Working papers have traditionally been an important means of communication in social sciences, including human geography. However, while some series have thrived for decades, working paper series in human geography are generally less common than in some other social sciences or the natural sciences, and face an uncertain future. Based on a survey with the editors of thirty journals in human geography, we draw a diverse and rather controversial picture of the current landscape of working paper series. We delve into the histories of some of the most prominent working paper series, identify key trends and propose ideas about the potential future of working paper series to enrich disciplinary spaces of dialogue.
AalbersMB (2004) Creative destruction through the Anglo-American hegemony: A non-Anglo-American view on publications, referees and language. Area36: 319–322.
2.
AalbersMBRossiU (2007) A coming community: Young geographers coping with multi-tier spaces of academic publishing across Europe. Social & Cultural Geography8(2): 283–302.
3.
AlatasSH (2006) The autonomous, the universal and the future of sociology. Current Sociology54(1): 7–23.
4.
AsaiS (2020) Market power of publishers in setting article processing charges for open access journals. Scientometrics123(2): 1037–1049.
5.
AshJKitchinRLeszczynskiA (2018) Digital turn, digital geographies?Progress in Human Geography42(1): 25–43.
6.
AtienzaMRonda-PupoGAPhelpsN (2019) Bridges over troubled water? Journals, geographers and economists in the field of economy and space 1980–2017. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space51(8): 1800–1823.
7.
BaberZ (2003) Provincial universalism: The landscape of knowledge production in an era of globalization. Current Sociology51(6): 615–623.
8.
BeallJ (2015) Beall’s list: Potential, possible, or probable predatory scholarly open-access publishers. Available at: http://scholarlyoa.com/publishers/ (accessed 29 May 2015).
BergstromTC (2001) Free labour for costly journals?Journal of Economic Perspectives15(4): 183–198.
11.
CarpentierSDörrySLordS, et al. (2015) Navigating the heavy seas of online publishing: Reflections on ten years editorship. Articulo: Journal of Urban Research. Epub ahead of print 29 May. DOI: 10.4000/articulo.2726.
12.
CastreeN (2022) Navigating together without a map: Metaphors for making geography’s future. Environment and Planning F1(1): 7–13.
13.
CastreeNSparkeM (2000) Introduction: Professional geography and the corporatization of the University: Experiences, Evaluations, and Engagements. Antipode32(3): 222–229.
14.
CastreeNLeszczynskiAStallinsJA, et al. (2022) Reconstituting geography for the 21st century. Environment and Planning F1(1): 3–6.
15.
CockayneDHortonAKayK, et al. (2018) On economic geography’s ‘movers’ to business and management schools: A response from outside ‘the project’. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space50(7): 1510–1518.
16.
CoomesOTMooreTRBreauS (2017) The price of journals in geography. The Professional Geographer69(2): 251–262.
Garcia-RamonMD (2003) Globalization and international geography: The questions of languages and scholarly traditions. Progress in Human Geography27(1): 1–5.
19.
GrayMPollardJ (2018) Flourishing or floundering? Policing the boundaries of economic geography. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space50(7): 1541–1545.
20.
ImhofNMüllerM (2020) How international are geography journals? Not international enough. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space52(7): 1246–1249.
21.
JamesABradshawMCoeNM, et al. (2018) Sustaining economic geography? Business and Management Schools and the UK’s Great Economic Geography Diaspora. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space50(6): 1355–1366.
22.
KitchinR (2005) Commentary: Disrupting and destabilizing Anglo-American and English-language hegemony in geography. Social & Cultural Geography6(1): 1–15.
23.
KitchinR (2007) Mapping Worlds: International Perspectives on Social and Cultural Geographies. London: Routledge.
24.
LarivièreVHausteinSMongeonP (2015) The oligopoly of academic publishers in the digital era. PLoS ONE10(6): e0127502.
25.
LiuWChengHHanX (2022) Rebuilding geography for the 21st century through disciplinary reunification and social engagement. Environment and Planning F1(1): 114–124.
26.
McFarlaneC (2022) Editorial: Geography in the world. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers47(1): 2–8.
27.
MincaC (2000) Venetian geographical praxis. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space18(3): 285–289.
28.
MüllerM (2021) Worlding geography: From linguistic privilege to decolonial anywheres. Progress in Human Geography45(6): 1440–1466.
29.
RadcliffeSA (2017) Decolonising geographical knowledges. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers42(3): 329–333.
30.
Rodríguez-PoseA (2006) Is there an ‘Anglo-American’ domination in human geography? And, is it bad?Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space38(4): 603–610.
31.
SchuermansNMeeusBDe MaesschalckF (2010) Is there a world beyond the web of science? Publication practices outside the heartland of academic geography. Area42(4): 417–424.
32.
SheppardE (2022) Geography and the present conjuncture. Environment and Planning F1(1): 14–25.
33.
SimonsenK (2002) Editorial: Global–local ambivalence. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers27: 391–394.
34.
YeungHWC (2001) Redressing the geographical bias in social science knowledge. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space33(1): 1–9.
35.
YeungHWC (2002) Deciphering citations. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space34(12): 2093–2102.
