This commentary provides several critiques to Portugali's admirably ambitious paper on the utility of applying Bohm's scientific approach to unify the current disarray in urban studies. The critiques focus on incommensurability between science and social science, conceptual over-reach, and the value of diversity versus unity.
BarnettCBridgeG (2017) The situations of urban inquiry: Thinking problematically about the city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research40: 1186–1204.
2.
BoddenS (2023) Working through our differences: Limits of ontology in the ordinary lives of critical geographical theory. Dialogues in Human Geography. https://doi.org/10.1177/20438206231221618.
3.
DeVerteuilG (2022) Slow scholarship, the slow city, and counter-visual practices. Environment and Planning F1(2–4): 226–249.
4.
DeVerteuilG (2023) Urban inequality revisited: From the corrugated city to the lopsided city. Dialogues in Urban Research1(3): 252–270.
5.
DeVerteuilGGolubchikovOSheridanZ (2021) Disaster and the lived politics of the resilient city. Geoforum125: 76–86.
6.
DeVerteuilGMarrMKienerJ (2022) More than bare-bones survival? From the urban margins to the urban commons. Annals of the Association of American Geographers112(7): 2080–2095.
7.
JazeelT (2019) Singularity. A manifesto for incomparable geographies. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography40(1): 5–21.
8.
KatzC (1996) Towards minor theory. Environment and Planning D14: 487–499.
PortugaliJ (2024) Bohm’s theory of orders as a basis for a unified urban theory. Dialogues in Urban Research2(3): 267–289.
11.
RobinsonJWuFHarrisonP, et al. (2022) Beyond variegation: The territorialisation of states, communities and developers in large-scale developments in Johannesburg, Shanghai and London. Urban Studies59(8): 1715–1740.
12.
SibleyD (1995) Geographies of Exclusion. London: Routledge.
13.
WalkerR (2015) Building a better theory of the urban: A response to ‘Towards a new epistemology of the urban?’City19(2–3): 183–191.
14.
WillsJ (2023) The extraordinary task of crafting a more ‘ordinary’ geography: Post-vanguardism and the art of not-knowing-best. Dialogues in Human Geography. https://doi.org/10.1177/20438206241240221.
