Maternal health in at-risk communities is a significant public health issue, especially in areas characterized by socio-economic and healthcare inequalities. This study aims to uncover the multiple factors that influence maternal well-being in Morocco, providing insights for targeted interventions and policy development.
Methods
An interpretive grounded theory approach was employed, combining in-depth interviews, observations and constant comparative data analysis. Participants (n = 69, aged 17–49) were recruited from six provinces across five main regions, representing diverse socio-economic backgrounds, cultural contexts, and healthcare systems.
Results
The analysis identified four main categories explaining the interactions and interrelations of factors shaping maternal and reproductive health. First, childbirth and postpartum maternal healthcare experiences reveal contrasting realities between home and hospital births, marked by fear, neglect, obstetric violence, and the critical role of family support. Second, cultural practices and beliefs strongly shape perceptions of pregnancy, delivery, and postpartum care, sometimes providing protection and other times reinforcing harmful traditions. Third, maternal health dynamics in the societal context highlight systemic barriers to healthcare access, the weight of sociocultural expectations, and the compounded burden of rural living. Finally, women’s reproductive autonomy and family size underscore limited decision-making power, ambivalence toward contraceptive use, son preference, and contraceptive misinformation. Together, these categories illustrate the complexity of relationships between socioeconomic status, access to healthcare services, education, cultural beliefs, and social support networks, which emerge as important determinants of maternal and reproductive health outcomes in Morocco.
Conclusions
By amplifying their voices and perspectives, this research advocates for holistic, equitable, and empowering approaches to maternal healthcare. The findings underscore the need for interventions tailored to local contexts, based on a thorough understanding of the determinants of maternal health.
DoraiswamySCheemaSMaisonneuveP, et al.Maternal mortality in the Middle East and North Africa region – how could countries move towards obstetric transition stage 5?BMC Pregnancy Childbirth2022; 22(1): 552. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04886-7
BoutayebWLamliliMMaamriA, et al.Actions on social determinants and interventions in primary health to improve mother and child health and health equity in Morocco. Int J Equity Health2016; 15: 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-016-0309-9
4.
EzzrariARagbiAAudibertM. Santé de la mère: les politiques sectorielles au Maroc sont-elles efficaces pour réduire les inégalités d’accès?Revue Réflexions Économiques2022; (22023): 84–97. Accessed October 29, .https://revues.imist.ma/index.php/refeco/article/view/32259
SebbaniMAdarmouchLAmineM, et al.Determinants of maternal health services use among vulnerable women in a rural community in the Moroccan high atlas. Afr J Reprod Health2020; 24(1): 97–105.
MoujahidCTurmanJEJrAmahdarL. Common traditions, practices, and beliefs related to safe motherhood and newborn health in Morocco. In: Healthcare. MDPI, 2023, vol 11, p. 769. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/11/5/769 (Accessed 6 February 2024).
9.
GeorgeASBranchiniCPortelaA. Do interventions that promote awareness of rights increase use of maternity care services? A systematic review. PLoS One2015; 10(10): e0138116. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138116
10.
HammarbergKKirkmanMde LaceyS. Qualitative research methods: when to use them and how to judge them. Hum Reprod2016; 31(3): 498–501. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dev334
11.
GreenJThorogoodN. Qualitative methods for health research, 2018, pp. 1–440. Published online.
12.
CampbellOMGrahamWJLancet Maternal Survival Series steering group. Strategies for reducing maternal mortality: getting on with what works. Lancet2006; 368(9543): 1284–1299. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69381-1
13.
CharmazK.Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage, 2006. (Accessed 6 November 2023).
14.
CorbinJStraussA. Basics of qualitative research (3rd Ed.): techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage Publications, Inc., 2008. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230153
15.
SebastianK. Distinguishing between the strains grounded theory: classical, interpretive and constructivist. Journal for Social Thought2019; 3(1). Accessed December 16, 2023.https://ojs.lib.uwo.ca/index.php/jst/article/view/4116
16.
TheronPM. Coding and data analysis during qualitative empirical research in Practical Theology. Skriflig2015; 49(3): 1880. https://doi.org/10.4102/ids.v49i3.1880
GraneheimUHLundmanB. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today2004; 24(2): 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001
20.
BohrenMAVogelJPTunçalpÖ, et al.Mistreatment of women during childbirth in Abuja, Nigeria: a qualitative study on perceptions and experiences of women and healthcare providers. Reprod Health2017; 14(1): 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-016-0265-2
21.
ShoreySYangYYAngE. The impact of negative childbirth experience on future reproductive decisions: a quantitative systematic review. J Adv Nurs2018; 74(6): 1236–1244. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13534
22.
MwashaLKKisakaLMPallangyoES. Disrespect and abuse in maternity care in a low-resource setting in Tanzania: provider’s perspectives of practice. PLoS One2023; 18(3): e0281349. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281349
23.
KujawskiSAFreedmanLPRamseyK, et al.Community and health system intervention to reduce disrespect and abuse during childbirth in Tanga Region, Tanzania: a comparative before-and-after study. PLoS Med2017; 14(7): e1002341. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002341
24.
ReddyBThomasSKarachiwalaB, et al.A scoping review of the impact of organisational factors on providers and related interventions in LMICs: implications for respectful maternity care. PLOS Global Public Health2022; 2(10): e0001134. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001134
RavenJHChenQTolhurstRJ, et al.Traditional beliefs and practices in the postpartum period in Fujian Province, China: a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth2007; 7(1): 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-7-8
BhuttaZADarmstadtGLHasanBS, et al.Community-based interventions for improving perinatal and neonatal health outcomes in developing countries: a review of the evidence. Pediatrics2005; 115(Supplement_2): 519–617. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2004-1441
29.
TanDAHaththotuwaRFraserIS. Cultural aspects and mythologies surrounding menstruation and abnormal uterine bleeding. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol2017; 40: 121–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2016.09.015
30.
BaumannSERabinMADevkotaB, et al.Centering communities in global health: using human-centered design to facilitate collaboration and intervention development. Community Health Equity Research & Policy2025; 45: 167–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/2752535X241264331Published online July 23 2024.
31.
OmaleLEViolaJ. Cultural attunement approach for enhanced uptake of harm reduction services: a qualitative study in marginalized U.S. communities. J Prev Interv Community, Published online April 3, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1080/10852352.2025.2496208 (Accessed 1 October 2025).
HusseinJFergusonL. Eliminating stigma and discrimination in sexual and reproductive health care: a public health imperative. Sex Reprod Health Matters2019; 27(3): 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2019.1697103
34.
MoujahidCTurmanJEAmahdarL. A scoping review of the social determinants of maternal health in the MENA region. The Pan African Medical Journal2024; 47(205): 205. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2024.47.205.42499
35.
OuahidHMansouriASebbaniM, et al.Gender norms and access to sexual and reproductive health services among women in the Marrakech-Safi region of Morocco: a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth2023; 23(1): 407. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05724-0
36.
AcharaiLKhalisMBouaddiO, et al.Sexual and reproductive health and gender-based violence among female migrants in Morocco: a cross sectional survey. BMC Womens Health2023; 23(1): 174. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-023-02307-1
37.
RajABoehmerU. Girl child marriage and its association with national rates of HIV, maternal health, and infant mortality across 97 countries. Violence Against Women2013; 19(4): 536–551. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801213487747
38.
EfevberaYBhabhaJFarmerPE, et al.Girl child marriage as a risk factor for early childhood development and stunting. Soc Sci Med2017; 185: 91–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.05.027
39.
NasrullahMZakarRZakarMZ, et al.Girl-child marriage and its association with morbidity and mortality of children under 5 years of age in a nationally-representative sample of Pakistan. J Pediatr2014; 164(3): 639–646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.11.017
40.
GeletaDBirhanuZKaufmanM, et al.Gender norms and family planning decision-making among married men and women, rural Ethiopia: a qualitative study. Sci J Publ Health2015; 3(2): 242–250.
41.
RustagiNTanejaDKKaurR, et al.Factors affecting contraception among women in a minority community in Delhi: a qualitative study. Health Popul Perspect Issues2010; 33(1): 10–15.
