‘More collaborative and open’: As systemic psychotherapists become more familiar with videoconferencing,are the advantages of the medium becoming more apparent? A focus group study with UK systemic practitioners

Abstract

Three semi-structured online focus group interviews were conducted with 17 systemic psychotherapists in the UK 1 year after the transition to videoconferencing therapy (or ‘teletherapy’) prompted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Thematic analysis identified 23 themes within 10 superordinate themes including Advantages of working online; Changes to the therapeutic relationship; Comparison to in-person therapy; Using therapeutic techniques online; Disadvantages of working online; Adapting to the affordances and constraints of technology. Whilst experiences were mildly positive overall, participants responded with almost twice as many positive comments as negative ones and described themselves as likely to continue working online. This study explores the advantages of online delivery which were described in the focus groups and posits that these digital affordances will lead to the development of more collaborative and invitational approaches.

Keywords

COVID-19 family psychotherapy family interventions family therapy practice telemental health videoconferencing teletherapy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aggett

Swainson

Tapsell

(2015) ‘Seeking permission’: an interviewing stance for finding connection with hard to reach families. Journal of Family Therapy 37(2): 190–209.

Borcsa

Pomini

Saint-Mont

(2021) Digital systemic practices in Europe: a survey before the Covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Family Therapy 43(1): 4–26.

Burbach

Pote

(2021) EDITORIAL: digital approaches- a paradigm shift?. Journal of Family Therapy 43: 169–184. DOI: 10.1111/1467-6427.12336.

Burnham

(1992) Approach-method-technique: making distinctions and creating connections. Human Systems 3(1): 3–26.

Dedoose Version 8.0.35 (2018) Web Application for Managing Analyzing, and Presenting Qualitative and Mixed Method Research Data. Los Angeles, CA: SocioCultural Research Consultants, LLC. www.dedoose.com.

Fredman

(2014) Weaving net-works of hope with families, practitioners and communities: inspirations from systemic and narrative approaches. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy 35(1): 54–71.

Hardy

Maier

Gregson

(2021) Couple teletherapy in the era of COVID-19: Experiences and recommendations. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy 47: 225–243. DOI: 10.1111/jmft.12501.

Humer

Stippl

Pieh

, et al. (2020). Psychodynamic, humanistic, systemic, and behavioral psychotherapists' experiences with remote psychotherapy during COVID-19 in Austria: a cross-sectional online survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research.

Lebow

(2021) Couple and family therapy (and families) in the digital age. Family Process 60: 689–693. DOI: 10.1111/famp.12705.

10.

Mc Kenny

Burbach

. (2021). Some ontological and epistemological consequences of the development of online family therapy and what this could mean for practice. (submitted).

11.

Mc Kenny

Galloghly

Porter

, et al. (2021) ‘Living in a Zoom world’: survey mapping how COVID-19 is changing family therapy practice in the UK. Journal of Family Therapy 43: 272–294. DOI: 10.1111/1467-6427.12332.

12.

Mlynář

González-Martínez

Lalanne

(2018) Situated organization of video-mediated interaction: a review of ethnomethodological and conversation analytic studies. Interacting with Computers 30(2): 73–84.

13.

Otter.AI version 2 (2021) software for transcribing audio and video files. Mountain view, California. https://otter.ai/.

14.

Pearce

(1998) Transcendent storytelling: abilities for systemic practitioners and their clients. Human Systems 9(3–4): 167–184.

15.

Probst

Stippl

Pieh

(2020) Changes in provision of psychotherapy in the early weeks of the COVID-19 lockdown in Austria. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17(11): 3815.

16.

Schon

(1983) The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.

17.

Selvini Palazzoli

Boscolo

Cecchin

, et al. (1980) Hypothesizing—circularity—neutrality: three guidelines for the conductor of the session. Family Process 19(1): 3–12.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.10 MB