This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes and patient comfort levels after gingival depigmentation using ablative and non-ablative 450 nm diode lasers.
Background:
Gingival pigmentation is a common esthetic concern that affects patients’ self-confidence. Laser-assisted depigmentation has emerged as a popular treatment, with both ablative and non-ablative techniques showing promising results. However, limited comparative data exist regarding their relative efficacy and patient experience.
Methods:
A split-mouth, single-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted on 20 patients with physiological gingival pigmentation scores of ≥2, based on the Dummett Oral Pigmentation Index (OPI). Each participant received ablative laser treatment on one side of the mouth and non-ablative treatment on the contralateral side. Outcome measures included changes in OPI and Melanin Pigmentation Index at baseline, 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months. Patient-reported pain and discomfort were assessed using a modified McGill Pain Questionnaire.
Results:
Both techniques achieved successful depigmentation. Ablative laser treatment resulted in immediate pigment removal with lower repigmentation rates but was associated with higher intraoperative discomfort. Non-ablative treatment caused less pain and faster healing but required multiple sessions to achieve comparable results. Statistical analysis confirmed significant differences in repigmentation rates and patient comfort levels between the two modalities.
Conclusions:
Both ablative and non-ablative 450 nm diode lasers are effective for gingival depigmentation. The choice of technique should be tailored to patient preferences, with ablative lasers favored for immediate results and non-ablative lasers preferred for enhanced comfort and faster recovery.
HoDK, GhineaR, HerreraLJ, et al.Color range and color distribution of healthy human gingiva: A prospective clinical study. Sci Rep, 2015; 5(1):18498.
2.
FellerL, MasilanaA, KhammissaRA, et al.Melanin: The biophysiology of oral melanocytes and physiological oral pigmentation. Head Face Med, 2014; 10(1):8.
3.
HaryoHM, DjaisAI, AdamAM. The comparison of some depigmentation techniques towards reccurence of gingival hyperpigmentation: A systematic review. MDJ, 2020; 9(2):114–117.
4.
SeveroMLB, De FrançaGM, DinizMNdO, Da SilveiraÉJD, CostaADLL. Pigmented lesions of the oral mucosa: Epidemiological survey of 172 cases with focus on differential diagnosis. JOI, 2020; 9(2):21.
5.
GoldarK, ChaubeyKK, AgarwalS, et al.Gingival depigmentation by gingival ceramic trimmer. Univ J Dent Sci, 2020; 6(1):43–48.
6.
HassanS, DhadseP, BajajP, et al.A comparison between the efficacy of scalpel and laser procedures for treating gingival hyperpigmentation: A case report. Cureus, 2022; 14(8):e27954.
7.
GufranK. A comparative evaluation of two different techniques for esthetic management of gingival melanin hyperpigmentation: A clinical study. J Dent Res Rev, 2016; 3(1):13–16.
8.
NarayankarSD, DeshpandeNC, DaveDH, et al.Comparative evaluation of gingival depigmentation by tetrafluroethane cryosurgery and surgical scalpel technique. A randomized clinical study. Contemp Clin Dent, 2017; 8(1):90–95.
9.
LukK, AnagnostakiE, LukK, et al.Impact of laser dentistry in management of color in aesthetic zone. In: lasers in dentistry—current concepts. Springer; 2024; pp. 507–532.
10.
GholamiL, MoghaddamSA, Rigi LadizMA, et al.Comparison of gingival depigmentation with Er, Cr: YSGG laser and surgical stripping, a 12-month follow-up. Lasers Med Sci, 2018; 33(8):1647–1656.
11.
BakhshiM, MojahediSM, AsnaashariM, et al.Gingival depigmentation by Er, Cr: YSGG laser and diode laser: A split mouth, clinical trial study lasers in gingival depigmentation. Laser Ther, 2018; 27(3):203–213.
12.
AltayebW, HamadahO, AlhaffarBA, et al.Gingival depigmentation with diode and Er, Cr: YSGG laser: Evaluating re-pigmentation rate and patient perceptions. Clin Oral Investig, 2021; 25(9):5351–5361.
13.
MuruppelAM, PaiBJ, BhatS, et al.Laser-assisted depigmentation—An introspection of the science, techniques, and perceptions. Dent J (Basel), 2020; 8(3):88.
14.
Mojahedi NasabSM, FrentzenM, MayrA, et al.Comparison of the diode laser wavelengths 445 nm and 810 nm in gingival depigmentation - A clinical evaluation. J Lasers Med Sci, 2023; 14:e63; doi: 10.34172/jlms.2023.63
15.
JhZK, El-SayedW, AlkhabuliJ. Gingival depigmentation using diode 980 nm and erbium-YAG 2940 nm lasers: A split-mouth clinical comparative study. Int J Dent, 2021; 2021:9424793.
16.
Taher AghaM, PolenikP. Laser treatment for melanin gingival pigmentations: A comparison study for 3 laser wavelengths 2780, 940, and 445 nm. Int J Dent, 2020; 2020(1):3896386.
17.
RibeiroFV, CavallerCP, CasarinRC, et al.Esthetic treatment of gingival hyperpigmentation with Nd: YAG laser or scalpel technique: A 6-month RCT of patient and professional assessment. Lasers Med Sci, 2014; 29(2):537–544.
18.
TranTH, NguyenQLD, DoTT, et al.Evaluation of carbon dioxide laser–assisted treatment for gingival melanin hyperpigmentation. Dent J (Basel), 2022; 10(12):238.
19.
CiosA, CieplakM, SzymańskiŁ, et al.Effect of different wavelengths of laser irradiation on the skin cells. Int J Mol Sci, 2021; 22(5):2437.
20.
ReicheltJ, WinterJ, MeisterJ, et al.A novel blue light laser system for surgical applications in dentistry: Evaluation of specific laser-tissue interactions in monolayer cultures. Clin Oral Investig, 2017; 21(4):985–994.
21.
FrentzenM, KrausD, ReicheltJ, et al.A novel blue light diode laser (445 nm) for dental application. Laser, 2016; 8(3):6–13.
22.
StrakasD, FranzenR. The blue wavelengths in laser dentistry: A review of current literature. Laser Dent Sci, 2023; 7(2):97–99.
23.
AshC, DubecM, DonneK, et al.Effect of wavelength and beam width on penetration in light-tissue interaction using computational methods. Lasers Med Sci, 2017; 32(8):1909–1918.
24.
DummettCO, GuptaOP. Estimating the epidemiology of oral pigmentation. J Natl Med Assoc, 1964; 56(5):419–420.
25.
HaniokaT, TanakaK, OjimaM, et al.Association of melanin pigmentation in the gingiva of children with parents who smoke. Pediatrics, 2005; 116(2):e186–e190.
26.
El ShenawyHM, NasrySA, ZakyAA, et al.Treatment of gingival hyperpigmentation by diode laser for esthetical purposes. Open Access Maced J Med Sci, 2015; 3(3):447–454.
27.
EsmatSA, El-SayedNM, FahmyRA. The power of pink: Transforming smile esthetics through laser-assisted gingival depigmentation. Alex Dent J, 2024.
28.
AhmedS, AlmoneaN, AlMarzooqR, et al.Use and success rate of lasers in the treatment of gingival melanin pigmentation: A systematic review. Int J Pharm Res Allied Sci, 2023; 12(1):26–31.
29.
MoeintaghaviA, AhrariF, FallahrastegarA, et al.Comparison of the effectiveness of CO2 and diode lasers for gingival melanin depigmentation: A randomized clinical trial. J Lasers Med Sci, 2022; 13:e8; doi: 10.34172/jlms.2022.08
30.
NammourS, El MobadderM, NamourM, et al.A randomized comparative clinical study to evaluate the longevity of esthetic results of gingival melanin depigmentation treatment using different laser wavelengths (diode, CO2, and Er: YAG). Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg, 2020; 38(3):167–173.
JurczyszynK, TrzeciakowskiW, WoźniakZ, et al.Assessment of effects of laser light combining three wavelengths (450, 520 and 640 nm) on temperature increase and depth of tissue lesions in an ex vivo study. Materials (Basel), 2020; 13(23):5340.
33.
XuX, JiangD-L, LiuG-X, et al.A novel 450 nm semiconductor blue laser system for application in colon endoscopic surgery: An ex vivo study of laser–tissue interactions. Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg, 2019; 37(1):25–30.
34.
MurthyMB, KaurJ, DasR. Treatment of gingival hyperpigmentation with rotary abrasive, scalpel, and laser techniques: A case series. J Indian Soc Periodontol, 2012; 16(4):614–619.
35.
AtsawasuwanP, GreethongK, NimmanonV. Treatment of gingival hyperpigmentation for esthetic purposes by Nd: YAG laser: Report of 4 cases. J Periodontol, 2000; 71(2):315–321.
36.
RpM, KV. Spectral dependence of laser light on light tissue interactions and its influence on laser therapy: An experimental study. Insights Biomed, 2020; 5(1).
37.
HaqueAU, RastogiPK, LalN, et al.Blue laser-assisted depigmentation of gingiva using non-ablative technique. BMJ Case Rep, 2024; 17(10):e260493.
38.
GeevargheseA, BaskaradossJK, AlsalemM, et al.Perception of general dentists and laypersons towards altered smile aesthetics. J Orthod Sci, 2019; 8(1):14.
39.
ChandraGB, VinayKumarMB, WalavalkarNN, et al.Evaluation of surgical scalpel versus semiconductor diode laser techniques in the management of gingival melanin hyperpigmentation: A split-mouth randomized clinical comparative study. J Indian Soc Periodontol, 2020; 24(1):47–53.
40.
LinYH, TuYK, LuCT, et al.Systematic review of treatment modalities for gingival depigmentation: A random‐effects P oisson regression analysis. J Esthet Restor Dent, 2014; 26(3):162–178.
