Planners in Shanghai and Chicago inhabit contrasting institutional planning systems. Despite these differences, the professional planners exhibit a shared commitment to basic rational planning doctrine. But most importantly, they practice a kind of pragmatic planning that adapts the principles of sustainability and an inclusive public interest to everyday planning conduct. Professional planners share a kind of practical intelligence acquired through university education that they use to pragmatically pursue shared planning norms within different institutional settings.
AnsellC (2011) Pragmatist Democracy: Evolutionary Learning in Public Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.
4.
BeatleyT (2005) Native to Nowhere: Sustaining Home and Community in a Global Age. Washington, DC: Island Press.
5.
BennettL (2010) The Third City: Chicago and American Urbanism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
6.
CampbellHMarshallR (2002) Utilitarianism’s bad breath? A re-evaluation of the public interest justification for planning. Planning Theory1(2): 163–187.
Development Methods of Urban Planning, Construction Department Act No. 146 (announced on 28October2005). National Urban Planning Registration Administration Committee.
13.
DierwechterYThornleyA (2010) Urban planning and regulation: The challenge of the market. In: RachelWRandallC (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Urban Planning. New York: Oxford University Press, 46–68.
14.
DonaghyKHopkinsL (2006) Coherentist theories of planning are possible and useful. Planning Theory5: 173–202.
15.
ForesterJ (1999) The Deliberative Practitioner: Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
16.
FriedmannJ (2005) Planning culture in transition. In: SanyalB (ed.) Comparative Planning Cultures. New York and London: Routledge, 29–44.
17.
HealeyP (1997) Collaborative Planning—Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. Houndmills and London: Macmillan Press.
18.
HealeyPRobertU (eds) (2010) Crossing Borders: International Exchange and Planning Practices. London and New York: Routledge.
19.
HochC (1994) What Planners Do. Chicago, IL: Planners Press.
Shanghai Master Plan (2006), developed by Shanghai Urban Planning Administrative Bureau. Avaiable at: http://www.shgtj.gov.cn/
35.
The Chicago Central Area Plan: Preparing the Central City for the 21st Century (2003). Available at: Hwww.cityofchicago.org
36.
Urban and Rural Planning Law of China Law and Regulation Collection of Urban and Rural Planning. (2008). National Urban Planning Registration Administration Committee.
37.
WangL (2009) Planning mixed-use development in globalizing cities: Shanghai and Chicago. PhD Dissertation, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL.
38.
WangL (2011) Mechanism of plan system in urban development: Comparing Shanghai and Chicago. Urban Planning Forum2: 33–42.
39.
WangLLiuG (2007) The evolution of public-private partnership American Downtown redevelopment in the second half of the twentieth century. Urban Planning International4: 21–26.
40.
WangLLiuG (2011) Neighborhood redevelopment model and planning in the central city of Shanghai and Chicago: A comparison of two cases. Urban Planning Forum4: 101–110.
41.
ZhangT (2002) Decentralization, localization, and the emergence of a quasi-participatory decision-making structure in urban development in Shanghai. International Planning Studies7: 303–323.
