Who Do We Model? A Brief Report Comparing Different Sources of Normative Influence on Adolescent Bystander Intervention

Abstract

Adolescence is a critical period of development in which various socializing relationships can play an important role in shaping behavior. This study examined adolescents’ bystander helping in relation to their perceived norms supporting intervention in dating and sexual violence situations across four different norm-referent groups. Survey questions asked about students’ bystander behavior and perceptions of bystander norms based on whether the norm was endorsed by friends, parents, teachers, and people in town. Paper-and-pencil surveys were completed during the school day by high school students (N = 609) in three different towns in northern New England. We used multinomial logistic regression to compare the impact of different norms on bystander behavior. Friend- and parent-referent bystander norms were both individually associated with increased helping behaviors. Multivariate analysis found only friend-referent norms were significantly related to more frequent helping behaviors. The implications of these results can inform norms-based prevention programs for adolescents.

Keywords

adolescents interpersonal violence sexual violence bystander intervention social norms

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ajzen

(1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Banyard

V. L.

Edwards

K. L.

Rizzo

A. J.

Rothman

E. F.

Greenberg

Kearns

M. C.

(2020). Improving social norms and actions to prevent sexual and intimate partner violence: A pilot study of the impact of green dot community on youth. Journal of Prevention & Health Promotion, 1(2), 183–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/2632077020966571

Barhight

L. R.

Hubbard

J. A.

Grassetti

S. N.

Morrow

M. T.

(2017). Relations between actual group norms, perceived peer behavior, and bystander children’s intervention to bullying. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 46(3), 394–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2015.1046180

Brant

(1990). Assessing proportionality in the proportional odds model for ordinal logistic regression. Biometrics, 46(4), 1171–1178. https://doi.org/10.2307/2532457

Cambron

Catalano

R. F.

Hawkins

J. D.

(2019). The social development model. In The Oxford handbook of developmental & life-course criminology (pp. 223–247). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190201371.013.13

Carlson

B. E.

Worden

A. P.

(2005). Attitudes and beliefs about domestic violence: Results of a public opinion survey: I. Definitions of domestic violence, criminal domestic violence, and prevalence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20(10), 1197–1218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260505278530

Casey

E. A.

Lindhorst

Storer

H. L.

(2017). The situational-cognitive model of adolescent bystander behavior: Modeling bystander decision-making in the context of bullying and teen dating violence. Psychology of Violence, 7(1), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000033

Catalano

R. F.

Hawkins

J. D.

(1996). The social development model: A theory of antisocial behavior. In Hawkins

J. D.

(Ed.), Delinquency and crime: Current theories. Cambridge University Press.

Chung

Rimal

R. N.

(2016). Social norms: A review. Review of Communication Research, 4(0), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.12840/issn.2255-4165.2016.04.01.008

10.

Cialdini

R. B.

(2008). Influence: Science and practice (5th ed.). Allyn and Bacon.

11.

Cleveland

M. J.

Feinberg

M. E.

Bontempo

D. E.

Greenberg

M. T.

(2008). The role of risk & protective factors in substance use across adolescence. Journal of Adolescent Health, 43(2), 157–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.01.015

12.

Cleveland

M. J.

Feinberg

M. E.

Jones

D. E.

(2012). Predicting alcohol use across adolescence: Relative strength of individual, family, peer, and contextual risk and protective factors. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 26(4), 703–713. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027583

13.

Coker

A. L.

Cook-Craig

P. G.

Williams

C. M.

Fisher

B. S.

Clear

E. R.

Garcia

L. S.

Hegge

L. M.

(2011). Evaluation of Green Dot: An active bystander intervention to reduce sexual violence on college campuses. Violence Against Women, 17(6), 777–796. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801211410264

14.

Cook-Craig

P. G.

Millspaugh

P. H.

Recktenwald

E. A.

Kelly

N. C.

Hegge

L. M.

Coker

A. L.

Pletcher

T. S.

(2014). From Empower to Green Dot: Successful strategies and lessons learned in developing comprehensive sexual violence primary prevention programming. Violence Against Women, 20(10), 1162–1178. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801214551286

15.

Davidov

D. M.

Hill

Bush

H. M.

Coker

A. L.

(2020). The green light for green dot: A qualitative study of factors influencing adoption of an efficacious violence prevention program in high school settings. Violence Against Women, 26(12/13), 1701–1726. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801219886377

16.

Debnam

K. J.

Mauer

(2021). Who, when, how, and why bystanders intervene in physical and psychological teen dating violence. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 22(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838018806505

17.

DeOrnellas

Spurgin

(2017). Teachers’ perspectives on bullying. In Rosen

L. H.

DeOrnellas

Scott

S. R.

(Eds.), Bullying in school: Perspectives from school staff, students, and parents (pp. 49–68). Palgrave Macmillan US. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59298-9_3

18.

Geber

Baumann

Klimmt

(2019). Where do norms come from? Peer communication as a factor in normative social influences on risk behavior. Communication Research, 46(5), 708–730. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650217718656

19.

Kettrey

H. H.

Marx

R. A.

(2020). Effects of bystander sexual assault prevention programs on promoting intervention skills and combatting the bystander effect: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 17(3), 343–367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-020-09417-y

20.

Lambe

L. J.

Cioppa

V. D.

Hong

I. K.

Craig

W. M.

(2019). Standing up to bullying: A social ecological review of peer defending in offline and online contexts. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 45(0), 51–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2018.05.007

21.

Masten

A. S.

Faden

V. B.

Zucker

R. A.

Spear

L. P.

(2008). Underage drinking: A developmental framework. Pediatrics, 121(Suppl. 4), S235–S251. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2007-2243A

22.

McDonnell

K. A.

Burke

J. G.

Gielen

A. C.

O’Campo

Weidl

(2011). Women’s perceptions of their community’s social norms towards assisting women who have experienced intimate partner violence. Journal of Urban Health, 88(2), 240–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-011-9546-9

23.

Miller

Tancredi

D. J.

McCauley

H. L.

Decker

M. R.

Virata

M. C. D.

Anderson

H. A.

Stetkevich

Brown

E. W.

Moideen

Silverman

J. G.

(2012). “Coaching boys into men”: A cluster-randomized controlled trial of a dating violence prevention program. Journal of Adolescent Health, 51(5), 431–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.01.018

24.

Moylan

C. A.

Hatfield

Randall

(2018). Campus sexual assault climate surveys: A brief exploration of publicly available reports. Journal of American College Health, 66(6), 445–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2018.1431914

25.

Mujal

G. N.

Taylor

M. E.

Fry

J. L.

Gochez-Kerr

T. H.

Weaver

N. L.

(2021). A systematic review of bystander interventions for the prevention of sexual violence. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 22(2), 381–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838019849587

26.

Neighbors

LaBrie

J. W.

Hummer

J. F.

Lewis

M. A.

Lee

C. M.

Desai

Kilmer

J. R.

Larimer

M. E.

(2010). Group identification as a moderator of the relationship between perceived social norms and alcohol consumption. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 24(3), 522–528. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019944

27.

Ozaki

Brandon

(2020). Evidence-based bystander programs to prevent sexual and dating violence in high schools. Leadership and Research in Education, 5(1), 73–98. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1254383

28.

Pozzoli

Gini

Vieno

(2012). The role of individual correlates and class norms in defending and passive bystanding behavior in bullying: A multilevel analysis. Child Development, 83(6), 1917–1931. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01831.x

29.

Reno

R. R.

Cialdini

R. B.

Kallgren

C. A.

(1993). The transsituational influence of social norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(1), 104–112. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.64.1.104

30.

Rivis

Sheeran

Armitage

C. J.

(2009). Expanding the affective and normative components of the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analysis of anticipated affect and moral norms. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39(12), 2985–3019. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00558.x

31.

Rothman

E. F.

Edwards

K. M.

Rizzo

A. J.

Kearns

Banyard

V. L.

(2019). Perceptions of community norms and youths’ reactive and proactive dating and sexual violence bystander action. American Journal of Community Psychology, 63(1–2), 122–134. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12312

32.

Schuler

M. S.

Tucker

J. S.

Pedersen

E. R.

D’Amico

E. J.

(2019). Relative influence of perceived peer and family substance use on adolescent alcohol, cigarette, and marijuana use across middle and high school. Addictive Behaviors, 88, 99–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.08.025

33.

Smith

S. G.

Zhang

Basile

K. C.

Merrick

M. T.

Wang

Kresnow

Chen

(2018). The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey: 2015 data brief—updated release (p. 32). National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

34.

StataCorp . (2019). Stata statistical software: Release 16 (Version 16) [Computer software].

35.

Turner

H. A.

Finkelhor

Hamby

S. L.

Shattuck

Ormrod

R. K.

(2011). Specifying type and location of peer victimization in a national sample of children and youth. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40(8), 1052–1067. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-011-9639-5

36.

Valente

T. W.

(2005). Network models and methods for studying the diffusion of innovations. In Carrington

P. J.

Scott

Wasserman

(Eds.), Models and methods in social network analysis (pp. 98–116). Cambridge University Press.

37.

Weitzman

B. C.

Guttmacher

Weinberg

Kapadia

(2003). Low response rate schools in surveys of adolescent risk taking behaviours: Possible biases, possible solutions. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 57(1), 63–67. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.57.1.63

38.

Wernick

L. J.

Kulick

Inglehart

M. H.

(2013). Factors predicting student intervention when witnessing anti-LGBTQ harassment: The influence of peers, teachers, and climate. Children and Youth Services Review, 35(2), 296–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.11.003

39.

Woods

W. C.

Kistler

T. A.

Stuart

G. L.

Cornelius

T. L.

(2020). Bystander intervention behavior as function of victimization history, opportunity, and situational context. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(9–10), NP8006-NP8031. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520975838

40.

Woolf

Rimal

R. N.

Sripad

(2014). Understanding the influence of proximal networks on high school athletes’ intentions to use androgenic anabolic steroids. Journal of Sport Management, 28(1), 8–20. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.2013-0046

41.

Yoon

Bauman

(2014). Teachers: A critical but overlooked component of bullying prevention and intervention. Theory Into Practice, 53(4), 308–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2014.947226

42.

Young

A. M.

Grey

Boyd

C. J.

(2009). Adolescents’ experiences of sexual assault by peers: Prevalence and nature of victimization occurring within and outside of school. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38(8), 1072–1083. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-008-9363-y