This paper aims to foster an explicit geoethical orientation in physical geography. Using examples from Aotearoa New Zealand, we approach the work of physical geography with a set of ethical coordinates derived from our research, arguing that they allow for greater sensitivity in considering what is more-than-human in our research relationships. Working with these ethical co-ordinates lays the political groundwork for thinking and doing physical geography differently in the pursuit of less exploitative social and ecological relations. Our proposition offers new potentials for the practice of geography more generally: opportunities for enactive research encounters, those that perform generative change for a decolonised, post-productivist, physical geography.
AshmoreP (2015) Towards a sociogeomorphology of rivers. Geomorphology251: 149–156.
2.
BawakaCWrightSSuchet-PearsonS, et al. (2015) Working with and learning from Country: Decentring human author-ity. Cultural Geographies22(2): 269–283.
3.
BennettNJ (2018) Navigating a just and inclusive path towards sustainable oceans. Marine Policy97: 139–146.
4.
BlueBBrierleyG (2016) ‘But what do you measure?’ Prospects for a constructive critical physical geography. Area48(2): 190–197.
5.
BraunB (2005) Environmental issues: Writing a more-than-human urban geography. Progress in Human Geography29(5): 635–650.
6.
BrierleyGFryirsKReidH, et al. (2021) The dark art of interpretation in geomorphology. Geomorphology390: 107870.
7.
BrierleyGTadakiMHikuroaD, et al. (2019) A geomorphic perspective on the rights of the river in Aotearoa New Zealand. River Research and Applications35(10): 1640–1651.
8.
BrierleyGJ (2020) Finding the Voice of the River: Beyond Restoration and Management. Cham: Springer Nature.
9.
BrierleyGJFryirsKA (2005) Geomorphology and River Management: Applications of the River Styles Framework. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
10.
BrookMPatelJ (2021) Some notes on erionite. Eocene26: 6–8.
11.
BrookMSBlackPMSalmondJ, et al. (2020) Erionite in Auckland bedrock and malignant mesothelioma: An emerging public and occupational health hazard?New Zealand Medical Journal133(1518): 73–78.
12.
CarboneMAdusumilliPSAlexanderHR, et al. (2019) Mesothelioma: Scientific clues for prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. CA: Cancer Journal for Clinicians69: 402–429.
13.
CarboneMBarisYIBertinoP, et al. (2011) Erionite exposure in North Dakota and Turkish villages with mesothelioma. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America108: 13618–13623.
14.
CastreeN (1995) The nature of produced nature: Materiality and knowledge construction in Marxism. Antipode27(1): 12–48.
15.
CastreeN (2005) Nature. London: Routledge.
16.
CastreeN (2014) The Anthropocene and geography I: The back story. Geography Compass8(7): 436–449.
17.
CastreeNBraunB (2001) Social Nature: Theory, Practice and Politics. Oxford; New York: Blackwell Publishing.
18.
ChamovitzD (2020) What a Plant Knows: A Field Guide to the Senses: Updated and Expanded Edition. New York: Scientific American/Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
19.
CruikshankJ (2007) Do Glaciers Listen? Local Knowledge, Colonial Encounters, and Social Imagination. Vancouver, BC, Canada: UBC Press.
20.
DavidsonKJBlackPM (1994) Diagenesis in Early Miocene Waitemata Group sediments, Upper Waitemata Harbour, Auckland, New Zealand. Geoscience Reports Shizuoka University20: 135–142.
21.
DewsburyJ-D (2009) Still: ‘No man’s land’ or never suspend the question. M/C Journal12(1): 134.
22.
DicksH (2021) Ethics of river restoration: The imitationist paradigm. In: MorandiBCottetMPiégayH (eds) River Restoration: Political, Social, and Economic Perspectives. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, pp.49–65.
23.
DowlingRLloydKSuchet -PearsonS (2017) Qualitative methods II: ‘More-than-human’ methodologies and/in praxis. Progress in Human Geography41(6): 823–831.
24.
DufourSPiégayH (2009) From the myth of a lost paradise to targeted river restoration: Forget natural references and focus on human benefits. River Research and Applications25(5): 568–581.
25.
EylesJTaylorSMBaxterJ, et al. (1993) The social construction of risk in a rural community: Responses of local residents to the 1990 Hagersville (Ontario) tire fire. Risk Analysis13(3): 281–290.
26.
FryirsKABrierleyGJ (2021) How far have management practices come in ‘working with the river’?Earth Surface Processes and Landforms46: 3004–3010.
27.
FryirsKABrierleyGJDixonT (2019) Engaging with research impact assessment for an environmental science case study. Nature Communications10(1): 1–10.
28.
GibbonsM (2013) Mode 1, Mode 2, and Innovation. In: CarayannisEG (ed) Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship. New York: Springer.
29.
GiordaniMMattiloiMDoganM, et al. (2016) Potential carcinogenic erionite from Lessini Mounts, NE Italy: Morphological, mineralogical and chemical characterization. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health: Part A79(18): 1–17.
30.
HeadL (2017) Cultures of nature. In: RichardsonDCastreeNGoodchildMF, et al. (eds) International Encyclopaedia of Geography: People, the Earth, Environment and Technology. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
31.
HeadL (2022) Beyond Green: Human-environment geographies for the ‘new’ century. Environment and Planning F: Philosophy, Theory, Models, Methods and Practice1(1): 93–103.
32.
HikuroaDBrierleyGTadakiM, et al. (2021) Restoring sociocultural relationships with rivers: Experiments in fluvial pluralism. In: MorandiBCottetMPiégayH (eds) River Restoration: Political, Social, and Economic Perspectives. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, pp.66–88.
33.
HowittR (2022) Ethics as first method: Reframing geographies at an(other) ending-of-the-world as co-motion?Environment and Planning F: Philosophy, Theory, Models, Methods and Practice1(1): 82–92.
34.
HutchingsJSmithJ (2020) Te Mahi Oneone Hua Parakore: A Māori Soil Sovereignty and Wellbeing Handbook. Christchurch: Freerange Press.
35.
HutchingsJSmithJHarmsworthG (2018) Elevating the mana of soil through the hua parakore framework. Mai Journal7(1): 92–102.
36.
HutchingsJTipenePCarneyG, et al. (2012) Hua Parakore: An indigenous food sovereignty initiative and hallmark of excellence for food and product production. Mai Journal1(2): 131–145.
37.
IlgrenEBPooleyFDLarragoitiaJC, et al. (2008) First confirmed erionite related mesothelioma in North America. Indoor Built Environment16(6): 496–510.
38.
JohnstoneC (1994) The Lens of Deep Ecology: A Systems Approach to Deep Ecology and Despairwork. London: The Oakwood Trust.
39.
KershawGGCastledenHLaroqueCP (2014) An argument for ethical physical geography research on indigenous landscapes in Canada. The Canadian Geographer/le Géographe Canadien58(4): 393–399.
40.
KoppesMKingL (2020) Beyond x, y, z (t): Navigating new landscapes of science in the science of landscapes. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface125(9): e005588.
41.
KorchevskiyARasmusonJORasmusonEJ (2019) Empirical model of mesothelioma potency factors for different mineral fibers based on their chemical composition and dimensionality. Inhalation Toxicology31(5): 180–191.
42.
KurioJReasonP (2021) Voicing Rivers through ontopoetics: A co-operative inquiry. River Research and Applications. Epub ahead of print 19May. DOI: 10.1002/rra.3817.
43.
LaneSN (2017) Slow science, the geographical expedition, and critical physical geography. The Canadian Geographer/le Géographe Canadien61(1): 84–101.
44.
LatimerJMieleM (2013) Naturecultures? Science, affect and the non-human. Theory, Culture and Society30(7/8): 5–31.
45.
LaveR (2015) Introduction to special issue on critical physical geography. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment39(5): 571–575.
46.
Le HeronRLewisN (2011) New value from asking ‘Is geography what geographers do?’. Geoforum1(42): 1–5.
47.
LeCainTJ (2017) Natural born humans: Putting culture, science, and religion back into nature. Journal for the Study of Religion Nature & Culture11(4): 420–434.
RiverOfLifeMPoelinaABagnallD, et al. (2020) Recognizing the Martuwarra’s first law right to life as a living ancestral being. Transnational Environmental Law9(3): 541–568.
50.
MorrowO (2021) Ball jars, bacteria, and labor: Co-producing nature through cooperative enterprise. Food and Foodways29(3): 264–280.
51.
O’RiordanT (2004) Beyond environmentalism, towards sustainability. In: HerbertDMatthewsJ (eds) Unifying Geography, Common Heritage, Shared Future. New York: Routledge, pp.117–143.
52.
O’NeilC (2016) Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. New York: Crown.
53.
ParsonsMFisherKCreaseRP (2021) Environmental justice and Indigenous environmental justice. In: ParsonsMFisherKCreaseRP (eds) Decolonising Blue Spaces in the Anthropocene: Palgrave Studies in Natural Resource Management. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.39–73.
54.
PavelićSKMedicaJSGumbarevićD, et al. (2018) Critical review on zeolite Clinoptilolite safety and medical applications in vivo. Frontiers in Pharmacology9: 1350.
55.
PhiloC (2016) Less-than-human geographies. Political Geography60: 256–258.
56.
ProctorJD (1998) Ethics in geography: Giving moral form to the geographical imagination. Area30(1): 8–18.
57.
Puig de la BellacasaM (2015) Making time for soil: Technoscientific futurity and the pace of care. Social Studies of Science45(5): 691–716.
58.
RamABrookMSCroninSJ (2019) Engineering characteristics of soils prone to rainfall-induced slope failure in Viti Levu, Fiji. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology & Hydrogeology52: 336–345.
59.
RhoadsB (2022) Whither physical geography redux: Revisiting the place of physical geography in the United States. Environment and Planning F: Philosophy, Theory, Models, Methods and Practice1(1): 52–65.
60.
RichterDDBaconARBrecheisenZ, et al. (2014) Soil in the Anthropocene: Soil change matters. In: Proceedings of the IOP conference series: Earth and environmental science, vol. 25, Bendigo, VIC, Australia, 24–27 March 2014.
61.
RyanJC (2021) Hydropoetics: The rewor(l)ding of rivers. River Research and Applications. Epub ahead of print 10August. DOI: 10.1002/rra.3844.
62.
SalmondABrierleyGHikuroaD (2019) Let the rivers speak: Thinking about waterways in Aotearoa New Zealand. Policy Quarterly15(3): 45–54.
63.
SalmondJATadakiMDicksonM (2017) Can big data tame a ‘naughty’ world?The Canadian Geographer61(1): 52–63.
64.
SameshimaT (1978) Zeolites in tuff beds of the Miocene Waitemata Group, Auckland Province, New Zealand. In: SandLBMumptonFA (eds) Natural Zeolites: Occurrence, Properties, Use. Elmsford: Pergamon Press, pp.309–317.
65.
SchäferS (2021) Research ethics in human and physical geography: Ethical literacy, the ethics of intervention, and the limits of self-regulation. In: HennSMiggelbrinkJHörschelmannK (eds) Research Ethics in Human Geography. New York: Routledge, pp.42–58.
66.
SeedJMacyJFlemingP, et al. (1988) Thinking Like a Mountain: Towards a Council of All Beings. Gabriola Island, BC, Canada: New Society Publishers.
67.
SnelderTHCattanéoFSurenAM, et al. (2004) Is the river environment classification an improved landscape-scale classification of rivers?Journal of the North American Benthological Society23(3): 580–598.
68.
SpenceMD (2000) Dispossessing the Wilderness: Indian Removal and the Making of the National Parks. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
69.
SteffenWCrutzenPJMcNeillJR (2007) The Anthropocene: Are humans now overwhelming the great forces of nature?AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment36(8): 614–621.
70.
StrongeDCStevensonBAHarmsworthGR, et al. (2020) A well-being approach to soil health: Insights from Aotearoa New Zealand. Sustainability12(18): 7719.
71.
SwidlerE (2009) The social production of soil. Soil Science174(1): 2–8.
72.
SwyngedouwEHeynenN (2003) Urban political ecology, justice and the politics of scale. Antipode35(5): 898–918.
TadakiMBrierleyGDicksonM, et al. (2015) Cultivating critical practices in physical geography. The Geographical Journal181(2): 160–171.
75.
TadakiMSalmondJLe HeronR, et al. (2012) Nature, culture, and the work of physical geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers37: 4547–4562.
Van GosenBSBlitzTAPlumleeGS, et al. (2013) Geologic occurrences of erionite in the United States: An emerging national public health concern for respiratory disease. Environmental Geochemistry and Health35(4): 419–430.
78.
VanniniP (2015) Non-representational research methodologies: An introduction. In: VanniniP (ed.) Non-representational Methodologies. New York: Routledge, pp.11–28.
79.
WaterstoneM (2022) Making molehills out of mountains; Keeping the tempest in the teapot. Environment and Planning F: Philosophy, Theory, Models, Methods and Practice1(1): 104–113.
WhatmoreSLandströmC (2011) Flood apprentices: An exercise in making things public. Economy and Society40(4): 582–610.
82.
WingMSharpEL (forthcoming) A ‘democracy of compost’: Neo-materialist urban encounters with soil. In: Urban Natures: Making Visible, (Re)Connecting and (Re)Politicising. Abingdon: Routledge.
83.
WohlE (2013) Wilderness is dead: Whither critical zone studies and geomorphology in the Anthropocene?Anthropocene2: 4–15.
84.
WolfeCBuckBMillerA, et al. (2017) Exposure to naturally occurring mineral fibers due to off-road vehicle use: A review. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health220(8): 1230–1241.
85.
United Nations World Water Assessment Programme (WWAP), UN Water (2018) The United Nations World Water Development Report 2018: Nature-based Solutions for Water. Paris: UNESCO. Available at: https://www.unwater.org/publications/world-water-development-report-2018/ (accessed 12 October 2021).
