The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of tonic drone accompaniment on the intonation of violinists and violists. Twenty-eight middle and high school students performed an ascending diatonic line and a descending dominant 7th arpeggio on the violin or viola in three trials: pretest, posttest accompanied with drone, and posttest unaccompanied. The students were grouped based on age and years of experience. A significant difference in cent deviation scores was found between age groups but not years of experience. Post hoc analysis revealed a significant difference between the middle-age group and the youngest group. No significant difference was found overall between pretest, drone accompanied posttest, and unaccompanied posttest conditions.
AlexanderM. L. (2011). Effects of stimulus type, distance, and instrument on high school students’ open string tuning. String Research Journal, 2, 67-81. doi:10.1177/194849921100200006
2.
BoersmaP.WeeninkD. (2017). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 6.0.36). Retrieved from http://www.praat.org/
3.
BrittinR. V. (1993). Effects of upper and lower-register accompaniment on intonation. Journal of Band Research, 29, 43-50.
4.
CarmanG. G. (1936). A study of intonation in violin playing (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global database. (UMI No. TM18435)
5.
CurryN. (2011). Dr. Nick’s steps to practicing intonation on a string instrument. American String Teacher, 61(4), 94-95. doi:10.1177/000313131106100421
6.
DalbyB. F. (1992). A computer-based training program for developing harmonic intonation discrimination skill. Journal of Research in Music Education, 40, 139-152. doi:10.2307/3345563
7.
ElliottC. A. (1974). Effect of vocalization on the sense of pitch of beginning band class students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 22, 120-128. doi:10.2307/3345312
8.
GeringerJ. M. (1978). Intonational performance and perception of ascending scales. Journal of Research in Music Education, 26, 32-40. doi:10.2307/3344787
9.
GeringerJ. M. (1983). The relationship of pitch-matching and pitch-discrimination abilities of preschool and fourth-grade students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 31, 93-99. doi:10.2307/3345213
10.
GeringerJ. M. (2018). Eight artist-level violinists performing unaccompanied Bach: Are there consistent tuning patterns?String Research Journal, 8, 51-61. doi:10.1177/1948499218769657
11.
GeringerJ. M.AllenM. L. (2004). An analysis of vibrato among high school and university violin and cello students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 52, 167-178. doi:10.2307/3345438
12.
GeringerJ. M.AllenM. L.MacleodR. B. (2010). String vibrato: Research related to performance and perception. String Research Journal, 1, 7-23. doi:10.1177/194849921000100101
13.
GeringerJ. M.MacLeodR. B.AllenM. L. (2010). Perceived pitch of violin and cello vibrato tones among music majors. Journal of Research in Music Education, 57, 351-363. doi:10.1177/0022429409350510
14.
GeringerJ. M.MacleodR. B.EllisJ. C. (2013). A descriptive analysis of performance models’ intonation in a recorded excerpt from Suzuki Violin School Volume I. String Research Journal, 4, 71-88. doi:10.1177/194849921300400405
15.
GeringerJ. M.MacLeodR. B.SasanfarJ. K. (2015). In tune or out of tune: Are different instruments and voice heard differently?Journal of Research in Music Education, 63, 89-101. doi:10.1177/0022429415572025
16.
GeringerJ. M.MadsenC. K. (1981). Verbal and operant discrimination—Preference for tone quality and intonation. Psychology of Music, 9, 26-30. doi:10.1177/03057356810090010501
17.
GeringerJ. M.MadsenC. K. (1989). Pitch and tone quality discrimination and preference: Evidence for a hierarchical model of musical elements. The Canadian Music Educator, 30, 29-38.
18.
GeringerJ. M.MadsenC. K. (1998). Musicians’ ratings of good versus bad vocal and string performances. Journal of Research in Music Education, 46, 522-534. doi:10.2307/3345348
19.
GeringerJ. M.WittA. C. (1985). An investigation of tuning performance and perception of string instrumentalists. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 85, 90-101. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/40317945
20.
GreenE. A. H. (2010). Teaching stringed instruments in class. Van Nuys, CA: Alfred Music.
21.
GreeneP. C. (1937). Violin intonation. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 8, 207-207. doi:10.1121/1.1901994
22.
HamannD. L.FrostR.WietersM. (2002). Factors contributing to perceived tuning independence among middle school and high school string players. String Research Journal, 2, 63-87.
23.
HamannD. L.GillespieR. (2013). Strategies for teaching strings: Building a successful string and orchestra program (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
24.
HamannD. L.LauverJ.AsherK. (2006). Perceived and actual tuning ability of middle school students. String Research Journal, 3, 43-54.
25.
HopkinsM. T. (2012). Strategies for improving the intonation of your orchestra. American String Teacher, 62(4), 24-28. doi:10.1177/000313131206200404
26.
HopkinsM. T. (2013). Teachers’ practices and beliefs regarding teaching tuning in elementary and middle school group string classes. Journal of Research in Music Education, 61, 97-114. doi:10.1177/0022429412473607
27.
HopkinsM. T. (2014). Pilot-testing of new software for measuring string players’ instrument tuning skills. Journal of Music, Technology & Education, 7, 5-21. doi:10.1386/jmte.7.1.5_1
28.
HopkinsM. T. (2015). Eighth-grade violinists’ instrument tuning ability: A comparison of pitch perception and tuning accuracy. Journal of Research in Music Education, 63, 349-368. doi:10.1177/0022429415597884
29.
HoveyN. W. (1976). Efficient rehearsal procedures for school bands. Elkhart, IN: Selmer.
30.
JohnsonC. M.GeringerJ. M. (2007). Predicting music majors’ overall ratings of wind band performances: Elements of music. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 173, 25-38. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/40319468
31.
KantorskiV. J. (1986). String instrument intonation in upper and lower registers: The effects of accompaniment. Journal of Research in Music Education, 34, 200-210. doi:10.2307/3344749
32.
KlotmanR. (1981, April). Teaching intonation. The Instrumentalist, 35, 46.
33.
KohutD. (1973). Instrumental music pedagogy: Teaching techniques for school band and orchestra directors. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
34.
LauxC. C. (2015). The effect of a tonic drone accompaniment on the pitch accuracy of scales played by beginner violin and viola students (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global database. (UMI No. 3710248)
35.
LoosenF. (1994). Tuning of diatonic scales by violinists, pianists, and nonmusicians. Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 221-226. doi:10.3758/BF03213900
36.
LoosenF. (1995). The effect of musical experience on the conception of accurate tuning. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 291-306. doi:10.2307/40286185
37.
MacLeodR. B. (2008). Influences of dynamic level and pitch register on the vibrato rates and widths of violin and viola players. Journal of Research in Music Education, 56, 43-54. doi:10.1177/0022429408323070
38.
MeyerH. S. (1993). A computer system to improve violin intonation (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global database. (UMI No. 9414442)
39.
MorrisonS. J.FykJ. (2002). Intonation. In ParncuttR.McPhersonG. E. (Eds.), The science and psychology of music performance: Creative strategies for teaching and learning (pp. 183-197). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
40.
NuñezM. L. (2002). Comparison of aural and visual instructional methodologies designed to improve the intonation accuracy of seventh grade violin and viola instrumentalists (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global database. (UMI No. 3127050)
41.
ReelJ. (2005). Music and musicians—Drone on: Your inner sense of pitch? It all comes down to one note. Strings, 20, 26-29.
42.
SalzbergR. S. (1980). The effects of visual stimulus and instruction on intonation accuracy of string instrumentalist. Psychology of Music, 8(2), 42-49. doi:10.1177/030573568082005
43.
ScherberR. V. (2014). Pedagogical practices related to the ability to discern and correct intonation errors: An evaluation of current practices, expectations, and a model for instruction (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global database. (UMI No. 3638073)
44.
SchlacksW. F. (1981). The effect of vocalization through an interval training program upon the pitch accuracy of high school band students (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global database. (UMI No. 8201436)
45.
SelbyC. (2017). Habits of a successful orchestra director (
RushS., Ed.). Chicago, IL: GIA Publications.
46.
SmithC. M. (1995). Development of performance pitch accuracy of string students. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 124, 13-23. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/40318702
47.
SoginD. W. (1997). An exploratory study on contingent verbal feedback for accuracy of intonation in musical performance. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 84, 217-218. doi:10.2466/pms.1997.84.1.217
48.
SpiegelM. F.WatsonC. S. (1984). Performance on frequency-discrimination tasks by musicians and nonmusicians. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 76, 1690-1695. doi:10.1121/1.391605
49.
WatkinsC. (2004). Advanced intonation skills: Helping students understand what they hear. American String Teacher, 54, 86-90. doi:10.1177/000313130405400110
