The current study draws from the literature on “direct deterrence” programs as a framework for preventing corporate crime. Direct deterrence programs focus on reducing crime by communicating the likelihood and severity of sanctions to potential offenders. We believe a similar strategy may be useful when designing ethics codes. Ethics codes are the most commonly applied aspect of corporate internal compliance programs, yet evidence supporting their effectiveness is mixed and rigorous evaluation of their impact rare. Here, we employed an experimental design to examine how the content of ethics codes impact ethical decisions. Results suggest that the presence of an ethics code can increase compliance, but that supervisors also play a critical role. Implications for research and internal compliance programs are discussed.
AguinisH.BradleyK. J. (2014). Best practice recommendations for designing and implementing experimental vignette methodology studies. Organizational Research Methods, 17(4), 351–371.
2.
BarghJ. A. (1990). Auto-motives: Preconscious determinants of thought and behavior. In HigginsE. T.SorrentinoR. M. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition (Vol. 2, pp. 93–130). Guilford.
3.
BarghJ. A.ChartrandT. L. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54(7), 462–479.
4.
BarghJ. A.ChartrandT. L. (2000). The mind in the middle: A practical guide to priming and automaticity research. In ReisH. T.JuddC. M. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 253–285). Cambridge University Press.
5.
BeccariaC. (1777). An essay on crimes and punishments translated from the Italian: With a commentary, attributed to Mons. de Voltaire. Translated from the French (5th ed.). Printed by John Exshaw, No. 86, Dame-Street.
6.
BenthamJ. (1789). An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. Printed in the year 1780, and now first published by Jeremy Bentham, of Lincoln’s inn, esquire. Printed for T. Payne, and Son, at the Mews Gate.
7.
BlumsteinA.CohenJ.NaginD. (1978). Estimating the effects of criminal sanctions on crime rates. National Academy Press.
8.
BragaA. A.WeisburdD. L. (2012). The effects of focused deterrence strategies on crime: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the empirical evidence. Journal of research in crime and delinquency, 49(3), 323–358.
9.
BragaA. A.WeisburdD.TurchanB. (2018). Focused deterrence strategies and crime control: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the empirical evidence. Criminology & Public Policy, 17(1), 205–250.
10.
BraithwaiteJ. (2018). Minimally sufficient deterrence. Crime and Justice, 47(1), 69–118.
11.
ChandlerJ.ShapiroD. (2016). Conducting clinical research using crowdsourced convenience samples. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology12, 53–81.
12.
CleekM. A.LeonardS. L. (1998). Can corporate codes of ethics influence behavior?Journal of Business Ethics, 17(6), 619–630. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25073109
13.
EngelCNaginD. (2015). “Who is afraid of the stick? Experimentally testing the deterrent effect of sanction certainty.” Review of Behavioral Economics, 2(4), 405–434.
14.
ErwinP. M. (2011). Corporate codes of conduct: The effects of code content and quality on ethical performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 99(4), 535–548. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41476216
FollmerD. J.SperlingR. A.SuenH. K. (2017). The role of MTurk in education research: Advantages, issues, and future decisions. Educational Researcher, 466, 329–334.
17.
GeerkenM. R.GoveW. R. (1975). Deterrence: Some theoretical considerations. Law & Society Review, 93, 497–513.
18.
GeerkenM.GoveW. R. (1977). Deterrence, overload, and incapacitation: An empirical evaluation. Social Forces, 562, 424–447. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/56.2.424
19.
GoodmanJ. K.CryderC. E.CheemaA. (2013). Data collection in a flat world: The strengths and weaknesses of mechanical Turk samples. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26(3), 213–224. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1753
20.
GoslingS. D.VazireS.SrivastavaS.JohnO. P. (2004). Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about internet questionnaires. American Psychologist, 59(2), 93. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.59.2.93
21.
HauserD. J.SchwarzN. (2016). Attentive turkers: MTurk participants perform better on online attention checks than do subject pool participants. Behavior Research Methods, 48(1), 400–407. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0578-z
HilbigB. E.ZettlerI. (2015). When the cat’s away, some mice will play: A basic trait account of dishonest behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 57, 72–88.
24.
KahnemanD. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
25.
KapteinM. (2011). Toward effective codes: Testing the relationship with unethical behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 99(2), 233–251. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41476195
26.
KapteinM.SchwartzM. S. (2008). The effectiveness of business codes: A critical examination of existing studies and the development of an integrated research model. Journal of Business Ethics, 77(2), 111–127. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25075548
27.
KennedyD. M. (1997). Pulling levers: Chronic offenders, high-crime settings, and a theory of prevention. Valparaiso University Law Review, 31, 449–484.
Kish-GephartJ. J.HarrisonD. A.TreviñoL. K. (2010). Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: Meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 1–31.
30.
KreagerD. A.MatsuedaR. L. (2014). Bayesian updating and crime. In Encyclopedia of criminology and criminal justice (pp. 116–125). Springer.
31.
LangevoortD. C. (2018). Behavioral ethics, behavioral compliance. Chapter 11 In ArlenJ. (Ed.), Research handbook on corporate crime and financial misdealing. Edward Elgar Publishing.
32.
MaederE. M.YamamotoS.McManusL. A. (2018). Methodology matters: Comparing sample types and data collection methods in a juror decision-making study on the influence of defendant race. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 24(7), 687–702.
33.
MazarN.AmirO.ArielyD. (2008). The dishonesty of honest people: A theory of self-concept maintenance (Report). Journal of Marketing Research, 45(6), 633. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.45.6.633
34.
McLeodM.PayneG.EvertR. (2016). Organizational ethics research: A systematic review of methods and analytical techniques. Journal of Business Ethics, 134(3), 429–443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2436-9
35.
MilgramS. (1974). Obedience to authority. Harper & Row Publishers.
36.
MullenE.NadlerJ. (2008). Moral spillovers: The effect of moral violations on deviant behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(5), 1239–1245.
37.
NaginD. S. (2013). Deterrence in the twenty-first century. In TonryM. (Ed.), Crime and Justice Series: Vol. 42. Crime and justice in America 1975-2025, pp. 199–263). University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.1086/670398
38.
NaginD. S.PogarskyG. (2001). Integrating celerity, impulsivity, and extralegal sanction threats into a model of general deterrence: Theory and evidence. Criminology, 39(4), 865–892.
PapachristosA.MearesT.FaganJ. (2007). Attention felons: Evaluating project safe neighborhoods in Chicago. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 4, 223−272.
41.
PaternosterR. (2010). How much do we really know about criminal deterrence?Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 1003, 765–824.
42.
PaternosterR.SaltzmanL. E.ChiricosT. G.WaldoG. P. (1982). Criminology: Perceived risk and deterrence: Methodological artifacts in perceptual deterrence research. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 73, 1238–1803.
43.
PaternosterR.SimpsonS. (1993). A rational choice theory of corporate crime. Routine Activity and Rational Choice, 5, 37–58.
44.
PaternosterR.SimpsonS. (1996). Sanction threats and appeals to morality: Testing a rational choice model of corporate crime. Law and Society Review, 30(3), 549–583.
45.
PeerE.VosgerauJ.AcquistiA. (2014). Reputation as a sufficient condition for data quality on Amazon mechanical Turk. Behavioral Research Methods, 46(4), 1023–1031. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0434-y
46.
PetersenL.KringsF. (2009). Are ethical codes of conduct toothless tigers for dealing with employment discrimination?Journal of Business Ethics, 85(4), 501–514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9785-1
47.
PickettJ. T.RocheS. P. (2016). Arrested development: Misguided directions in deterrence theory and policy. Criminology & Public Policy, 153, 727–751. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12217
48.
PrattT. C.CullenF. T.BlevinsK. R.DaigleL. E.MadensenT. D. (2006). The empirical status of deterrence theory. Transaction.
SaltzmanL.PaternosterR.WaldoG.ChiricosT. (1982). Deterrent and experiential effects: The problem of causal order in perceptual deterrence research. The Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 19(2), 172.
51.
Schell-BuseyN. (2009). In SimpsonS. S.MacKenzieD.OstroffC.PaternosterR.PrestonL.WilsonD. (Eds.), The deterrent effects of ethics codes for corporate crime: A meta -analysis. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
52.
SchnatterlyK. (2003). Increasing firm value through detection and prevention of white-collar crime. Strategic Management Journal, 24(7), 587. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.330
53.
SchweitzerM. E.GibsonD. E. (2007). Fairness, feelings, and ethical decision-making: consequences of violating community standards of fairness. Journal of Business Ethics, 77(3), 287–301.
54.
ShoverN.HochstetlerA. (2006). Choosing white-collar crime. Cambridge University Press.
55.
SmithN. C.SimpsonS. S.HuangC. (2007). Why managers fail to do the right thing: An empirical study of unethical and illegal conduct. Business Ethics Quarterly, 17(04), 633–667.
56.
TreviñoL. K.WeaverG. R.ReynoldsS. J. (2006). Behavioral ethics in organizations: A review. Journal of Management, 32(6), 951–990.
57.
TurnerG. B.TaylorG. S.HartleyM. F. (1995). Ethics, gratuities, and professionalization of the purchasing function. Journal of Business Ethics, 14(9), 751–760. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25072694
58.
ssersteinR. L.LazarN. A. (2016). The ASA statement on p-values: Context, process, and purpose. The American Statistician70, 129–133.
59.
sersteinR. L.SchirmA. L.LazarN. A. (2019). Moving to a world beyond “p<0.05.”The American Statistician, 73(S1), 1–19.
60.
WeberE.SellersD.RossiP. (1988). Vig-write: The PC vignette generating program. Social and Demographic Research Institute, University of Massachusetts.
61.
WeisburdD.EinatT.KowalskiM. (2008). The miracle of the cells: An experimental study of interventions to increase payment of court-ordered financial obligations. Criminology & Public Policy, 71, 9–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2008.00487.x
62.
WilhelmW. (2012). Financial decision making: A study of board room decision-making dynamics. Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, 54(1), 27–40.
63.
ZhangT.GinoF.BazermanM. H. (2014). Morality rebooted: Exploring simple fixes to our moral bugs. Research in Organizational Behavior, 34, 63–79.
64.
ZimringF. E.HawkinsG. (1973). In HawkinsG. (Ed.), Deterrence: The legal threat in crime control. University of Chicago Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
