Following multiple high-profile reports of news organizations releasing AI-generated news stories, this study reports on an audience survey that assessed whether news consumers trusted the news generated by AI and thought it was credible. Two types of news quality were assessed—that of thorough and accurate reporting in an AI-generated news story, as well as the overall availability of a diverse set of news opinions or perspectives. This study found that higher consumption of news and encountering AI-generated news corresponded with belief in better news stories but less diverse news as a result of AI. Thus, human-generated news was trusted and appeared more credible, the more people were concerned with the availability of diverse news in an AI-generated news context.
AbouarqoubM. (2024). Diffusion of innovations in Arab newsrooms: Opportunities and obstacles of adopting generative AI to enhance digital storytelling. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.
3.
AllenD. S. (2008). The Trouble with transparency: The challenge of doing journalism ethics in a surveillance society. Journalism Studies (London, England), 9(3), 323–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700801997224
4.
BakshyE.MessingS.AdamicL. A. (2015). Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science, 348(6239), 1130–1132. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1160
5.
BartneckC.YogeeswaranK.SibleyC. G. (2024). Personality and demographic correlates of support for regulating artificial intelligence. AI Ethics, 4, 419–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-023-00279-4
6.
BodóB.HelbergerN.EskensS.MöllerJ. (2019). Interested in diversity: The role of user attitudes, algorithmic feedback loops, and policy in news personalization. Digital Journalism, 7(2), 206–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2018.1521292
7.
BroussardM.DiakopoulosN.GuzmanA. L.AbebeR.DupagneM.ChuanC.-H. (2019). Artificial intelligence and journalism. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 96(3), 673–695. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699019859901
8.
DeuzeM. (2005). What is journalism?: Professional identity and ideology of journalists reconsidered. Journalism (London, England), 6(4), 442–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884905056815
9.
DeuzeM.BeckettC. (2022). Imagination, algorithms and news: Developing AI literacy for journalism. Digital Journalism, 10(10), 1913–1918. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2119152
FletcherR.NielsenR. K. (2017). Are news audiences increasingly fragmented? A cross-national comparative analysis of cross-platform news audience fragmentation and duplication. Journal of Communication, 67(4), 476–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12315
GnambsT.SteinJ.ZinnS.GrieseF.AppelM. (2025). Attitudes, experiences, and usage intentions of Artificial Intelligence: A population study in Germany. Telematics & Informatics, 98, Article 102265. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/6u49f
16.
GraefeA.HaimM.HaarmannB.BrosiusH.-B. (2018). Readers’ perception of computer-generated news: Credibility, expertise, and readability. Journalism (London, England), 19(5), 595–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884916641269
17.
GuzmanA. L. (Ed.). (2018). Human-machine communication: Rethinking communication, technology, and ourselves. Peter Lang.
18.
GyldenstedC. (2015). From mirrors to movers: five elements of positive psychology in constructive journalism (1st edition.). Ggroup Publishing.
19.
HartW.AlbarracínD.EaglyA. H.BrechanI.LindbergM. J.MerrillL. (2009). Feeling validated versus being correct: A meta-analysis of selective exposure to information. Psychological Bulletin, 135(4), 555–588. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015701
IyengarS.WestwoodS. J. (2015). Fear and loathing across party lines: New evidence on group polarization. American Journal of Political Science, 59(3), 690–707. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12152
22.
JiangL.HanE. H. (2019, March). Modbot: automatic Comments moderation [Paper Presentation]. Computation + journalism symposium, Miami, FL, United Staes.
23.
JonesB.JonesR.LugerE. (2022). AI “everywhere and nowhere”: Addressing the AI intelligibility problem in public service journalism. Digital Journalism, 10(10), 1731–1755. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2145328
24.
KarlssonM. (2010). Rituals of transparency: Evaluating online news outlets’ uses of transparency rituals in the United States, United Kingdom and Sweden. Journalism Studies (London, England), 11(4), 535–545. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616701003638400
25.
KimS. (2025). Perceptions of discriminatory decisions of artificial intelligence: Unpacking the role of individual characteristics. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 194, Article 103387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2024.103387
KruikemeierS.LechelerS. (2018). News consumer perceptions of new journalistic sourcing techniques. Journalism Studies (London, England), 19(5), 632–649. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2016.1192956
28.
LasorsaD. (2012). Transparency and other journalistic norms on twitter: The role of gender. Journalism Studies (London, England), 13(3), 402–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2012.657909
29.
MessingS.WestwoodS. J. (2014). Selective exposure in the age of social media: Endorsements trump partisan source affiliation when selecting news online. Communication Research, 41(8), 1042–1063. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650212466406
30.
McIntyreK.SobelM. (2018). Reconstructing Rwanda: How Rwandan reporters use constructive journalism to promote peace. Journalism Studies (London, England), 19(14), 2126–2147. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2017.1326834
31.
McBrideK. B.RosenstielT. B. (2013). The new ethics of journalism: principles for the 21st century (First Edition).CQ Press. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071934098
32.
MolyneuxL.CoddingtonM. (2020). Aggregation, clickbait and their effect on perceptions of journalistic credibility and quality. Journalism Practice, 14(4), 429–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2019.1628658
OpdahlA. L.TessemB.Dang-NguyenD.-T.MottaE.SettyV.ThrondsenE.TverbergA.TrattnerC. (2023). Trustworthy journalism through AI. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 146, Article 102182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.datak.2023.102182
35.
PlaisanceP. L. (2007). Transparency: An assessment of the kantian roots of a key element in media ethics practice. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 22(2–3), 187–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/08900520701315855
36.
PorlezzaC. (2023). Promoting responsible AI: A European perspective on the governance of artificial intelligence in media and journalism. Communications, 48(3), 370–394. https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2022-0091
37.
SaeedF. (2022). Filter bubble and fake news: Facebook and journalist ethics. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 6(10), 59–65. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2022.61004
38.
SiebertF.FredrickS.PetersonT.SchrammW. L. (1956). Four theories of the press: the authoritarian, libertarian, social responsibility, and Soviet Communist concepts of what the press should be and do. University of Illinois Press
39.
SingerJ. B. (2007). Contested autonomy: Professional and popular claims on journalistic norms. Journalism Studies (London, England), 8(1), 79–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700601056866
Túñez-LópezJ. M.CeideC. F.Vaz-ÁlvarezM. (2021). Impact of artificial intelligence on journalism: transformations in the company, products, contents and professional profile. Communication & Society, 34(1), 177–193. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.34.1.177-193
42.
UzoechiN. (2014). “Oil complex” and social responsibility theory of the media: Shaping Nigeria’s environmental discourse with social media. The International Journal of Technology Management & Sustainable Development, 13(2), 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1386/tmsd.13.2.117_1
43.
VosT. P.CraftS. (2017). The discursive construction of journalistic transparency. Journalism Studies (London, England), 18(12), 1505–1522. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2015.1135754
WardS. J. A. (2015). The magical concept of transparency. In ZionL.CragiD. (Eds.), Ethics for digital journalists (1st ed., pp. 45–58). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203702567-4
46.
ZhangW.Pérez TorneroJ. M. (2023). Introduction to AI journalism: Framework and ontology of the trans-domain field for integrating AI into journalism. Journal of Applied Journalism & Media Studies, 12(3), 333–353. https://doi.org/10.1386/ajms_00063_1
