The purpose of this study was to survey collegiate string musicians on their use of drone accompaniments to improve intonation. A questionnaire was developed and distributed to collegiate string musicians (N = 152). Most participants reported that they used a drone accompaniment as a tool to improve their intonation and that they were introduced to it in high school. Participants indicated they used a drone accompaniment more regularly when practicing scales and arpeggios. Additionally, they believed that it was an effective technique for improving intonation, especially for scales and arpeggios. A positive-moderate relationship between reported use of a drone accompaniment in practice and its perceived effectiveness to improve intonation was found for fast passages, slow passages, and solo repertoire. A majority of participants reported that they used a tuning application on their mobile device and a dedicated metronome and tuner to produce a drone accompaniment.
AlexanderM. L. (2008). Teaching tuning to the string orchestra: Classroom procedures for beginning to advanced students. American String Teacher, 58(4), 20–26. doi:10.1177/000313130805800404
2.
AlexanderM. L. (2011). Effects of stimulus type, distance, and instrument on high school students’ open string tuning. String Research Journal, 2, 67–81. doi:10.1177/194849921100200006
3.
CarmanG. G. (1936). A study of intonation in violin playing (Master’s thesis). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses database. (UMI No. TM18435)
4.
CurryN. (2011). Dr. Nick’s steps to practicing intonation on a string instrument. American String Teacher, 61(4), 94–95. doi:10.1177/000313131106100421
5.
DemorestS. M.ClementsA. (2007). Factors influencing the pitch-matching of junior high boys. Journal of Research in Music Education, 55, 190–203. doi:10.1177/002242940705500302
6.
EmersonR. M.FretzR. I.ShawL. L. (2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
7.
EricksenK. E. (1973). A comparison of three teaching procedures used in the development of improving intonation in clarinet performance (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses database. (UMI No. 7413214)
8.
FlunkerJ. K. (2010). Trumpet intonation pedagogy in the United States at the beginning of the twenty-first century (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses database. (UMI No. 3428898)
9.
GeringerJ. M. (1978). Intonational performance and perception of ascending scales. Journal of Research in Music Education, 26, 32–40. doi:10.2307/3344787
10.
GeringerJ. M. (1983). The relationship of pitch-matching and pitch-discrimination abilities of preschool and fourth-grade students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 31, 93–99. doi:10.2307/3345213
11.
GeringerJ. M. (2018). Eight artist-level violinists performing unaccompanied Bach: Are there consistent tuning patterns?String Research Journal, 8, 51–61. doi:10.1177/1948499218769657
12.
GeringerJ. M.MacleodR. B.EllisJ. C. (2013). A descriptive analysis of performance models’ intonation in a recorded excerpt from Suzuki Violin School Volume I. String Research Journal, 4, 71–88. doi:10.1177/194849921300400405
13.
GeringerJ. M.MadsenC. K. (1981). Verbal and operant discrimination preference for tone quality and intonation. Psychology of Music, 9, 26–30. doi:10.1177/03057356810090010501
14.
GeringerJ. M.MadsenC. K. (1989). Pitch and tone quality discrimination and preference: Evidence for a hierarchical model of music elements. Canadian Music Educator, 30, 29–38.
15.
GeringerJ. M.MadsenC. K. (1998). Musicians’ ratings of good versus bad vocal and string performances. Journal of Research in Music Education, 46, 522–534. doi:10.2307/3345348
16.
GeringerJ. M.WittA. C. (1985). An investigation of tuning performance and perception of string instrumentalists. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 85, 90–101.
17.
GreenE. A. H. (1966). Teaching stringed instruments in class. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
18.
GreeneP. C. (1937). Violin intonation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 8, 207–207. doi:10.1121/1.1901994
19.
GriswoldH. E. (1988). How to teach aural skills with electronic tuners. Music Educators Journal, 74(5), 49–51. doi:10.2307/3397983
HamannD. L.GillespieR. (2013). Strategies for teaching strings: Building a successful string and orchestra program (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
22.
HamannD. L.LauverJ.AsherK. (2006). Perceived and actual tuning ability of middle school students. Journal of String Research, 3, 43–54.
23.
HopkinsM. T. (2012). Strategies for improving the intonation of your orchestra. American String Teacher, 62(4), 24–28. doi:10.1177/000313131206200404
24.
HopkinsM. T. (2013). Teachers’ practices and beliefs regarding teaching tuning in elementary and middle school group string classes. Journal of Research in Music Education, 61, 97–114. doi:10.1177/0022429412473607
25.
HopkinsM. T. (2015). Eighth-grade violinists’ instrument tuning ability: A comparison of pitch perception and tuning accuracy. Journal of Research in Music Education, 63, 349–368. doi:10.1177/0022429415597884
26.
JohnsonC. M.GeringerJ. M. (2007). Predicting music majors’ overall ratings of wind band performances: Elements of music. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 173, 25–38.
27.
KantorskiV. J. (1986). String instrument intonation in upper and lower registers: The effects of accompaniment. Journal of Research in Music Education, 34, 200–210. doi:10.2307/3344749
28.
KohutD. (1973). Instrumental music pedagogy: Teaching techniques for school band and orchestra directors. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
29.
LauxC. C. (2015). The effect of a tonic drone accompaniment on pitch accuracy of scales played by beginner violin and viola students (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses database. (UMI No. 3710248)
30.
LeppA.BarkleyJ. E.KarpinskiA. C. (2015). The relationship between cell phone use and academic performance in a sample of U.S. college students. Sage Open, 5(1). doi:10.1177/2158244015573169
31.
LoosenF. (1994). Tuning of diatonic scales by violinists, pianists, and nonmusicians. Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 221–226. doi:10.3758/BF03213900
32.
LoosenF. (1995). The effect of musical experience on the conception of accurate tuning. Music Perception, 12, 291–306. doi:10.2307/40286185
33.
MadsenC. K. (1966). The effect of scale direction on pitch acuity in solo vocal performance. Journal of Research in Music Education, 14, 266–275. doi:10.2307/3344282
34.
MadsenC. K.GeringerJ. M. (1976). Preference for trumpet tone quality versus intonation. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 46, 13–22.
35.
MadsenC. K.GeringerJ. M. (1981). Discrimination between tone quality and intonation in unaccompanied flute/oboe duets. Journal of Research in Music Education, 29, 305–313. doi:10.2307/3345006
36.
MadsenC. K.MadsenC. H. (2016). Teaching/Discipline: A positive approach for educational development (5th ed.). Raleigh, NC: Contemporary.
37.
MeyerH. (1993). A computer system to improve violin intonation (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses database. (UMI No. 9414442)
38.
NuñezM. L. (2002). Comparison of aural and visual instructional methodologies designed to improve the intonation accuracy of seventh -grade violin and viola instrumentalists (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses database. (UMI No. 3127050)
39.
OblingerD.OblingerJ. L. (Eds.). (2005). Educating the Net Generation. Washington, DC: Educause.
SalzbergR. S. (1980). The effects of visual stimulus and instruction on intonation accuracy of string instrumentalist. Psychology of Music, 8(2), 42–49. doi:10.1177/030573568082005
42.
ScherberR. V. (2014). Pedagogical practices related to the ability to discern and correct intonation errors: An evaluation of current practices, expectations, and a model for instruction (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses database. (UMI No. 3638073)
43.
SilveiraJ. M.HudsonM. W. (2015). Hazing in the college marching band. Journal of Research in Music Education, 63, 5–27. doi:10.1177/0022429415569064
44.
SilveyB. A. (2011). Undergraduate music majors’ perceptions of instrumental conducting curricula. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 21(1), 27–38. doi:10.1177/1057083710387521
45.
SimsW. L.CassidyJ. W. (2019). Impostor phenomenon responses of early career music education faculty. Journal of Research in Music Education, 67, 45–61. doi:10.1177/0022429418812464
46.
SmithC. M. (1995). Development of performance pitch accuracy of string students. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 124, 13–23.
47.
SoginD. W. (1989). An analysis of string instrumentalists’ performed intonational adjustments within an ascending and descending pitch set. Journal of Research in Music Education, 37, 104–111. doi:10.2307/3344702
48.
TwengeJ. M. (2017). iGen: Why today’s super-connected kids are growing up less rebellious, more tolerant, less happy–and completely unprepared for adulthood. New York, NY: Atria Books.
49.
WatkinsC. (2004). Advanced intonation skills: Helping students understand what they hear. American String Teacher, 54(1), 86–90. doi:10.1177/000313130405400110
50.
WorthyM. D. (2000). Effects of tone-quality conditions on perception and performance of pitch among selected wind instrumentalists. Journal of Research in Music Education, 48, 222–236. doi:10.2307/3345395
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
