This article investigates the significance of digital social touch in creating and maintaining our relationships to intimate others. It presents ‘Project Re:Connect’ – a speculative design project centred around mediating digital social touch through footwear. The primary objective of the project was to use diegetic props to instigate debate and deliberate decision making regarding the design futures of technologically mediated communication.
BevanJLSparksL (2011) Communication in the context of long-distance family caregiving: an integrated review and practical applications. Patient Education and Counseling85(1): 26–30.
2.
AmmarAMuellerPTrabelsiK, et al. (2020) Psychological consequences of COVID-19 home confinement: the ECLB-COVID19 multicenter study. PLoS One15(11): e0240204.
3.
BenedettiJ (2013) Stanislavski and the Actor: The Method of Physical Action. London, UK: Routledge.
DaintonMAylorB (2002) Patterns of communication channel use in the maintenance of long-distance relationships. Communication Research Reports19(2): 118–129.
7.
DunneARabyF (2013) Speculative Everything: Design, Fiction, and Social Dreaming. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8.
FieldT (2010) Touch for socioemotional and physical well-being: a review. Developmental Review30(4): 367–383.
9.
GroenewaldT (2004) A phenomenological research design illustrated. International Journal of Qualitative Methods3(1): 42–55.
10.
HaansAIjsselsteijnW (2006) Mediated social touch: a review of current research and future directions. Virtual Reality9(2–3): 149–159.
11.
HawkleyLCCacioppoJT (2010) Loneliness matters: a theoretical and empirical review of consequences and mechanisms. Annals of Behavioral Medicine40(2): 218–227.
12.
Hayes-RothBVan GentRHuberD (1997) Acting in character. In: Creating Personalities for Synthetic Actors. Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany: Springer, 92–112.
13.
Holt-LunstadJSmithTBBakerM, et al. (2015) Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for mortality: a meta-analytic review. Perspectives on Psychological Science10(2): 227–237.
14.
HuismanGFrederiksADvan ErpJB, et al. (2016) Simulating affective touch: using a vibrotactile array to generate pleasant stroking sensations. In: International Conference on Human Haptic Sensing and Touch Enabled Computer Applications. Berlin, Germany: Springer International Publishing, 240–250.
15.
HwangTJRabheruKPeisahC, et al. (2020) Loneliness and social isolation during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Psychogeriatrics32(10): 1217–1220.
16.
LuongABendasJEtziR, et al. (2017) The individual preferred velocity of stroking touch as a stable measurement. Physiology & Behavior177: 129–134.
17.
MadianouMMillerD (2013) Polymedia: towards a new theory of digital media in interpersonal communication. International Journal of Cultural Studies16(2): 169–187.
18.
MasiCMChenHHawkleyLC, et al. (2011) A meta-analysis of interventions to reduce loneliness. Personality and Social Psychology Review15(3): 219–266.
19.
MitrovićIAugerJHannaJ, et al. (eds), (2009) Beyond speculative design: past–present–future. Cape Town, South Africa: Foresight, 10, 4–21.
McGloneFVallboABOlaussonH, et al. (2007) Discriminative touch and emotional touch. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale61(3): 173–183.
22.
NeustaedterCGreenbergS (2012) Intimacy in long-distance relationships over video chat. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, NY: ACM, 753–762.
23.
ParigiPHensonW (2014) Social isolation in America. Annual Review of Sociology40: 153–171.
24.
PietrabissaGSimpsonSG (2020) Psychological consequences of social isolation during COVID-19 outbreak. Frontiers in Psychology11: 2201.
25.
RazaiMSOakeshottPKankamH, et al. (2020) Mitigating the psychological effects of social isolation during the covid-19 pandemic. BMJ369: m1904.
26.
RobsonC (2011) Real Word Research. 3rd edition. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
27.
RothWM (2005) Auto/Biography and Auto/Ethnography: Praxis of Research Method. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publication.
28.
SmithJA (ed), (2007). Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29.
TurkleS (2017) Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. Hachette, UK: Basic Books.
30.
Van ManenM (1984) “Doing” phenomenological research and writing: an introduction. Qualitative Health Research31(6): 1069–1082.
31.
VaucelleCBonanniLIshiiH (2009) Design of haptic interfaces for therapy. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, NY: ACM, 467–470.
32.
WheelerLReisHNezlekJB (1983) Loneliness, social interaction, and sex roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology45(4): 943–953.
33.
WilliamsSNArmitageCJTampeT, et al. (2020) Public perceptions and experiences of social distancing and social isolation during the COVID-19 pandemic: a UK-based focus group study. BMJ Open10(7): e039334.
