There is a need to better understand traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine (TCIM) and health literacy (HL) as intersecting fields of research, and to identify the impact of HL on TCIM use and practices. This is best achieved through validated instruments that measure TCIM-specific HL.
Methods:
This critical, systematic review aimed to identify the use and features of validated instruments for measuring HL in the general adult population using TCIM, and the degree to which those elements measure TCIM-specific HL. Evaluation of the methodological rigor of instrument testing and grade determination was undertaken using the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) checklist and an adapted version of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses–COSMIN manual for the systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures.
Results:
A total of 21 validated HL instruments, identified from 29 studies, were included in the review. Ten instruments were specific or partially specific to TCIM. Most instruments assessed two or more HL domains (n = 14), including five that assessed all four domains of the integrated conceptual model of HL. Approximately one quarter of all instruments received an overall assessment rating of “very good” quality (n = 5), with majority of instruments rating as either “doubtful” (n = 9) or “inadequate” (n = 7) quality.
Conclusion:
The examination of HL in relation to TCIM use and users will clearly benefit the TCIM research field and the wider health research community. Focused efforts to develop validated TCIM-specific HL instruments will ensure TCIM use and users are not excluded from HL scholarship and advancements.
Heaton-ShresthaC, HansonK, Quirke-McFarlaneS, et al.Exploring how members of the public access and use health research and information: A scoping review. BMC Public Health2023;23(1):2179; doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16918-8
2.
SørensenK, Van den BrouckeS, FullamJ, (HLS-EU) Consortium Health Literacy Project European. et al.; Health literacy and public health: A systematic review and integration of definitions and models. BMC Public Health2012;12:80; doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-80
3.
TavousiM, MohammadiS, SadighiJ, et al.Measuring health literacy: A systematic review and bibliometric analysis of instruments from 1993 to 2021. PLoS One2022;17(7):e0271524; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271524
4.
HaunJN, ValerioMA, McCormackLA, et al.Health literacy measurement: An inventory and descriptive summary of 51 instruments. J Health Commun2014;19 Suppl 2:302–333; doi: 10.1080/10810730.2014.936571
5.
Levin-ZamirD, LeungAYM, DodsonS, et al.Health literacy in selected populations: Individuals, families, and communities from the international and cultural perspective. Stud Health Technol Inform2017;37(2):131–151; doi: 10.3233/isu-170834
6.
QianZ, WangGY, HenningM, et al.Understanding health literacy from a traditional Chinese medicine perspective. J Integr Med2023;21(3):215–220; doi: 10.1016/j.joim.2023.03.001
7.
AdamsJ, BroomA, SibbrittD, et al.Public Health and Health Services Research in Traditional, Complementary and Integrative Health Care. World Scientific: London, 2019.
8.
ReidR, SteelA, WardleJ, et al.Complementary medicine use by the Australian population: A critical mixed studies systematic review of utilisation, perceptions and factors associated with use. BMC Complement Altern Med2016;16:176; doi: 10.1186/s12906-016-1143-8
9.
WHO. WHO Global Report on Traditional and Complementary Medicine. WHO: Geneva; 2019.
10.
van der HeideI, WangJ, DroomersM, et al.The relationship between health, education, and health literacy: Results from the Dutch adult literacy and life skills survey. J Health Commun2013;18(Suppl 1):172–184; doi: 10.1080/10810730.2013.825668
11.
Hedelund LausenL, SmithSK, CaiA, et al.How is health literacy addressed in primary care? Strategies that general practitioners use to support patients. J Commun in Healthcare2018;11(4):278–287; doi: 10.1080/17538068.2018.1531477
12.
PageMJ, McKenzieJE, BossuytPM, et al.The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. PLoS Med2021;18(3):e1003583; doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003583
13.
SheaBJ, ReevesBC, WellsG, et al.AMSTAR 2: A critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ2017;358:j4008; doi: 10.1136/bmj.j4008
MokkinkLB, de VetHCW, PrinsenCAC, et al.COSMIN risk of bias checklist for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res2018;27(5):1171–1179; doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1765-4
16.
MokkinkLB, TerweeCB, PatrickDL, et al.The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: An international Delphi study. Qual Life Res2010;19(4):539–549; doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9606-8
17.
PrinsenCAC, MokkinkLB, BouterLM, et al.COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res2018;27(5):1147–1157; doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3
18.
TerweeCB, PrinsenCAC, ChiarottoA, et al.COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: A Delphi study. Qual Life Res2018;27(5):1159–1170; doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1829-0
19.
ElsmanEBM, MokkinkLB, TerweeCB, et al.Guideline for reporting systematic reviews of Outcome Measurement Instruments (OMIs): PRISMA-COSMIN for OMIs 2024. Health Qual Life Outcomes2024;22(1):48; doi: 10.1186/s12955-024-02256-9
TerweeCB, JansmaEP, RiphagenII, et al.Development of a methodological PubMed search filter for finding studies on measurement properties of measurement instruments. Qual Life Res2009;18(8):1115–1123; doi: 10.1007/s11136-009-9528-5
22.
BainsSS, EgedeLE. Association of health literacy with complementary and alternative medicine use: A cross-sectional study in adult primary care patients. BMC Complement Altern Med2011;11:138; doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-11-138
23.
BarnesLAJ, RolfeMI, BarclayL, et al.Demographics, health literacy and health locus of control beliefs of Australian women who take complementary medicine products during pregnancy and breastfeeding: A cross‐sectional, online, national survey. Health Expect2022;25(2):667–683; doi: 10.1111/hex.13414
24.
BarnesLAJ, BarclayL, McCafferyK, et al.Complementary medicine products information-seeking by pregnant and breastfeeding women in Australia. Midwifery2019;77:60–70; doi: 10.1016/j.m.2019.06.011
25.
CaoX, LiaoY, WuX, et al.Willingness to use acupuncture: Knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and practices among allergic rhinitis patients. Medicine (Baltimore)2023;102(39):e35297; doi: 10.1097/md.0000000000035297
26.
DabaghianF, HasanpourM, MaroufizadehS, et al.Use of medicinal plants and its association with health literacy in the general population of Iran during the COVID-19 pandemy: A web-based cross-sectional survey. RJP2023;10:31–40; doi: 10.22127/RJP.2022.366963.1997
27.
DadgariA, BagheriI, SalmaniN, et al.Mothers’ attitudes toward the use of complementary and alternative medicine in children with cancer. Int J Cancer Manag2020;13(10); doi: 10.5812/ijcm.104870
28.
DehghanM, RadMM, LariLA, et al.The relationship between use of complementary and alternative medicine and health literacy in chronically ill outpatient cases: A cross-sectional study in Southeastern Iran. Front Public Health2023;11:988388; doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.988388
29.
GanWC, SmithL, McIntyreE, et al.The prevalence, characteristics, expenditure and predictors of complementary medicine use in Australians living with gastrointestinal disorders: A cross-sectional study. Complement Ther Clin Pract2019;35:158–169; doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2019.02.008
30.
GardinerP, MitchellS, FilippelliAC, et al.Health literacy and complementary and alternative medicine use among underserved inpatients in a safety net hospital. J Health Commun2013;18 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):290–297; doi: 10.1080/10810730.2013.830663
31.
GhasemiN, OmidvarS, NazmiS. Prevalence of use of medicinal plants and its relationship with health literacy and attitude among pregnant women. Iran J Obs, Gyno, Infertility2023; doi: 10.22038/ijogi.2023.22146
32.
LinH-W, ChangEH, KoY, et al.Conceptualization, development and psychometric evaluations of a new medication-related health literacy instrument: The Chinese medication literacy measurement. Int J Environ Res Public Health2020;17(19):6951; doi: 10.3390/ijerph17196951
33.
McIntyreE, FoleyH, DiezelH, et al.Development and preliminarily validation of the complementary medicine disclosure index. Patient Educ Couns2020;103(6):1237–1244; doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.01.008
34.
MusokeP, NantaayiB, Kato NdawulaR, et al.Fear of COVID-19 and the media influence on herbal medication use in Uganda: A cross-sectional study. Risk Manag Healthc Policy2021;14:3965–3975; doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S332325
35.
OkawaY, IdeguchiN, YamashitaH. Relationship between health literacy and attitudes toward acupuncture: A web-based cross-sectional survey with a panel of Japanese residents. PLoS One2023;18(10):e0292729; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292729
36.
OzdelikaraA, KaraoğlanİÇ. Effects of oncology patients’ health literacy on use of complementary and alternative therapy. Altern Ther Health Med2023;29(6):120–127.
37.
Özkanİ, TaylanS, EroğluN. Examination the relationship between the health literacy of patients with type 2 diabetes and the use of complementary and alternative medicine. Afr H Sci2023;23(2):519–529; doi: 10.4314/ahs.v23i2.60
38.
SchubertTP. An assessment of health literacy in independent rural older adults. 2019.
39.
SeyyedrassoliA, GhahramanianA, RahimlouZ. The relationship between knowledge and attitude of patients with chronic diseases regarding complementary medicine. Iran Red Crescent Med J2017;19(5); doi: 10.5812/ircmj.46166
40.
Shreffler-GrantJ, NicholsEG, WeinertC. Community-based skill building intervention to enhance health literacy among older rural adults. West J Nurs Res2021;43(7):668–676.
41.
Shreffler-GrantJ, NicholsEG, WeinertC. Bee Safe, a skill-building intervention to enhance CAM health literacy: Lessons learned. Health Promot Pract2018;19(3):475–481; doi: 10.1177/1524839917700612
42.
Shreffler-GrantJ, WeinertC, NicholsE. Instrument to measure health literacy about complementary and alternative medicine. J Nurs Meas2014;22(3):489–499; doi: 10.1891/1061-3749.22.3.489
43.
SmithCA, ChangE, GallegoG. Complementary medicine use and health literacy in older Australians. Complement Ther Med2019;42:53–58; doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2018.10.025
44.
Tek AyazS. The roles of health literacy in parents’ honey use and the use of complementary alternative medicine in a Turkish population. BMC Complement Med Ther2023;23(1):376; doi: 10.1186/s12906-023-04209-z
45.
Ünal ToprakF, Coşkun PalazS, ÇağlarS. The impact of health literacy levels on women’s fear of contracting Covid-19 and their attitudes toward holistic complementary and alternative medicine: Mediation analysis results. Health Care Women Int2023;44(7–8):869–884; doi: 10.1080/07399332.2022.2070623
46.
von ConradyDM, BonneyA. Patterns of complementary and alternative medicine use and health literacy in general practice patients in urban and regional Australia. Aust Fam Physician2017;46:315–324; doi: 10.3316/informit.793036333480186
47.
WeinertC, Shreffler-GrantJ, NicholsE. Psychometric evaluation of the MSU CAM health literacy scale. Complement Ther Med2019;42:156–157; doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2018.11.007
48.
WyattG, SikorskiiA, WillsCE. Development and initial validation of a Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) knowledge instrument. J Nurs Meas2013;21(1):55–63; doi: 10.1891/1061-3749.21.1.55
49.
XieB, WangM, FeldmanR, et al.Exploring older and younger adults’ preferences for health information and participation in decision making using the Health Information Wants Questionnaire (HIWQ). Health Expect2014;17(6):795–808; doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2012.00804.x
50.
ZakariaAF, Ahmad SharoniSK, FauziR, LiangB. The usage of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM): Prevalence, health literacy, beliefs and self-management among people with hypertension in a rural areas, Pahang, Malaysia. JUMMEC2023;sp2023(1):86–95; doi: 10.22452/jummec.sp2023no2.10
51.
ZeldaW, WrightS, MajaT. Adaptation of the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine Revised (REALM -R) to the South African context: Part 1. J Interdisciplin Health Sciences2010;15(1); doi: 10.4102/hsag.v15i1.468
52.
WallaceLS, RogersES, RoskosSE, et al.BRIEF REPORT: Screening items to identify patients with limited health literacy skills. J Gen Intern Med2006;21(8):874–877; doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00532.x
53.
WeissBD, MaysMZ, MartzW, et al.Quick assessment of literacy in primary care: The newest vital sign. Ann Fam Med2005;3(6):514–522; doi: 10.1370/afm.405
54.
UllahI, JagugaF, RansingR, et al.Fear during COVID-19 pandemic: Fear of COVID-19 scale measurement properties. Int J Ment Health Addict2022;20(4):2493–2502; doi: 10.1007/s11469-021-00528-9
55.
AlotibyA. The impact of media on public health awareness concerning the use of natural remedies against the COVID-19 outbreak in Saudi Arabia. Int J Gen Med2021;14:3145–3152; doi: 10.2147/ijgm.s317348
56.
MalyRC, FrankJC, MarshallGN, et al.Perceived Efficacy in Patient‐Physician Interactions (PEPPI): Validation of an instrument in older persons. J Am Geriatr Soc1998;46(7):889–894; doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1998.tb02725.x
57.
OsborneRH, BatterhamRW, ElsworthGR, et al.The grounded psychometric development and initial validation of the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ). BMC Public Health2013;13:658; doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-658
58.
IshikawaH, NomuraK, SatoM, et al.Developing a measure of communicative and critical health literacy: A pilot study of Japanese office workers. Health Promot Int2008;23(3):269–274; doi: 10.1093/heapro/dan017
59.
MurphyPW, DavisTC, LongSW, et al.Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM): A quick reading test for patients. J Read1993;37:124–130; doi: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40033408
60.
DavisTC, LongSW, JacksonRH, et al.Rapid estimate of adult literacy in medicine: A shortened screening instrument. Fam Med1993;25:391–395.
61.
TociE, BurazeriG, SørensenK, et al.Health literacy and socioeconomic characteristics among older people in transitional Kosovo. Health Promot Int2013;3:1646–1658; doi: 10.1093/heapro/dau009
62.
SørensenK, Van den BrouckeS, PelikanJM, HLS-EU Consortium. et al.; Measuring health literacy in populations: Illuminating the design and development process of the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire (HLS-EU-Q). BMC Public Health2013;13:948; doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-948
63.
AbacigilF, HarlakH, OkyayP, et al.Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the European health literacy survey questionnaire. Health Promot Int2019;34(4):658–667; doi: 10.1093/heapro/day020
64.
TavousiM, Haeri-MehriziA, RakhshaniF, et al.Development and validation of a short and easy-to-use instrument for measuring health literacy: The Health Literacy Instrument for Adults (HELIA). BMC Public Health2020;20(1):656; doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08787-2
65.
BassPF, WilsonJF, GriffithCH. A shortened instrument for literacy screening. J Gen Intern Med2003;18(12):1036–1038; doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2003.10651.x
66.
ChewLD, BradleyKA, BoykoEJ. Brief questions to identify patients with inadequate health literacy. Fam Med2004;36(8):588–594.
67.
AhorsuDK, LinC-Y, ImaniV, et al.The fear of COVID-19 scale: Development and initial validation. Int J Ment Health Addict2020:1–9; doi: 10.1007/s11469-020-00270-8
XieB, WangM, FeldmanR. Preferences for health information and decision-making: Development of the Health Information Wants (HIW) questionnaire. In: Proceedings of the 2011 iConference. Association for Computing Machinery: New York, NY; 2011; pp. 273–280.
70.
SteelA, Gallego-PerezD, IjazN, et al.Integration of Traditional, Complementary, and Integrative Medicine (TCIM) in the institutionalization of evidence-informed decision-making: WHO meeting report. J Integr Complement Med2025;31(4):388–394; doi: 10.1089/jicm.2024.0837
71.
NguyenTH, ParkH, HanH-R, et al.State of the science of health literacy measures: Validity implications for minority populations. Patient Educ Couns2015;98:1492–1512; doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.07.013
72.
World Health Organisation. WHO Global Report on Traditional and Complementary Medicine 2019. World Health Organisation (WHO): Geneva; 2019.
73.
FjærEL, LandetER, McNamaraCL, et al.The use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) in Europe. BMC Complement Med Ther2020;20(1):108–109; doi: 10.1186/s12906-020-02903-w
74.
SteelA, McIntyreE, HarnettJ, et al.Complementary medicine use in the Australian population: Results of a nationally-representative cross-sectional survey. Sci Rep2018;8(1):17325–17327.
75.
RecchiaDR, CramerH, WardleJ, et al.Profiles and predictors of healthcare utilization: Using a cluster-analytic approach to identify typical users across conventional, allied and complementary medicine, and self-care. BMC Health Serv Res2022;22(1):29; doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07426-9
76.
JamesPB, WardleJ, SteelA, et al.Traditional, complementary and alternative medicine use in Sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review. BMJ Glob Health2018;3(5):e000895.
77.
PeltzerK, PengpidS. Utilization and practice of Traditional/Complementary/Alternative Medicine (T/CAM) in Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) member states. Stud Ethno-Med2015;9(2):209–218; doi: 10.1080/09735070.2015.11905437
78.
GuidoPC, RibasA, GaioliM, et al.The state of the integrative medicine in Latin America: The long road to include complementary, natural, and traditional practices in formal health systems. Euro J Integr Med2015;7:5–12; doi: 10.1016/j.eujim.2014.06.010
79.
CruchinhoP, López-FrancoMD, CapelasML, Handovers4SafeCare. et al.; Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of measurement instruments: A practical guideline for novice researchers. J Multidiscip Healthc2024;17:2701–2728; doi: 10.2147/jmdh.S419714
80.
SteelA, FoleyH, BugarcicA, et al.Designing the Contemporary Implementation of Traditional knowledge and Evidence (CITE) framework to guide the application of traditional knowledge in contemporary health contexts: A Delphi study. Evid Policy2024;21(3):347–369; doi: 10.1332/17442648y2024d000000037
81.
RusticusS. Content validity. In: Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. (MichalosAC., ed.) Springer Netherlands: Dordrecht; 2014; pp. 1261–1262.
82.
YaghmaleF. Content validity and its estimation. J Med Educ2009:3; doi: 10.22037/jme.v3i1.870
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
