Speed across various organizational processes, such as decision-making, executing operational activities, and responding to competitive challenges, represents an essential component of firms’ ability to achieve a competitive advantage. However, a theoretical and empirical consensus has yet to form whether decision speed (DS), implementation speed (IS), and response speed (RS) are beneficial or detrimental to firm performance. To help reconcile these inconclusive findings, we meta-analyze 127 studies (representing 239 effect sizes) and report overall direct effects for DS (0.21), IS (0.22), and RS (0.10) on firm performance. In addition, we examine contingencies which reveal that the performance consequences of DS, IS, and RS vary across contextual and methodological conditions.
AguinisH.DaltonD. R.BoscoF. A.PierceC. A.DaltonC. M. (2011). Meta-analytic choices and judgment calls: Implications for theory building and testing, obtained effect sizes, and scholarly impact. Journal of Management, 37, 5–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310377113
2.
AguinisH.GottfredsonR. K.WrightT. A. (2011). Best-practice recommendations for estimating interaction effects using meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(8), 1033–1043.https://doi.org/10.1002/job.719
3.
AllenJ. S.StevensonR. M.O'BoyleE. H.SeibertS. (2021). What matters more for entrepreneurship success? A meta-analysis comparing general mental ability and emotional intelligence in entrepreneurial settings. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 15(3), 352–376. https://doi.org/310.1002/sej.1377
4.
AnconaD.OkhuysenG.PerlowL. (2001). Taking time to integrate temporal research. Academy of Management Review, 26(4), 512–529. https://doi.org/510.5465/amr.2001.5393887
5.
AngwinD. (2004). Speed in M&A integration: The first 100 days. European Management Journal, 22(4), 418–430. https://doi.org/410.1016/j.emj.2004.1006.1005
BachrachD. G.KimK. Y.PatelP. C.HarmsP. D. (2022). Birds of a feather?: Firm sales growth and narcissism in the upper echelons at the CEO-TMT interface. The Leadership Quarterly, 34, 101621. https://doi.org/101610.101016/j.leaqua.102022.101621
8.
BakkerR. M.ShepherdD. A. (2017). Pull the plug or take the plunge: Multiple opportunities and the speed of venturing decisions in the Australian mining industry. Academy of Management Journal, 60, 130–155. https://doi.org/110.5465/amj.2013.1165
9.
BarretoI. (2010). Dynamic capabilities: A review of past research and an agenda for the future. Journal of Management, 36(1), 256–280. https://doi.org/210.1177/0149206309350776
10.
BauerF.MatzlerK. (2014). Antecedents of M&A success: The role of strategic complementarity, cultural fit, and degree and speed of integration. Strategic Management Journal, 35, 269–291. https://doi.org/210.1002/smj.2091
11.
BauerF.SchriberS.DegischerD.KingD. R. (2018). Contextualizing speed and cross-border acquisition performance: Labor market flexibility and efficiency effects. Journal of World Business, 53(2), 290–301. https://doi.org/210.1016/j.jwb.2018.1001.1001
BijmoltT. H. A.PietersR. G. M. (2001). Meta-analysis in marketing when studies contain multiple measurements. Marketing Letters, 12, 157–169. https://doi.org/110.1023/A:1011117103381
14.
BourgeoisL. J.,IIIEisenhardtK. M. (1988). Strategic decision processes in high velocity environments: Four cases in the microcomputer industry. Management Science, 34(7), 816–835. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.34.7.816
15.
BrownS. L.EisenhardtK. M. (1995). Product development: Past research, present findings, and future directions. Academy of Management Review, 20, 343–378. https://doi.org/310.5465/amr.1995.9507312922
16.
BurkhardB.SirénC.van EssenM.GrichnikD.ShepherdD. A. (2022). Nothing ventured, nothing gained: A meta-analysis of CEO overconfidence, strategic risk taking, and performance. Journal of Management, 49(8), 2629–2666. https://doi.org/2610.1177/01492063221110203
17.
CadoganJ. W.SouchonA. L.ProcterD. B. (2008). The quality of market-oriented behaviors: Formative index construction. Journal of Business Research, 61(12), 1263–1277. https://doi.org/1210.1016/j.jbusres.2008.1201.1014
18.
CalantoneR.GarciaR.DrögeC. (2003). The effects of environmental turbulence on new product development strategy planning. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 20(2), 90–103. https://doi.org/110.1111/1540-5885.2002003
19.
CalantoneR. J.RandhawaP.VoorheesC. M. (2014). Breakeven time on new product launches: An investigation of the drivers and impact on firm performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31, 94–104. https://doi.org/110.1111/jpim.12194
20.
ChangS.RheeJ. (2011). Rapid FDI expansion and firm performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(8), 979–994. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2011.30
21.
ChenM. J.HambrickD. (1995). Speed, stealth, and selective attack: How small firms differ from large firms in competitive behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 453–482. https://doi.org/410.5465/256688
22.
ClarkK. B. (1989). Project scope and project performance: The effect of parts strategy and supplier involvement on product development. Management Science, 35(10), 1247–1263. https://doi.org/1210.1287/mnsc.1235.1210.1247
23.
CohenJ. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159. https://doi.org/110.1037/0033-2909.1112.1031.1155
24.
CohenM. A.EliashbergJ.HoT. H. (1996). Erratum. New product development: The performance and time-to-market tradeoff. Management Science, 42, 143–186. https://doi.org/110.1287/mnsc.1242.1282.1173
25.
CohenW. M.LevinthalD. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–152. https://doi.org/110.2307/2393553
26.
ConnellyB. L.CrookT. R.CombsJ. G.KetchenD. J.,Jr.AguinisH. (2018). Competence-and integrity-based trust in interorganizational relationships: Which matters more?Journal of Management, 44(3), 919–945. https://doi.org/910.1177/0149206315596813
27.
DaltonD. R.DailyC. M.CertoS. T.RoengpityaR. (2003). Meta-analyses of financial performance and equity: Fusion or confusion?Academy of Management Journal, 46(1), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.5465/30040673
28.
DaltonD. R.DailyC. M.JohnsonJ. L.EllstrandA. E. (1999). Number of directors and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 674–686. https://doi.org/610.5465/256988
29.
DavisP. S.DibrellC. C.JanzB. D. (2002). The impact of time on the strategy–performance relationship: Implications for managers. Industrial Marketing Management, 31, 339–347. https://doi.org/310.1016/S0019-8501(1001)00168-00167
30.
DierickxI.CoolK. (1989). Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science, 35(12), 1504–1511. https://doi.org/1510.1287/mnsc.1535.1512.1504
31.
DooleyR. S.FryxellG. E.JudgeW. Q. (2000). Belaboring the not-so-obvious: Consensus, commitment, and strategy implementation speed and success. Journal of Management, 26, 1237–1257. https://doi.org/1210.1016/S0149-2063(1200)00081-00087
32.
DreesJ. M.HeugensP. P. (2013). Synthesizing and extending resource dependence theory: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 39(6), 1666–1698. https://doi.org/1610.1177/0149206312471391
33.
DuvalS.TweedieR. (2000). A nonparametric “trim and fill” method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95(449), 89–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.01622000.10473905
34.
DykesB. J.Hughes-MorganM.KolevK. D.FerrierW. J. (2018). Organizational speed as a dynamic capability: Toward a holistic perspective. Strategic Organization, 17(2), 266–278. https://doi.org/210.1177/1476127018804249
35.
DykesB. J.KolevK. D. (2018). Entry timing in foreign markets: A meta-analytic review and critique. Journal of International Management, 24, 404–416. https://doi.org/410.1016/j.intman.2018.1005.1001
36.
EisenhardtK. M. (1989). Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 543–576. https://doi.org/510.5465/256434
37.
FerrierW. J. (2001). Navigating the competitive landscape: The drivers and consequences of competitive aggressiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 858–877. https://doi.org/810.5465/3069419
38.
FerrierW. J.SmithK. G.GrimmC. M. (1999). The role of competitive action in market share erosion and industry dethronement: A study of industry leaders and challengers. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 372–388. https://doi.org/310.5465/257009
39.
ForbesD. P. (2005). Managerial determinants of decision speed in new ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 355–366. https://doi.org/310.1002/smj.1451
40.
FredricksonJ. W.MitchellT. R. (1984). Strategic decision processes: Comprehensiveness and performance in an industry with an unstable environment. Academy of Management Journal, 27(2), 399–423. https://doi.org/310.5465/255932
41.
GeyskensI.KrishnanR.SteenkampJ. B. E.CunhaP. V. (2009). A review and evaluation of meta-analysis practices in management research. Journal of Management, 35, 393–419. https://doi.org/310.1177/014920630832850
42.
Gonzalez-MuléE.AguinisH. (2018). Advancing theory by assessing boundary conditions with metaregression: A critical review and best-practice recommendations. Journal of Management, 44(6), 2246–2273. https://doi.org/2210.1177/0149206317710723
43.
GraaflandJ.NoorderhavenN. (2020). Culture and institutions: How economic freedom and long-term orientation interactively influence corporate social responsibility. Journal of International Business Studies, 51, 1034–1043. https://doi.org/1010.1057/s41267-41019-00301-41260
HamannP. M.HalwO.GuentherT. W. (2022). Meta-analysis of the corporate planning–organizational performance relationship: A research note. Strategic Management Journal, 44(7), 1803–1819. https://doi.org/1810.1002/smj.3476
46.
HambrickD. C.ChoT. S.ChenM. J. (1996). The influence of top management team heterogeneity on firms’ competitive moves. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 659–684. https://doi.org/610.2307/2393871
47.
HambrickD. C.FinkelsteinS. (1987). Managerial discretion: A bridge between polar views of organizational outcomes. Research in Organizational Behavior, 9, 369–406.
48.
HashaiN.KafourosM.BuckleyP. J. (2018). The performance implications of speed, regularity, and duration in alliance portfolio expansion. Journal of Management, 44(2), 707–731. https://doi.org/710.1177/0149206315592030
49.
HeckmanJ. J. (1976). The common structure of statistical models of truncation, sample selection and limited dependent variables and a simple estimator for such models. Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, 5, 475–492.
50.
HedgesL. V.OlkinI. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Academic Press.
51.
HillA. D.JohnsonS. G.GrecoL. M.O’BoyleE. H.WalterS. L. (2021). Endogeneity: A review and agenda for the methodology-practice divide affecting micro and macro research. Journal of Management, 47(1), 105–143. https://doi.org/110.1177/0149206320960533
52.
HofstedeG.MinkovM. (2010). Long-versus short-term orientation: New perspectives. Asia Pacific Business Review, 16(4), 493–504. https://doi.org/410.1080/13602381003637609
53.
HomburgC.BuceriusM. (2006). Is speed of integration really a success factor of mergers and acquisitions? An analysis of the role of internal and external relatedness. Strategic Management Journal, 27, 347–367. https://doi.org/310.1002/smj.1520
54.
HomburgC.GrozdanovicM.KlarmannM. (2007). Responsiveness to customers and competitors: The role of affective and cognitive organizational systems. Journal of Marketing, 71, 18–38. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.1571.1503.1018
55.
HuangS.DingZ.LinX.ZhuY. (2022). Post-entry internationalization speed, learning speed, and performance: A meta-analytic review and theory extension. Global Strategy Journal, 13(2), 483–516. https://doi.org/410.1002/gsj.1452
56.
HunterJ. E.SchmidtF. L. (1990). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Sage.
57.
HunterJ. E.SchmidtF. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Sage.
58.
JeongS. H.HarrisonD. A. (2017). Glass breaking, strategy making, and value creating: Meta-analytic outcomes of women as CEOs and TMT members. Academy of Management Journal, 60, 1219–1252. https://doi.org/1210.5465/amj.2014.0716
59.
JudgeW.MillerA. (1991). Antecedents and outcomes of decision speed in different environmental contexts. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 449–463. https://doi.org/410.5465/256451
60.
KepesS.BanksG. C.McDanielM.WhetzelD. L. (2012). Publication bias in the organizational sciences. Organizational Research Methods, 15, 624–662. https://doi.org/610.1177/1094428112452760
61.
KepesS.McDanielM. A.BrannickM. T.BanksG. C. (2013). Meta-analytic reviews in the organizational sciences: Two meta-analytic schools on the way to MARS (the meta-analytic reporting standards). Journal of Business and Psychology, 28, 23–143. https://doi.org/110.1007/s10869-10013-19300-10862
62.
KesslerE. H.BierlyP. E.GopalakrishnanS. (2000). Internal vs. external learning in new product development: Effects on speed, costs and competitive advantage. R&D Management, 30, 213–224. https://doi.org/210.1111/1467-9310.00172
63.
KesslerE. H.ChakrabartiA. K. (1996). Innovation speed: A conceptual model of context, antecedents, and outcomes. Academy of Management Review, 21, 1143–1191. https://doi.org/1110.5465/amr.1996.9704071866
64.
KimH.WuJ.SchulerD. A.HoskissonR. E. (2020). Chinese Multinationals’ fast internationalization: Financial performance advantage in one region, disadvantage in another. Journal of International Business Studies, 51(7), 1076–1106. https://doi.org/1010.1057/s41267-41019-00279-41269
65.
KingD. R.DaltonD. R.DailyC. M.CovinJ. G. (2004). Meta-analyses of post-acquisition performance: Indications of unidentified moderators. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 187–200. https://doi.org/110.1002/smj.1371
66.
KissA. N.BarrP. S. (2017). New product development strategy implementation duration and new venture performance: A contingency-based perspective. Journal of Management, 43, 1185–1210. https://doi.org/1110.1177/0149206314549251
67.
KolevK. D.McNamaraG. (2020). Board demography and divestitures: The impact of gender and racial diversity on divestiture rate and divestiture returns. Long Range Planning, 53(2), 101881. https://doi.org/101810.101016/j.lrp.102019.101805.101001
68.
LaamanenT.KeilT. (2008). Performance of serial acquirers: Toward an acquisition program perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 663–672. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.670
69.
LamontB. T.WilliamsR. J.HoffmanJ. J. (1994). Performance during “M-Form” reorganization and recovery time: The effects of prior strategy and implementation speed. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 153–166. https://doi.org/110.5465/256774
70.
LangerakF.GriffinA.HultinkE. J. (2010). Balancing development costs and sales to optimize the development time of product line additions. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27, 336–348. https://doi.org/310.1111/j.1540-5885.2010.00720.x
71.
LangerakF.HultinkE. J. (2005). The impact of new product development acceleration approaches on speed and profitability: Lessons for pioneers and fast followers. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 52, 30–42. https://doi.org/10.1109/tem.2004.839941
72.
LeeR. P.GrewalR. (2004). Strategic responses to new technologies and their impact on firm performance. Journal of Marketing, 68, 157–171. https://doi.org/110.1509/jmkg.1568.1504.1157.42730
73.
LeeD.Kirkpatrick-HuskK.MadhavanR. (2017). Diversity in alliance portfolios and performance outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 43(5), 1472–1497. https://doi.org/1410.1177/014920631455631
74.
LipseyM. W.WilsonD. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Sage.
75.
LukasB. A.MenonA. (2004). New product quality: Intended and unintended consequences of new product development speed. Journal of Business Research, 57, 1258–1264. https://doi.org/1210.1016/S0148-2963(1202)00448-00444
76.
LynnG. S.ReillyR. R.AkgunA. E. (2000). Knowledge management in new product teams: Practices and outcomes. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 47(2), 221–231. https://doi.org/210.1109/1117.846789
77.
MavroudiE.KesidouE.PandzaK. (2020). Shifting back and forth: How does the temporal cycling between exploratory and exploitative R&D influence firm performance?Journal of Business Research, 110, 386–396. https://doi.org/310.1016/j.jbusres.2020.1001.1056
78.
McNamaraG.SchleicherD. J. (2024). What constitutes a contribution at JOM?Journal of Management, 50(5), 1495–1501. https://doi.org/1410.1177/01492063241238701
79.
MeyerC. (1993). Fast cycle time: How to align purpose, strategy, and structure for speed. Free Press.
80.
MohrA.BatsakisG. (2017). Internationalization speed and firm performance: A study of the market-seeking expansion of retail MNEs. Management International Review, 57(2), 153–177. https://doi.org/110.1007/s11575-11016-10284-11579
81.
MoormanC.MinerA. S. (1997). The impact of organizational memory on new product performance and creativity. Journal of Marketing Research, 34, 91–106. https://doi.org/110.1177/002224379703400108
82.
MosakowskiE.EarleyP. C. (2000). A selective review of time assumptions in strategy research. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 796–812. https://doi.org/710.5465/amr.2000.3707728
83.
MusajiS.SchulzeW. S.De CastroJ. O. (2020). How long does it take to get to the learning curve?Academy of Management Journal, 63(1), 205–223. https://doi.org/https://doi.210.5465/amj.2017.1145
84.
NadkarniS.NarayananV. K. (2007). The evolution of collective strategy frames in high-and low-velocity industries. Organization Science, 18(4), 688–710. https://doi.org/610.1287/orsc.1070.0268
85.
Pacheco-de-AlmeidaG.HawkA.YeungB. (2015). The right speed and its value. Strategic Management Journal, 36, 159–176. https://doi.org/110.1002/smj.2213
86.
PayneJ. W.BettmanJ. R.JohnsonE. J. (1988). Adaptive strategy selection in decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14(3), 534–552. https://doi.org/510.1037/0278-7393.1014.1033.1534
PearsonC. M.MitroffI. I. (1993). From crisis prone to crisis prepared: A framework for crisis management. Academy of Management Perspectives, 7, 48–59. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.1993.9409142058
89.
PelledL. H.EisenhardtK. M.XinK. R. (1999). Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667029
90.
Pérez-NordtvedtL.PayneG. T.ShortJ. C.KediaB. L. (2008). An entrainment-based model of temporal organizational fit, misfit, and performance. Organization Science, 19(5), 785–801. https://doi.org/710.1287/orsc.1070.0330
91.
PerlowL.OkhuysenG.RepenningN. (2002). The speed trap: Exploring the relationship between decision making and temporal context. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 931–955. https://doi.org/910.5465/3069323
92.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.LeeJ. Y.PodsakoffN. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/810.1037/0021-9010.1088.1035.1879
93.
PostC.ByronK. (2015). Women on boards and firm financial performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 58(5), 1546–1571. https://doi.org/1510.5465/amj.2013.0319
94.
RothsteinH. R.SuttonA. J.BorensteinM. (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments. John Wiley & Sons.
95.
SaetherE. A.EideA. E.BjørgumØ, (2021). Sustainability among Norwegian maritime firms: Green strategy and innovation as mediators of long-term orientation and emission reduction. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(5), 2382–2395. https://doi.org/2310.1002/bse.2752
96.
SambaC.TabeshP.ThanosI. C.PapadakisV. M. (2021). Method in the madness? A meta-analysis on the strategic implications of decision comprehensiveness. Strategic Organization, 19(3), 414–440. https://doi.org/410.1177/1476127020904973
97.
SantoroG.ThrassouA.BrescianiS.Del GiudiceM. (2021). Do knowledge management and dynamic capabilities affect ambidextrous entrepreneurial intensity and firms’ performance?IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 68(2), 378–386. https://doi.org/310.1109/tem.2019.2907874
98.
SchijvenM.HittM. A. (2012). The vicarious wisdom of crowds: Toward a behavioral perspective on investor reactions to acquisition announcements. Strategic Management Journal, 33(11), 1247–1268. https://doi.org/1210.1002/smj.1984
99.
SchweigerS. A.StettlerT. R.BaldaufA.ZamudioC. (2019). The complementarity of strategic orientations: A meta-analytic synthesis and theory extension. Strategic Management Journal, 40(11), 1822–1851. https://doi.org/1810.1002/smj.3042
100.
ShengS.ZhouK. Z.LessassyL. (2013). NPD speed vs. innovativeness: The contingent impact of institutional and market environments. Journal of Business Research, 66, 2355–2362. https://doi.org/2310.1016/j.jbusres.2012.2304.2018
101.
ShiW.SunJ.PrescottJ. (2012). A temporal perspective of merger and acquisition and strategic alliance initiatives. Journal of Management, 38(1), 164–209. https://doi.org/110.1177/0149206311424942
102.
SmithK. G.GrimmC. M.GannonM. J.ChenM. J. (1991). Organizational information processing, competitive responses, and performance in the US domestic airline industry. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 60–85. https://doi.org/10.5465/256302
103.
SouitarisV.MaestroM. (2010). Polychronicity in top management teams: The impact on strategic decision processes and performance of new technology ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 31, 652–678. https://doi.org/610.1002/smj.1831
104.
StawB. (1981). The escalation of commitment to a course of action. Academy of Management Review, 6, 577–587. https://doi.org/510.5465/amr.1981.4285694
105.
SwinkM.SongM. (2007). Effects of marketing-manufacturing integration on new product development time and competitive advantage. Journal of Operations Management, 25, 203–217. https://doi.org/210.1016/j.jom.2006.1003.1001
106.
SzulanskiG. (1996). Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 27–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171105
107.
VanderWerfP. A.MahonJ. F. (1997). Meta-analysis of the impact of research methods on findings of first-mover advantage. Management Science, 43(11), 1510–1519. https://doi.org/1510.1287/mnsc.1543.1511.1510
108.
VermeulenF.BarkemaH. (2002). Pace, rhythm, and scope: Process dependence in building a profitable multinational corporation. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 637–653. https://doi.org/610.1002/smj.1243
109.
WhitenerE. M. (1990). Confusion of confidence intervals and credibility intervals in metaanalysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 315–321. https://doi.org/310.1037/0021-9010.1075.1033.1315
110.
WoodJ. A. (2008). Methodology for dealing with duplicate study effects in a meta-analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 11(1), 79–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428106296638
111.
YalcinkayaG. (2008). A culture-based approach to understanding the adoption and diffusion on new products across countries. International Marketing Review, 25, 202–214. https://doi.org/210.1108/02651330810866281
112.
ZahraS. A.GeorgeG. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185–203. https://doi.org/110.5465/amr.2002.6587995
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
