Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025-5
Experimenting with smart city concepts and digital solutions in municipalities of the Global South: An international development cooperation perspective from South Africa
Smart city concepts and digital solutions have become popular in many cities and municipalities around the globe. They are viewed as an opportunity to increase governance efficiency, improve the quality of service delivery, and strengthen democratic practices. International development cooperation agencies, like Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit, increasingly turn to digitalisation to address municipal deficiencies in the Global South. Yet, their role in introducing and sustaining small-scale smart city solutions within weak local governments remains underexplored. This study provides new perspectives on the advantages, challenges, and general practices of implementing digitalisation and smart city solutions in weak local governments from an international development cooperation perspective. It dives deeper into projects conceptualised as part of the Governance Support Programme II in South Africa. Using qualitative research, it argues that it is possible to foster smart city concepts by implementing frugal, small-scale, simple Information and Communication Technology solutions. However, securing long-term sustainability and institutional prioritisation of these solutions presents significant challenges for development agencies. These findings can influence key decision-makers in development agencies and local governments in the Global South to introduce innovative smart city solutions to resolve persistent governance failures.
AllanC (2019) E-MPAC course material, “Session 2 Oversight, Accountability and the Realisation of Human Rights”. Governance & Development Unit (GDU).
2.
AmmonsDNRivenbarkWC (2008) Factors influencing the use of performance data to improve municipal services: Evidence from the North Carolina benchmarking project. Public Administration Review68(2): 304–318.
3.
AverwegUGreylingE (2009) A survey of information and communication technologies and information needs in a selected municipality in South Africa. In: LeaningM (ed) Issues in Information and Media Literacy: Education, Practice and Pedagogy. Santa Rosa, CA: Informing Science Press, 149–166.
4.
BabinATutunaruSCavalencoI, et al. (2021) Smart infrastructures for rural areas – Best practices and suggested actions for Moldova. In: HemkerT (ed) Central and Eastern European eDem and eGov Days 2021: Conference Proceedings. Vienna, Budapest: Austrian Computer Society, Facultas, 127–137.
Cammers-GoodwinS (2022) Revisiting smartness in the smart city. In: VallorS (ed) The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Technology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 169–188.
7.
CariusAGiorgiLSchmidL (2014) Smart cities: Key concepts, actors and potential entry points for development cooperation. In: Publication Series Integrated Implementation of the 2030 Agenda in Cities and City-Regions. Bonn and Eschborn: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH.
8.
CleverSCragoTPolkaA, et al. (2018) Ethical analysis of smart city applications. Urban Science2(4): 1–17.
Department of Cooperative Governance, Republic of South Africa (DCoG) (n.d.) Summary of municipalities placed under intervention for 2019/20 Financial Year [unpublished].
11.
EMPAC Certificate Course Evaluation Forms. Course 1, 2, and 3[unpublished].
12.
FazekasS (2016) Putting life to smart city project portfolios (the role of innovation in smart cities). In: REAL CORP 2016, Smart Me Up! Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Urban Planning, Regional Development and Information Society, Vienna.
13.
FölscherA (2007) Local fiscal discipline: Fiscal prudence, transparency, and accountability. In: ShahA (ed) Local Budgeting. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank, 79–104.
14.
FourieM-LOppermanL (2011) Municipal Finance and Accounting, 2nd ed., Pretoria: Van Schaik Publishers.
HalegouaGR (2020) Smart Cities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17.
HamzaL (2023) Local government vertical upward accountability, oversight, and the intervention mechanism in South Africa. Lex localis - Journal of Local Self-Government21(3): 567–589.
18.
HeYStojmenovicILiuY, et al. (2014) Smart city. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks10(5): 867593.
19.
Hinojosa-HinojosaKGonzález-CachoT (2024) The dark side of smart cities. In: Cebral-LouredaMRincón-FloresEGSanchez-AnteG (eds) What AI Can Do. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 193–215. ISBN: 978-1-032-39600-2.
20.
IGLUS, EPFL (n.d.) Smart cities MOOC. Innovative Governance of Large Urban Systems. École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne [unpublished].
Kormann-HainzlGLovasz-BukvovaHHölzlM, et al. (2021) Are smart villages just smaller smart cities? Call for a region-type-specific approach to the smartification of communities. In: HemkerT (ed) Central and Eastern European eDem and eGov Days 2021: Conference Proceedings. Vienna, Budapest: Austrian Computer Society, Facultas, 115–125.
MarchH (2018) The smart city and other ICT-led techno-imaginaries: Any room for dialogue with degrowth?Journal of Cleaner Production197(2): 1694–1703.
25.
McArdleGKitchinR (2016) The Dublin dashboard: Design and development of a real-time analytical urban dashboard. In: ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume III-4/W1, 1st International Conference on Smart Data and Smart Cities, 30th UDMS, Split, Croatia, 7–9 September 2016.
26.
MundulaLAuciS (2016) Smart cities: A policy tool for city efficiency? In: REAL CORP 2016, Smart Me Up! Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Urban Planning, Regional Development and Information Society, Vienna.
27.
MundulaLAuciSVignaniD (2016) Defining smart cities: A relative and dynamic approach. In: REAL CORP 2016, Smart Me Up! Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Urban Planning, Regional Development and Information Society, Vienna.
28.
NguyenBCZimmerF (2023) Ist das eine gute idee? Eine fallstudie zur zivilen wahrnehmung von smart-city-projekten. In: ImeriAScheibeKZimmerF (eds) Informationswissenschaft im Wandel – Wissenschaftliche Tagung 2022 (IWWT22). Glückstadt: Verlag Werner Hülsbusch, 308–313.
29.
NowaczykSResminiALongV, et al. (2022) Smaller is smarter: A case for small to medium-sized smart cities. Journal of Smart Cities and Society1: 95–117.
30.
OjedaMS (2021) Sustainability and non-discrimination: The only possible path for the proper development of smart cities and smart territories. In: MillerKWendtK (eds) The Fourth Industrial Revolution and Its Impact on Ethics. Cham: Springer, 199–214.
31.
RadchenkoK (2021) Public–private partnership for smarter cities. In: HemkerT (ed) Central and Eastern European eDem and eGov Days 2021: Conference Proceedings. Vienna, Budapest: Austrian Computer Society, Facultas, 103–114.
32.
RaduL-D (2023) The need for green software in smart cities. In: VisviziATroisiOGrimaldiM (eds) Research and Innovation Forum 2022. Cham: Springer, 225–232.
33.
RazaSSReevesE (2024) Starting from scratch: The articulated development of a smart city in Limerick, Ireland. Sustainability16(24): 11157.
34.
ReshetnikovaMSVasilievaGAMikhaylovIA (2023) Smart cities at risk: Tech breakthrough or social control. Chinese case study. In: VisviziATroisiOGrimaldiM (eds) Research and Innovation Forum 2022. Cham: Springer, 261–270.
35.
RuitersG (2007) Contradictions in municipal services in contemporary South Africa: Disciplinary commodification and self-disconnections. Critical Social Policy27(4): 487–508.
36.
RyserJ (2016) Smart cities or smart about cities. In: REAL CORP 2016, Smart Me Up! Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Urban Planning, Regional Development and Information Society, Vienna.
37.
SarantisDSoaresDSusarD, et al. (2024) Assessing digital government at the local level: An analysis of worldwide municipalities’ survey. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (ICEGOV ’24). Association for Computing Machinery, 215–222.
38.
SarvLSoeR-M (2022) Piloting smart city solutions in very small, small and medium-sized municipalities: The Estonian case study. In: 15th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (ICEGOV 2022), 4–7 October 2022, Guimarães, Portugal. New York: ACM, 8 pages.
SteenbockLFernandesJPresserMA (2015) Towards smart city democracy. Perspektiv25: 38–43.
45.
StiglitzJESenAFitoussiJ-P (2010) Mismeasuring Our Lives: Why GDP Doesn’t Add Up. New York, London: The New Press.
46.
SzczepańskaAKaźmierczakRMyszkowskaM (2023) Smart city solutions from a societal perspective – A case study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health20(6): 5136.
United Nations (2024) E-Government Survey 2024: Accelerating Digital Transformation for Sustainable Development. New York: Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Available at: https://www.un-ilibrary.org/content/books/9789211067286/read
51.
WohlersTE (2005) A comparative study of agenda-setting at the local level. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Western Political Science Association, Oakland, CA.
