Testimony to the United States Senate Special Committee on Aging at a Hearing on Guardianship and Alternatives: Protection and Empowerment

Abstract

These remarks are from Dr. Shogren’s written testimony on March 30, 2023, at a hearing of the United States Senate Special Committee on Aging on “Guardianship and Alternatives: Protection and Empowerment.” These remarks and a video of Dr. Shogren’s oral testimony is publicly available at https://www.aging.senate.gov/hearings/guardianship-and-alternatives-protection-and-empowerment as well as in the Congressional Record.

Keywords

supported decision making policy inclusion self-determination intellectual disability

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, & the Arc. (2016). Joint position statement on autonomy, decision-making supports, and guardianship. https://www.aaidd.org/news-policy/policy/position-statements/autonomy-decision-making-supports-and-guardianship

American Bar Association. (2016). PRACTICAL tool for lawyers: Steps in supported decision-making. https://www.americanbar.org/groups/law_aging/resources/guardianship_law_practice/practical_tool.html

American Bar Association. (2017). ABA urges supported decision making as less-restrictive alternative to guardianship. https://www.americanbar.org/groups/law_aging/publications/bifocal/vol_38/issue-6–august-2017-/aba-urges-supported-decision-making-as-less-restrictive-alternat/

American Bar Association Commission on Law and Aging. (2022). Supported decision-making and less-restrictive alternatives: A statutory chart. https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/law_aging/2022-sdm-lst-rstctd-altntvs.pdf

Bradley

Hiersteiner

St. John

Bourne

M. L.

(2019). What does NCI data reveal about the guardianship status of people with IDD. National Core Indicators Data Brief. https://legacy.nationalcoreindicators.org/upload/core-indicators/NCI_GuardianshipBrief_April2019_Final.pdf

Center for Public Representation. (2023). Supported decision-making gives people with disabilities a voice. https://supporteddecisions.org/

Dinerstein

R. D.

Grewal

Martinis

(2016). Emerging international trends and practices in guardianship law for people with disabiities. ILSA Journal of International and Comparative Law. https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2312&context=facsch_lawrev

Findings and Purposes of ADA Amendments Act of 2008, Pub. L. 110-325, §2, Sept. 25, 2008, 122 Stat. 3553.

Fourth National Guardianship Summit. (2021). Maximizing autonomy and ensuring accountability: Recommendations of the fourth national guardianship summit. https://law.syracuse.edu/wp-content/uploads/Fourth_National_Guardianship_Summit_-_Adopted_Recommendations_May_2021.pdf

10.

Glen

(2018). Piloting personhood: Reflections from the first year of a supported decision-making project. Cardozo Law Review, 39, 495–519.

11.

Hatch

(2015). My story. Inclusion, 3(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.1352/2326-6988-3.1.34

12.

Jameson

J. M.

Riesen

Polychronis

Trader

Mizner

Martinis

Hoyle

(2015). Guardianship and the potential of supported decision making with individuals with disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 40(1), 36–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796915586189

13.

Kansas University Center on Developmental Disabilities. (n.d.). Supported decision-making. https://selfdetermination.ku.edu/supported-decision-making/

14.

Khemka

Hickson

(Eds.). (2021). Decision making by individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Springer.

15.

Martinis

Harris

Fox

Blanck

(2023). State guardianship laws and supported decision-making in the United States after ross and ross v. hatch: Analysis and implications for research, policy, education, and advocacy. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 34(1), 8–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/10442073211028586

16.

Millar

D. S.

(2007). “I never put it together”: The disconnect between self-determination and guardianship—Implications for practice. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 42(2), 119–129.

17.

Missouri Family to Family. (2017). Supported decision-making. https://mofamilytofamily.org/tag/supported-decision-making/

18.

Moran

(2022). 2021 guardianship legislation: Highlights and trends effectuating improved processes and outcomes in U.S. guardianship systems. Bifocal: Journal of the ABA Commission on Law and Aging, 43(4). https://www.americanbar.org/groups/law_aging/publications/bifocal/vol-43/bifocal-forty-three-four/2021-guardianship-trends/

19.

National Guardianship Association. (n.d.). What is guardianship.

20.

National Resource Center on for Supported Decision Making. (n.d.). Supported decision-making tools. https://supporteddecisionmaking.org/resource-library/

21.

National Council on Disability. (2018). Beyond guardianship: Toward alternatives that promote greater self-determination. https://ncd.gov/publications/2018/beyond-guardianship-toward-alternatives

22.

National Council on Disability. (2019). Turning rights into reality: How guardianship and alternatives impact the autonomy of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. https://ncd.gov/publications/2019/turning-rights-into-reality

23.

Pell

Mulkern

(2016). Supported decision making pilot: Pilot program evaluation year 2 report. https://www.hsri.org/files/uploads/publications/SDM_Pilot_Evaluation_Year_2_Report_HSRI_2016_FINAL.pdf

24.

Quality Trust for Individuals with Disabilities. (2014). Supported decision-making: An agenda for action. https://www.c-q-l.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/CQL-Supported-Decision-Making-Agenda-For-Action-2015.pdf

25.

Shogren

K. A.

Abery

Antosh

Broussard

Coppens

Finn

Goodman

Harris

Knapp

Martinis

Neeman

Nelis

Wehmeyer

M. L.

(2015). Recommendations of the self-determination and self-advocacy strand from the National Goals 2015 conference. Inclusion, 3(4), 205–210. https://doi.org/10.1352/2326-6988-3.4.205

26.

Shogren

K. A.

Rifenbark

G. G.

Wehmeyer

M. L.

Dean

E. E.

Killeen

M. B.

Karsevar

(2020). Refining the supported decision making inventory. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 17(3), 195–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/jppi.12335

27.

Shogren

K. A.

Wehmeyer

M. L.

Martinis

Blanck

(2019). Supported decision-making: Theory, research and practice to enhance self-determination and quality of life. Cambridge University Press.

28.

Shogren

K. A.

Wehmeyer

M. L.

Palmer

S. B.

Rifenbark

G. G.

Little

T. D.

(2015). Relationships between self-determination and postschool outcomes for youth with disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 48(4), 256–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466913489733

29.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Administration for Community Living. (2017). Supported decision making program. https://www.acl.gov/programs/consumer-control/supported-decision-making-program