Results From the POINT Pragmatic Randomized Trial: An Emergency Department-Based Peer Support Specialist Intervention to Increase Opioid Use Disorder Treatment Linkage and Reduce Recurrent Overdose
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online July, 2024
Results From the POINT Pragmatic Randomized Trial: An Emergency Department-Based Peer Support Specialist Intervention to Increase Opioid Use Disorder Treatment Linkage and Reduce Recurrent Overdose
People with opioid use disorder (OUD) frequently present at the emergency department (ED), a potentially critical point for intervention and treatment linkage. Peer recovery support specialist (PRSS) interventions have expanded in US-based EDs, although evidence supporting such interventions has not been firmly established.
Methods:
Researchers conducted a pragmatic trial of POINT (Project Planned Outreach, Intervention, Naloxone, and Treatment), an ED-initiated intervention for harm reduction and recovery coaching/treatment linkage in 2 Indiana EDs. Cluster randomization allocated patients to the POINT intervention (n = 157) versus a control condition (n = 86). Participants completed a structured interview, and all outcomes were assessed using administrative data from an extensive state health exchange and state systems. Target patients (n = 243) presented to the ED for a possible opioid-related reason. The primary outcome was overdose-related ED re-presentation. Key secondary outcomes included OUD medication treatment linkage, duration of medication in days, all-cause ED re-presentation, all-cause inpatient re-presentation, and Medicaid enrollment. All outcomes were assessed at 3-, 6-, and 12-months post-enrollment. Ad hoc analyses were performed to assess treatment motivation and readiness.
Results:
POINT and standard care participants did not differ significantly on any outcomes measured. Participants who presented to the ED for overdose had significantly lower scores (3.5 vs 4.2, P < .01) regarding readiness to begin treatment compared to those presenting for other opioid-related issues.
Conclusions:
This is the first randomized trial investigating overdose outcomes for an ED peer recovery support specialist intervention. Though underpowered, results suggest no benefit of PRSS services over standard care. Given the scope of PRSS, future work in this area should assess more recovery- and harm reduction-oriented outcomes, as well as the potential benefits of integrating PRSS within multimodal ED-based interventions for OUD.
HouryDEHaegerichTMVivolo-KantorA.Opportunities for prevention and intervention of opioid overdose in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2018;71(6):688-690. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.01.052
4.
LangabeerJRStottsALBobrowBJ, et al. Prevalence and charges of opioid-related visits to U.S. emergency departments. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021;221:108568. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108568
5.
ChenYWangYNielsenSKuhnLLamT.A systematic review of opioid overdose interventions delivered within emergency departments. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020;213:108009. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108009
6.
BuschSHFiellinDAChawarskiMC, et al. Cost-effectiveness of emergency department-initiated treatment for opioid dependence. Addict Abingdon Engl. 2017;112:2002-2010. doi:10.1111/add.13900
7.
D’OnofrioGO’ConnorPGPantalonMV, et al. Emergency department-initiated buprenorphine/naloxone treatment for opioid dependence: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;313(16):1636-1644. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.3474
8.
HawkKMcCormackREdelmanEJ, et al. Perspectives about emergency department care encounters among adults with opioid use disorder. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(1):e2144955. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.44955
9.
BeaudoinFLJackaBPLiY, et al. Effect of a peer-led behavioral intervention for emergency department patients at high risk of fatal opioid overdose: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(8):e2225582. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.25582
10.
WatsonDPWeathersTMcGuireA, et al. Evaluation of an emergency department-based opioid overdose survivor intervention: Difference-in-difference analysis of electronic health record data to assess key outcomes. Drug Alcohol Depend. 221;221:108595. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108595
11.
JackHEOllerDKellyJMagidsonJFWakemanSE.Addressing substance use disorder in primary care: the role, integration, and impact of recovery coaches. Subst Abuse. 2018;39(3):307-314. doi:10.1080/29767342.2017.1389802
12.
ReifSBraudeLLymanDR, et al. Peer recovery support for individuals with substance use disorders: assessing the evidence. Psychiatr Serv Wash DC. 2014;65(7):853-861. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.201400047
BardwellGKerrTBoydJMcNeilR.Characterizing peer roles in an overdose crisis: preferences for peer workers in overdose response programs in emergency shelters. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018;190:6-8. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.05.023
15.
Faulkner-GursteinR.The social logic of naloxone: peer administration, harm reduction, and the transformation of social policy. Soc Sci Med. 2017;180:20-27. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.03.013
16.
PowellKGTreitlerPPetersonNABorysSHallcomD.Promoting opioid overdose prevention and recovery: an exploratory study of an innovative intervention model to address opioid abuse. Int J Drug Policy. 2019;64:21-29. doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.12.004
17.
WagnerKDOmanRFSmithKP, et al. “Another tool for the tool box? I’ll take it!”: feasibility and acceptability of mobile recovery outreach teams (MROT) for opioid overdose patients in the emergency room. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2019;108:95-103. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2019.04.011
18.
ImDDCharyACondellaAL, et al. Emergency department clinicians’ attitudes toward opioid use disorder and emergency department-initiated buprenorphine treatment: a mixed-methods study. West J Emerg Med. 2020;21(2):261-271. doi:10.5811/westjem.2019.11.44382
19.
LowensteinMKilaruAPerroneJ, et al. Barriers and facilitators for emergency department initiation of buprenorphine: a physician survey. Am J Emerg Med. 2019;37(9):1787-1790. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2019.02.025
20.
WatsonDPStatonMDGastalaN.Identifying unique barriers to implementing rural emergency department-based peer services for opioid use disorder through qualitative comparison with urban sites. Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2022;17(1):41. doi:10.1186/s13722-022-00324-3
21.
WatsonDPPhalenPMedcalfSMessmerSMcGuireA.Evaluation of post-discharge engagement for emergency department patients with opioid use history who received telehealth recovery coaching services. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2023;18(1):9. doi:10.1186/s13011-023-00523-4
22.
RamdinCGuoMFabricantSSantosCNelsonL.The impact of a peer-navigator program on naloxone distribution and buprenorphine utilization in the emergency department. Subst Use Misuse. 2021;57(4):581-587. doi:10.1080/10826084.2021.2023187
23.
SamuelsEABernsteinSLMarshallBDLKriegerMBairdJMelloMJ.Peer navigation and take-home naloxone for opioid overdose emergency department patients: preliminary patient outcomes. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2018;94:29-34. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2018.07.013
24.
StatonMDWatsonDPThorpeD.Implementation of peer recovery coach services for opioid overdose patients in emergency departments in Indiana: findings from an informal learning collaborative of stakeholders. Transl Behav Med. 2021;11:1803-1813. doi:10.1093/tbm/ibab031
25.
WatsonDPBruckerKMcGuireA, et al. Replication of an emergency department-based recovery coaching intervention and pilot testing of pragmatic trial protocols within the context of Indiana’s Opioid State Targeted Response plan. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2020;108:88-94. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2019.06.002
26.
FordINorrieJ.Pragmatic trials. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(5):454-463. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1510059
27.
WatsonDPAndraka-ChristouBClarkeTWiegandtJ.Introduction to the special issue on innovative interventions and approaches to expand medication assisted treatment: seizing research opportunities made available by the opioid STR program. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2019;108:1-3. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2019.10.004
28.
ICAADA. CAPRC I certification, certified peer addiction recovery coach I. 2018. Accessed December 31, 2018. https://icaada.org/CAPRC-I.php
BonellCFletcherAMortonMLorencTMooreL.Realist randomised controlled trials: a new approach to evaluating complex public health interventions. Soc Sci Med. 2012;75(12):2299-2306. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.08.032
32.
PlaisancePLurieKGVicautE, et al. A comparison of standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation and active compression–decompression resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(8):569-575. doi:10.1056/NEJM199908193410804
33.
LeonGDMelnickGKresselDJainchillN.Circumstances, motivation, readiness, and suitability (the CMRS Scales): predicting retention in therapeutic community treatment. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1994;20(4):495-515. doi:10.3109/00952999409109186
34.
SamuelsE.Emergency department naloxone distribution: a Rhode Island department of health, recovery community, and emergency department partnership to reduce opioid overdose deaths. R I Med J. 2014;97(10):38-39.
35.
GrzebinskiSSteinLDhamoonMS.Characteristics and outcomes of hospitalizations and readmissions for opioid dependence and overdose: nationally representative data. Subst Abuse. 2021;42(4):654-661. doi:10.1080/29767342.2020.1823548
36.
PetersonCLiuYXuLNatarajNZhangKMikoszCA.U.S. National 90-day readmissions after opioid overdose discharge. Am J Prev Med. 2019;56(6):875-881. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2018.12.003
MorganJRBarocasJAMurphySM, et al. Comparison of rates of overdose and hospitalization after initiation of medication for opioid use disorder in the inpatient vs outpatient setting. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(12):e2029676. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.29676
39.
DirALWatsonDPZhissMTaylorLBrayBCMcGuireA. Barriers impacting the POINT pragmatic trial: the unavoidable overlap between research and intervention procedures in “real-world” research. Trials. 2021;22(1):114. doi:10.1186/s13063-021-05065-3
40.
BaborTFMcReeBGKassebaumPAGrimaldiPLAhmedKBrayJ.Screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT): toward a public health approach to the management of substance abuse. Subst Abuse. 2007;28(3):7-30. doi:10.1300/J465v28n03_03
41.
BernsteinEBernsteinJASteinJBSaitzR.SBIRT in emergency care settings: are we ready to take it to scale?Acad Emerg Med. 2009;16(11):1072-1077. doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00549.x
42.
EssienURSileanuFEZhaoX, et al. Racial/Ethnic differences in the medical treatment of opioid use disorders within the VA healthcare system following non-fatal opioid overdose. J Gen Intern Med. 2020;35(5):1537-1544. doi:10.1007/s11606-020-05645-0
43.
WagnerKDMittalMLHardingRW, et al. “It’s Gonna be a lifeline”: findings from focus group research to investigate what people who use opioids want from peer-based postoverdose interventions in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2020;76(6):717-727. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.06.003
44.
CoupetED’OnofrioGChawarskiM, et al. Emergency department patients with untreated opioid use disorder: a comparison of those seeking versus not seeking referral to substance use treatment. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021;219:108428. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108428
45.
HawkKGrauLEFiellinDA, et al. A qualitative study of emergency department patients who survived an opioid overdose: perspectives on treatment and unmet needs. Acad Emerg Med Off J Soc Acad Emerg Med. 2021;28(5):542-552. doi:10.1111/acem.14197
46.
AtaiantsJMazzellaSRothAMSellRLRobinsonLFLankenauSE.Overdose response among trained and untrained women with a history of illicit drug use: a mixed-methods examination. Drugs Abingdon Engl. 2021;28(4):328-339. doi:10.1080/09687637.2020.1818691
47.
BrayBCWatsonDPSalisbury-AfsharETaylorLMcGuireA.Patterns of opioid use behaviors among patients seen in the emergency department: latent class analysis of baseline data from the POINT pragmatic trial. J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2023;146:208979. doi:10.1016/j.josat.2023.208979
48.
CushmanPALiebschutzJMAndersonBJMoreauMRSteinMD.Buprenorphine initiation and linkage to outpatient buprenorphine do not reduce frequency of injection opiate use following hospitalization. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2016;68:68-73. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2016.06.003
49.
HawkKHoppeJKetchamE, et al. Consensus recommendations on the treatment of opioid use disorder in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2021;78:434-442. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2021.04.023
50.
HawkKD’OnofrioG.Emergency department screening and interventions for substance use disorders. Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2018;13(1):18. doi:10.1186/s13722-018-0117-1
51.
FaudeSDelgadoMKPerroneJ, et al. Variability in opioid use disorder clinical presentations and treatment in the emergency department: a mixed-methods study. Am J Emerg Med. 2023;66:53-60. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2023.01.009
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
