Elementary music educators use a variety of strategies in classroom instruction. The purpose of this case study was to explore student perceptions of Curwen hand signs, a common instructional strategy in elementary music classrooms. Second- and third-grade students reported various challenges, benefits, and influential factors surrounding hand sign use. Results indicated that students enjoyed movement activities and benefited from visual and physical reminders of singing tasks during instruction. They described several challenges, including multitasking, required background knowledge, and distraction. Influential factors included a learning curve, accuracy, placement, pattern length and complexity, and enjoyment. The results of this study suggest that hand signs should be considered one instructional strategy in a toolbox of multiple approaches.
AlkahtaniM.AhmadA.DarmoulS.SammanS.Al-zabadiA.MantrafK. B. (2016). Multitasking trends and impact on education: A literature review. International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business, and Industrial Engineering, 10(3), 995–1001. https://www.scholar.waset.org/1999.10/10004600
2.
ArmesJ. W.HarryA. G.GrimsbyR. (2022). Implementing universal design principles in music teaching. Music Educators Journal, 109(1), 44–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/00274321221114869
3.
AutryM. R. (1975). A study of the effect of hand signs in the development of sight singing skills [Doctoral dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
CampbellP. S.Scott-KassnerC. (1995). Music in childhood: From preschool through the elementary grades. Cengage.
6.
CassidyJ. W. (1993). Effect of various sightsinging strategies on nonmusic majors’ pitch accuracy. Journal of Research in Music Education, 41(4), 293–302. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345505
ChoksyL. (1974). The Kodály method: Comprehensive music education from infant to adult. Prentice-Hall.
9.
CousinsS. B.PersellinD. C. (1999). The effect of Curwen hand signs on the vocal accuracy of young children (pp. 17–21). Texas Music Education Research. https://www.tmea.org/college/research/
10.
CreswellJ. W.PothC. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among the five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
11.
DarrowA. A. (2010). Music education for all: Employing the principles of universal design to educational practice. General Music Today, 24(1), 43–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1048371310376901
12.
DraperE. A. (2022). Supporting students with specific learning disabilities: Strategies for the general music classroom. Journal of General Music Education, 36(1), 47–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/27527646221115153
13.
ElwoodM. B. (2011). The effectiveness of Curwen hand signs and corresponding hand movements on the vocal accuracy of second grade students as measured by Rutowski’s singing voice development measure [Master’s thesis, Missouri State University]. https://bearworks.missouristate.edu/theses/2665/
14.
FeierabendJ. M.StrongM. (Eds). (2018). Feierabend fundamentals: History, philosophy, and practice. GIA Publications.
15.
FlohrJ. W. (2010). Best practices for young children’s music education: Guidance from brain research. General Music Today, 23(2), 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1048371309352344
16.
Frey-ClarkM. (2017). Pitch systems and Curwen hand signs: A review of literature. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 36(1), 59–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755123316689812
17.
GentryK. (2016). Music teachers’ reported use of kinesthetic approaches to teach pitch matching and reading to elementary music students [Master’s thesis, Southern Methodist University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
18.
GordonE. E. (2012). Learning sequences in music: A contemporary music learning theory. GIA Publications.
19.
HeddenS. K.WoodsD. G. (1992). Student outcomes of teaching system for general music, grades K-8. In ColwellR. (Ed)., Handbook of research on music teaching and learning: A project of the music educators national conference (pp. 669–675). Oxford University Press.
20.
HoulahanM.TackaP. (2015). Kodaly today: A cognitive approach to elementary music education (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
21.
JacobiB. S. (2011). Kodaly, literacy, and the brain: Preparing young music students to read pitch on the staff. General Music Today, 25(2), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1048371311414182
22.
JonesB. A. (1981). A comparative study of spatial reienforcement as a means for improving the pitch discrimination of seven year olds [Doctoral dissertation, The University of Mississippi]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
23.
KillianJ. N.HenryM. L. (2005). A comparison of successful and unsuccessful strategies in individual sight-singing preparation and performance. Journal of Research in Music Education, 53(1), 51–65. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345606
24.
KuehneJ. M. (2010). Sight-singing: Ten years of published research. UPDATE: Applications of Research in Music Education, 29(1), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755123310378453
25.
LiaoM. Y. (2008). The effects of gesture use on young children’s pitch accuracy for singing tonal patterns. International Journal of Music Education, 26(3), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/0255761408092525
26.
MartinB. A. (1991). Effects of hand signs, syllables, and letters on first graders’ acquisition of tonal skills. Journal of Research in Music Education, 39(2), 161–170.https://doi.org/10.2307/3344696
27.
NicholsB. (2012). The way we do the things we do: A survey of middle-school choral educators’ sight-singing attitudes and influences. Contributions to Music Education, 39, 87–100. www.jstor.org/stable/24127246
28.
PattonM. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage.
29.
RainbowB. (1980). John Curwen: A short critical biography. Novello.
30.
ReifingerJ. J. L. (2013). Strategies to develop students’ conceptual understanding and singing accuracy of pitch. General Music Today, 26(2), 14–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1048371312442514
31.
SaldañaJ. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Sage.
32.
SalvadorK.CulpM. E. (2022). Intersections in music education: Implications of universal design for learning, culturally responsive education, and trauma-informed education for P-12 praxis. Music Educators Journal, 108(3), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/00274321221087737
33.
SandersR. B. (2015). The teaching of choral sight singing: Analyzing and understanding experienced choral directors’ perceptions and beliefs [Doctoral dissertation, Boston University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
34.
ShouldiceH. N. (2021). Weaving it all together: A practical guide to applying Gordon’s music learning theory in the elementary general music program. GIA Publications.
35.
StakeR. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage.
36.
SteevesC. (1984). The effect of Curwen-Kodaly hand signs on pitch and interval discrimination within a Kodaly curricular framework. Calgary.
YoungsonS. C.PersellinD. C. (2001). The Curwen hand signs: A help or hindrance when developing vocal accuracy. Kodály Envoy, 27(2), 9–12. second
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
