The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of three choral configurations on a soprano section’s sound. The first configuration resembled a choir section without an assigned standing position, the second configuration grouped singers by timbre, and the third used acoustic-compatibility placement. Three conductors configured a university soprano section (N = 13) who were audio-recorded singing in each configuration and answered questions about their perceptions. Audio recordings were analyzed acoustically using long-term average spectra and perceptually through pitch analysis and listener perceptions. Results indicated that participants sang with significantly increased spectral energy in the acoustic-compatibility configuration (p < .001), and both singer and listener participants preferred intentional standing configurations over the random standing configuration. Findings from this study suggest that choral directors can use intentional configurations in conjunction with 2 ft intersinger spacing to improve singer comfort and overall sound.
AdamsK. A. (2019a). Changes to spacing preference in ensembles of varying size: A pilot study. International Journal of Research in Choral Singing, 7, 3–15.
2.
AdamsK. A. (2019b). Choral configuration: An overview of research and implications for the choral music educator. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 37(2), 24–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755123318783526
3.
ArchibequeC. (2005). Reposition your singers: Refine your sound [Conference session]. American Choral Directors Association National Conference, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
AtkinsonD. S. (2006). The effect of choir formation on the acoustical attributes of the singing voice (UMI No. 3245987) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Mississippi]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
6.
BarrettB. T. (2003). Chorister placement: The criteria, procedures, and methods used in placing the chorister within the mixed choral ensemble (UMI No. 3089912) [Doctoral dissertation, The University of Arizona]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
7.
BartleJ. A. (1993). Lifeline for children’s choir directors. Alfred Music.
8.
BonshorM. J. (2017). Confidence and choral configuration: The affective impact of situational and acoustic factors in amateur choirs. Psychology of Music, 45(5), 628–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735616669996
9.
BrinsonB. A.DemorestS. M. (2013). Choral music: Methods and materials (2nd ed.). Cengage Learning.
10.
BrunkanM. C. (2013). The effects of watching three types of conductor gestures and performing varied gestures along with the conductor on measures of singers’ intonation and tone quality: A pilot study. International Journal of Research in Choral Singing, 4(2), 37–51. https://acda-publications.s3.us-east2.amazonaws.com/IJRCS/volumefour/ijrcs4_2_brunkan.pdf
11.
BrunkanM. C. (2016). Relationships of a circular singer arm gesture to acoustical and perceptual measures of singing: A motion capture study. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 34(3), 56–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755123314567782
ConfredoD.GeringerJ.FlowersP.BrittinR.ParisiJ. (2018, March22–24). Perceiving tone and tempo in music: Measurement with auditory sort-and-rank tasks [Symposium]. National Association for Music Educators biennial Music Research and Teacher Education National Conference, Atlanta, GA, United States.
14.
Cook-CunninghamS. L.GradyM. L. (2018). The effects of three physical and vocal warm-up procedures on acoustic and perceptual measures of choral sound. Journal of Voice, 32(2), 192–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.04.003
15.
CrowtherD. S. (2003). Key choral concepts: Teaching techniques and tools to help your choir sound great. Cedar Fort Publications.
16.
DaffernH. (2017). Blend in singing ensemble performance: Vibrato production in a vocal quartet. Journal of Voice, 31(3), 385.e23–385.e29. doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.09.007
17.
DaughertyJ. F. (1999). Spacing, formation, and choral sound: Preferences and perceptions of auditors and choristers. Journal of Research in Music Education, 47(3), 224–238. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345781
18.
DaughertyJ. F. (2001). On the voice: Rethinking how voices work in a choral ensemble. Choral Journal, 42(5), 69–75.
DaughertyJ. F. (2005). The effects of choir spacing and choir formation on the tuning accuracy and intonation tendencies of a mixed choir. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America118(3), Article 699. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4785699
21.
DaughertyJ. F.GradyM. L.CoffeenR. C. (2019). Effects of choir spacing and riser step heights on acoustic and perceptual measures of SATB choir sound acquired from four microphone positions in two performance halls. Journal of Research in Music Education, 67(3), 355–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429419844508
22.
DaughertyJ. F.ManternachJ. N.BrunkanM. C. (2013). Acoustic and perceptual measures of SATB choir performances on two types of portable choral riser units in three singer-spacing conditions. International Journal of Music Education, 31(3), 359–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/0255761411434499
23.
EkholmE. (2000). The effect of singing mode and seating arrangement on choral blend and overall choral sound. Journal of Research in Music Education, 48(2), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345571
24.
EllingboeB. (2019). A practical guide to choral conducting. Neil A. Kjos Music Company.
25.
EmmonsS.ChaseC. (2006). Prescriptions for choral excellence. Oxford University Press.
FolgerW. M. (2002). Unifying the choral sound through voice matching: An empirical study of the adjustments in vibrato frequency modulation and amplitude modulation (UMI No. 3049163) [Doctoral dissertation, University of North Carolina Greensboro]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
28.
FredricksonS. (2004). Popular choral handbook: New techniques for Pop, Jazz, and Show Choir Directors. ScottMusic.com.
29.
GiardiniereD. C. (1991). Voice matching: An investigation of vocal matches, their effect on choral sound, and procedures of inquiry conducted by Weston Noble (UMI No. 9213181) [Doctoral dissertation, New York University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
30.
GoodwinA. W. (1980). An acoustical study of individual voices in choral blend. Journal of Research in Music Education, 28(2), 119–128. https://doi.org/10.2307/3344820
31.
GradyM. L. (2014a). Effects of traditional pattern, lateral-only, and vertical-only conducting gestures on acoustic and perceptual measures of choir sound: An exploratory study. International Journal of Research in Choral Singing, 5(1), 39–59. https://acda-publications.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/IJRCS/IJRCS5-1grady.pdf
32.
GradyM. L. (2014b). The effects of nonverbal behaviors exhibited by multiple conductors on the timbre, intonation, and perceptions of three university choirs, and assessed relationships between time spent in selected conductor behaviors and analysis of the choirs’ performances (UMI No. 3635958) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Kansas]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
33.
GradyM. L.Cook-CunninghamS. L. (2018). The effects of three physical and vocal warm-up procedures on acoustic and perceptual measures of choral sound: Study replication with younger populations. Journal of Voice, 34(4), 647.e15–647.e22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.12.009
34.
GradyM. L.GilliamT. M. (2020). Effects of three common choral performance movement conditions on acoustic and perceptual measures of choral sound. Journal of Research in Music Education, 68(3), 286–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429420931498
35.
HaasemannF. (1991). Group vocal technique. Hinshaw Music.
36.
HoltM.JordanJ. M. (2008). The school choral program: Philosophy, planning, organizing, and teaching. GIA Publications.
37.
HowardD. M.AngusJ. (2017). Acoustics and psychoacoustics (5th ed.). Focal Press.
38.
KillianJ. N.BasingerL. (2007). Perception of choral blend among choral, instrumental, and nonmusic majors using the continuous response digital interface. Journal of Research in Music Education, 55(4), 313–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429408317373
39.
KnutsonB. J. (1987). Interviews with selected choral conductors concerning rationale and practices regarding choral blend (Order No. 8802564) [Doctoral dissertation, Florida State University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
40.
LambsonA. R. (1961). An evaluation of various seating plans used in choral singing. Journal of Research in Music Education, 9(1), 47–54. https://doi.org/10.2307/3344394
41.
LindgrenH.SundbergJ. (1972). Grundfrekvensförlopp och falsksäng [Stencil]. Department of Musicology, University of Stockholm.
42.
MolnarJ. W. (1950). The selection and placement of choir voices. Music Educators Journal, 36(6), 48–49. https://doi.org/10.2307/3387447
43.
MonsonB. B.LottoA. J.TernströmS. (2011). Detection of high-frequency energy changes in sustained vowels produced by singers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 129(4), 2263–2268. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3557033
44.
NobleW. H. (2005). Achieving choral blend through standing position [DVD 628]. GIA.
45.
OsinskiR. D. (2014). Effect of voice matching on individual vocal characteristics of singers performing in duet (UMI No. 3680250) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Washington]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
46.
PhillipsK. H. (2016). Directing the choral music program. Oxford University Press.
47.
ReidK. L. P.DavisP.OatesJ.CabreraD.TernströmS.BlackM.ChapmanJ. (2007). The acoustic characteristics of professional opera singers performing in chorus versus solo mode. Journal of Voice, 21(1), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2005.08.010
48.
RosenbaumH. (2017). A practical guide to choral conducting. Routledge.
49.
SilveyP. E. (2016). Coordinating vocal colors in women’s choruses. Choral Journal, 57(2), 10–23.
50.
SmithB.SataloffR. T. (2013). Choral pedagogy (3rd ed.). Plural Publishing.
51.
TernströmS. (1999). Preferred self-to-other ratios in choir singing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 105(6), 3563–3574. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.424680
52.
TernströmS. O. (2008). Hi-Fi voice: Observations on the distribution of energy in the singing voice spectrum above 5 kHz. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 123(5), 3379–3379. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2934016
TocheffR. D. (1990). Acoustical placement of voices in choral formations (UMI No. 9111807) [Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
UshinoM. (2013). Studying the validity of changes in choral formation to influence overall sound: A small-scale study using spectrographic analysis (UMI No. 1523195) [Master’s thesis, California State University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
59.
WangW. C. (2006). The effect of seating arrangement on choral sound in a nonselected mixed collegiate choral ensemble. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 120(5), 3030. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4787145
60.
WannarkaR.RuhlK. (2008). Seating arrangements that promote positive academic and behavioural outcomes: A review of empirical research. Support for Learning, 23(2), 89–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9604.2008.00375.x
WoodruffN. W. (2002). The acoustic interaction of voices in ensemble: An inquiry into the phenomenon of voice matching and the perception of unaltered vocal process (UMI No. 3075332) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Oklahoma]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
63.
YangE. H. (2004). The study of seating arrangement effect on choral blend: Positioning singers in three seating arrangements according to individual volume (UMI No. 3151681) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Washington]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
64.
ZabriskieA. (2010). Evolution of choral sound of the St. Olaf Choir and the Westminster Choir (UMI No. 3442164) [Doctoral dissertation, Florida State University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
