In this work, complex and advanced multiphysics and multiscale models of a 2D virtual induced neuronal stem cell (iNSC) and a mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) are presented to estimate the biophysical effects induced by microsecond-duration pulsed electric fields (µsPEFs) for neurogenesis purposes. Particularly, this study is part of the RISEUP project, which aims to promote axonal regeneration in spinal cord injuries by manipulating stem cells within an electropulsed bio-hybrid (EPB) device. This device delivers tailored µsPEF protocols to induce electropermeabilization of plasma and intracellular membranes. The two key focuses of this work are the development of a neurofunctionalized iNSC model and, for the first time in the literature, of a calcium oscillations model on the virtual MSC, to assess the impact of µsPEFs on iNSC neuronal dynamics and on changes in ionic fluxes across electroporated MSC membranes, respectively. Numerical simulations are carried out in COMSOL Multiphysics (v. 6.2) using a bipolar µsPEFs with a combination of 30 and 60 kV/m field intensities with 100 and 1000 µs durations. Results demonstrate that the µsPEF application affects iNSC neuronal firing: fully silenced at 60 kV/m, and partially suppressed at 30 kV/m, with activity resuming poststimulation at both pulse durations. Moreover, µsPEF can extend calcium oscillation periods up to 50%, highlighting their potential to modulate calcium dynamics and steer stem cell fate, supporting the core RISEUP mechanisms of proliferation and differentiation. The multiphysics methodologies implemented are crucial to deeply investigate the cellular mechanisms underlying the RISEUP approach, thereby unveiling key processes driving neural regeneration and paving the way for innovative, targeted therapies.
MaharaG, TianC, XuX, et al.Revolutionising health care: Exploring the latest advances in medical sciences. J Glob Health, 2023; 13:03042.
3.
BhattacharyaA, MrudulaK, SreepadaSS, et al.An overview of noninvasive brain stimulation: Basic principles and clinical applications. Can J Neurol Sci, 2022; 49(4):479–492.
4.
RotundoS, BriziD, FloriA, et al.Shaping and focusing magnetic field in the human body: State-of-the-art and promising technologies. Sensors (Basel), 2022; 22(14):5132. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/22/14/5132/htm
5.
MattssonMO, SimkóM. Emerging medical applications based on non-ionizing electromagnetic fields from 0 Hz to 10 THz. Med Devices (Auckl), 2019; 12:347–368.
6.
ZieselD, NowakowskaM, ScheruebelS, et al.Electrical stimulation methods and protocols for the treatment of traumatic brain injury: A critical review of preclinical research. J Neuroeng Rehabil, 2023; 20(1):51. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10131365/
7.
FammK, LittB, TraceyKJ, et al.A jump-start for electroceuticals. Nature, 2013; 496(7444):159–161.
8.
YeH, HendeeJ, RuanJ, et al.Neuron matters: Neuromodulation with electromagnetic stimulation must consider neurons as dynamic identities. J Neuroeng Rehabil, 2022; 19(1):116.
9.
SomaaFA, de GraafTA, SackAT. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of neurological diseases. Front Neurol, 2022; 13(May):793253.
10.
AlosaimiF, BoonstraJT, TanS, et al.The role of neurotransmitter systems in mediating deep brain stimulation effects in Parkinson’s disease. Front Neurosci, 2022; 16:998932.
11.
NeumannWJ, GilronR, LittleS, et al.Adaptive deep brain stimulation: From experimental evidence toward practical implementation. Mov Disord, 2023; 38(6):937–948.
12.
D’OnofrioV, ManzoN, GuerraA, et al.Combining transcranial magnetic stimulation and deep brain stimulation: Current knowledge, relevance and future perspectives. Brain Sci, 2023; 13(2):349.
13.
BarbosaRMG, SoaresMC, PortelaDMMC, et al.New perspectives of deep brain stimulation indications for Parkinson’s disease: A critical review. Brain Sci, 2024; 14(7):638.
14.
ZhangW, DengB, XieF, et al.Efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in Parkinson’s disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. EClinicalMedicine, 2022; 52:101589.
15.
AnjumA, YazidMD, Fauzi DaudM, et al.Spinal cord injury: Pathophysiology, multimolecular interactions, and underlying recovery mechanisms. Int J Mol Sci, 2020; 21(20):7533–7535.
16.
FontanaS, CaramazzaL, MarracinoP, et al.Electric field bridging-effect in electrified microfibrils’ scaffolds. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2023; 11:1264406.
17.
TeissieJ, GolzioM, RolsMP. Mechanisms of cell membrane electropermeabilization: A minireview of our present (lack of?) knowledge. Biochim Biophys Acta, 2005; 1724(3):270–280.
18.
BretonM, MirLM. Microsecond and nanosecond electric pulses in cancer treatments. Bioelectromagnetics, 2012; 33(2):106–123.
19.
KawanoS, ShojiS, IchinoseS, et al.Characterization of Ca2+ signaling pathways in human mesenchymal stem cells. Cell Calcium, 2002; 32(4):165–174.
20.
HannaH, DenziA, LibertiM, et al.Electropermeabilization of inner and outer cell membranes with microsecond pulsed electric fields: Quantitative study with calcium ions. Sci Rep, 2017; 7(1):13079.
21.
ValletLA, AndréFM, MirLM. Calcium oscillations in differentiating mesenchymal stem cells: Analysis and control using pulsed electric fields. 2021.
22.
ValletLA, PetidierMS, FernandesR, et al.Electrical control of calcium oscillations in Mesenchymal stem cells in proliferation and differentiation. 2024; doi: 10.1186/s13287-020-1555-8
23.
InnamoratiG, SecchiaroliLC, CaramazzaL, et al.Effects of the electromagnetic fields (EMFs) on cellular redox homeostasis. Free Radic Biol Med, 2023; 198:S8.
24.
InnamoratiG, Sanchez-PetidierM, BergaforaG, et al.Characterization of stem cells response to bipolar microsecond 2 pulses electric stimulation 3. Int J Mol Sci, 2023; 2023.
25.
De MenorvalMA, AndreFM, SilveA, et al.Electric pulses: A flexible tool to manipulate cytosolic calcium concentrations and generate spontaneous-like calcium oscillations in mesenchymal stem cells. Sci Rep, 2016; 6. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27561994/
26.
ValletLA, Sánchez-PetidierM, FernandesR, et al.Calcium oscillations in Mesenchymal Stem Cells, a control on cell cycle progression to influence cell fate towards proliferation or differentiation? Stem Cell Res Ther, 2025; 16(1). Available from: https://www.researchsquare.com
27.
BergLJ, LeeCK, MatsumuraH, et al.Human neural stem cells directly programmed from peripheral blood show functional integration into the adult mouse brain. Stem Cell Res Ther, 2024; 15(1):488.
28.
FontanaS, DolciottiN, Moreno-ManzanoV, et al.Microdosimetry of µsPEFs exposure on advanced stem cells 3D models in microfibrils scaffolds. Present 4th URSI Atl Radio Sci Meet (URSI AT-RASC 2024). 2024.
29.
FontanaS, CaramazzaL, ColellaM, et al.Advanced microdosimetric and neurofunctionalized multiphysics on stem cells models under microsecond pulse stimulation. IEEE J Electromagn RF Microwaves Med Biol, 2024; 1–10.
30.
PaffiA, CaramazzaL, ColellaM, et al.Pulsed electric fields for regeneration of injured spinal cord: Calcium Oscillations Modeling. Proc Int Conf Electromagn Adv Appl ICEAA. 2024;(2024):704–7.
31.
De AngelisA, DenziA, MerlaC, et al.Confocal microscopy improves 3D microdosimetry applied to nanoporation experiments targeting endoplasmic reticulum. 2020. Available from: www.frontiersin.org
32.
PaffiA, CaramazzaL, ColellaM, et al.Electro Pulsed Devices for Regeneration of Injuried Spinal Cord: Advanced Modelling of Microdevices and Cells. pp. 329–332. 2023;Venice.
33.
PaffiA, CaramazzaL, ColellaM, et al.Neuro-functionalized microdosimetric models for applications of electroporation. 2023 IEEE MTT-S Int Microw Biomed Conf. 2023;(964562):1–3.
34.
MirLM, GehlJ, SersaG, et al.Standard operating procedures of the electrochemotherapy: Instructions for the use of bleomycin or cisplatin administered either systemically or locally and electric pulses delivered by the Cliniporator TM by means of invasive or non-invasive electrodes. 2006. Available from: www.cliniporator.com
35.
ZhangN, LiZ, HanX, et al.Irreversible electroporation: An emerging immunomodulatory therapy on solid tumors. Front Immunol, 2021; 12(January):811726.
36.
HannaH, AndreFM, MirLM. Electrical control of calcium oscillations in mesenchymal stem cells using microsecond pulsed electric fields. Stem Cell Res Ther, 2017; 8(1):91.
37.
DebruinKA, KrassowskaW. Modeling electroporation in a single cell. I. Effects of field strength and rest potential. Biophys J, 1999.
38.
HodgkinAL, HuxleyAF. A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve. J Physiol, 1952; 117(4):500–544.
39.
MercadalB, VernierPT, IvorraA. Dependence of electroporation detection threshold on cell radius: An explanation to observations non compatible with Schwan’s equation model. J Membr Biol, 2016; 249(5):663–676.
40.
WyattKD, TanapatP, WangSSH. Speed limits in the cerebellum: Constraints from myelinated and unmyelinated parallel fibers. Eur J Neurosci, 2005; 21(8):2285–2290.
41.
SneydJ, RugisJ, SuS, et al.Simulation of calcium dynamics in realistic three-dimensional domains. Biomolecules, 2022; 12(10):1455.
42.
ChiapperinoMA, MesciaL, BiaP, et al.Experimental and numerical study of electroporation induced by long monopolar and short bipolar pulses on realistic 3D irregularly shaped cells. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 2020; 67(10):2781–2788.
43.
MesciaL, ChiapperinoMA, BiaP, et al.Multiphysics modelling of membrane electroporation in irregularly shaped cells. Prog Electromagn Res Symp, 2019; 2019:2992–2998.
44.
KumarM, MishraA. A microdosimetry analysis of reversible electroporation in scattered, overlapping, and cancerous cervical cells. 2021 Available from; doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-898413/v1
45.
LiC, WangS, ZhangY, et al.Picosecond pulse electrical field suppressing spike firing in hippocampal CA1 in rat in vivo. Bioelectromagnetics, 2020; 41(8):617–629.
46.
NesinV, BowmanAM, XiaoS, et al.Cell permeabilization and inhibition of voltage-gated Ca2+ and Na+ channel currents by nanosecond pulsed electric field. Bioelectromagnetics, 2012; 33(5):394–404.
47.
CasciolaM, XiaoS, ApollonioF, et al.Cancellation of nerve excitation by the reversal of nanosecond stimulus polarity and its relevance to the gating time of sodium channels. Cell Mol Life Sci, 2019; 76(22):4539–4550.
48.
SunS, LiuY, LipskyS, et al.Physical manipulation of calcium oscillations facilitates osteodifferentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. Faseb J, 2007; 21(7):1472–1480.
49.
TonelliFMP, SantosAK, GomesDA, et al.Stem cells and calcium signaling. Adv Exp Med Biol, 2012; 740:891–916.
50.
LiuL, MichowskiW, KolodziejczykA, et al.The cell cycle in stem cell proliferation, pluripotency and differentiation. Nat Cell Biol, 2019; 21(9):1060–1067.
51.
RaoM, GershonMD. The bowel and beyond: The enteric nervous system in neurological disorders. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2016; 13(9):517–528.
52.
LambertiP, RomeoS, SanninoA, et al.The role of pulse repetition rate in nsPEF-induced electroporation: A biological and numerical investigation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 2015; 62(9):2234–2243.
53.
ZaklitJ, CravisoGL, LeblancN, et al.Adrenal chromaffin cells exposed to 5-ns pulses require higher electric fields to porate intracellular membranes than the plasma membrane: An experimental and modeling study. J Membr Biol, 2017; 250(5):535–552.
54.
ZudansI, AgarwalA, OrwarO, et al.Numerical calculations of single-cell electroporation with an electrolyte-filled capillary. Biophys J, 2007; 92(10):3696–3705.
55.
DenziA, CameraF, MerlaC, et al.A microdosimetric study of electropulsation on multiple realistically shaped cells: Effect of neighbours. J Membr Biol, 2016; 249(5):691–701.
56.
PuciharG, KotnikT, ValičB, et al.Numerical determination of transmembrane voltage induced on irregularly shaped cells. Ann Biomed Eng, 2006; 34(4):642–652.
57.
PuciharG, KotnikT, MiklavčičD, et al.Kinetics of transmembrane transport of small molecules into electropermeabilized cells. Biophys J, 2008; 95(6):2837–2848.
58.
Towhidi Khodadadi Maimari, PedrigiRM. Comparison between direct and reverse electroporation of cells in situ: A simulation study. 2016. Available from: https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/
59.
KotnikT, PuciharG, MiklavčičD. Induced transmembrane voltage and its correlation with electroporation- mediated molecular transport. J Membr Biol, 2010; 236(1):3–13.
60.
LeppikL, ZhihuaH, MobiniS, et al.Combining electrical stimulation and tissue engineering to treat large bone defects in a rat model. Sci Rep, 2018; 8(1):6307–6314.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
