This commentary reviews Adams-Price and Morse’s personal reflections of aging, creativity, and culture. They explore the themes of re-imagining creativity in the main paper through their own experiences as experienced jewelry maker and novice fiddler as they examine the role and benefits of creativity on aging individuals. Additionally, they respond to a set of reviewers who offered commentary on their paper.
Adams-PriceC. E. (1998). Creativity and successful aging: Empirical and theoretical approaches. Springer.
2.
Adams-PriceC. E.MorseL. W. (2025). Creativity, aging, context and culture: Reimagining creativity in everyday life in older adults. Possibility Studies & Society, 3(4), 499–523.
3.
Adams-PriceC. E.NadorffD. K.MorseL. W.DavisK. T.StearnsM. A. (2018). The Creative Benefits Scale: Connecting generativity to life satisfaction in mid to late life. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 86(3), 242–265.
4.
AntoniettiA.ColauttiL. (2025). Creativity in older people’s life: From leisure activities to ecological training programs: A commentary on “Creativity, aging, context, and culture.”Possibility Studies & Society, 3(4), 559–565.
5.
BaltesP. B.BaltesM. M. (Eds.). (1993). Successful aging: Perspectives from the behavioral sciences (Vol. 4). Cambridge University Press.
6.
CohenG. D. (2000). The creative: Awakening human potential in the second half of life. Avon Books.
7.
CohenG. D. (2006). Research on creativity and aging: The positive impact of the arts on health and illness. Generations, 30(1), 7–15.
8.
CunninghamW. R.ClaytonV.OvertonW. (1975). Fluid and crystallized intelligence in young adulthood and old age. Journal of Gerontology, 30, 53–55.
9.
EriksonE. H.EriksonJ. M.KivnickH. Q. (1989). Vital involvement in old age. W. W. Norton.
10.
GagnéR. M. (Ed.). (1977). The conditions of learning (3rd ed.). Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
11.
HannaG. P. (2025). Flourishing: Grassroots creative engagement for everyday living in later life. Possibility Studies & Society, 3(4), 534–538.
12.
JohnsG. A.MorseL. W.MorseD. T. (2001). Analysis of early vs later responses on a divergent production task across three time press conditions. Journal of Creative Behavior, 35(1), 65–72. http://doi.org/10.1002.j2162-6057.2001.tb0122.x
13.
KhatenaJ. (1976). Major directions in creativity research. Gifted Child Quarterly, 20(3), 336–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698627602000330
14.
KhatenaJ. (1982). Educational psychology of the gifted. John Wiley & Sons.
15.
KhatenaJ. (1992). Gifted: Challenge and response for education. F. E. Peacock Publishers.
16.
KhatenaJ.TamásZ. (1977). Originality and perceptual set: Comparative study of Hungarians and Americans. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 44(3 Pt 1), 777–778. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1977.44.3.777
17.
LindauerM.OrwollL.KelleyM. C. (1997). Aging artists on the creativity of their old age. Creativity Research Journal, 10(2), 133–152.
18.
LubartT.LubinJ. (2025). When creativity comes of age: A commentary. Possibility Studies & Society, 3(4), 549–553.
19.
McGovernJ. (2025). Possibilities: A commentary on creative aging. Possibility Studies & Society, 3(4), 524–529.
20.
SimontonD. K. (1988). Age and outstanding achievement: What do we know after a century of research?Psychological Bulletin, 104, 251–267.
21.
SkaggsR.Novak-LeonardJ. L. (2025). Connecting creative aging research with context and practice: Commentary on “Creativity, aging, context and culture: Reimagining creativity in everyday life in older adults.” Possibility Studies & Society, 3(4), 554–558.
22.
StebbinsR. A. (2007). Serious leisure: A perspective for our time. Transaction.
23.
StephensonR. C. (2025). Reimagining elderhood through creative engagement: Commentary on “Creativity, aging, context and culture.” Possibility Studies & Society, 3(4), 530–533.
24.
TanggaardL. (2025). Towards more inclusive understandings of creativity. Possibility Studies & Society, 3(4), 539–543.
25.
ZhengM.KaufmanJ. C. (2025). Little legacies: Another creativity benefit for older adults. Possibility Studies & Society, 3(4), 544–548.
