Abstract
In this response to Van de Peer and Laermans's sociology of fashion dialogue opener, I will both respond to their call for including new areas of inspection within fashion scholarship, and argue that by including a meaningful focus on processes, not just systems, fashion scholarship can gain in historical and contemporary depth. In my brief empirical case studies, I consider the complex fashionabilities of Port wine in the eighteenth century, champagne in the nineteenth century, and rosé wine in the early twenty-first century. Through these cases, I seek to stress that fashion sociology must keep also history within its analytical reach, in order for meaningful and comprehensive theoretical understanding of fashion to develop further.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
