Using Participatory Methods to Develop the Prediabetes-Related Stress Scale (PRSS)

Abstract

Background

Prediabetes is a risk factor for type 2 diabetes. The transition from prediabetes to type 2 diabetes is inequitable, with Latinos reporting an increased risk than other groups. Stress can affect this transition; however, we have no means of measuring prediabetes-related stress.

Research Design and Study Sample

We used group concept-mapping, a participatory mixed-methods approach to collect data from English- and Spanish-speaking Latino adults (18+ years old) living with prediabetes, or clinical providers, in the United States. Participants were invited to multiple activities. First, brainstorming around focal questions about the stress of prediabetes diagnosis and management. Second, individually sorting 86 brainstormed statements into like groups, and rating these statements based on perceived importance. Third, interpreting quantitative results. Post-concept mapping, we invited participants to complete cognitive interviews of the initial English and Spanish versions of the scale.

Results

Forty participants engaged in one or more activities. Results from the sorting and rating activities resulted in 10 clusters that reflect how participants grouped the 86 statements. The clusters were shared with participants to support the interpretation of the data. Cognitive interviews revealed participant suggestions to improve comprehension of instructions, response options, and items. This iterative process resulted in a 29-item scale developed in English and Spanish.

Conclusion

We centered participant experiences to create the first scale that focuses on the emotional health related to prediabetes diagnosis and management. This scale can support diabetes prevention research by measuring prediabetes-specific stress and support clinical interactions to inform tailored conversations between patients and providers.

Keywords

adult(s)Latino population prediabetes scale development participatory research

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Centers for Disease and Control (CDC) . National diabetes statistics report. https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/php/data-research/index.html (2024b, accessed 10 August 2024).

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) . What is the national DPP? https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes-prevention/programs/what-is-the-national-dpp.html#cdc_generic_section_3-key-component-the-lifestyle-change-program (2024c, May 10, 2024).

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) . National diabetes prevention program. https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/communication-resources/ndpp-prevent-type-2-diabetes.html (2024a, accessed 15 May 2024).

Janevic

McCarthy

Liu

, et al. Racial and ethnic inequities in development of type 2 diabetes after gestational diabetes mellitus. Obstet Gynecol 2023; 142: 901–910. https://journals.lww.com/greenjournal/fulltext/2023/10000/racial_and_ethnic_inequities_in_development_of.20.aspx

Black

. Diabetes, diversity, and disparity: what do we do with the evidence? Am J Public Health 2002; 92: 543–548.

Chung

Arends-Kuenning

. Racial, ethnic, and urban/rural differences in transitions into diabetes: evidence from the health and retirement survey biomarker and self-reported data. J Rural Soc Sci 2022; 37: 1–23.

Gopalan

Lorincz

Wirtalla

, et al. Awareness of prediabetes and engagement in diabetes risk–reducing behaviors. Am J Prev Med 2015; 49: 512–519.

Wallace

Barrington

Albrecht

, et al. The role of stress responses on engagement in dietary and physical activity behaviors among Latino adults living with prediabetes. Ethn Health 2022; 27: 1395–1409.

Wallace

Lytle

Albrecht

, et al. All of that causes me stress: an exploration of the sources of stress experienced by Latinxs living with prediabetes. J Lat Psychol 2021; 9: 204–216.

10.

Hall

Chapman

Lee

, et al. Implicit racial/ethnic bias among health care professionals and its influence on health care outcomes: a systematic review. Am J Public Health 2015; 105: e60–e76.

11.

Onwuegbuzie

Bustamante

Nelson

. Mixed research as a tool for developing quantitative instruments. J Mix Methods Res 2010; 4: 56–78.

12.

Kane

Rosas

. Conversations about group concept mapping: applications, examples, and enhancements. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications, 2017.

13.

LaNoue

Gerolamo

Powell

, et al. Development and preliminary validation of a scale to measure patient uncertainty: the “uncertainty scale”. J Health Psychol 2020; 25: 1248–1258.

14.

Wallace

Wexler

Miser

, et al. Development and validation of the patient opioid education measure. J Pain Res 2013; 6: 663–681.

15.

Kane

Trochim

. Concept mapping for planning and evaluation. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, Inc. Epub ahead of print 19 August 2025.

16.

Trochim

WMK

. An introduction to concept mapping for planning and evaluation. Eval Program Plann 1989; 12: 1–16.

17.

Kane

Trochim

. Concept mapping for applied social research. The Sage Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, 2009, pp. 435–474.

18.

Tourangeau

. Cognitive aspects of survey measurement and mismeasurement. Int J Public Opin Res 2003; 15: 3–7.

19.

Willis

Miller

. Cross-cultural cognitive interviewing: seeking comparability and enhancing understanding. Field Methods 2011; 23: 331–341.

20.

Flesch

. Flesch-Kincaid readability test. Retrieved Oct 2007; 26: 2007.

21.

Johnson

Adkins

Chauvin

. A review of the quality indicators of rigor in qualitative research. Am J Pharm Educ; 84: 7120.

22.

Willis

. The practice of cross-cultural cognitive interviewing. Public Opin Q 2015; 79: 359–395.

23.

van de Vijver

Tanzer

. Bias and equivalence in cross-cultural assessment: an overview. Eur Rev Appl Psychol 2004; 54: 119–135.

24.

Fetters

Curry

Creswell

. Achieving integration in mixed methods designs— principles and practices. Health Serv Res 2013; 48: 2134–2156.

25.

McWayne

Mattis

Wright

LEG

, et al. An emic, mixed-methods approach to defining and measuring positive parenting among low-income Black families. Early Educ Dev 2017; 28: 182–206.

26.

Goerman

Caspar

. Managing the cognitive pretesting of multilingual survey instruments: a case study of pretesting of the U.S. census bureau bilingual Spanish/English questionnaire. Survey methods in multinational, multiregional, and multicultural contexts. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2010, pp. 75–90.

27.

Welch

Jacobson

Polonsky

. The problem areas in diabetes scale: an evaluation of its clinical utility. Diabetes Care 1997; 20: 760–766.

28.

Polonsky

Fisher

Earles

, et al. Assessing psychosocial distress in diabetes: development of the diabetes distress scale. Diabetes Care 2005; 28: 626–631.

29.

Schmitt

Reimer

Kulzer

, et al. How to assess diabetes distress: comparison of the problem areas in diabetes scale (PAID) and the diabetes distress scale (DDS). Diabet Med 2016; 33: 835–843.

30.

US Census Bureau . Colombian and Honduran populations surpassed a million for first time; Venezuelan population grew the fastest of all Hispanic groups since 2010. https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2023/09/2020-census-dhc-a-hispanic-population.html (2024, June 1, 2024).

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.06 MB