Choral configuration, an umbrella term that refers to acoustical placement, formation, or spacing among singers, may cause noticeable transformations to the sound of a choir and the vocal production of ensemble members. Researchers have sought to discover how and to what extent these variables affect the choral sound. The purpose of this article is to examine published research in the area of choral configuration. This article concludes with implications for how choral music educators might apply research to create an optimal configuration for their ensembles.
AspaasC.McCreaC. R.MorrisR. J.FowlerL. (2004). Select acoustic and perceptual measures of choral formation. International Journal of Research in Choral Singing, 2(1), 11–26.
3.
AtkinsonD. S. (2010). The effects of choral formation on the singing voice. Choral Journal, 50(8), 24–33.
4.
BonshorM. J. (2017). Confidence and choral configuration: The affective impact of situational and acoustic factors in amateur choirs. Psychology of Music, 45, 628–644. doi:10.1177/030573561669996
5.
BrinsonB. A. (1996). Choral music methods and materials. New York, NY: Schirmer Books.
6.
BrinsonB. A.DemorestS. M. (2014). Choral music methods and materials. Belmont, CA: Schirmer Books.
7.
CollinsD. L. (1999). Teaching choral music (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
8.
DaughertyJ. F. (1999). Spacing, formation, and choral sound: Preferences and perceptions of auditors and choristers. Journal of Research in Music Education, 47, 224–238. doi:10.2307/3345781
9.
DaughertyJ. F. (2003). Choir spacing and formation: Choral sound preferences in random, synergistic, and gender-specific chamber choir placements. International Journal of Research in Choral Singing, 1(1), 48–59.
10.
DaughertyJ. F.ManternachJ. N.BrunkanM. C. (2012). Acoustic and perceptual measures of SATB choir performances on two types of portable choral riser units in three singer-spacing conditions. International Journal of Music Education, 31, 359–375. doi:10.1177/0255761411434499
11.
DeckerH. A.HerfordJ. (Eds.). (1973). Choral conducting: A symposium. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
12.
EkholmE. (2000). The effect of singing mode and seating arrangement on choral blend and overall sound. Journal of Research in Music Education, 48, 123–135. doi:10.2307/3345571
13.
FolgerW. M. (2002). Unifying the choral sound through voice matching: An empirical study of the adjustments in vibrato frequency modulation and amplitude modulation (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3049163)
14.
FreerP. K. (2015). Perspectives of European boys about their voice change and school choral singing: Developing the possible selves of adolescent male singers. British Journal of Music Education, 32(1), 87–106. doi:10.1017/S026505171400031X
15.
GiardineireD. C. (1991). Voice matching: A perceptual study of vocal matches, effect on choral sound, and procedures of inquiry conducted by Weston Noble (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). New York University, New York.
16.
KillianJ. N.BasingerL. (2007). Perception of choral blend among choral, instrumental, and nonmusic majors using the continuous response digital interface. Journal of Research in Music Education, 55, 313–325. doi:10.1177/0022429408317373
17.
LambsonA. R. (1961). An evaluation of various seating plans used in choral singing. Journal of Research in Music Education, 9, 47–54. doi:10.2307/3344394
PhillipsK. H. (2016). Directing the choral music program (2nd ed.). Oxford, England: Oxford University.
20.
RoeP. F. (1983). Choral music education (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
21.
SmithB.SataloffR. T. (2013). Choral pedagogy (3rd ed.). San Diego, CA: Plural.
22.
TernströmS. (1999). Preferred self-to-other ratios in choir singing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 105, 3563–3574. doi:10.1121/1.424680
23.
TernströmS. (2003). Choir acoustics: An overview of scientific research published to date. International Journal of Research in Choral Singing, 1(1), 3–12.
24.
TocheffR. D. (1990). Acoustical placement of voices in choral formations (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 9111807)
25.
TonkinsonS. (1994). The Lombard effect in choral singing. Journal of Voice, 8(1), 24–29. doi:10.1016/s0892-1997(05)80316–9
WebbG. B. (Ed.). (1993). Up front! Becoming the complete choral conductor. Boston, MA: E. C. Schirmer Music.
28.
WoodruffN. W. (2002). The acoustic interaction of voices in ensemble: An inquiry into the phenomenon of voice matching and the perception of unaltered vocal process (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3075332)
