Impact of a Co-curricular Poverty Simulation on Pharmacy Students’ Socioeconomic and Patient Advocacy Attitudes and Beliefs

Abstract

Background: Pharmacists are well-positioned to assist patients facing poverty with financial and well-being resource navigation. Pharmacy educators must find avenues for students that foster awareness of applicable challenges encountered by economically disadvantaged patients. Objective: This study examines the impact of a poverty simulation on pharmacy students’ socioeconomic and patient advocacy attitudes and beliefs. Methods: Third year professional pharmacy students participated in the Community Action Poverty Simulation (CAPS). Students were asked to voluntarily complete a survey prior to and following their participation. The survey was based upon a combination of 3 previously validated survey tools: Attitudes Toward Poverty (ATP) scale, Medical Student Attitudes Toward the Underserved (MSATU), and the Locus of Control Scale (LCS). Students also responded to open-ended questions postsimulation. Results: Forty of the 74 students completed both the presimulation and postsimulation surveys. Significant changes were seen in a matched sample analysis for 17 of 49 survey questions. Prominent differences (decreasing agreement) came from the statements: “An able-bodied person collecting welfare is ripping off the system” and “Welfare makes people lazy”; and increasing agreement that “I feel personally responsible for providing medical care to the needy.” Open-ended survey responses reflected a greater understanding of time and effort needed to locate and navigate available resources, and challenges such as adhering to medication regimens due to inability to pay. Conclusion: A poverty simulation, such as CAPS, is an effective method to encourage pharmacy students to reflect on their future impact toward patients facing the challenges of poverty. The shift in students’ attitudes and beliefs on various measures revealed that the simulation had an impact on altering perceptions for those with low socioeconomic status.

Keywords

simulation poverty patient advocacy socioeconomic awareness population health

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Grover

. What a $400 emergency expense tells us about the economy. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. Published June 11, 2021. Accessed February 15, 2023. https://www.minneapolisfed.org/article/2021/what-a-400-dollar-emergency-expense-tells-us-about-the-economy

Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Education. Financial condition and health care burdens of people in deep poverty. Published July 15, 2015. Accessed February 15, 2023. https://aspe.hhs.gov/reports/financial-condition-health-care-burdens-people-deep-poverty-0

American Family Physician. Poverty and health—the family medicine perspective. Date unknown. Accessed February 15, 2023. https://www.aafp.org/about/policies/all/poverty-health.html

Missouri Community Action Network. The community action poverty simulation. Date unknown. Accessed February 15, 2023. https://www.povertysimulation.net

Clarke

Sedlacek

Watson

SB.

Impact of a simulation exercise on pharmacy student attitude toward poverty. Am J Pharm Educ. 2016;80(2):21. doi:10.5688/ajpe80221

Hartman

Kidd

Resler

Lax

GA.

An authentic poverty simulation for health care profession students using community volunteers experiencing poverty. Nurse Educ. 2019;45(2):93-96. doi:10.1097/nne.0000000000000679

Turk

Colbert

AM.

Using simulation to help beginning nursing students learn about the experience of poverty: a descriptive study. Nurse Educ Today. 2018;71:174-179. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2018.09.035

Crandall

Davis

Broeseker

Hildebrandt

A longitudinal comparison of pharmacy and medical students’ attitudes toward the medically underserved. Am J Pharm Educ. 2008;72(6):148. Accessed February 15, 2023. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2661153/

Stephenson-Hunter

. Locus of Control, Poverty and Health Promoting Lifestyles [Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies]. 2018. Accessed February 15, 2023. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/4816

10.

Rotter

JB.

Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychol Monogr. 1966;80(1): 1-28. doi:10.1037/h0092976

11.

Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education. Accreditation standards and key elements for the professional program in pharmacy leading to the doctor of pharmacy degree. Published February 2, 2015. Accessed February 15, 2023. https://www.acpe-accredit.org/pdf/Standards2016FINAL.pdf

12.

Abes

Jones

McEwen

MK.

Reconceptualizing the model of multiple dimensions of identity: the role of meaning-making capacity in the construction of multiple identities. J Col Stud Dev. 2007;48(1):1-22. doi:10.1353/csd.2007.0000

13.

Yun

Weaver

RD.

Development and validation of a short form of the attitude toward poverty scale. Adv Soc Work. 2010;11(2):174-187. doi:10.18060/437

14.

Crandall

SJS

Volk

Loemker

. Medical students’ attitudes toward providing care for the underserved: are we training socially responsible physicians? JAMA. 1993;269(19):2519-2523. Accessed February 15, 2023. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/406119

15.

Faul

Erdfelder

Lang

Buchner

G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39(2):175-191. Accessed February 15, 2023. https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/BF03193146

16.

Tavakol

Dennick

Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. Int J Med Educ. 2011;2:53-55. Accessed February 15, 2023. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4205511/

17.

McKinney Ventures and Urban Ministries of Durham. SPENT. Accessed February 15, 2023. https://www.playspent.org