MehrleKG. Do we really need technicians?NARD J1980; 102: 29.
2.
Proceedings of an invitational conference. Directions for clinical practice in pharmacy. Am J Hosp Pharm1985; 42: 1287–342.
3.
ASHP Task Force on Technical Personnel in Pharmacy. Toward a well-defined category of technical personnel in pharmacy. Am J Hosp Pharm1987; 44: 2560–5.
4.
PhillipsCSRyanMRRobertsKB. Current and future delegation of pharmacy activities to technicians in Tennessee. Am J Hosp Pharm1988; 45: 577–83.
5.
Proceedings of an invitational conference conducted by the University of Maryland Center on Drugs and Public Policy. Technical personnel in pharmacy: Directions for the profession in society. Am J Hosp Pharm1989; 46: 491–557.
6.
Report of the task force on the roles of the practitioner and the subprofessional in pharmacy. J Am Pharm Assoc1969; NS9: 415–23.
7.
BeahmMR. A survey of opinion and law regarding the use of nonlicensed personnel in pharmacy. Am J Hosp Pharm1970; 27: 713–35.
8.
BaldwinHJMcMahonJL. The use of nonprofessional personnel in the dispensing process. J Am Pharm Assoc1972; NS12: 60–1, 73.
9.
DahlinPA. Views of pharmacy supportive personnel in Florida. Drug Intell Clin Pharm1983; 17: 576–9.
10.
HoganGF. ASHP survey of use of pharmacy technicians—1985. Am J Hosp Pharm1985; 42: 2720–1.