This article examines Canada’s immigration and detention system through its newly established alternatives to detention (ATD) program. As a program that relies rather extensively on mobile carceral technologies such as electronic monitoring and voice reporting, I argue that we should consider these alternatives not only as extensions of carceral apparatuses and the detention system but as pervasive, far-reaching, and more abstract manifestations of control and confinement. I introduce the term “techno-carcerality” to theorize how we might understand the shift from traditional modes of confinement to less traditional ones, grounded in mobile, electronic, and digital technologies. I contend that the use of mobile carceral technologies in the context of immigration and detention imposes physical, psychological, spatial, and data-driven modes of control and confinement in private, public, and digital space, which are veiled behind notions and misconceptions of increased freedom, mobility, and autonomy. While the ATD program may offer some better options than those available within detention centers or other carceral institutions, it is a program that involves immense surveillance dataveillance techniques that lead to profound carceral effects and anxieties, affecting everyday life in ways that experientially mimic and transcend conventional confinement.
Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunications Commission (2019) Communications monitoring report 2018. Report to Government of Canada. Available at: crtc.gc.ca/pubs/cmr2018-en.pdf(accessed 18 December 2018).
CarnochanWB (1998) The literature of confinement. In: MorrisNRothmanDJ (eds) The Oxford History of the Prison. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 381–406.
8.
ClevelandJRousseauCKronickR (2012) The harmful effects of detention and family separation on asylum seekers’ mental health in the context of bill C-31. Brief Submitted to the House of Commons Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration Concerning Bill C-31, the Protecting Canada’s Immigration System Act, April.
9.
ClevelandJRousseauC (2013) Psychiatric symptoms associated with brief detention of adult asylum seekers in Canada. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry58(7): 409–416.
10.
Correctional Service Canada (2017) A profile of offenders in the electronic monitoring research pilot: the first year. Available at: www.csc-scc.gc.ca/research/err-16-08-eng.shtml(accessed 22 December 2018).
ElhaiJDDvorakRDLevineJC, et al. (2017) Problematic smartphone use: a conceptual overview and systematic review of relations with anxiety and depression psychopathology. Journal of Affective Disorders207: 251–259.
13.
FoucaultM (1977) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage Books.
14.
GillN (2013) Mobility versus liberty? The punitive use of movement within and outside carceral environments. In: MoranMGillNConlonD (eds) Carceral Spaces: Mobility and Agency in Imprisonment and Migrant Detention. London: Ashgate Publishing, pp. 19–35.
15.
GillNConlonDMoranD, et al. (2018) Carceral circuitry: new directions in carceral geography. Progress in Human Geography42(2): 183–204.
GrosHVan GrollP (2015) ‘We have no rights’: arbitrary imprisonment and cruel treatment of migrants with mental health issues in Canada. International Human Rights Program, University of Toronto Faculty of Law. Available at: ihrp.law.utoronto.ca/We_Have_No_Rights(accessed 12 December 2018).
19.
HaggertyKDEricsonRV (2000) The surveillant assemblage. British Journal of Sociology51(4): 605–622.
KazimiA (2012) Undesirables: White Canada and the Komagata Maru. Vancouver: Douglas & McIntyre.
22.
KleinAWilliamsL (2012) Immigration detention in the community: research on the experiences of migrants released from detention centres in the UK. Population, Space and Place18(6): 741–753.
KoskelaH (2000) ‘The gaze without eyes’: video-surveillance and the changing nature of urban space. Progress in Human Geography24(2): 242–265.
25.
LeppABarkleyJEKarpinskiC (2014) The relationship between cell phone use, academic performance, anxiety, and satisfaction with life in college students. Computers in Human Behavior31: 343–350.
LuptonD (2016) The Quantified Self: A Sociology of Self-Tracking. Cambridge: Polity.
28.
LyonD (2003) Surveillance as social sorting: computer codes and mobile bodies. In: LyonD (ed.) Surveillance as Social Sorting: Privacy, Risk, and Digital Discrimination. London: Routledge, pp. 13–30.
29.
LyonD (2018) The Culture of Surveillance. Cambridge: Polity.
30.
MaddrellA (2017) Carceral transitions experienced through community service placements in charity shops. In: TurnerJPetersK (eds) Carceral Mobilities: Interrogating Movement in Incarceration. London: Routledge, pp. 221–235.
MichalonB (2017) Accommodation for asylum seekers and ‘tolerance’ in Romania: governing foreigners by mobility? In: TurnerJPetersK (eds) Carceral Mobilities: Interrogating Movement in Incarceration. London: Routledge, pp. 57–70.
33.
MilesCACohnJP (2006) Tracking prisoners in jail with biometrics: an experiment in a navy brig. National Institute of Justice, 1 January. Available at: www.nij.gov/journals/253/pages/tracking.aspx (accessed 22 June 2020).
NanavatiSThiemeMNanavatiR (2002) Biometrics: Identification Verification in a Networked World. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
36.
NorrisC (2003) From personal to digital: CCTV, the panopticon, and the technological mediations of suspicion and social control. In: LyonD (ed.) Surveillance as Social Sorting: Privacy, Risk, and Digital Discrimination. London: Routledge, pp. 249–281.
Sierra Systems (2014) Report to British Columbia justice and public safety sector: technical assessment of electronic supervision. Report for the British Columbia Justice and Public Safety Sector Sierra Systems, 12 December.
39.
SilvermanSJ (2014) In the wake of irregular arrivals: changes to the Canadian immigration detention system. Refuge30(2): 27–34.
40.
SorensonK (2012) A study of electronic monitoring in the correctional and immigration settings. Report of the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security, House of Commons, September.
41.
ThobaniS (2007) Exalted Subjects: Studies in the Making of Race and Nation in Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Van DijckJ (2014) Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: big data between scientific paradigm and ideology. Surveillance and Society12(2): 197–208.
44.
Murakami WoodD (2007) Beyond the panopticon? Foucault and surveillance studies. In: CramptonJWEldenS (eds) Knowledge and Power: Foucault and Geography. London: Ashgate Publishing, pp. 245–264.
45.
YehSS (2010) Cost-benefit analysis of reducing crime through electronic monitoring of parolees and probationers. Journal of Criminal Justice38: 1090–1096.
46.
ZuboffS (2019) The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. New York: Public Affairs.
