andaman-Nicobar Islands. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America97: S174–S191.
39.
ScordilisEM (2006) Empirical global relations converting MS and mb to moment magnitude. Journal of Seismology10: 225–236.
40.
ShedlockKMGiardiniDGrünthalGZhangP (2000) The GSHAP global seismic hazard map. Seismological Research Letters71: 679–689.
41.
SimonsWSocquetAVignyCAmbrosiusBHaji AbuSPromthongCSubaryaCSarsitoDAMatheussenSMorganPSpakmanW (2007), A decade of GPS in SE Asia: Resolving Sundaland motion and boundaries. Journal of Geophysical Research112: B06420. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JB003868
42.
SipkinSA (2003) A correction to body-wave magnitude mb based on moment magnitude MW. Seismological Research Letters74(6): 739–742.
43.
SocquetAVignyCChamot-RookeNSimonsWRanginCAmbrosiusB (2006) India and Sunda plates motion and deformation along their boundary in Myanmar determined by GPS. Journal of Geophysical Research111: B05406.
44.
SteppJC (1973) Analysis of completeness of the earthquake sample in the Puget Sound area (ed HardingST). Seismic Zoning, NOAA Technical Report ERL 267-ESL30, Boulder, CO: NOAA.
45.
StewartJPDouglasJJavanbargMBozorgniaYAbrahamsonNABooreDMCampbellKWDelavaudEErdikMStaffordPJ (2015) Selection of ground motion prediction equations for the global earthquake model. Earthquake Spectra31(1): 19–45.
46.
StirlingMWMcVerryGHGerstenbergerMCLitchfieldNJVan DissenRJBerrymanKRBarnesPWallaceLMVillamorPLangridgeRMLamarcheGNodderSReynersMEBradleyBRhoadesDASmithWDNicolAPettingaJClarkKJJacobsK (2012) National seismic hazard model for New Zealand: 2010 update. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America102(4): 1514–1542; doi:10.1785/0120110170
47.
StrasserFOArangoMCBommerJJ (2010) Scaling of the source dimensions of interface and intraslab subduction-zone earthquakes with moment magnitude. Seismological Research Letters81: 941–950.
48.
ThantMKawaseH (2012) Seismic sources identification and characterization for Myanmar: Towards updating the probabilistic seismic hazard maps. In: AGU Fall meeting, San Francisco, CA, 14–18December2015.
49.
TintiSMulargiaF (1985) Completeness analysis of a seismic catalog. Annals of Geophysics3: 407–414.
50.
UhrhammerR (1986) Characteristics of northern and southern California seismicity: Earthquake notes, v. 57, p. 21.
51.
WangYShyuJBHSiehKChiangH-WWangC-CAungTLinY-NNShenC-CMinSThanOLinKKTunST (2013) Permanent upper plate deformation in western Myanmar during the great 1762 earthquake: Implications for neotectonic behavior of the northern Sunda megathrust. Journal of Geophysical Research-Solid Earth118: 1277–1303.
52.
WangYSiehKAungTMinSKhaingSNTunST (2011) Earthquakes and slip rate of the southern Sagaing fault: Insights from an offset ancient fort wall, lower Burma (Myanmar). Geophysical Journal International185(1): 49–64.
53.
WangYSiehKTunSTLaiKYMyintT (2014) Active tectonic and earthquake Myanmar region. Journal of Geophysical Research119: 3767–3822.
54.
WellsDLCoppersmithKJ (1994) New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, and surface displacements. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America84(4): 974–1002.
55.
ZachariasenJSiehKTaylorFWEdwardsRLHantoroWS (1999) Submergence and uplift associated with the giant 1833 Sumatran subduction earthquake—Evidence from coral microatolls. Journal of Geophysical Research104: 895–919.
56.
ZawSHOrnthammarathTPoovarodomN (2019) Seismic reconnaissance and observed damage after the Mw 6.8, 24 August 2016 Chauk (Central Myanmar) earthquake. Journal of Earthquake Engineering23(2): 284–304.
57.
ZhaoJXZhangJAsanoAOhnoYOouchiTTakahashiTOgawaHIrikuraKThioHSomervillePFukushimaYFukushimaY (2006) Attenuation relations of strong ground motion in Japan using site classification based on predominant period. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America96(3): 898–913.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
