Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2026-2
Effects of Voluntary Ingestion of Synthetic Delta-9-Tetrahydrocannabinol on the Hedonic Value of Rewarding and Aversive Substances and CB1 Receptor Expression
Human studies indicate a relationship between delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and alcohol use, yet research on their codependency remains limited. Rodent models have shown that cannabinoids can enhance the incentive salience and hedonic value of sucrose and alcohol. However, results seem to vary by the functions of THC dose and route of administration.
Materials and Methods:
The present study addresses these discrepancies by using a translational model of THC consumption, using lower oral doses of synthetic THC (Dronabinol). Male Long-Evans (n = 24) rats consumed a vehicle or THC-containing cookie (0.05 mg/kg or 0.5 mg/kg) before testing the palatability of rewarding and aversive substances in the taste reactivity paradigm.
Results:
Separate, linear, mixed-effect models revealed that THC dose-dependently increased hedonic reactions to both sucrose (0.1 M and 0.5 M) and alcohol (10% and 40% ETOH) compared with control. Comparatively, THC reduced aversion to alcohol (10% and 40%) and quinine compared with vehicle. Western blot data analyzed via one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s post hoc analysis revealed that repeated oral THC consumption dose-dependently downregulated cannabinoid receptor 1 receptor expression in the dorsal hippocampus, while no significant changes were observed in the nucleus accumbens or amygdala.
Conclusions:
These findings suggest that oral THC enhances the hedonic value of rewarding and aversive substances and provide insights into the neurobiological mechanisms that may contribute to the bidirectional use of cannabis and alcohol.
RussoEB. History of cannabis and its preparations in Saga, Science, and Sobriquet. Chem Biodivers, 2007; 4(8):1614–1648.
2.
SchulenbergJE, JohnstonLD, O’MalleyPM, et al.Monitoring the Future National Survey Results on Drug Use, 1975–2017. Volume II, College Students & Adults Ages 19–55 [Internet]. Institute for Social Research; 2018. [cited 2023 Feb 13]. Available from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED589764
3.
HammondD, GoodmanS, WadsworthE, et al.Trends in the use of cannabis products in Canada and the USA, 2018–2020: Findings from the International Cannabis Policy Study. International Journal of Drug Policy, 2022; 105:103716.
4.
NelsonNG, LawWX, WeingartenMJ, et al.Combined Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol and moderate alcohol administration: Effects on ingestive behaviors in adolescent male rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl), 2019; 236(2):671–684.
5.
RohlederC, PahlischF, GrafR, et al.Different pharmaceutical preparations of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol differentially affect its behavioral effects in rats. Addict Biol, 2020; 25(3):e12745.
6.
SmokerMP, HernandezM, ZhangY, et al.Assessment of acute motor effects and tolerance following self-administration of alcohol and edible Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol in adolescent male mice. Alcohol Clin Exp Res, 2019; 43(11):2446–2457.
7.
SmokerMP, MackieK, LapishCC, et al.Self-administration of edible Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol and associated behavioral effects in mice. Drug Alcohol Depend, 2019; 199:106–115.
8.
GrotenhermenF. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cannabinoids. Clin Pharmacokinet, 2003; 42(4):327–360.
9.
FavratB, MénétreyA, AugsburgerM, et al.Two cases of “cannabis acute psychosis” following the administration of oral cannabis. BMC Psychiatry, 2005; 5(1):17.
10.
HuestisMA. Human Cannabinoid Pharmacokinetics. Chem Biodivers, 2007; 4(8):1770–1804.
11.
BarrusDG, LefeverTW, WileyJL. Evaluation of reinforcing and aversive effects of voluntary Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol ingestion in rats. Neuropharmacology, 2018; 137:133–140.
12.
VerendeevA, RileyAL. Conditioned taste aversion and drugs of abuse: History and interpretation. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 2012; 36(10):2193–2205.
13.
BaggioS, SapinM, KhazaalY, et al.Comorbidity of symptoms of alcohol and cannabis use disorders among a population-based sample of simultaneous users. Insight from a network perspective. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2018; 15(12):2893.
14.
HasinD, WalshC. Cannabis use, cannabis use disorder, and comorbid psychiatric illness: A narrative review. J Clin Med, 2020; 10(1):15.
15.
JorgensenC, WellsJ. Is marijuana really a gateway drug? A nationally representative test of the marijuana gateway hypothesis using a propensity score matching design. J Exp Criminol, 2022; 18(3):497–514.
16.
PacekLR, MartinsSS, CrumRM. The bidirectional relationships between alcohol, cannabis, co-occurring alcohol and cannabis use disorders with major depressive disorder: Results from a national sample. J Affect Disord, 2013; 148(2–3):188–195.
17.
SwartzwelderNA, RisherML, AbdelwahabSH, et al.Effects of ethanol, Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol, or their combination on object recognition memory and object preference in adolescent and adult male rats. Neurosci Lett, 2012; 527(1):11–15.
18.
GallateJE, SaharovT, MalletPE, et al.Increased motivation for beer in rats following administration of a cannabinoid CB1 receptor agonist. Eur J Pharmacol, 1999; 370(3):233–240.
19.
MalinenH, HyytiäP. Ethanol self-administration is regulated by CB1 receptors in the nucleus accumbens and ventral tegmental area in Alcohol-Preferring AA rats. Alcohol Clin Exp Res, 2008; 32(11):1976–1983.
20.
HamidullahS, LutelmowskiCD, CreightonSD, et al.Effects of vapourized THC and voluntary alcohol drinking during adolescence on cognition, reward, and anxiety-like behaviours in rats. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry, 2021; 106:110141.
21.
AllsopDJ, DunlopAJ, SaddlerC, et al.Changes in cigarette and alcohol use during cannabis abstinence. Drug Alcohol Depend, 2014; 138:54–60.
22.
BerridgeKC, RobinsonTE. Liking, Wanting and the incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. Am Psychol, 2016; 71(8):670–679.
23.
BerridgeK. Measuring hedonic impact in animals and infants: Microstructure of affective taste reactivity patterns. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 2000; 24(2):173–198.
24.
GrillHJ, NorgrenR. The taste reactivity test. I. Mimetic responses to gustatory stimuli in neurologically normal rats. Brain Res, 1978; 143(2):263–279.
25.
MahlerSV, SmithKS, BerridgeKC. Endocannabinoid hedonic hotspot for sensory pleasure: Anandamide in nucleus accumbens shell enhances ‘liking’ of a sweet reward. Neuropsychopharmacology, 2007; 32(11):2267–2278.
FoltinRW, FischmanMW, ByrneMF. Effects of smoked marijuana on food intake and body weight of humans living in a residential laboratory. Appetite, 1988; 11(1):1–14.
28.
IversenLL. The Science of Marijuana. Oxford University Press, USA; 2001. p. 303.
29.
JarrettMM, LimebeerCL, ParkerLA. Effect of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol on sucrose palatability as measured by the taste reactivity test. Physiol Behav, 2005; 86(4):475–479.
30.
JarrettMM, ScantleburyJ, ParkerLA. Effect of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol on quinine palatability and AM251 on sucrose and quinine palatability using the taste reactivity test. Physiol Behav, 2007; 90(2–3):425–430.
31.
KruseLC, CaoJK, VirayK, et al.Voluntary oral consumption of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol by adolescent rats impairs reward-predictive cue behaviors in adulthood. Neuropsychopharmacology, 2019; 44(8):1406–1414.
32.
LazenkaMF, SelleyDE, Sim-SelleyLJ. ΔFosB induction correlates inversely with CB1 receptor desensitization in a brain region-dependent manner following repeated Δ9-THC administration. Neuropharmacology, 2014; 77:224–233.
33.
VillaresJ. Chronic use of marijuana decreases cannabinoid receptor binding and mRNA expression in the human brain. Neuroscience, 2007; 145(1):323–334.
34.
ZamberlettiE, GabaglioM, GrilliM, et al.Long-term hippocampal glutamate synapse and astrocyte dysfunctions underlying the altered phenotype induced by adolescent THC treatment in male rats. Pharmacol Res, 2016; 111:459–470.
35.
RomeroJ, Garcia-PalomeroE, CastroJG, et al.Effects of chronic exposure to Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol on cannabinoid receptor binding and mRNA levels in several rat brain regions. Brain Res Mol Brain Res, 1997; 46(1–2):100–108.
36.
WukitschTJ, BraseEC, MoserTJ, et al.Differential rearing alters taste reactivity to ethanol, sucrose, and quinine. Psychopharmacology (Berl), 2020; 237(2):583–597.
37.
WukitschTJ, CainME. The effects of voluntary adolescent alcohol consumption on alcohol taste reactivity in Long Evans rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl), 2021; 238(6):1713–1728.
38.
WukitschTJ, MoserTJ, BraseEC, et al.Adolescent ethanol exposure and differential rearing environment affect taste reactivity to ethanol in rats. Alcohol, 2020; 89:113–122.
39.
CarricaLK, ChoiCY, WalterFA, et al.Effects of combined use of alcohol and delta-9-tetrahydrocannibinol on working memory in Long Evans rats. Behav Brain Res, 2023 Jul;449:114475.
40.
SangiamoDT, WeingartenMJ, NelsonNG, et al.Experience with dronabinol consumption facilitated a stimulant effect of alcohol and affected alcohol-related changes in frontal cortical endocannabinoid levels in male rats. Behav Brain Res, 2023; 452:114587.
41.
LauxDA, AzumaMC, CainME. Effects of repeated voluntary oral consumption of synthetic delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol on locomotor activity and cannabinoid receptor 1 expression. Behav Brain Res, 2025; 477:115315.
ArnoneM, MaruaniJ, ChaperonF, et al.Selective inhibition of sucrose and ethanol intake by SR 141716, an antagonist of central cannabinoid (CB1) receptors. Psychopharmacology (Berl), 1997; 132(1):104–106.
44.
KochJE. Δ9-THC stimulates food intake in Lewis rats: Effects on chow, high-fat and sweet high-fat diets. Pharmacol Biochem Behav, 2001; 68(3):539–543.
45.
HložekT, UttlL, KadeřábekL, et al.Pharmacokinetic and behavioural profile of THC, CBD, and THC+CBD combination after pulmonary, oral, and subcutaneous administration in rats and confirmation of conversion in vivo of CBD to THC. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol, 2017; 27(12):1223–1237.
46.
KieferSW, DoppJM. Taste Reactivity to Alcohol in Rats. Behav Neurosci, 1989; 103(6):1318–1326.
47.
StinsonFS, RuanWJ, PickeringR, et al.Cannabis use disorders in the USA: Prevalence, correlates and co-morbidity. Psychol Med, 2006; 36(10):1447–1460.
48.
IbrahimKM, MassalyN, YoonH-J, et al.Dorsal hippocampus to nucleus accumbens projections drive reinforcement via activation of accumbal dynorphin neurons. Nat Commun, 2024; 15(1):750.
CastroDC, BerridgeKC. Advances in the neurobiological bases for food ‘liking’ versus ‘wanting. ‘ Physiol Behav, 2014; 136:22–30.
51.
PeciñaS, SmithKS, BerridgeKC. Hedonic hot spots in the brain. Neuroscientist, 2006; 12(6):500–511.
52.
KoobGF, SannaPP, BloomFE. Neuroscience of Addiction. Neuron, 1998; 21(3):467–476.
53.
McBrideWJ. Central nucleus of the amygdala and the effects of alcohol and alcohol-drinking behavior in rodents. Pharmacol Biochem Behav, 2002; 71(3):509–515.
