Purpose: Reward-based crowdfunding literature often places disproportionate emphasis on the campaign stage, which focuses on engaging potential backers and securing financial contributions. Our research extends this analysis to the post-campaign stage, examining how campaign outcomes influence market entry. By linking campaign characteristics to market entry, we aim to enhance the understanding of what constitutes overall success in the crowdfunding process. Study design: We analyse the market entry phase of 335 successfully funded campaigns on Kickstarter, defining market entry as ‘the product’s availability for sale online’. Data collection involved two main steps: gathering campaign information and determining market entry. Campaign data were collected from Kickstarter, focusing on high-tech ‘gadgets’ funded between 2012 and 2023. Market entry data were obtained through a four-step online search to ensure comprehensive coverage. We then linked market entry outcomes to various campaign characteristics, such as funding amount, number of contributors, and campaign duration. Findings: Our analysis reveals that 43% of the projects entered the market after completing the campaign stage. We found number of contributors to be a significant factor associated with market entry, whereas average contribution amount is not. Contributions: This research underscores the importance of attracting a broad base of supporters for successful market entry, which challenges the assumption that a small but dedicated group of contributors is sufficient. Implications: We clarify the distinction between ‘campaign success’ and ‘crowdfunding success’ and emphasise that the former represents only one component of the latter.
AgrawalA.CataliniC.GoldfarbA. (2014). Some simple economics of crowdfunding. Innovation Policy and the Economy, 14(1), 63–97. https://doi.org/10.1086/674021
2.
AppioF. P.LeoneD.PlataniaF.SchiavoneF. (2020). Why are rewards not delivered on time in rewards-based crowdfunding campaigns? An empirical exploration. Technological Forecasting and SocialChange, 157, Article 120069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120069
3.
ArenaM.BengoI.CalderiniM.ChiodoV. (2018). Unlocking finance for social tech start-ups: Is there a new opportunity space?Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 127, 154–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.035
4.
ArshadN.ShneorR.BerndtA. (2023). The reward crowdfunding campaign management process: An engagement perspective. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 30(11), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijebr-05-2023-0480
5.
BagheriA.ChitsazanH.KoolajiS. (2020). Deterrents of tourism business crowdfunding: Aversion decision and aversion behavior. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 88, Article 102517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102517
BessièreV.StéphanyE.WirtzP. (2020). Crowdfunding, business angels, and venture capital: An exploratory study of the concept of the funding trajectory. Venture Capital, 22(2), 135–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691066.2019.1599188
BöckelA.HörischJ.TennerI. (2021). A systematic literature review of crowdfunding and sustainability: Highlighting what really matters. Management review quarterly, 71, 433–453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-020-00189-3
10.
BorstI.MoserC.FergusonJ. (2018). From friendfunding to crowdfunding: Relevance of relationships, social media, and platform activities to crowdfunding performance. New Media & Society, 20(4), 1396–1414. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817694599
11.
CardonaL. F.Guzmán-LunaJ. A.Restrepo-CarmonaJ. A. (2024). Bibliometric analysis of the machine learning applications in fraud detection on crowdfunding platforms. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 17(8), Article 352. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm17080352
12.
ChoyK.SchlagweinD. (2016). Crowdsourcing for a better world: On the relation between IT affordances and donor motivations in charitable crowdfunding. Information Technology and People, 29(1), 221–247. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-09-2014-0215
13.
CicchielloA. F.GalloS.MonferràS. (2022). Mapping crowdfunding in cultural and creative industries: A conceptual and empirical overview. European Management Review, 19(1), 22–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12510
14.
CourtneyC.DuttaS.LiY. (2017). Resolving information asymmetry: Signaling, endorsement, and crowdfunding success. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(2), 265–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12267
15.
ÇubukcuA.UlusoyT.BozE. Y. (2020). Crowdfunding and open innovation together: A conceptual framework of a hybrid crowd innovation model. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 17(08), Article 2150003. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219877021500036
16.
DavidsonR.PoorN. (2015). The barriers facing artists’ use of crowdfunding platforms: Personality, emotional labor, and going to the well one too many times. New Media & Society, 17(2), 289–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814558916
DengL.YeQ.XuD.SunW.JiangG. (2022). A literature review and integrated framework for the determinants of crowdfunding success. Financial Innovation, 8(1), Article 41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-022-00345-6
19.
DroverW.WoodM. S.ZacharakisA. (2017). Attributes of angel and crowdfunded investments as determinants of VC screening decisions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(3), 323–347. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12207
20.
GerberE. M.HuiJ. (2013). Crowdfunding: Motivations and deterrents for participation. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 20(6), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1145/253054
21.
GleasureR. (2015). Resistance to crowdfunding among entrepreneurs: An impression management perspective. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 24(4), 219–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2015.09.001
22.
GohK.-Y.HengC.-S.LinZ. (2013). Social media brand community and consumer behavior: Quantifying the relative impact of user-and marketer-generated content. Information Systems Research, 24(1), 88–107. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1120.0469
23.
GraceM. (2023). An examination of unaddressed research gaps in reward-based crowdfunding performance and success. Muma Business Review, 7(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.28945/5210
24.
GulatiR.HigginsM. C. (2003). Which ties matter when? The contingent effects of interorganizational partnerships on IPO success. Strategic Management Journal, 24(2), 127–144. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.287
25.
HaltG. B.DonchJ. C.StilesA. R.FesnakR. (2017). Intellectual property and financing strategies for technology startups. Springer.
HoqueM. M. (2024). Crowdfunding for innovation: A comprehensive empirical review. Future Business Journal, 10(1), Article 102. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-024-00387-5
28.
HuangX.KabirR.NguyenT. N. (2024). Do project quality and founder information signals always matter? Evidence from equity and reward crowdfunding. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 29(3), 3309–3325. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2835
29.
JungeL. B.LaursenI. C.NielsenK. R. (2022). Choosing crowdfunding: Why do entrepreneurs choose to engage in crowdfunding?Technovation, 111, Article 102385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102385
30.
KaartemoV. (2017). The elements of a successful crowdfunding campaign: A systematic literature review of crowdfunding performance. International Review of Entrepreneurship, 15(3), 291–318.
31.
KaminskiJ.HoppC.TykvovaT. (2019). New technology assessment in entrepreneurial financing–does crowdfunding predict venture capital investments?Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 139, 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.11.015
32.
KenworthyN. (2024). Crowded out: The true costs of crowdfunding healthcare. MIT Press.
33.
KrausS.RichterC.BremA.ChengC.-F.ChangM.-L. (2016). Strategies for reward-based crowdfunding campaigns. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 1(1), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2016.01.010
34.
KuppuswamyV.BayusB. L. (2018). Crowdfunding creative ideas: The dynamics of project backers. In CummingD.HornufL. (Eds.), The economics of crowdfunding: Startups, portals and investor behavior (pp. 151–182). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66119-3_8
35.
LeeC. H.ChiravuriA. (2019). Dealing with initial success versus failure in crowdfunding market: Serial crowdfunding, changing strategies, and funding performance. Internet Research, 29(5), 1190–1212. https://doi.org/10.1108/intr-03-2018-0132
LogueD.GrimesM. (2022). Living up to the hype: How new ventures manage the resource and liability of future-oriented visions within the nascent market of impact investing. Academy of Management Journal, 65(3), 1055–1082. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2020.1583
39.
LukyanenkoR.ParsonsJ.WiersmaY.WachingerG.HuberB.MeldtR. (2017). Representing crowd knowledge: Guidelines for conceptual modeling of user-generated content. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 18(4), 2–339. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00456
40.
MachadoM.CoitaI. F.Gomez TeijeiroL.WenzlaffK.GregoriadesA.ThemistocleousC.van HeeswijkW.BernardF. S.MuñizJ. A.BolestaK.OsterriederJ. R.LiuY.DzurovskiA.StancaL.AydinN. S.Rupeika-ApogaR.TengH.-W.YilmazG. N.PeliovaJ.AlexyM.,FilipovskaO. (2024). Crowdfunding fraud detection: A systematic review highlights AI and blockchain using topic modeling. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4948895
41.
MeghouarH.EzzahidH.-A.ShneorR. (2024). What drives the use of crowdfunding by micro-entrepreneurs in Morocco?–Exploring fundraiser motives and characteristics. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 16(6), 1872–1901. https://doi.org/10.1108/jeee-04-2023-0177
42.
MoedlM. (2019). Is wisdom of the crowd a positive signal? Effects of crowdfinancing on subsequent venture capital selection. In Effects of crowdfinancing on subsequent venture capital selection (August 1, 2019). Max Planck Institute for Innovation & Competition Research Paper (18-15).
43.
MoedlM. (2020). Effects of crowdfinancing on subsequent venture capital selection. In MödlM. (Ed.), Signaling effects of crowdfunding on venture investors’ decision making (pp. 125–145). Springer Gabler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-31590-0_7
44.
MollickE. (2013). Swept away by the crowd? Crowdfunding, venture capital, and the selection of entrepreneurs. Venture Capital, 15(4), 343–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691066.2013.825305
MollickE.RobbA. (2016). Democratizing innovation and capital access: The role of crowdfunding. California Management Review, 58(2), 72–87. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2016.58.2.72
47.
Mora-CruzA.Palos-SanchezP. R. (2023). Crowdfunding platforms: A systematic literature review and a bibliometric analysis. The International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 19(3), 1257–1288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-023-00856-3
48.
MurrayA.FisherG. (2023). When more is less: Explaining the curse of too much capital for early-stage ventures. Organization Science, 34(1), 246–282. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.1568
49.
NeumayrM.HandyF. (2019). Charitable giving: What influences donors’ choice among different causes?Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 30(4), 783–799. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-017-9843-3
50.
NoorM. A.HossainT.ShiraziH. (2022). Crowdfunding: A new approach to entrepreneurship’s startup phase. ABC Journal of Advanced Research, 11(2), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.18034/abcjar.v11i2.646
51.
OberoiS.SrivastavaS.GuptaV. K.JoshiR.MehtaA. (2022). Crowd reactions to entrepreneurial failure in rewards-based crowdfunding: A psychological contract theory perspective. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(7), Article 300. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15070300
52.
O’BrienR. M. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality & Quantity, 41(5), 673–690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6
53.
PassianteG. (2020). Innovative entrepreneurship in action: From high-tech to digital entrepreneurship (Vol. 45). Springer.
54.
PenroseE. T. (2009). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford university press.
55.
ProntiA.PagliarinoE. (2018). Not just for money. Crowdfunding a new tool of open innovation to support the agro-food sector. Evidences on the Italian market. Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, 17(1), Article 20170016. https://doi.org/10.1515/jafio-2017-0016
RomaP.VasiM.KolympirisC. (2021). On the signaling effect of reward-based crowdfunding:(When) do later stage venture capitalists rely more on the crowd than their peers?Research Policy, 50(6), Article 104267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104267
58.
RykkjaA.BonetL. (2025). From intent to inaction: Factors conditioning cultural institutions from embracing crowdfunding as a fundraising tool. Journal of Alternative Finance, 2(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/27533743241313462
59.
RyuS.KimY.-G. (2016). A typology of crowdfunding sponsors: Birds of a feather flock together?Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 16, 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2016.01.006
60.
SchwienbacherA.LarraldeB. (2012). Alternative types of entrepreneurial finance. In CummingD. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of entrepreneurial finance (pp. 369–391). Oxford University Press.
61.
ShneorR.VikA. A. (2020). Crowdfunding success: A systematic literature review 2010–2017. Baltic Journal of Management, 15(2), 149–182. https://doi.org/10.1108/bjm-04-2019-0148
62.
ShneorR.ZhaoL.FlåtenB.-T. (2020). Introduction: From fundamentals to advances in crowdfunding research and practice. In ShneorR.ZhaoL.FlåtenB.-T. (Eds.), Advances in crowdfunding: Research and practice (pp. 1–18). Palgrave Macmillan.
63.
SmithS.WindmeijerF.WrightE. (2015). Peer effects in charitable giving: Evidence from the (running) field. The Economic Journal, 125(585), 1053–1071. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12114
64.
SongY.TianX. (2020). Managerial responses and customer engagement in crowdfunding. Sustainability, 12(8), Article 3389. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083389
65.
SpenceM. (1978). Job market signaling. In SpenceM.ZeckhauserR. (Eds.), Uncertainty in economics (pp. 281–306). Elsevier.
66.
ThiesF.HuberA.BockC.BenlianA.KrausS. (2019). Following the crowd—does crowdfunding affect venture capitalists’ selection of entrepreneurial ventures?Journal of Small Business Management, 57(4), 1378–1398. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12447
VanackerT.VismaraS.Walthoff-BormX. (2019). What happens after a crowdfunding campaign?Edward Elgar Publishing.
69.
Van TeunenbroekC.BekkersR. (2020). Follow the crowd: Social information and crowdfunding donations in a large field experiment. Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, 3(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.30636/jbpa.31.87
70.
Van TeunenbroekC.BekkersR.BeersmaB. (2021). They ought to do it too: Understanding effects of social information on donation behavior and mood. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 18(2), 229–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-020-00270-3
71.
Van TeunenbroekC.BijvankJ.WenzlaffK. (2025). Supplementary materials for “Prioritise reach over contribution size: On the drivers of market entry after crowdfunding campaign success”. Open Science Platform (OSF). https://osf.io/3u6gy/
72.
van TeunenbroekC.Dalla ChiesaD.HesseL. (2023). The contribution of crowdfunding for philanthropy: A systematic review and framework of donation and reward crowdfunding. Journal of Philanthropy and Marketing, 28(3), Article e1791. https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.1791
73.
Wesemann LekkasH.AntretterT.ShepherdD.WincentJ. (2025). Following in the footsteps of others: Social proof in angel groups. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 49(4), 1037–1070. https://doi.org/10.1177/10422587251315657
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
