While the involvement in terrorist organizations and social movements has generated a plethora of literature, little work exists on the exit from these two types of collectives. In order to grasp the plurality of factors involved in these processes, we based ourselves on an empirical sociological survey of 64 activists of the Partiya Karkerên Kurdistan (PKK). This party experienced a major wave of departures from the guerrilla movement in the early 2000s. The micro-sociological study of desistance trajectories make it possible to develop a relevant explanatory model of disengagement combining attention to diachronicity, the identification of micro-level turning points and meso-level windows of opportunity. After recalling the conditions under which the survey was carried out, we will show how desistance brings into play a certain relationship to time, key moments which, in the case of the PKK, concern not so much state repression as the internal dysfunctions of the party, as well as the “possibilities” that open up for the actors, either during moments of the party restructuraction or in civilian life.
AkkayaAHJoostJ (2011) The PKK in 2000s: continuity through breaks? In MarliesCJoostJ (eds) Nationalisms and Politics in Turkey: Political Islam, Kemalism and the Kurdish Issue. London and New York: Routledge, 143–162.
2.
AkkayaAHJoostJ (2012) Reassembling the political: the PKK and the project of radical democracy. European Journal of Turkish Studies. DOI: 10.4000/ejts.4615.
3.
AlimiEY (2001) Relational dynamics in factional adoption of terrorist tactics: a comparative perspective. Theory and Society40(1): 95–119.
4.
AydınoğluE (2014). Fis Koyunden Kobane’ye Kurt Ozgurluk Hareketi. Istanbul: Versus Kitap.
5.
BanduraA (1998) Mechanisms of moral disengagement. In ReichW (ed.) Origins of Terrorism: Psychologies, Ideologies, Theologies, States of Mind. Washington D.C: Woodrow Wilson Center Press, 161–191.
6.
BarrelleK (2014) Disengagement from violent extremism Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression, 7(2): 129–142.
7.
BeckerHS (1960) Notes on the concept of commitment. American Journal of Sociology66(1): 32–40.
8.
Bennani-ChraïbiMFillieuleO (2012), Retour sur les situations révolutionnaires arabes. Revue Française de Science Politique62: 1–2.
9.
BjørgoTHorganJ (2009) Leaving Terrorism Behind: Individual and Collective Disengagement. New York: Routledge.
10.
BjørgoT (2011) Dreams and disillusionment: engagement in and disengagement from militant extremist groups. Crime, Law and Social Change554: 277–285.
11.
BlumerHG (1939) Collective behavior. In ParkRE (ed) An Outline of the Principles of Sociology. New York: Barnes and Noble, 221–280.
12.
BosiL (2012) État des savoirs et pistes de recherche sur la violence politique. Critique Internationale54(1): 171–189.
13.
BosiLDella PortaD (2012) Micro-mobilization into armed groups: ideological, instrumental and solidaristic paths. Qualitative Sociology35: 361–383.
14.
BosiLDonatellaD (2011) Processes out of Political Violence: A Comparative Historical Sociology of Italian Left-Wing Underground Organizations and the Provisional IRA. In Gunning J (ed)How Does Terrorism End?Londres: Routledge.
15.
BourdieuP (1986) L’illusion biographique. Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales62/63: 69–72.
16.
BoutronC (2015) Women at war, war on women: reconciliation and patriarchy. In ShekhawatS (ed.) Female Combatants in Conflict and Peace.Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 149–166.
17.
BoutronC (2019) De la subversion à l’instrumentalisation. Trajectoires combattantes féminines et réaffirmation du patriarcat dans le Pérou de l’après-conflit. In Guibet LafayeCFrénodA (eds) S’émanciper par les armes ? Sur la violence politique des femmes. Paris: Presses de l’Inalco, 103–116.
18.
CalveiroP (2014) Politique et/ou violence. Une approche de la guérilla des années 1970. Tracés143: 17–42.
19.
Chernov HwangJ (2015) The disengagement of Indonesian jihadists: understanding the pathways. Terrorism and Political Violence29(2):227–295.
20.
CigerliSLe SaoutD (2005). Les Mutations de la question kurde. Öcalan et le PKK. Paris : Maisonneuve et Larose.
21.
ClubbG (2009) Re-evaluating the disengagement process: the case of fatah. Perspectives on Terrorism3(3): 25–34.
DebosM (2008) Les limites de l’accumulation par les armes. Itinéraires d’ex-combattants au Tchad. Politique Africaine109(1): 167–181.
26.
Della PortaD (2009) Leaving underground organizations: a sociological analysis of the Italian case. In BjørgoTHorganJ (eds) Leaving Terrorism Behind: Individual and Collective Disengagement. London: Routledge, pp. 66–87.
27.
Della PortaD (2013) Clandestine Political Violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
DemantFSlootmanMBuijsF, et al. (2008) Deradicalisation of right-wing radicals and islamic radicals. In: van DonselaarJRodriguesPR (eds) Racism and Extremism Monitor Eight Report. Amsterdam: Anne Frank House/Amsterdam University Press.
29.
DisleyEWeedKRedingA, et al. (2012) Individual Disengagement from Al Qa’ida-Influenced Terrorist Groups. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. URL: Individual disengagement from Al Qa’ida-influenced terrorist groups: A Rapid Evidence Assessment to inform policy and practice in preventing terrorism | RAND.
30.
DuclosN (2010). L’Adieu aux armes ? Parcours d’anciens combattants. Paris : Khartala.
31.
DorronsoroGGrojeanO (2009) Engagement militant et phénomènes de radicalisation chez les Kurdes de Turquie. European Journal of Turkish Studies. Published August 2009. URL: http://ejts.revues.org/198.
32.
EdwardsA (2009) Abandoning armed resistance? The ulster volunteer force as a case study of strategic terrorism in Northern Ireland. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism322: 146–166.
33.
FillieuleO (2005) Temps biographique, temps social et variabilité des rétributions. In FillieuleO (ed.) Le Désengagement Militant. Paris: Belin, 17–45.
34.
FillieuleO (2012) Le désengagement d’organisations radicales. Approche par les processus et les configurations. Lien social et Politiques68: 37–59.
35.
FillieuleO (2015) Disengagement from radical organizations: a process and multilevel model of analysis. In KlandermansBvan StralenC (eds) Movements in Times of Democratic Transition. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 34–63.
36.
GaribayD (2005) De la lutte armée à la lutte électorale, itinéraires divergents d’une trajectoire insolite. Une comparaison à partir des cas centraméricains et colombien. Revue internationale de politique comparée123: 283–297.
37.
GrojeanO (2008) “La production de l’Homme nouveau au sein du PKK. European Journal of Turkish Studies8. Published December 30 2008. URL: http://journals.openedition.org/ejts/2753. English version: The Production of the New Man Within the PKK. Translated by Adrian Morfee. European Journal of Turkish Studies.
38.
GrojeanO (2013) Comment gérer une crise politique interne? Façonnage organisationnel du militantisme, maintien de l’engagement et trajectoires de défection. Politix1022: 63–88.
39.
Guibet LafayeC (2022a) Évolution générationnelle des facteurs de l’engagement au PKK. SociologieS (AISLF). Forthcoming.
40.
Guibet LafayeC (2022b) Sortir de la lutte armée: dissonances cognitives et contradictions normatives. Le cas du PKK. Revue internationale de politique comparée. Forthcoming.
41.
Guibet LafayeCTugrulB (2021) Kurdish ‘patriotic’ Families: An Incentive or a Brake to Join the PKK. Critical Studies on Terrorism.
42.
Guibet LafayeCTugrulB (2022) PKK militants: from the 1970s to nowadays. Three cohorts. Terrorism and Political Violence. Forthcoming.
43.
GünesC (2011) The Kurdish National Movement in Turkey: From Protest to Resistance. London: Routledge.
44.
HechterM (1987) Principles of Group Solidarity.Berkeley: University of California Press.
45.
HedströmPSwedbergS (eds) (1998) Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46.
HorganJ (2008) Deradicalization or disengagement? A process in need of clarity and a counterterrorism initiative in need of evaluation. Perspectives on Terrorism2(4): 3–8.
47.
HorganJ (2009) Walking Away from Terrorism: Accounts of Disengagement from Radical and Extremist Movements. London: Routledge.
48.
JacobsonM (2008) Why terrorists quit: gaining from Al Qa’ida’s losses. CTC Sentinel18: 1–4.
49.
JonesSG.LibickiMC (2008) How Terrorist Groups End: Lessons for Countering Al Qa’ida.Santa Monica: RAND Corporation.
KarayılanM (2014) Bir Savaşın Anatomisi: Kurdistan’da Askeri cizgi. Diyarbakır: Aram.
52.
LaperrièreA (1997) Les critères de scientificité des méthodes qualitatives. In: PoupartJDeslauriersJ-PGroulxL-H, et al. (eds) La recherche qualitative : enjeux épistémologiques et méthodologiques. Boucherville (Québec): Gaëtan Morin éd.
53.
LarzillièrePCalabreseECGrajalesJ, et al. (2021) Engagements et désengagements combattants. Les émotions comme outil d’analyse. Critique Internationale912: 163–181.
54.
LaurensS (2007) “‘Pourquoi’ et ‘comment’ poser les questions qui fâchent ?”. Réflexions sur les dilemmes récurrents que posent les entretiens avec des “imposants”. Genèses4(69): 112–127.
55.
MarcusA (2007) Blood and Belief. The PKK and the Kurdish Fight for Independence. NY: New York University Press.
56.
MoghadamA (2012) Failure and disengagement in the Red Army Faction. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism352: 156–181.
57.
MontazLDialloK (2021) Des ‘démobilisés’ en quête de reconnaissance: le renouveau du combat politique des ex-combattants ivoiriens. Critique Internationale912: 89–110.
58.
O’ConnorF (2021) 4 - The PKK and Rural Insurgency. In: O’ConnorF (ed) Understanding Insurgency. Popular Support for the PKK in Turkey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 107–145.
59.
RashwanD (2009) The renunciation of violence by Egyptian Jihadi organizations. In: BjørgoTHorganJ (eds) Leaving Terrorism Behind: Individual and Collective Disengagement. Abington: Routledge, 113–132.
60.
SharifiDM (2016) Après le désengagement : les défis de la reconstruction identitaire des ex-guérilléros. In: PleyersGCapitaineB (eds) Mouvements sociaux. Quand le sujet devient acteur.Paris : Maison des Sciences de l’Homme, 259–271.
61.
SnowDAZurcherLAEkland-OlsonS (1980) Social networks and social movements: a microstructural approach to differential recruitment. American Sociological Review45: 787–801.
62.
SommierI (1998) La Violence politique et son deuil. L’après 68 en France et en Italie. Rennes : Presses Universitaires de Rennes.
63.
SommierI (2012) Engagement radical, désengagement et déradicalisation. Continuum et lignes de fracture. Lien social et Politiques68:15–35.
