Not all White-Collar Crimes (WCCs) are the same with respect to complexity and risk. Using previous rankings of WCC complexity, we examined associations between the Dark Triad traits and the likelihood and self-perceived efficacy of committing these different WCCs. Study 1 (N = 167) found that those high in Machiavellianism reported higher likelihood of committing the most complex (antitrust violations) but not simplest (embezzlement) WCCs. Individuals high in psychopathy reported a different pattern: a higher likelihood of committing the simplest but not most complex WCCs. Study 2 (n = 257) replicated this effect among financial professionals. These results are consistent with the impulsive nature of psychopathy and the strategic nature of Machiavellianism. These findings have implications for profiling WCC offenders.
AmosB.LongpréN.De RoosM. S. (2022). The dark triad of personality: Attitudes and beliefs towards white-collar crime. Journal of White Collar and Corporate Crime, 2631309X2211200. https://doi.org/10.1177/2631309x221120002
2.
BasakA.ČernýJ.GutierrezM.CurtisS.KamhouaC.JonesD.KiekintveldC. (2018, September). An initial study of targeted personality models in the flipit game. In International conference on decision and game theory for security (pp. 623–636). Springer International Publishing.
3.
BereczkeiT. (2015). The manipulative skill: Cognitive devices and their neural correlates underlying Machiavellian’s decision making. Brain and Cognition, 99, 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2015.06.007
4.
BlickleG.SchlegelA.FassbenderP.KleinU. K. A. (2006). Some personality correlates of business white-collar crime. Applied Psychology, 55(2), 220–233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2006.00226.x
5.
BogaertsS.GarofaloC.De CaluwéE.JankovićM. (2021). Grandiose and vulnerable narcissism, identity integration and self-control related to criminal behavior. BMC Psychology, 9(1), 191. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-021-00697-1
6.
BurnsR.MeitlM. B. (2019). Prosecution, defense, and sentencing of white‐collar crime. The Handbook of White‐Collar Crime, 279–296. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118775004.ch18
7.
CarréJ. R.JonesD. N.MuellerS. M. (2020). Perceiving opportunities for legal and illegal profit: Machiavellianism and the Dark Triad. Personality and Individual Differences, 162, 109942.
8.
CastilleC. M.BucknerJ. C.ThoroughgoodC. N. (2018). Prosocial citizens without a moral compass? Examining the relationship between machiavellianism and unethical pro-organizational behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 149(4), 919–930. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3079-9
CohenL. B.FelsonM. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 588. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094589
11.
ColemanJ. W. (1987). Toward an integrated theory of white-collar crime. American Journal of Sociology, 93(2), 406–439. https://doi.org/10.1086/228750
CresseyD. R. (1953). Other people’s money: Study in the social psychology of embezzlement. Free Press.
14.
CurtisS. R.BasakA.CarreJ. R.BošanskýB.ČernýJ.Ben-AsherN.KiekintveldC. (2021). The Dark Triad and strategic resource control in a competitive computer game. Personality and Individual Differences, 168, 110343.
HelmF. A.AndrewsD. G.de RoosM. S.JonesD. N. (2023) Differential offending as predicted by the dark Triad in an Iranian sample. Manuscript Under Review.
20.
JonesD. B. (2013). What’s mine is mine and what’s yours is mine: The Dark Triad and gambling with your neighbor’s money. Journal of Research in Personality, 47(5), 563–571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.04.005
21.
JonesD. B.MuellerS. M. (2021). Is machiavellianism dead or dormant? The perils of researching a secretive construct. Journal of Business Ethics, 176(3), 535–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04708-w
JonesD. N. (2014). Risk in the face of retribution: Psychopathic individuals persist in financial misbehavior among the dark triad. Personality and Individual Differences, 67, 109–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.030
24.
JonesD. N. (2016). The dark side of personality: Science and practice in social, personality, and clinical psychology. In Zeigler-HillV.MarcusD. K. (Eds.), The nature of Machiavellianism: Distinct patterns of misbehavior (pp. 87–107). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
25.
JonesD. N.FigueredoA. J. (2013). The core of darkness: Uncovering the heart of the dark triad. European Journal of Personality, 27(6), 521–531. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1893
26.
JonesD. N.PaulhusD. L. (2010). Differentiating the dark triad within the interpersonal circumplex. In HorowitzL. M.StrackS. N. (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal theory and research (pp. 249–267). Guilford.
27.
JonesD.N.PaulhusD.L. (2017). Duplicity among the Dark Triad: Three faces of deceit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(2), 329–342. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000139
28.
LeeK.AshtonM. C.WiltshireJ.BourdageJ. S.VisserB. A.GallucciA. (2013). Sex, power, and money: Prediction from the dark triad and honesty–humility. European Journal of Personality, 27(2), 169–184. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1860
LynamD. R.HoyleR. H.NewmanJ. P. (2006). The perils of partialling: Cautionary tales from aggression and psychopathy. Assessment, 13(3), 328–341.
32.
MathieuC.HareR. D.JonesD. N.BabiakP.NeumannC. S. (2013). Factor structure of the B-scan 360: A measure of corporate psychopathy. Psychological Assessment, 25(1), 288–293. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029262
33.
MorfC. C.RhodewaltF. (2001). Unraveling the paradoxes of narcissism: A dynamic self-regulatory processing model. Psychological Inquiry, 12(4), 177–196. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli1204_1
34.
MurisP.MerckelbachH.OtgaarH.MeijerE. H. (2017). The malevolent side of human nature. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(2), 183–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616666070
35.
NeeC.ButtonM.ShepherdD.BlackbournD.LealS. (2019). The psychology of the corrupt: Some preliminary findings. Journal of Financial Crime, 26(2), 488–495. https://doi.org/10.1108/jfc-03-2018-0032
36.
NewmanJ. P. (1987). Reaction to punishment in extraverts and psychopaths: Implications for the impulsive behavior of disinhibited individuals. Journal of Research in Personality, 21(4), 464–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(87)90033-x
37.
PaulhusD. L. (1983). Sphere-specific measures of perceived control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(6), 1253–1265. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.6.1253
38.
PaulhusD.L.BuckelsE.E.TrapnellP.D.JonesD.N. (2021). Screening for dark personalities. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 37(3), 208–222. DOI:10.1027/1015-5759/a000602
39.
PaulhusD. L.WilliamsK. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(6), 556–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-6566(02)00505-6
40.
PodsakoffP.M.MacKenzieS.B.LeeJ.Y.PodsakoffN.P. (2003). Common method bias in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
RaskinR.TerryH. R. (1988). A principal-components analysis of the narcissistic personality inventory and further evidence of its construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(5), 890–902. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.5.890
44.
RichardF. D.BondC. F.Jr.Stokes-ZootaJ. J. (2003). One hundred years of social psychology quantitatively described. Review of General Psychology, 7(4), 331–363.
45.
SchönbrodtF. D.PeruginiM. (2013). At what sample size do correlations stabilize?Journal of Research in Personality, 47(5), 609–612.
46.
SzabóE.JonesD. B. (2019). Gender differences moderate machiavellianism and impulsivity: Implications for dark triad research. Personality and Individual Differences, 141, 160–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.01.008
47.
TettR.P.BurnettD.D. (2003). A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 500–517. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.500
