The purpose of this study was to validate previous research that suggests using movement in conjunction with singing tasks can affect intonation and perception of the task. Singers (N = 49) were video and audio recorded, using a motion capture system, while singing a phrase from a familiar song, first with no motion, and then while doing a low, circular arm gesture. Analysis of relationships between a circular singer arm gesture and changes in intonation indicated most singers (67.3%, n = 33) were closer to the target pitch when doing the low, circular gesture. Additionally, significant correlations were found between motion of the hand and face. Participant perceptions of singing with motion included “fuller tone” and “more breath” with the lower motion and singing without motion viewed as “easy” and “comfortable.” Results of this study suggest that singing with motion can affect intonation, other bodily movements, and perception of singing.
BoersmaP.WeeninkD. (2014). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.4) [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://www.praat.org/
2.
BrunkanM. C. (2013). The effects of watching three types of conductor gestures and performing varied gestures along with the conductor on measures of singers’ intonation and tone quality: A pilot study. International Journal of Research in Choral Singing, 4(2), 36–51.
3.
CraneE. A. (2009). Measures of emotion: How feelings are expressed in the body and face during walking (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (ATT No. 3382058)
4.
DarbyJ.LiB.CostenN. (2010). Tracking human pose with multiple activity models. Pattern Recognition, 43, 3042–3058.
5.
DariushB. (2003). Human motion analysis for biomechanics and biomedicine. Machine Vision and Applications, 14, 202–205.
6.
EichenbergerR.ThomasA. (1994). What they see is what you get: Linking the visual, the aural, and the kinetic to promote artistic choral singing [Videotape]. Chapel Hill, NC: Hinshaw Music.
7.
ElKouraG. (2003). Animating the human hand (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (ATT No. MQ78129)
8.
ElliottD. (2005). Praxial music education reflections and dialogues. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
9.
HuangP.HiltonA.StarckJ. (2010). Shape similarity for 3D video sequences of people. International Journal of Computer Vision, 89, 362–381.
10.
JiangJ.AlwanA.KeatingP. (2000). On the correlation between orofacial movements, tongue movements, and speech acoustics. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107, 2904–2904.
11.
JiangJ.AlwanA.KeatingP. A.AuerE. T.Jr.BernsteinL. E. (2002). On the relationship between face movements, tongue movements, and speech acoustics. EURASIP Journal on Applied Signal Processing, 11, 1174–1188.
12.
KawakamiH.MitoY.WatanumaR. (2008). Analysis of drum player’s motion. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 123, 3799–3799.
13.
KrauseD. W. (1983). The positive use of conducting stance and motion to affect vocal production and to assist musicality in the training of children’s choirs (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (AAT No. 0552760)
14.
KunJ. (2004). A real-time responsive/interactive system for musical conducting using motion capture technology (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (ATT No. 3135261)
15.
LinklaterK. (1976). Freeing the natural voice. New York, NY: Drama Book.
16.
LivingstoneS. R.ThompsonW. F.RussoF. A. (2009). Facial expression and emotional singing: A study of perception and production with motion capture and electromyography. Music Perception, 26, 475–488.
17.
ManternachJ. M. (2012). The effect of nonverbal conductor lip rounding and eyebrow lifting on singers’ lip and eyebrow postures: A motion capture study. International Journal of Research in Choral Singing, 4(1), 36–46.
18.
NairS. P.GibbsS.ArnoldG.AbboudR.WangW. (2010). A method to calculate the centre of the ankle joint. Clinical Biomechanics, 2, 582–587.
19.
NortonJ. C. (2008). Motion capture to build a foundation for a computer-controlled instrument by study of classical guitar performance (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (ATT No. 3332997)
PierceA. (2007). Deepening musical performance through movement. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
24.
RacicV.BrownjohnJ. M. W.PavicA. (2010). Reproduction and application of human bouncing and jumping forces from visual marker data. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 329, 3397–3416.
25.
SamaanM. (2009). Development of a three dimensional kinematic model of lip and jaw coordination during speech (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (ATT No. 1472919)
26.
SchoonderwaldtE. (2009). The player and the bowed string: Coordination of bowing parameters in violin and viola performance. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 126, 2709–2720.
27.
StevensJ. P. (2009). Multivariate statistics for the social sciences. New York, NY: Routledge.
28.
SukH.SinB.LeeS. (2010). Hand gesture recognition based on dynamic Bayesian network framework. Pattern Recognition, 43, 3059–3072.
29.
ThurmanL.WelchG. (2000). Forewords to this book: Sunsets, elephants, vocal self- expression, and life-long learning. In ThurmanL.WelchG. (Eds.), Bodymind and voice: Foundations of voice education (pp. xi-xxiv). Collegeville, MN: VoiceCare Network, National Center for Voice and Speech, Fairview Voice Center.
30.
ToiviainenP. (2008). Kinematics and kinetics of music-induced movement. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 124, 2447.
31.
WisR. M. (1993). Gesture and body movement as physical metaphor to facilitate learning and to enhance musical experience in the choral rehearsal (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (AAT No. 9327319)
32.
YehiaH.KuratateT.Varikiotis-BatesonE. (2002). Linking facial animation, head motion and speech acoustics. Journal of Phonetics, 30, 555–568.
