Conditional sex transformation systems could improve genetic control strategies against insect pests. Here, we developed and tested CRISPR-based, tetracycline-repressible sex transformation strains in the Australian sheep blowfly, Lucilia cuprina. Using Tet-Off–regulated expression of Cas9 and dCas9, we targeted the sex-determining gene transformer with the goal of converting females into males. Conditional Cas9 expression enabled knockout of a visual marker gene, confirming inducible genome editing. However, strains expressing transformer-targeting sgRNA arrays did not undergo sex transformation. Embryonic microinjection of transformer-targeting sgRNAs into Cas9-expressing embryos produced intersex individuals, indicating that sgRNA expression from the integrated arrays was insufficient to disrupt the sex determination pathway. In contrast, high-level dCas9 expression was associated with developmental delays, reduced body weight, and lethality. These findings establish the first conditional CRISPR expression system in L. cuprina and demonstrate that Cas9 is compatible with inducible gene editing, whereas dCas9 is poorly tolerated at high expression levels.
TookerJF, PearsonsKA. Newer characters, same story: Neonicotinoid insecticides disrupt food webs through direct and indirect effects. Curr Opin Insect Sci, 2021; 46:50–56; doi: 10.1016/j.cois.2021.02.013
4.
GarcíaGP, FloresAE, Fernández-SalasI, et al.Recent rapid rise of a permethrin knock down resistance allele in Aedes aegypti in México. PLoS Negl Trop Dis, 2009; 3(10):e531; doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000531
KlassenW, VreysenMJB. Area-wide integrated pest management and the sterile insect technique. In: Sterile insect technique, 2nd ed. (DykVA, HendrichsJ, RobinsonAS, eds.) CRC Press: Boca Raton; 2021; pp. 75–112; doi: 10.1201/9781003035572
7.
LanceDR, McInnisDO. Biological basis of the sterile insect technique. In: Sterile insect technique, 2nd ed. (DykVA, HendrichsJ, RobinsonAS, eds.) CRC Press: Boca Raton; 2021; pp. 113–142; doi: 10.1201/9781003035572
8.
VreysenMJB, BarclayHJ, HendrichsJ. Modeling of preferential mating in areawide control programs that integrate the release of strains of sterile males only or both sexes. AN, 2006; 99(3):607–616; doi: 10.1603/0013-8746(2006)99[607:MOPMIA]2.0.CO;2
9.
RendónP, McInnisD, LanceD, et al.Medfly (Diptera:Tephritidae) genetic sexing: Large-scale field comparison of males-only and bisexual sterile fly releases in Guatemala. J Econ Entomol, 2004; 97(5):1547–1553; doi: 10.1603/0022-0493-97.5.1547
10.
MezaJS, Ul HaqI, VreysenMJB, et al.Comparison of classical and transgenic genetic sexing strains of Mediterranean fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) for application of the sterile insect technique. PLoS One, 2018; 13(12):e0208880; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208880
11.
HäckerI, BourtzisK, ScheteligMF. Applying modern molecular technologies in support of the sterile insect technique. In: Sterile insect technique, 2nd ed. (DykVA, HendrichsJ, RobinsonAS, eds.) CRC Press: Boca Raton; 2021; pp. 657–702; doi: 10.1201/9781003035572
12.
GossenM, BujardH. Tight control of gene expression in mammalian cells by tetracycline-responsive promoters. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1992; 89(12):5547–5551; doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.12.5547
13.
HeinrichJC, ScottMJ. A repressible female-specific lethal genetic system for making transgenic insect strains suitable for a sterile-release program. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2000; 97(15):8229–8232; doi: 10.1073/pnas.140142697
14.
ThomasDD, DonnellyCA, WoodRJ, et al.Insect population control using a dominant, repressible, lethal genetic system. Science, 2000; 287(5462):2474–2476; doi: 10.1126/science.287.5462.2474
15.
ConchaC, PalavesamA, GuerreroFD, et al.A transgenic male-only strain of the new world screwworm for an improved control program using the sterile insect technique. BMC Biol, 2016; 14(1):72; doi: 10.1186/s12915-016-0296-8
16.
ConchaC, YanY, ArpA, et al.An early female lethal system of the new world screwworm, Cochliomyia hominivorax, for biotechnology-enhanced SIT. BMC Genet, 2020; 21(2):1–12; doi: 10.1186/s12863-020-00948-x
17.
YanY, ScottMJ. A transgenic embryonic sexing system for the Australian sheep blow fly Lucilia cuprina. Sci Rep, 2015; 5(1):16090; doi: 10.1038/srep16090
18.
YanY, ScottMJ. Building a transgenic sexing strain for genetic control of the Australian sheep blow fly Lucilia cuprina using two lethal effectors. BMC Genet, 2020; 21(Suppl 2):141; doi: 10.1186/s12863-020-00947-y
19.
SchliekelmanP, EllnerS, GouldF. Pest control by genetic manipulation of sex ratio. J Econ Entomol, 2005; 98(1):18–34; doi: 10.1093/jee/98.1.18
20.
ConchaC, ScottMJ. Sexual development in Lucilia cuprina (Diptera, Calliphoridae) is controlled by the transformer gene. Genetics, 2009; 182(3):785–798; doi: 10.1534/genetics.109.100982
21.
LiF, VenskoSPII, BelikoffEJ, et al.Conservation and sex-specific splicing of the transformer gene in the calliphorids Cochliomyia hominivorax, Cochliomyia macellaria and Lucilia sericata. PLoS One, 2013; 8(2):e56303; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056303
22.
PauloDF, WilliamsonME, ArpAP, et al.Specific gene disruption in the major livestock pests Cochliomyia hominivorax and Lucilia cuprina using CRISPR/Cas9. G3 (Bethesda), 2019; 9(9):3045–3055; doi: 10.1534/g3.119.400544
23.
WilliamsonME, YanY, ScottMJ. Conditional knockdown of transformer in sheep blow fly suggests a role in repression of dosage compensation and potential for population suppression. PLoS Genet, 2021; 17(10):e1009792; doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009792
24.
JiangF, DoudnaJA. CRISPR–Cas9 structures and mechanisms. Annu Rev Biophys, 2017; 46:505–529; doi: 10.1146/annurev-biophys-062215-010822
25.
QiLS, LarsonMH, GilbertLA, et al.Repurposing CRISPR as an RNA-guided platform for sequence-specific control of gene expression. Cell, 2013; 152(5):1173–1183; doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.022
26.
LiF, WantuchHA, LingerRJ, et al.Transgenic sexing system for genetic control of the Australian sheep blow fly Lucilia cuprina. Insect Biochem Mol Biol, 2014; 51:80–88; doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2014.06.001
27.
ConchaC, BelikoffEJ, CareyB, et al.Efficient germ-line transformation of the economically important pest species Lucilia cuprina and Lucilia sericata (Diptera, Calliphoridae). Insect Biochem Mol Biol, 2011; 41(1):70–75; doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2010.09.006
28.
WeintraubAS, LiCH, ZamudioAV, et al.YY1 is a structural regulator of enhancer-promoter loops. Cell, 2017; 171(7):1573–1588.e28; doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.11.008
29.
NovasR, BasikaT, WilliamsonME, et al.Identification and functional analysis of Cochliomyia hominivorax U6 gene promoters. Insect Mol Biol, 2023; 32(6):716–724; doi: 10.1111/imb.12875
30.
ClementK, ReesH, CanverMC, et al.CRISPResso2 provides accurate and rapid genome editing sequence analysis. Nat Biotechnol, 2019; 37(3):224–226; doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0032-3
31.
YanY, LingerRJ, ScottMJ. Building early-larval sexing systems for genetic control of the Australian sheep blow fly Lucilia cuprina using two constitutive promoters. Sci Rep, 2017; 7(1):2538; doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-02763-4
32.
YanY, WilliamsonME, DavisRJ, et al.Improved transgenic sexing strains for genetic control of the Australian sheep blow fly Lucilia cuprina using embryo-specific gene promoters. Mol Genet Genomics, 2020; 295(2):287–298; doi: 10.1007/s00438-019-01622-3
33.
PortF, BullockSL. Augmenting CRISPR applications in drosophila with tRNA-flanked Cas9 and Cpf1 sgRNAs. Nat Methods, 2016; 13(10):852–854; doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3972
34.
BikardD, JiangW, SamaiP, et al.Programmable repression and activation of bacterial gene expression using an engineered CRISPR-Cas system. Nucleic Acids Res, 2013; 41(15):7429–7437; doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt520
35.
EckermannKN, AhmedHMM, KaramiNejadRanjbarM, et al.Hyperactive piggyBac transposase improves transformation efficiency in diverse insect species. Insect Biochem Mol Biol, 2018; 98:16–24; doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2018.04.001
36.
Honnorat-BenabbouVC, LebugleAA, SallekB, et al.Stability study of tetracyclines with respect to their use in slow release systems. J Mater Sci: Mater Med, 2001; 12(2):107–110; doi: 10.1023/A:1008909708650
37.
YanY, KobayashiY, HuangC, et al.Highly efficient temperature inducible CRISPR-Cas9 gene targeting in Drosophila suzukii. Int J Mol Sci, 2021; 22(13):6724; doi: 10.3390/ijms22136724
ConchaC, EdmanRM, BelikoffEJ, et al.Organization and expression of the Australian sheep blowfly (Lucilia cuprina) hsp23, hsp24, hsp70 and hsp83 genes. Insect Mol Biol, 2012; 21(2):169–180; doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2583.2011.01123.x
40.
ChenK, MaimaitirexiatiG, ZhangQ, et al.CRISPR-Cas9-based one-step multiplexed genome editing through optimizing guide RNA processing strategies in Pichia pastoris. Synth Syst Biotechnol, 2025; 10(2):484–494; doi: 10.1016/j.synbio.2025.01.005
41.
ČermákT, CurtinSJ, Gil-HumanesJ, et al.A multipurpose toolkit to enable advanced genome engineering in plants. Plant Cell, 2017; 29(6):1196–1217; doi: 10.1105/tpc.16.00922
42.
LorenzenMD, BerghammerAJ, BrownSJ, et al.piggyBac-mediated germline transformation in the beetle Tribolium castaneum. Insect Mol Biol, 2003; 12(5):433–440; doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2583.2003.00427.x
43.
CaiR, LvR, ShiX, et al.CRISPR/dCas9 tools: Epigenetic mechanism and application in gene transcriptional regulation. Int J Mol Sci, 2023; 24(19):14865; doi: 10.3390/ijms241914865
44.
PortF, ChenH-M, LeeT, et al.Optimized CRISPR/Cas tools for efficient germline and somatic genome engineering in drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2014; 111(29):E2967–E2976; doi: 10.1073/pnas.1405500111
45.
HuynhN, ZengJ, LiuW, et al.A drosophila CRISPR/Cas9 toolkit for conditionally manipulating gene expression in the prothoracic gland as a test case for polytene tissues. G3 (Bethesda), 2018; 8(11):3593–3605; doi: 10.1534/g3.118.200539
46.
WhinnKS, KaurG, LewisJS, et al.Nuclease dead Cas9 is a programmable roadblock for DNA replication. Sci Rep, 2019; 9(1):13292; doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49837-z
47.
Molano-FernándezM, HicksonID, HerranzH. Replication stress promotes cellular transformation in drosophila epithelium. Cell Death Discov, 2025; 11(1):96; doi: 10.1038/s41420-025-02383-2
48.
LeeS-B, Segura-BayonaS, Villamor-PayàM, et al.Tousled-like kinases stabilize replication forks and show synthetic lethality with checkpoint and PARP inhibitors. Sci Adv, 2018; 4(8):eaat4985; doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aat4985
Perez-RiverolY, BaiJ, BandlaC, et al.The PRIDE database resources in 2022: A hub for mass spectrometry-based proteomics evidences. Nucleic Acids Res., 2022; 50(D1):D543–D552; doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab1038
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
