Governing AI (also) means governing markets,institutions and people

Abstract

This short paper is a response to commentaries on the Global Data Justice project's paper, Governing AI means governing data. These commentaries discuss the claim that data governance is still relevant for thinking about a more just technology landscape. Our response considers whether the ‘AI wars’ make data governance obsolete, and what arguments there are for contesting its capture and its current limitations.

Keywords

AI data governance data justice transnational governance neoliberalism

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

de Souza

Taylor

(2025) Rebooting the global consensus: Norm entrepreneurship, data governance and the inalienability of digital bodies. Big Data & Society 12(2).

de Souza

Smith

Taylor

(2024) Decolonial data law and governance. Technology and Regulation 2024: 1–11.

Dencik

(2025) What role can governance play in data justice? Reflections on the current AI moment. Dialogues on Digital Society.

EFF . (2025) Stopping States From Passing AI Laws for the Next Decade Is a Terrible Idea. Electronic Frontier Foundation. Available at: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2025/05/stopping-states-passing-ai-laws-next-decade-terrible-idea (accessed 10 July 2025)

Forum Standardisatie . (2024) AI en Standaarden. Available at: https://ecp.nl/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/AI-en-standaarden.pdf (accessed 10 July 2025)

Hintz

(2025) Governing AI and the democratisation of governance. Dialogues on Digital Society.

Purtova

(2025) Does governing artificial intelligence mean governing data? When looking at data (governance), what do we not see? Dialogues on Digital Society.

Scassa

(2025) Laying the foundations for AI justice in uncertain times. Dialogues on Digital Society.

Weick

(1996) Drop your tools: An allegory for organizational studies. Administrative Science Quarterly 41(2): 301–313.