Fashion is often linked to fleeting trends and seasonal clothing changes, leading to its dismissal as socially insignificant. However, we argue that sociology must recognize the ‘in/out' difference as a key temporal dynamic shaping the functioning of various societal subsystems. We illustrate fashion's influence in three areas: the social sciences and humanities, the visual arts, and the clothing economy, emphasizing its varying degrees of impact. To clarify these differences and the broader logic of fashion, we draw on Niklas Luhmann's social systems theory, where fashion operates as performative semantics in science, a secondary code in the arts, and a conditioning second code in the clothing industry. We also incorporate Pierre Bourdieu's field theory to analyze further fashion's role across domains and to offer small-scale empirical case studies of the functioning of the temporal logic of fashion in every subsystem. Our approach proposes a transversal yet open theory of fashion – anchored in social systems theory while fostering interdisciplinary connections. Additionally, we argue that fashion has gained increasing influence in several societal subsystems in recent decades. In hypermodernity, this intensification of ‘fashionability' – a heightened focus on the present through the in/out distinction – coexists with a countertrend of canonization, in which theories and artistic movements are ‘detemporalized' to attain lasting significance.
AspersPGodartF (2013) Sociology of fashion: Order and change. Annual Review of Sociology39: 171–192.
3.
BaraldiCCorsiG (2017) Niklas Luhmann: Education as a Social System. Cham: Springer.
4.
BaudelaireC (1964) The Painter of Modern Life and Other Essays (J. Mayne, Trans. & Ed). London: Phaidon Press.
5.
BaudrillardJ (1993) Symbolic Exchange and Death. London: Sage.
6.
BlumerH (1969) Fashion: From class differentiation to collective selection. Sociological Quarterly10: 275–291.
7.
BourdieuP (1975) The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason. Social Science Information14(6): 5–18.
8.
BourdieuP (1983) Haute Couture et Haute Culture. In: BourdieuP (ed) Questions de Sociologie. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit, 196–206.
9.
BourdieuP (1984) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
10.
BourdieuP (1996) The Rules of Art: Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
11.
BourdieuPDelsautY (1975) Le couturier et sa griffe: Contribution à une théorie de la magie. Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales1(1): 7–36.
12.
BransL (2024) Fashioning ideology, ideologizing fashion: How the climate crisis transforms the cultural field of fashion. PhD Thesis, Leuven University.
13.
BrewardC (1995) The Culture of Fashion: A New History of Fashionable Dress. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
14.
CortoisLLaermansR (2017) The basic script and the three variants of institutionalized individualism. European Journal of Social Theory21(1): 60–78.
15.
CraneD (2000) Fashion and Its Social Agendas: Class, Gender and Identity in Clothing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16.
CussetF (2008) French theory: How Foucault, Derrida, Deleuze, & Co. transformed the intellectual life of the United States. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
17.
EisenmanSF, Crow T, Lukacher B, et al. (eds) (1994) Nineteenth Century Art: A Critical History. London: Thames & Hudson.
18.
EntwistleJ (2002) The aesthetic economy: The production of value in the field of fashion modelling. Journal of Consumer Culture2(3): 317–339.
19.
EspositoE (2004) Die Verbindlichkeit des Vorübergehenden: Paradoxien der Mode. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
20.
EspositoE (2011) Originality through imitation: The rationality of fashion. Organization Studies32(5): 603–613.
21.
FillipelloRParkinsI (eds) (forthcoming) Fashion and Feeling: The Affective Politics of Dress. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
22.
FletcherKThamM (2019) Earth Logic: Fashion Action Research Plan. London: The JJ Charitable Trust.
23.
FosterH, Krauss Epstein R, Bois Y-A, et al. (2004) Art Since 1900: Modernism, Antimodernism, Postmodernism. London: Thames & Hudson.
24.
FranckG (1998) Ökonomie der Aufmerksamkeit. Ein Entwurf. Munich: Carl Hanser.
FurediF (2004) Therapy Culture: Cultivating Vulnerability in an Uncertain Age. London and New York: Routledge.
27.
GaneM (2003) French Social Theory. London: Sage.
28.
HartogF (2015) Regimes of Historicity: Presentism and Experiences of Time. New York: Columbia University Press.
29.
HarveyD (1989) The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. London: Blackwell.
30.
HarveyD (1989) The condition of postmodernity: An enquiry into the origins of cultural change. London: Blackwell.
31.
HeinichN (1998) Ce que l’art fait à la sociologie. Paris: Minuit.
32.
HeinichN (2014) Le paradigme de l’art contemporain. Structures d’une récolution artistique. Paris: Gallimard.
33.
IsraelM (2023) A Year in the Art World: An Insider's View. London: Thames & Hudson.
34.
JamesonF (1991) Postmodernism, or, the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Durham: Duke University Press.
35.
KawamuraY (2005) Fashion-ology: An Introduction to Fashion Studies. Oxford: Berg.
36.
KornbluhA (2023) Immediacy or, the Style of Too Late Capitalism. London: Verso.
37.
KuipersG (2022) Sociologische mode/modieuze sociologie. In: Fadil N, Gielen P,Verschraegen, G (eds) RL in 51.826 Woorden. Leuven: Faculty of Social Sciences, 52–53.
38.
KuipersGBransLCarboneL (2023) The myth of trickle-down: How fashions do (not) spread in European fashion magazines, and what this tells us about power and status in the global fashion system. In: AlmilaA-MSerkanD (eds) Fashion’s Transnational Inequalities. London: pp.114–140.
39.
LaermansR (2011) The attention regime: On mass media and the information society. In: SchinkelWNoordegraaf-EelensL (eds) In media res: Peter Sloterdijk’s Sphereological Poetics of Being. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp.115–132.
40.
LaermansR (2012) De waarden van de kunst. In: GlorieuxJSiongersJSmitsW (eds) Cultuursociologie buiten de lijnen. Tielt: LannooCampus, 327–345.
41.
LaermansR (2015) Moving Together. Theorizing and Making Contemporary Dance. Amsterdam: Valiz.
42.
LaermansR (2016) Systems theory and culture: Drawing lessons from parsons and Luhmann. In: InglisDAlmilaA-M (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Cultural Sociology. Los Angeles: Sage, pp. 178–192.
43.
LakatosI (1980) The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44.
LamontM (1987) How to become a dominant French philosopher: The case of Jacques Derrida. American Journal of Sociology93(3): 584–622.
45.
LehmannU (2000) Tigersprung: Fashion and Modernity. Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
46.
LiebersonS (2000) A Matter of Taste: How Names, Fashions, and Culture Change. New Haven: Yale University Press.
47.
LipovetskyG (1994) The Empire of Fashion: Dressing Modern Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
48.
LoschekI (2009) When Clothes Become Fashion: Design and Innovation Systems. Oxford: Berg.
49.
LotringerSCohenS (eds) (2001) French Theory in America. London: Routledge.
50.
LuhmannN (1984) Udo H.A. Schwarz, Das Modische. Soziologische Revue7: 73–74.
51.
LuhmannN (1990) The work of art and the self-reproduction of art. In: LuhmannN (eds) Essays on Self-Reference. New York: Columbia University Press, pp.191–214.
52.
LuhmannN (1992) Die Wissenschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
53.
LuhmannN (1994) Die Wirtschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
54.
LuhmannN (1995) Social Systems. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
55.
LuhmannN (2000a) Art as a Social System. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
56.
LuhmannN (2000b) The Reality of the Mass Media. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
57.
LuhmannN (2002) Das Erziehungssytem der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
58.
LuhmannN (2012) Theory of Society. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press (2 vols.).
59.
LyotardJ-F (1984) The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
60.
MalpasSWakeP (eds) (n.d.) The Routledge Companion to Critical and Cultural Theory. London: Routledge.
61.
MillerDWoodwardS (2012) Blue Jeans: The Art of the Ordinary. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
62.
MoellerH-G (2006) Luhmann Explained: From Souls to Systems. Chicago and La Salle. IL: Open Court.
63.
MorgnerC (ed) (2022) The Making of Meaning: From the Individual to Social Order. Selections from Niklas Luhmann’s Works on Semantics and Social Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
64.
MoulinR (1992) De la valeur de l’art. Paris: Flammarion.
65.
NassehiANollmannG (2004) Bourdieu und Luhmann: Ein Theorienvergleich. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
66.
OsborneP (1995) The Politics of Time: Modernity and Avant-garde. London: Verso.
PeaseEHustinxLVan de PeerA (2024) Second-hand clothes, first-hand mindset: A wardrobe study of higher-education student clothing practice. International Journal of Fashion Studies11(2): 269–288.
69.
PedroniM (2023) Two decades of fashion blogging and influencing: A critical overview. Fashion Theory27(2): 237–268.
70.
#RewiringFashion (2020) #RewiringFashion. Available at: https://rewiringfashion.org (accessed 3 April 2025).
71.
RocamoraA (2002) Fields of fashion: Critical insights into Bourdieu’s sociology of culture. Journal of Consumer Culture2(3): 341–362.
72.
RocamoraA (2012) Hypertextuality and remediation in the fashion media: The case of fashion blogs. Journalism Practice6(1): 92–106.
73.
SchiermerB (2010) Mode, Bewusstsein und Kommunikation. Soziale Systeme. Zeitschrift für Soziologische Theorie16(1): 121–149.
74.
SchinkelW (2010) The autopoieisis of the art world after the end of art. Cultural Sociology4(2): 267–290.
75.
SchmidtD (2007) Die Mode der Gesellschaft: Eine systemtheoretische Analyse. Baltmannsweiler: Schneider Verlag.
76.
ShnayersonM (2020) Boom: Mad Money, Mega Dealers and the Rise of Contemporary Art. New York: PublicAffairs.
77.
SimmelG (1957) Fashion. The American Journal of SociologyLXII(6): 541–558.
78.
SmelikA (2018) New materialism: A theoretical framework for fashion in the age of technological innovation. International Journal of Fashion Studies5(1): 33–54.
79.
SteeleV (1998) Fashion: A cultural history. New York: Oxford University Press.
80.
SurmaTVanheesCWilsM, et al. (2025) Developing curriculum for deep thinking: The knowledge revival. New York: Springer.
81.
Ten BosR (2000) Fashion and utopia in management thinking. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Hopkins.
82.
ThorntonS (2008) Seven Days in the Art World. New York and London: W.W. Norton & Company.
83.
TwiggJ (2013) Fashion and Age: Dress, the Body and Later Life. London: Bloomsbury.
84.
UrbanHB (2015) New Age, Neopagan, and new religious movements: Alternative spirituality in contemporary America. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
85.
Van de PeerA (2014a) So last season: The production of the fashion present in the politics of time. Fashion Theory18(3): 317–340.
86.
Van de PeerA (2014b) Re-artification in a world of de-artification: Materiality and intellectualisation in fashion media discourse (1949–2010). Cultural Sociology8(4): 443–461.
87.
Van de PeerA (2015) Ghostbusting fashion: Symbolic boundaries and the politics of time in fashion journalism. International Journal of Cultural Studies18(6): 1–17.
88.
Van de PeerA (2016) Niklas luhmann: Fashion between the fashionable and old-fashioned. In: RocamoraASmelikA (eds) Thinking Through Fashion: A Guide to key Theorists. London: I.B. Tauris, pp. 200–214.
89.
Van de PeerA (in press) Beauty and fashion. In: SarpilaOKuipersG (eds) Handbook of Beauty and Inequality. London: Springer.
90.
VeblenT (1899) The Theory of the Leisure Class. New York: A.M. Kelley.
91.
VinkenB (2005) Fashion Zeitgeist: Trends and Cycles in the Fashion System. London: Berg.
92.
WeimerM (2002) Learner-centered Teaching: Five Key Changes to Practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
93.
WilfE (2019) Creativity on Demand: The Dilemmas of Innovation in an Accelerated Age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
94.
XuYChenYBurmanR, et al. (2014) Secondhand clothing consumption: A cross-cultural comparison between American and Chinese young consumers. International Journal of Consumer Studies38(6): 670–677.
95.
ZarganiL (2020) Giorgio Armani writes open letter to WWD. WWD, 3 April. Available at: https://wwd.com (accessed 2 May 2025).
