This article advances the psychological knowledge on the phenomenon of Changers-for-Good (C4Gs), that is, individuals who extend the range of the possible, addressing pressing and often insurmountable social problems and achieving durable and systemic social change. C4Gs are presented from both conceptual and practical perspectives. It is documented, through the presented examples and literature review, that their approach could be perceived on three axes: Conceptual, performative, and ethical. Each of these dimensions can be broken down into components: Conceptual: Perceiving challenges as doable, divergent thinking, embracing contradictions, and the cognitive part of the Peace-Oriented Mindset (POM); Performative: Entrepreneurial qualities, propensity for building social capital, and action-oriented POM; Ethical: Empathy, compassion, and—possibly—a blend of the two: Empassion. Moreover, assessment methods for each of these components are presented. It is concluded that the C4G model may be a gateway for educating and training future social sector leaders.
AdlerP. S.KwonS. W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17–40. https://doi.org/10.2307/4134367
2.
AhmetogluG.LeutnerF.Chamorro-PremuzicT. (2011). EQ-nomics: Understanding the relationship between individual differences in trait emotional intelligence and entrepreneurship. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(8), 1028–1033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.08.016
3.
AllenC. (2012). Ashoka: The search for India’s lost emperor. Hachette Digital.
4.
ArtigeL. (2022). Innovation. In GlăveanuV. P. (Ed.), The Palgrave encyclopedia of the possible(pp. 703–821). Palgrave Macmillan.
5.
BaerJ. (1993). Creativity and divergent thinking: A task-specific approach. Psychology Press.
6.
BarraganR. C.DweckC. S. (2014). Rethinking natural altruism: Simple reciprocal interactions trigger children’s benevolence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(48), 17071–17074. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1419408111
7.
Bar-TalD. (2007). Sociopsychological foundations of intractable conflicts. American Behavioral Scientist, 50(11), 1430–1453. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764207302462
8.
BettsS. C.LaudR.KretininA. (2018). Social entrepreneurship: A contemporary approach to solving social problems. Global Journal of Entrepreneurship, 2(1), 31–40.
9.
BornsteinD. (2004). How to change the world. Social entrepreneurs and the power of new ideas. Oxford University Press.
10.
BourdieuP. (1986). The forms of capital. In RichardsonJ. (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood.
11.
BrehmJ.RahnW. (1997). Individual-level evidence for the causes and consequences of social capital. American Journal of Political Science, 41(3), 999–1023. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111684
BreyerT. (2020). Empathy, sympathy and compassion. In SzantoT.LandweerH. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of phenomenology of emotion (pp. 429–440). Routledge.
BurtR. S. (1997). The contingent value of social capital. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(2), 339–365. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393923
16.
BurtR. S. (2001). Structural holes versus network closure as social capital. In LinN.CookK. S.BurtR. S. (Eds.), Social Capital; Theory and research (pp. 31–56). Aldine de Gruyter.
17.
CainM. (2019). But it wouldn’t be me”: Exploring empathy and compassion for self and others through creative processes. In BartonG.GarvisS. (Eds.), Compassion and empathy in educational contexts (pp. 39–57). Palgrave Macmillan.
18.
CarriereK. R. (2018). “We are book eight”: Dialoging the collective imagination through literary fan activism. Culture & Psychology, 24(4), 529–544. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067x18796805
ChierchiaG.SingerT. (2017). The neuroscience of compassion and empathy and their link to prosocial motivation and behavior. In DreherJ.-C.TremblayL. (Eds.), Decision neuroscience (pp. 247–257). Elsevier.
21.
ColemanJ. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120. https://doi.org/10.1086/228943
22.
ColemanJ. S. (2000). Foundations of social theory. Belknap Press.
23.
CooperR. A. (1981). Jeremy Bentham, Elizabeth Fry, and English Prison Reform. Journal of the History of Ideas, 42(4), 675–690.
24.
DavisM. H. (2006). Empathy. In StetsJ. E.TurnerJ. H. (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of emotions (pp. 443–466). Springer.
25.
DavisM. H.HallJ. A.MayerP. S. (2016). Developing a new measure of entrepreneurial mindset: Reliability, validity, and implications for practitioners. Consulting Psychology Journal Practice and Research, 68(1), 21–48. https://doi.org/10.1037/cpb0000045
de VignemontF.SingerT. (2006). The empathic brain: How, when and why?Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(10), 435–441.
29.
DraytonW. (2002). The citizen sector: Becoming as entrepreneurial and competitive as business. California Management Review, 44(3), 120–132. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166136
30.
DraytonW. (2005). Where the real power lies. Alliance, 10(1), 29–30.
31.
DraytonW. (2009). Social entrepreneurs don’t want to help. They want to change the world, Interview. Focus, 12(2), 53–57.
32.
DruckerP. F. (1985). Innovation and entrepreneurship. Harper Business.
DweckC. S. (2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Psychology Press.
35.
DweckC. S. (2006). Mindset. The new psychology of success. Random House.
36.
EisenbergN.StrayerJ. (1987). Critical issues in the study of empathy. In N. Eisenberg & J. Strayer (Eds.), Empathy and its development (pp. 3–13). Cambridge University Press.
37.
FauconnierG.TurnerM. (2003). The way we think. Basic Books.
38.
FineB. (2001). Social capital versus social theory: Political economy and social science at the turn of the Millennium. Routledge.
39.
FryE. G. (2018). Observations on the visiting, superintendence, and government of female prisoners. Franklin Classics Trade Press.
40.
FukuyamaF. (2001). Social capital, civil society and development. Third World Quarterly, 22(1), 7–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/713701144
41.
FusiG.LavolpeS.CrepaldiM.RusconiM. L. (2021). The controversial effect of age on divergent thinking abilities: A systematic review. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 55(2), 374–395. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.461
42.
GerdesK. E.SegalE. (2011). Importance of empathy for social work practice: integrating new science. Social Work, 56(2), 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/56.2.141
43.
GlăveanuV. P. (2020). The possible: A sociocultural theory. Oxford University Press.
44.
GlăveanuV. P. (2022). Possible in psychology. In GlăveanuV. P. (Ed.), The Palgrave encyclopedia of the possible (pp. 1162–1170). Palgrave Macmillan.
45.
GordonM. (2009). Roots of empathy: Changing the world child by child. The Experiment.
46.
GrimesM. G.McMullenJ. S.VogusT. J.MillerT. L. (2013). Studying the origins of social entrepreneurship: Compassion and the role of embedded agency. Academy of Management Review, 38(3), 460–463. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2012.0429
47.
GuilfordJ. P. (1967). The nature of Human Intelligence. McGraw-Hill.
48.
GuilfordJ. P.ChristensenP. R.MerrifieldP. R.WilsonR. C. (1978). Alternate uses: Manual of instructions and interpretations. Sheridan Psychological Services.
JellenH. G.UrbanK. K. (1986). The TCT-DP (Test for Creative Thinking-drawing production): An instrument that can be applied to most age and ability groups. Creative Child & Adult Quarterly, 11(3), 138–155.
53.
JimenezS. (2009). Compassion. In LopezS. J. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of positive psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 209–215). Wiley-Blackwell.
KahnemanD. (2011). Thinking fast and slow. Ferrar, Straus and Gireoux.
56.
KimK. H. (2017). The Torrance Tests of creative thinking - figural or verbal: Which one should we use?. Creativity. Theories – Research - Applications, 4(2), 302–321. https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2017-0015
57.
KonrathS.CorneilleO.BushmanB. J.LuminetO. (2014). The relationship between narcissistic exploitativeness, dispositional empathy, and emotion recognition abilities. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 38(1), 129–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-013-0164-y
LahiriN. (2015). Ashoka in Ancient India. Harvard University Press.
60.
LederachJ. P. (2003). The little book of conflict transformation. Good Books.
61.
LiuY.XuS.ZhangB. (2020). Thriving at work: How a paradox mindset influences innovative work behavior. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 56(3), 347–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886319888267
62.
LongA. A. (2006). From epicurus to epictetus: Studies in Hellenistic and Roman philosophy. Clarendon Press.
63.
MairJ.MartíI. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business, 41, 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2005.09.002
64.
MartinR. L.OsbergS. (2007). Social entrepreneurship: The case for definition. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 5(2), 29–39.
65.
MaskellP. (2000). Social capital, innovation, and competitiveness. In BaronS.FieldJ.SchullerT. (Eds.), Social capital; critical perspective (pp. 111–123). Oxford University Press.
MillerT. L.GrimesM. G.McMullenJ. S.VogusT. J. (2012). Venturing for others with heart and head: How compassion encourages social entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Review, 37(4), 616–640. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2010.0456
71.
Miron-SpektorE.ErezM. (2019). Looking at creativity through a paradox lens. In SmithW. K.LewisM. W.JarzabkowskiP.LangleyA. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of organizational paradox (pp. 434–451). Oxford University Press.
72.
Miron-SpektorE.GinoF.ArgoteL. (2011). Paradoxical frames and creative sparks: Enhancing individual creativity through conflict and integration. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 116(2), 229–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.03.006
MortG. S.WeerawardenaJ.CarnegieK. (2003). Social entrepreneurship: Towards conceptualization. Journal of Philanthropy and Marketing, 8(1), 76–88. https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.202
75.
NichollsA.ChoA. (2008). Social entrepreneurship: The structuration of the field. In NichollsA. (Ed.), Social Entrepreneurship. New models of sustainable change (pp. 99–118). Oxford University Press.
OlsonR. M. (2011). Doing some good to friends; Socrates’ just treatment of Polemarchus. Journal of Philosophical Research, 36, 149–172. https://doi.org/10.5840/jpr_2011_5
PeredoA. M.McLeanM. (2006). Social entrepreneurship: A critical review of the concept. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 56–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2005.10.007
80.
PiagetJ. (2008). The moral judgment of the child. Free Press Paperbacks.
81.
PiotrowskiC.KellerJ. W.OgawaT. (1993). Projective techniques: An international perspective. Psychological Reports, 72(1), 179–182. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1993.72.1.179
82.
PommierE.NeffK. D.Tóth-KirályI. (2020). The development and validation of the Compassion Scale. Assessment, 27(1), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191119874108
PraszkierR.MunnikP. (2021a). Social Entrepreneurship. In GlăveanuV. P. (Eds.), The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible (pp. 1508–1517). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98390-5_218-1
88.
PraszkierR.MunnikP. (2021b). Paradox Mindset. In GlăveanuV. P. (Eds.), The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible (pp. 960–966). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98390-5_205-1
89.
PraszkierR.MunnikP.ZabłockaA. (2021). Paradox mindset in management: Theory and measurement. Journal of Positive Management, 11(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.12775/JPM.2020.001
90.
PraszkierR.NowakA. (2012). Social entrepreneurship: Theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.
91.
PraszkierR.NowakA.Zabłocka-BursaA. (2009). Social capital built by social entrepreneurs and the specific personality traits that facilitate the process. Social Psychology, 4(1–2), 42–54.
92.
PraszkierR.ZabłockaA.MunnikP. (2023). Peace-oriented mindset and how to measure it. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 19(3). https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.10445
93.
PuglisiC. R.BarchamW. L. (2008). Bernardino da Feltre, the Monte di Pietà and the man of sorrows: Activist, microcredit and logo. Artibus et Historiae, 29(58), 35–63. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40343649
94.
PutnamR. D. (1993). The prosperous community: Social capital and public life. The American Prospect, 13, 35–42.
RiciglianoR. (2003). Networks of effective action: Implementing an integrated approach to peacebuilding. Security Dialogue, 34(4), 445–462.
99.
RobinsonP. B.StimpsonD. V.HuefnerJ. C.HuntH. K. (1991). An attitude approach to the prediction of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 15(4), 13–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879101500405
100.
RoperJ.CheneyG. (2005). Leadership, learning and human resource management. The meanings of social entrepreneurship today. Corporate Governance, 5(3), 95–104. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720700510604733
Shamay-TsooryS. G.Aharon-PeretzJ.PerryD. (2009). Two systems for empathy: A double dissociation between emotional and cognitive empathy in inferior frontal gyrus versus ventromedial prefrontal lesions. Brain, 132(3), 617–627. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awn279
108.
SleesmanD. J. (2019). Pushing through the tension while stuck in the mud: Paradox mindset and escalation of commitment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 155(C), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.03.008
109.
SmithR.BellR.WattsH. (2014). Personality trait differences between traditional and social entrepreneurs. Social Enterprise Journal, 10(3), 200–221.
110.
SpruijtJ. (2012, May28–29). Do you have what it takes? - Personality traits of social entrepreneurs. In MarchioriM.AlbanoV.BarbiniF. (Eds.). TRACK 19. Corporate Social Responsibility, Organizational Change and Performance: Proceedings of XIII Workshop Organizzazione Aziendale. Università degli Studi di Verona.
111.
StephanU.DrenchevaA. (2017). The person in social entrepreneurship: A systematic review of research on the social entrepreneurial personality. In AhmetogluG.Chamorro-PremuzicT.KlingerB.KarciskyK. (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of entrepreneurship (pp. 205–230). Wiley-Blackwell.
StraughairC. (2019). Cultivating compassion in nursing: A grounded theory study to explore the perceptions of individuals who have experienced nursing care as patients. Nurse Education in Practice, 35(9), 98–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2019.02.002
115.
TaillardA. (2021). Possible in philosophy. In GlăveanuV. P. (Ed.), The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the possible (pp. 1145–1153). Macmillan.
116.
TanW.-L.WilliamsJ. J.TanT.-M. (2006). Social in social entrepreneurship: Altruism and entrepreneurship, partners in social entrepreneurship. In TanW.-L.WilliamsJ. J.TanT.-M. (Eds.), Social in social entrepreneurship: Altruism and entrepreneurship, partners in social entrepreneurship (pp. 8–11). Singapore Management University.
117.
TaylorM. B. (1997). Compassion: Its neglect and importance. British Journal of General Practice, 47(421), 521–523.
van DongenJ. D. M. (2020). The empathic brain of psychopaths: From social science to neuroscience in empathy. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 695. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00695
VanSandtC. V.SudM.MarméC. (2009). Enabling the original intent: Catalysts for social entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(S3), 419–428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0419-z
122.
van ZomerenM.PostmesT.SpearsR. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 504–535.
123.
WagonerB.PowerS. A. (2022). Social Change. In GlăveanuV. P. (Ed.), The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the possible (pp. 1503–1508). Macmillan.
124.
WakabayashiA.Baron-CohenS.WheelwrightS.GoldenfeldN.DelaneyJ.FineD.SmithR.WeilL. (2006). Development of short forms of the Empathy Quotient (EQ-Short) and the Systemizing Quotient (SQ-Short). Personality and Individual Differences, 41(5), 929–940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.03.017
125.
WoolcockM.NarayanD. (2000). Social capital: Implications for development; theory, research, and policy. The World Bank Research Observer, 15(2), 225–249. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/15.2.225
126.
WrightS. C.TaylorD. M.MoghaddamF. M. (1990). Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group: From acceptance to collective protest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6), 994–1003. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.994
127.
ZabłockaA.PraszkierR.PetrushakE.Kacprzyk-MurawskaM. (2017). Measuring the propensity for building social capital depending on ties-strength. Journal of Positive Management, 7(4), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.12775/jpm.2016.020
