This article critically reviews and meta-analyzes the environmental performance of family firms. Using a sample of 40,910 firms covering a 12-year period, we conclude that the average effect of family involvement on environmental performance is negative, albeit small. This negative effect is more pronounced in primary studies that measure environmental performance via the environmental operational practices adopted and in those that define family business using the family ownership and management criteria. Our findings suggest that from an agency perspective, and compared with nonfamily firms, the negative view of the environmental performance of family firms prevails over the positive view.
AbdallahW.GoergenM.O’SullivanN. (2015). Endogeneity: How failure to correct for it can cause wrong inferences and some remedies. British Journal of Management, 26(4), 791–804.
2.
AguileraR. V.Aragón-CorreaJ. A.MaranoV.TashmanP. A. (2021). The corporate governance of environmental sustainability: A review and proposal for more integrated research. Journal of Management, 47(6), 1468–1497.
3.
AguinisH.PierceC. A.BoscoF. A.DaltonD. R.DaltonC. M. (2011). Debunking myths and urban legends about meta-analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 14(2), 306–331.
4.
AielloF.CardamoneP.MannarinoL.PupoV. (2019). Firm ownership and green patents does family involvement in business matter? [Working paper series]. University of Calabria.
5.
AloeA. M. (2015). Inaccuracy of regression results in replacing bivariate correlations. Research Synthesis Methods, 6(1), 21–27.
6.
AloeA. M.BeckerB. J. (2012). An effect size for regression predictors in meta-analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 37(2), 278–297.
7.
AmbecS.LanoieP. (2008). Does it pay to be green? A systematic overview. Academy of Management Perspectives, 22(4), 45–62.
8.
AmitR.VillalongaB. (2020). Family ownership. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 36(2), 241–257.
9.
AndersonR. C.ReebD. M. (2003). Founding-family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. The Journal of Finance, 58(3), 1301–1328.
10.
AndersonR. C.ReebD. M. (2004). Board composition: Balancing family influence in S&P 500 firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(2), 209–237.
11.
ArditoL.Messeni PetruzzelliA.PascucciF.PeruffoE. (2019). Inter-firm R&D collaborations and green innovation value: The role of family firms’ involvement and the moderating effects of proximity dimensions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(1), 185–197.
12.
ArenaC.MichelonG. (2018). A matter of control or identity? Family firms’ environmental reporting decisions along the corporate life cycle. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(8), 1596–1608.
13.
ArregleJ.-L.DuranP.HittM. A.van EssenM. (2017). Why is family firms’ internationalization unique? A meta-analysis. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(5), 801–831.
14.
BanalievaE. R.EddlestonK. A.ZellwegerT. M. (2015). When do family firms have an advantage in transitioning economies? Toward a dynamic institution-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 36(9), 1358–1377.
15.
BansalP.ClellandI. (2004). Talking trash: Legitimacy, impression management, and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal, 47(1), 93–103.
16.
BansalP.DesJardineM. R. (2014). Business sustainability: It is about time. Strategic Organization, 12(1), 70–78.
17.
BansalP.KistruckG. (2006). Seeing is (not) believing: Managing the impressions of the firm’s commitment to the natural environment. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(2), 165–180.
18.
BarontiniR.CaprioL. (2006). The effect of family control on firm value and performance: Evidence from continental Europe. European Financial Management, 12(5), 689–723.
19.
BerroneP.CruzC.Gómez-MejíaL. R. (2012). Socioemotional wealth in family firms: Theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Family Business Review, 25(3), 258–279.
20.
BerroneP.CruzC.Gómez-MejíaL. R.Larraza-KintanaM. (2010). Socioemotional wealth and corporate responses to institutional pressures: Do family-controlled firms pollute less?Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(1), 82–113.
21.
BerroneP.FosfuriA.GelabertL. (2017). Does greenwashing pay off? Understanding the relationship between environmental actions and environmental legitimacy. Journal of Business Ethics, 144(2), 363–379.
22.
BertrandM.SchoarA. (2006). The role of family in family firms. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(2), 73–96.
23.
BiancoM.BontempiM. E.GolinelliR.ParigiG. (2013). Family firms’ investments, uncertainty and opacity. Small Business Economics, 40(4), 1035–1058.
24.
BlockJ. H. (2012). R&D investments in family and founder firms: An agency perspectives. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(2), 248–265.
25.
BlockJ. H.WagnerM. (2014). The effect of family ownership on different dimensions of corporate social responsibility: Evidence from large us firms. Business Strategy and the Environment, 23(7), 475–492.
26.
BoiralO. (2013). Sustainability reports as simulacra? A counter-account of A and A+ GRI reports. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26(7), 1036–1071.
27.
BorensteinM.HedgesL. V.HigginsJ. P. T.RothsteinH. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Wiley.
28.
BowenF. (2014). After greenwashing: Symbolic corporate environmentalism and society. Cambridge University Press.
29.
BozziS.BarontiniR.MiroshnychenkoI. (2017). Investor protection and CEO compensation in family firms. Corporate Ownership and Control, 14(2), 17–29.
30.
CampopianoG.De MassisA. (2015). Corporate social responsibility reporting: A content analysis in family and non-family firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 129(3), 511–534.
31.
CanavatiS. (2018). Corporate social performance in family firms: A meta-analysis. Journal of Family Business Management, 8(3), 235–273.
32.
CannellaA. A.JonesC. D.WithersM. C. (2014). Family- versus lone-founder-controlled public corporations: Social identity theory and boards of directors. Academy of Management Journal, 58(2), 436–459.
33.
CarneyM.Van EssenM.GedajlovicE. R.HeugensP. P. (2015). What do we know about private family firms? A meta-analytical review. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(3), 513–544.
34.
ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H.KellermannsF. W.ChangE. P. C. (2007). Are family managers agents or stewards? An exploratory study in privately held family firms. Journal of Business Research, 60(10), 1030–1038.
35.
ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H.LitzR. A. (2004). Comparing the agency costs of family and non-family firms: Conceptual issues and exploratory evidence. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(4), 335–354.
36.
ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H.PearsonA. W.BarnettT. (2012). Family involvement, family influence, and family-centered non-economic goals in small firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(2), 267–293.
37.
ChrismanJ. J.PatelP. C. (2012). Variations in R&D investments of family and nonfamily firms behavioral agency and myopic loss aversion perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 976–997.
38.
ChrismanJ. J.SharmaP.SteierL. P.ChuaJ. H. (2013). The influence of family goals, governance, and resources on firm outcomes. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(6), 1249–1261.
39.
ChuaJ. H.ChrismanJ. J.De MassisA.WangH. (2018). Reflections on family firm goals and the assessment of performance. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 9(2), 107–113.
40.
ChuaJ. H.ChrismanJ. J.SharmaP. (1999). Defining the family business by behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(4), 19–39.
41.
ChuaJ. H.ChrismanJ. J.SteierL. P.RauS. B. (2012). Sources of heterogeneity in family firms: An introduction. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(6), 1103–1113.
42.
CirilloA.HuybrechtsJ.MussolinoD.SciasciaS.VoordeckersW. (2020). Researching family business growth. European Management Review, 17, 733–746.
43.
ClaessensS.DjankovS.LangL. H. P. (2000). The separation of ownership and control in East Asian Corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1), 81–112.
ClarkR.ReedJ.SunderlandT. (2018). Bridging funding gaps for climate and sustainable development: Pitfalls, progress and potential of private finance. Land Use Policy, 71, 335–346.
46.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge.
47.
CraigJ.DibrellC. (2006). The natural environment, innovation, and firm performance: A comparative study. Family Business Review, 19(4), 275–288.
48.
CruzC.Larraza-KintanaM.Garcés-GaldeanoL.BerroneP. (2014). Are family firms really more socially responsible?Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(6), 1295–1316.
49.
CuiV.DingS.LiuM.WuZ. (2016). Revisiting the effect of family involvement on corporate social responsibility: A behavioral agency perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 152(1), 291–309.
50.
Dal MasoL.BascoR.BassettiT.LattanziN. (2020). Family ownership and environmental performance: The mediation effect of human resource practices. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), 1548–1562.
51.
DarnallN.HenriquesI.SadorskyP. (2010). Adopting proactive environmental strategy: The influence of stakeholders and firm size. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6), 1072–1094.
52.
DaspitJ. J.ChrismanJ. J.SharmaP.PearsonA. W.MahtoR. V. (2018). Governance as a source of family firm heterogeneity. Journal of Business Research, 84, 293–300.
53.
DekkerJ.HassoT. (2016). Environmental performance focus in private family firms: The role of social embeddedness. Journal of Business Ethics, 136(2), 293–309.
54.
DelmasM. A.GergaudO. (2014). Sustainable certification for future generations. Family Business Review, 27(3), 228–243.
55.
DelmasM. A.ToffelM. W. (2004). Stakeholders and environmental management practices: An institutional framework. Business Strategy and the Environment, 13(4), 209–222.
56.
DelmasM. A.ToffelM. W. (2008). Organizational responses to environmental demands: Opening the black box. Strategic Management Journal, 29(10), 1027–1055.
57.
de Freitas NettoS. V.SobralM. F. F.RibeiroA. R. B.SoaresG. R. d. L. (2020). Concepts and forms of greenwashing: A systematic review. Environmental Sciences Europe, 32(19).
58.
De MassisA.AudretschD.UhlanerL.KammerlanderN. (2018). Innovation with limited resources: Management lessons from the German Mittelstand. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 35(1), 125–146.
59.
De MassisA.FrattiniF.MajocchiA.PiscitelloL. (2018). Family firms in the global economy: Toward a deeper understanding of internationalization determinants, processes, and outcomes. Global Strategy Journal, 8(1), 3–21.
60.
De MassisA.KotlarJ.ManelliL. (2021). Family firms, family boundary organizations and the family-related organizational ecosystem. Family Business Review.
61.
De MassisA.KotlarJ.MazzolaP.MinolaT.SciasciaS. (2018). Conflicting selves: Family owners’ multiple goals and self-control agency problems in private firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 42(3), 362–389.
62.
De MassisA.KotlarJ.WrightM.KellermannsF. W. (2017). Sector-based entrepreneurial capabilities and the promise of sector studies in entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 42(1), 3–23.
63.
De MassisA.SharmaP.ChuaJ. H.ChrismanJ. J. (2012). Family business studies: An annotated bibliography. Edward Elgar.
64.
DioufD.BoiralO. (2017). The quality of sustainability reports and impression management: A stakeholder perspective. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 30(3), 643–667.
65.
DouJ.SuE.WangS. (2017). When does family ownership promote proactive environmental strategy? The role of the firm’s long-term orientation. Journal of Business Ethics, 158(1), 81–95.
66.
DuranP.KammerlanderN.Van EssenM.ZellwegerT. (2016). Doing more with less innovation input and output in family firms. Academy of Management Journal, 59(4), 1224–1264.
67.
DyckA.LinsK. V.RothL.TownerM.WagnerH. F. (2018). Control rights and corporate sustainability around the world [Working paper]. University of Toronto.
68.
DyerG. W. (2006). Examining the “family effect” on firm performance. Family Business Review, 19(4), 253–273.
69.
EddlestonK. A.KellermannsF. W.SarathyR. (2008). Resource configuration in family firms: Linking resources, strategic planning and technological opportunities to performance. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1), 26–50.
70.
EggerM.SmithG. D.SchneiderM.MinderC. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. British Medical Journal, 315, 629–634.
71.
EndrikatJ.GuentherE.HoppeH. (2014). Making sense of conflicting empirical findings: A meta-analytic review of the relationship between corporate environmental and financial performance. European Management Journal, 32(5), 735–751.
EvertR. E.MartinJ. A.McLeodM. S.PayneG. T. (2016). Empirics in family business research. Family Business Review, 29(1), 17–43.
75.
FaccioM.LangL. H. P. (2002). The ultimate ownership of Western European corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 65(3), 365–395.
76.
FamaE. F.JensenM. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–325.
77.
FeranitaF.KotlarJ.De MassisA. (2017). Collaborative innovation in family firms: Past research, current debates and agenda for future research. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 8(3), 137–156.
78.
FiggeF.HahnT. (2012). Is green and profitable sustainable? Assessing the trade-off between economic and environmental aspects. International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), 92–102.
79.
GalbreathJ. (2017). The impact of board structure on corporate social responsibility: A temporal view. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(3), 358–370.
80.
GeyskensI.KrishnanR.SteenkampJ.-B. E. M.CunhaP. V. (2008). A review and evaluation of meta-analysis practices in management research. Journal of Management, 35(2), 393–419.
Gómez-MejíaL. R.HaynesK. T.Núñez-NickelM.JacobsonK. J. L.Moyano-FuentesJ. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 106–137.
83.
Gómez-MejíaL. R.LannelongueG.Muñoz-BullónF.RequejoI.Sanchez-BuenoM. J. (2019). Family firms’ concern for the environment: Does it pay off to pollute less?Academy of Management Proceedings, 2019(1), Article 14454.
84.
GraaflandJ. (2020). Family business ownership and cleaner production: Moderation by company size and family management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 255, Article 120120.
85.
GraaflandJ.SmidH. (2017). Reconsidering the relevance of social license pressure and government regulation for environmental performance of European SMEs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 141, 967–977.
86.
GriffinJ. J.MahonJ. F. (1997). The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate: Twenty-five years of incomparable research. Business & Society, 36(1), 5–31.
87.
HamiltonB. H.NickersonJ. A. (2003). Correcting for endogeneity in strategic management research. Strategic Organization, 1(1), 51–78.
88.
HarbordR. M.HigginsJ. P. T. (2008). Meta-regression in Stata. Stata Journal, 8(4), 493–519.
89.
HartS. L.MilsteinM. B. (2003). Creating sustainable value. Academy of Management Executive, 17(2), 56–69.
90.
HedgesL. V.OlkinI. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Academic Press.
91.
HigginsJ. P. T.ThompsonS. G.DeeksJ. J.AltmanD. G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. British Medical Journal, 327, 557–560.
92.
HirigoyenG.Poulain-RehmT. (2014). The corporate social responsibility of family businesses: An international approach. International Journal of Financial Studies, 2(3), 240–265.
93.
HoldernessC. G. (2009). The myth of diffuse ownership in the United States. Review of Financial Studies, 22(4), 1377–1408.
HuangY.-C.DingH.-B.KaoM.-R. (2009). Salient stakeholder voices: Family business and green innovation adoption. Journal of Management & Organization, 15(3), 309–326.
96.
JamesH. S. (1999). Owner as manager, extended horizons and the family firm. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 6(1), 41–55.
97.
JunniP.SaralaR. M.TarasV.TarbaS. Y. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity and performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 299–312.
98.
KangJ.-K.KimJ. (2020). Do family firms invest more than nonfamily firms in employee-friendly policies?Management Science, 66(3), 1300–1324.
99.
KappesI.SchmidT. (2013). The effect of family governance on corporate time horizons. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21(6), 547–566.
100.
KimE. H.LyonT. P. (2011). Strategic environmental disclosure: Evidence from the DOE’s voluntary greenhouse gas registry. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 61(3), 311–326.
101.
KimE. H.LyonT. P. (2014). Greenwash vs. brownwash: Exaggeration and undue modesty in corporate sustainability disclosure. Organization Science, 26(3), 705–723.
102.
KimJ.FaircloughS.DibrellC. (2016). Attention, action, and greenwash in family-influenced firms? Evidence from polluting industries. Organization & Environment, 30(4), 304–323.
103.
KisamoreJ. L.BrannickM. T. (2007). An illustration of the consequences of meta-analysis model choice. Organizational Research Methods, 11(1), 35–53.
104.
KotlarJ.De MassisA.FrattiniF.BianchiM.FangH. (2013). Technology acquisition in family and nonfamily firms: A longitudinal analysis of Spanish manufacturing firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(6), 1073–1088.
105.
LagasioV.CucariN. (2019). Corporate governance and environmental social governance disclosure: A meta-analytical review. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(4), 701–711.
La PortaR.Lopez-de-SilanesF.ShleiferA. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. The Journal of Finance, 54(2), 471–517.
108.
La PortaR.Lopez-de-SilanesF.ShleiferA. (2008). The economic consequences of legal origins. Journal of Economic Literature, 46(2), 285–332.
109.
La PortaR.Lopez-de-SilanesF.ShleiferA. (2013). Law and finance after a decade of research. In ConstantinidesG. M.HarrisM.StulzR. M. (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of finance (pp. 425–491). Elsevier.
110.
Le Breton-MillerI.MillerD. (2006). Why do some family businesses out-compete? Governance, long-term orientations, and sustainable capability. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(6), 731–746.
111.
Le Breton-MillerI.MillerD. (2016). Family firms and practices of sustainability: A contingency view. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 7(1), 26–33.
112.
LipseyM. W.WilsonD. B. (2000). Practical meta-analysis. SAGE.
113.
López-GonzálezE.Martínez-FerreroJ.García-MecaE. (2019). Corporate social responsibility in family firms: A contingency approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 211, 1044–1064.
114.
LucasM. T.NoordewierT. G. (2016). Environmental management practices and firm financial performance: The moderating effect of industry pollution-related factors. International Journal of Production Economics, 175, 24–34.
115.
LumpkinT. G.BrighamK. H. (2011). Long-term orientation and intertemporal choice in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(6), 1149–1169.
116.
MadisonK.HoltD. T.KellermannsF. W.RanftA. L. (2016). Viewing family firm behavior and governance through the lens of agency and stewardship theories. Family Business Review, 29(1), 65–93.
117.
MaloniM. J.HiattM. S.AstrachanJ. H. (2017). Supply management and family business: A review and call for research. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 23(2), 123–136.
118.
MarquisC.ToffelM. W.ZhouY. (2016). Scrutiny, norms, and selective disclosure: A global study of greenwashing. Organization Science, 27(2), 483–504.
119.
MauchC.StolzfusN.WeinerD. R. (2006). Shades of green: Environment activism around the globe. Rowman & Littlefield.
120.
McWilliamsA.RuppD. E.SiegelD. S.StahlG. K.WaldmanW. A. (2019). The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility: Psychological and organizational perspectives. Oxford University Press.
121.
MehrotraV.MorckR.ShimJ.WiwattanakantangY. (2013). Adoptive expectations: Rising sons in Japanese family firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 108(3), 840–854.
122.
MemiliE.FangH. C.KoçB.Yildirim-ÖktemÖ.SonmezS. (2018). Sustainability practices of family firms: The interplay between family ownership and long-term orientation. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 26(1), 9–28.
123.
MillerD.Le Breton-MillerI. (2005a). Management insights from great and struggling family businesses. Long Range Planning, 38(6), 517–530.
124.
MillerD.Le Breton-MillerI. (2005b). Managing for the long run. Harvard Business School Press.
125.
MillerD.Le Breton-MillerI. (2006). Family governance and firm performance: Agency, stewardship, and capabilities. Family Business Review, 19(1), 73–87.
126.
MillerD.Le Breton-MillerI. (2014). Deconstructing socioemotional wealth. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(4), 713–720.
127.
MillerD.Le Breton-MillerI. (2021). Family firms: A breed of extremes?Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 45, 663–681. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258720964186
128.
MillerD.Le Breton-MillerI.LesterR. H. (2011). Family and lone founder ownership and strategic behaviour: Social context, identity, and institutional logics. Journal of Management Studies, 48(1), 1–25.
129.
MillerD.Le Breton-MillerI.LesterR. H.CannellaA. A. (2007). Are family firms really superior performers?Journal of Corporate Finance, 13(5), 829–858.
130.
MillerD.Le Breton-MillerI.ScholnickB. (2008). Stewardship vs. stagnation: An empirical comparison of small family and non-family businesses. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1), 51–78.
131.
MillerD.XuX.MehrotraV. (2014). When is human capital a valuable resource? The performance effects of Ivy league selection among celebrated CEOs. Strategic Management Journal, 36(6), 930–944.
132.
MinichilliA.CorbettaG.MacMillanI. C. (2010). Top management teams in family-controlled companies: “Familiness,” “faultlines,” and their impact on financial performance. Journal of Management Studies, 47(2), 205–222.
133.
MiroshnychenkoI.De MassisA. (2020). Environmental practices of family and nonfamily firms [Working paper]. Free University of Bozen-Bolzano.
134.
MorckR.YeungB. (2003). Agency problems in large family business groups. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(4), 367–382.
135.
MorckR.YeungB. (2004). Family control and the rent-seeking society. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28, 391–409.
136.
Muñoz-BullonF.Sanchez-BuenoM. J.Suárez-GonzálezI. (2018). Diversification decisions among family firms: The role of family involvement and generational stage. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 21(1), 39–52.
137.
NeubaumD. O.DibrellC.CraigJ. B. (2012). Balancing natural environmental concerns of internal and external stakeholders in family and non-family businesses. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 3(1), 28–37.
138.
NeubaumD. O.KammerlanderN.BrighamK. H. (2019). Capturing family firm heterogeneity: How taxonomies and typologies can help the field move forward. Family Business Review, 32(2), 106–130.
139.
O’BoyleE. H.PollackJ. M.RutherfordM. W. (2012). Exploring the relation between family involvement and firms’ financial performance: A meta-analysis of main and moderator effects. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(1), 1–18.
140.
O’BoyleE. H.RutherfordM. W.PollackJ. M. (2010). Examining the relation between ethical focus and financial performance in family firms: An exploratory study. Family Business Review, 23(4), 310–326.
141.
OgusE.YaziciA. C.GurbuzF. (2007). Evaluating the significance test when the correlation coefficient is different from zero in the test of hypothesis. Communications in Statistics: Simulation and Computation, 36(4), 847–854.
142.
OrthU. R.GreenM. T. (2009). Consumer loyalty to family versus non-family business: The roles of store image, trust and satisfaction. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 16(4), 248–259.
143.
Ortiz-de-MandojanaN.BansalP. (2016). The long-term benefits of organizational resilience through sustainable business practices. Strategic Management Journal, 37(8), 1615–1631.
144.
OzturkO.BalakrishnanN. (2020). Meta-analysis of quantile intervals from different studies with an application to a pulmonary tuberculosis data. Statistics in Medicine, 39(29), 4519–4537.
145.
ParkerS. C. (2012). Theories of entrepreneurship, innovation and the business cycle. Journal of Economic Surveys, 26(3), 377–394.
146.
PatelP. C.ChrismanJ. J. (2014). Risk abatement as a strategy for R&D investments in family firms. Strategic Management Journal, 35(4), 617–627.
147.
Pérez-GonzálezF. (2006). Inherited control and firm performance. American Economic Review, 96(5), 1559–1588.
148.
PindadoJ.De la TorreC. (2004). Why is ownership endogenous?Applied Economics Letters, 11(14), 901–904.
149.
RajuN. S.BrandP. A. (2003). Determining the significance of correlations corrected for unreliability and range restriction. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27(1), 52–71.
150.
RamusC. A.MontielI. (2005). When are corporate environmental policies a form of greenwashing?Business & Society, 44(4), 377–414.
ReesW. (2011). Investor influence on firms’ environmental, social and governance performance. The University of Edinburgh. http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1973724
153.
ReesW.RodionovaT. (2013). What type of controlling investors impact on which elements of corporate social responsibility?Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 3(3), 238–263.
ReesW.RodionovaT. (2015). The influence of family ownership on corporate social responsibility: An international analysis of publicly listed companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 23(3), 184–202.
156.
RichardsM.ZellwegerT.GondJ.-P. (2017). Maintaining moral legitimacy through worlds and words: An explanation of firms’ investment in sustainability certification. Journal of Management Studies, 54(5), 676–710.
157.
RousseauH. E.BerroneP.GelabertL. (2019). Localizing sustainable development goals: Nonprofit density and city sustainability. Academy of Management Discoveries, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.5465/amd.2018.0151
158.
SamaraG.JamaliD.SierraV.ParadaM. J. (2018). Who are the best performers? The environmental social performance of family firms. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 9(1), 33–43.
159.
Sanchez-BuenoM. J.Muñoz-BullónF.GalanJ. I. (2019). Socially responsible downsizing: Comparing family and non-family firms. Business Ethics: A European Review, 29, 35–55.
160.
SchmidT.AchleitnerA.-K.AmpenbergerM.KasererC. (2014). Family firms and R&D behavior: New evidence from a large-scale survey. Research Policy, 43(1), 233–244.
161.
SchmidtF. L.HunterJ. E. (2015). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. SAGE.
162.
SchulzeW. S.LubatkinM. H.DinoR. N.BuchholtzA. K. (2001). Agency relationships in family firms: Theory and evidence. Organization Science, 12(2), 99–116.
163.
SchulzeW. S.LubatkinM. H.DinoR. N. (2002). Altruism, agency, and the competitiveness of family firms. Managerial and Decision Economics, 23(4–5), 247–259.
164.
SchulzeW. S.LubatkinM. H.DinoR. N. (2003). Toward a theory of agency and altruism in family firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(4), 473–490.
165.
SendlhoferT. (2020). Decoupling from moral responsibility for CSR: Employees’ visionary procrastination at a SME. Journal of Business Ethics, 167(2), 361–378.
166.
ShadishW. R.HaddockC. K. (1994). Combining estimates of effect size. In The handbook of research synthesis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
167.
SharmaP.CarneyM. (2012). Value creation and performance in private family firms. Family Business Review, 25(3), 233–242.
168.
SharmaP.SharmaS. (2011). Drivers of proactive environmental strategy in family firms. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(2), 309–334.
169.
SharmaS. (2000). Managerial interpretations and organizational context as predictors of corporate choice of environmental strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 681–697.
170.
SharmaS.SharmaP. (2019). Patient capital: The role of family firms in sustainable business. Cambridge University Press.
171.
SturdyA.HeusinkveldS.ReayT.StrangD.SharmaP.SharmaS. (2019). The role of family firms in corporate sustainability. In SturdyA.HeusinkveldS.ReayT.StrangD. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of management ideas (pp. 427–442). Oxford University Press.
172.
SuurmondR.van RheeH.HakT. (2017). Introduction, comparison, and validation of meta-essentials: A free and simple tool for meta-analysis. Research Synthesis Methods, 8(4), 537–553.
173.
TaborW.ChrismanJ. J.MadisonK.VardamanJ. M. (2017). Nonfamily members in family firms: A review and future research agenda. Family Business Review, 31(1), 54–79.
174.
TerlaakA.KimS.RohT. (2018). Not good, not bad: The effect of family control on environmental performance disclosure by business group firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 153(4), 977–996.
TestaF.BoiralO.Heras-SaizarbitoriaI. (2018). Improving CSR performance by hard and soft means: The role of organizational citizenship behaviours and the internalization of CSR standards. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(5), 853–865.
177.
TestaF.IraldoF. (2010). Shadows and lights of GSCM (Green Supply Chain Management): Determinants and effects of these practices based on a multi-national study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(10), 953–962.
178.
TestaF.MiroshnychenkoI.BarontiniR.FreyM. (2018). Does it pay to be a greenwasher or a brownwasher?Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(7), 1104–1116.
179.
ThompsonS. G.HigginsJ. P. (2002). How should meta-regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted?Statistics in Medicine, 21(11), 1559–1573.
180.
UhlanerL. M.Berent-BraunM. M.JeurissenR. J. M.de WitG. (2012). Beyond size: Predicting engagement in environmental management practices of Dutch SMEs. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(4), 411–429.
181.
UhlanerL. M.van Goor-BalkH. J. M.MasurelE. (2004). Family business and corporate social responsibility in a sample of Dutch firms. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 11(2), 186–194.
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2013). A guidebook to the green economy: A guide to international green economy initiatives.
184.
ValentineJ. C.PigottT. D.RothsteinH. R. (2010). How many studies do you need?Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 35(2), 215–247.
185.
van EssenM.EngelenP.-J.CarneyM. (2013). Does “good” corporate governance help in a crisis? The impact of country- and firm-level governance mechanisms in the European financial crisis. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21(3), 201–224.
186.
van EssenM.OttenJ.CarberryE. J. (2012). Assessing managerial power theory. Journal of Management, 41(1), 164–202.
187.
van EssenM.OttenJ.CarberryE. J. (2015). Assessing managerial power theory: A meta-analytic approach to understanding the determinants of CEO compensation. Journal of Management, 41(1), 164–202.
188.
VillalongaB. (2018). The impact of ownership on building sustainable and responsible businesses. Journal of the British Academy, 6(Suppl. 1), 375–403.
189.
VillalongaB.AmitR. (2006). How do family ownership, control and management affect firm value?Journal of Financial Economics, 80(2), 385–417.
190.
WagnerD.BlockJ. H.MillerD.SchwensC.XiG. (2015). A meta-analysis of the financial performance of family firms. Another attempt. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 6, 3–13.
191.
WalkerK.WanF. (2011). The harm of symbolic actions and green-washing: Corporate actions and communications on environmental performance and their financial implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(2), 227–242.
192.
WoodJ. A. (2008). Methodology for dealing with duplicate study effects in a meta-analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 11(1), 79–95.
193.
WuZ.ChuaJ. H.ChrismanJ. J. (2007). Effects of family ownership and management on small business equity financing. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(6), 875–895.
194.
YorioP. L.YeF. (2012). A meta-analysis on the effects of service-learning on the social, personal, and cognitive outcomes of learning. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(1), 9–27.
195.
YuA.LumpkinG. T.SorensonR. L.BrighamK. H. (2012). The landscape of family business outcomes. Family Business Review, 25(1), 33–57.
196.
ZellwegerT. M.KellermannsF. W.ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H. (2011). Family control and family firm valuation by family CEOs: The importance of intentions for transgenerational control. Organization Science, 23(3), 851–868.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
