When evaluating seismically induced second-order effects in buildings, engineers and researchers are most familiar with these concerns in the context of multistory buildings with rigid diaphragms. However, similar concerns are valid for short single-story concrete or masonry-walled buildings with larger flexible diaphragms, which is a significant portion of the building stock in the United States. These rigid wall-flexible diaphragm (RWFD) buildings may have significant diaphragm drifts causing induced second-order effects. The stability coefficient currently found in ASCE 7 has traditionally been used by practitioners to evaluate the relative risk of P-delta instability in multistory buildings, but this indicator can be adapted for use in RWFD buildings. Using numerical studies following the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) P-695 collapse assessment methodology to evaluate the risk of collapse for a set of RWFD archetype buildings, a modified stability coefficient for RWFD buildings is found to capture the trend toward P-delta collapse and can act as a reasonable indicator without the need for heavy computational efforts.
American Concrete Institute (ACI) (2014) Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary. ACI 318–14. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
2.
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) (1993) Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. ANSI/ASCE 7-93. Reston, VA: ASCE.
3.
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) (2010) Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. ASCE 7-10. Reston, VA: ASCE.
4.
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) (2016) Minimum design loads and associated criteria for buildings and other structures. ASCE 7-16. Reston, VA: ASCE.
5.
American Wood Council (AWC) (2015) Special Design Provisions for Wind and Seismic: SDPWS. Leesburg, VA: AWC.
6.
Applied Technology Council (ATC) (1978) Tentative provisions for the development of seismic regulations for buildings. Report No. ATC 3-06, also identified as NSF Publication 78-8 and NBS Special Publication 510. Redwood City, CA: ATC.
7.
BernalD (1987) Amplification factors for inelastic dynamic p-δ effects in earthquake analysis. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics15: 635–651.
8.
CarrJ (2007) RUAUMOKO software. University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
9.
CohenGLKlingnerREHayesJRSweeneySC (2004) Seismic evaluation of low-rise reinforced masonry buildings with flexible diaphragms: I. Seismic and quasi-static testing. Earthquake Spectra20(3): 779–801.
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (2009) Quantification of building seismic performance factors. FEMA P-695. Washington, DC: FEMA.
12.
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (2015a) Issues and research needs identified during development of the 2015 NEHRP recommended seismic provisions for new buildings and other structures. Prepared by the Building Seismic Safety Council Provisions Update Committee, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Washington, DC, 31August.
13.
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (2015b) Seismic design of rigid wall-flexible diaphragm buildings: An alternate procedure. FEMA P-1026, Washington, DC: FEMA.
FischerAWSchaferBW (2018) Inelastic time history response of lumped parameter wall and diaphragm building. In: 11th U.S. national conference on earthquake engineering, Los Angeles, CA, 25–29 June.
16.
GuptaAKrawinklerH (2000) Dynamic P-delta effects for flexible inelastic steel structures. Journal of Structural Engineering126(1): 145–154.
17.
International Code Council (ICC) (2015) 2015 International Building Code. Washington, DC: ICC.
18.
KoliouM (2014) Seismic analysis and design of rigid wall—Flexible roof diaphragm structures. PhD dissertation, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY.
19.
KoliouMFiliatraultA (2017) Development of wood and steel diaphragm hysteretic connector database for performance-based earthquake engineering. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering15(10): 4319–4347.
20.
KoliouMFiliatraultAKellyDJLawsonJ (2016a) Buildings with rigid walls and flexible roof diaphragms. I: Evaluation of current U.S. seismic provisions. Journal of Structural Engineering142(3): 04015166.
21.
KoliouMFiliatraultAKellyDJLawsonJ (2016b) Distributed yielding concept for improved seismic collapse performance of rigid wall-flexible diaphragm buildings. Journal of Structural Engineering142(2): 04015137.
22.
KoliouMLawsonJFiliatraultAKellyDJ (2017) Evaluation of out-of-plane wall anchorage force provisions in buildings with rigid walls and flexible roof diaphragms. Earthquake Spectra33(1): 1–23.
23.
KoliouMVan De LindtJWFiliatraultA (2016c) Evaluation of an alternative seismic design approach for rigid wall flexible wood roof diaphragm buildings through probabilistic loss estimation and disaggregation. Engineering Structures127: 31–39.
LawsonJ (2019) Improving the accuracy of wood diaphragm deflection computations and its impact on ASCE 41 pseudo-lateral force estimates. In: 2019 SEAOC convention proceedings, Squaw Valley, CA, 28–30 August. Sacramento, CA: Structural Engineers Association of California.
26.
LawsonJYarberC (2013) Collective chord behavior in large flexible diaphragms. In: 2013 structures congress proceedings, Pittsburg, PA, 2–4 May, pp. 2274–2285. Pittsburg, PA: Structural Engineering Institute.
27.
LawsonJKellyDJKoliouMFiliatraultA (2014) Evaluating existing and proposing new seismic design provisions for rigid wall—Flexible diaphragm buildings. In: SEAOC 2014 83rd convention proceedings, Indian Wells, CA. Available at: https://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1080&context=aen_fac (accessed 30 April 2020).
28.
MathWorks (2013) MATLAB (Version 8.10.1.604). Natick, MA: The MathWorks, Inc.
29.
PangWNiCLawsonJPantS (2014) Distribution of chord forces in large panelized wood roof diaphragms. In: 2014 world conference on timber engineering, Quebec City, QC, Canada, 10–14 August.
30.
SchaferB (2019) Research on the seismic performance of rigid wall flexible diaphragm buildings with bare steel deck diaphragms. Report Series CFSRC R-2019-02. Baltimore, MD: Cold-Formed Steel Research Consortium.
31.
Structural Engineers Association of California (SEAOC) (2002) 2000 IBC Structural/Seismic Design Manual, vol. 2. Sacramento, CA: SEAOC, pp. 211–259.
32.
Structural Engineers Association of California (SEAOC) (2016) 2015 IBC SEAOC Structural/Seismic Design Manual, vol. 2, Sacramento, CA: SEAOC, pp. 129–152.
33.
TremblayRMartinEYangWRogersCA (2004) Analysis, testing and design of steel roof deck diaphragms for ductile earthquake resistance. Journal of Earthquake Engineering8(5): 775–816.
34.
Uniform Building Code (UBC) (1988) Uniform Building Code. International Conference of Building Officials, Whittier, CA.
