Risk measures are important key figures to measure the adequacy of the reserves of a company. The most common risk measures in practice are Value-at-Risk (VaR) and Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR). Recently, quantum-based algorithms are introduced to calculate them. These procedures are based on the so-called quantum amplitude estimation algorithm, which leads to a quadratic speed-up compared to classical Monte-Carlo based methods. Based on these ideas, we construct quantum-based algorithms to calculate alternatives for VaR and CVaR, namely the Expectile Value-at-Risk (EVaR) and the Range Value-at-Risk (RVaR). These algorithms are also based on quantum amplitude estimation. In two case studies, we compare their performance with the quantum-based algorithms for VaR and CVaR. We find that all of the algorithms perform sufficiently well on a quantum simulator. Further, the calculations of EVaR and VaR are robust against noise on a real quantum device. This is not the case for CVaR and RVaR.
AaronsonS.RallP. (2019). Quantum approximate counting, simplified. In Symposium on simplicity in algorithms (SOSA), proceedings (pp. 24–32). Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611976014.5
2.
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2006) International convergence of capital measurement and capital standards.
3.
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2009) Revisions to the Basel II market risk framework.
4.
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2010) Basel III: A global regulatory framework for more resilient banks and banking systems.
5.
BeckN.Di BernardinoE.MailhotM. (2021). Semi-parametric estimation of multivariate extreme expectiles. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 184, 104758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmva.2021.104758
BlackF.ScholesM. (1973). The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. World Scientific Reference on Contingent Claims Analysis in Corporate Finance, 81(3), 637–654. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814759588_0001
12.
BolandP. J. (2007). Statistical and probabilistic methods in actuarial science. Chapman and Hall/CRC.
13.
BrassardG.HoyerP.MoscaM.TappA. (2002). Quantum amplitude amplification and estimation. In Quantum computation and information, volume 305 of Contemporary Mathematics (pp. 53–74). American Mathematical Society. https://doi.org/10.1090/conm/305/05215
ChakrabartiS.KrishnakumarR.MazzolaG.StamatopoulosN.WoernerS.ZengW. J. (2021). A threshold for quantum advantage in derivative pricing. Quantum, 5, 463. https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2021-06-01-463
DraperT. G.KutinS. A.RainsE. M.SvoreK. M. (2006). A logarithmic-depth quantum carry-lookahead adder. Quantum Information and Computation, 6(4–5), 351–369. https://doi.org/10.5555/2012086.2012090
21.
EggerD. J.GambellaC.MarecekJ.McFaddinS.MevissenM.RaymondR.SimonettoA.WoernerS.YndurainE. (2020). Quantum computing for finance: State-of-the-art and future prospects. IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering, 1, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1109/TQE.2020.3030314
22.
EggerD. J.GutiérrezR. G.MestreJ. C.WoernerS. (2021). Credit risk analysis using quantum computers. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 70(12), 2136–2145. https://doi.org/10.1109/TC.2020.3038063
FisslerT.ZiegelJ. F. (2021). On the elicitability of Range Value at Risk. Statistics & Risk Modeling, 38(1–2), 25–46. https://doi.org/10.1515/strm-2020-0037
25.
FöllmerH.SchiedA. (2016). Stochastic finance: An introduction in discrete time. De Gruyter.
26.
FungT. C.JeongH.TzougasG. (2024). Soft splicing model: Bridging the gap between composite model and finite mixture model. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 2024(2), 168–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/03461238.2023.2234914
KayeP.LaflammeR.MoscaM. (2007). An introduction to quantum computing. Oxford Univ. Press.
34.
Koch-MedinaP.MunariC. (2024). Qualitative robustness of utility-based risk measures. Annals of Operations Research, 336(1-2), 967–980. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-022-04885-z
35.
KrätschmerV.SchiedA.ZähleH. (2014). Comparative and qualitative robustness for law-invariant risk measures. Finance and Stochastics, 18(2), 271–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00780-013-0225-4
36.
KuanC. M.YehJ. H.HsuY. C. (2009). Assessing Value at Risk with CARE, the conditional autoregressive expectile models. Journal of Econometrics, 150(2), 261–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2008.12.002
37.
LaudagéC.DesmettreS.WenzelJ. (2019). Severity modeling of extreme insurance claims for tariffication. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 88, 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2019.06.002
38.
MottonenM.VartiainenJ. J.BergholmV.SalomaaM. M. (2004a). Quantum circuits for general multiqubit gates. Physical Review Letters, 93(13), 130502. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.130502
NeweyW. K.PowellJ. L. (1987). Asymmetric least squares estimation and testing. Econometrica, 55(4), 819–847. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911031
42.
OhlssonE.JohanssonB. (2010). Non-life insurance pricing with generalized linear models. EAA lecture notes. Springer.
43.
RighiM. B.MüllerF. M. (2023). Range-based risk measures and their applications. ASTIN Bulletin, 53(3), 636–657. https://doi.org/10.1017/asb.2023.28
44.
RutkowskiM.TarcaS. (2015). Regulatory capital modelling for credit risk. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance, 18(5), 1550034. https://doi.org/10.1142/S021902491550034X
45.
ScheinerS. M.GurevitchJ. (2001). Design and analysis of ecological experiments. Oxford University Press.
46.
StamatopoulosN.CladerB. D.WoernerS.ZengW. J. (2024) Quantum risk analysis of financial derivatives.
StamatopoulosN.MazzolaG.WoernerS.ZengW. J. (2022). Towards quantum advantage in financial market risk using quantum gradient algorithms. Quantum, 6, 770. https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2022-07-20-770
SuttonJ. (1997). Gibrat’s legacy. Journal of Economic Literature, 35(1), 40–59.
51.
SuzukiY.UnoS.RaymondR.TanakaT.OnoderaT.YamamotoN. (2020). Amplitude estimation without phase estimation. Quantum Information Processing, 19(2), 75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-019-2565-2
52.
TaylorJ. W. (2008). Estimating Value at Risk and Expected Shortfall using expectiles. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 6(2), 231–252. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjfinec/nbn001
