This article critically examines the comparative implementation of crime victims’ rights in India, Australia, Sri Lanka, Indonesia, Pakistan and South Korea, with particular attention to procedural justice, institutional accountability and victim agency. Drawing on statutory frameworks and research, it examines whether recognition of victims’ rights leads to participation and protection. Despite legislative reforms, disparities persist in enforcement, access and cultural responsiveness. Using victimological concepts such as the ideal victim, institutional betrayal and trauma-informed practice, the analysis identifies recurring patterns of symbolic compliance, gaps in service delivery and tensions between legal ideals and lived realities. By synthesizing cross-national data and historical trajectories, the article proposes a framework for evaluating institutional performance and highlights the need for culturally attuned, trauma-informed reforms to ensure that victims’ rights are not merely aspirational but actionable.
AdilK. (2022). Police, state and society: Challenges and opportunities in Pakistan. Centre for Governance Research. https://cgr.com.pk/article/1884
2.
AghenitelM., & SamdaniJ. (2024). Victimization in Pakistan and its solutions. https://www.academia.edu/124322268/Victimization_in_Pakistan_and_Its_Solutions
3.
AhmadA., & AusafM. (2017). Human rights and judicial activism in India. HuSS International Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Sciences. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/358581805
4.
AltanL., CollinsK., McDonaldM., & O’ConnellM. (2025). Integrating a victim-centred approach into emergency management and sports security. In HallS. (Ed.), Routledge handbook of sport security (pp. 324–341). Routledge.
5.
AmirM. (1967). Victim precipitated forcible rape. Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology and Police Science, 58(4), 493–502. https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc/vol58/iss4/4
6.
AmirM. (1975). Sisters in crime. McGraw-Hill.
7.
Amnesty International. (2017). India: Impunity, discrimination and repression of dissent: Submission for the Universal Periodic Review – 27th session of the UPR Working Group, April/May. https://www.amnesty.org/ar/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/ASA2052062016ENGLISH.pdf
8.
Amnesty International. (2018). Amnesty international report 2017/18 – India. https://www.refworld.org/reference/annualreport/amnesty/2018/en/120525
9.
Amnesty International. (2019). Sri Lanka’s shameful record on detention without trial. https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/press-release/2012/03/sri-lanka-s-shameful-record-detention-without-trial/
10.
Amnesty International. (2023). Sri Lanka: Submission to the UN Committee on the elimination of discrimination against women. https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/asa37/6427/2023/en/
11.
Amnesty International. (2024). Pakistan: Submission to the UN human rights committee. https://www.amnesty.org/en/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/ASA3385762024ENGLISH.pdf
12.
Assistance to and Protection of Victims of Crime and Witnesses Act, No. 4 of 2015 (Sri Lanka).
13.
Aurat Foundation. (2020). Annual report on violence against women in Pakistan 2019. https://www.ecoi.net/en/document/2033087.html
14.
Australian Government. (2021). Trauma-informed approach skill set (CSCSS00007), correctional services training package. https://training.gov.au/Training/Details/60625dc3-8526-40b0-8c8c-dd1cf95ae74a/skillsetdetails
15.
Australian Institute of Criminology. (2005). Restorative justice in Australia: A national review. https://www.aic.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-05/rpp127.pdf
16.
Australian Institute of Criminology. (2021). Crime & justice research 2021. Australian Institute of Criminology. https://www.aic.gov.au/sites/default/files/2021-05/crime-and-justice-research-2021.pdf
17.
Australian Law Reform Commission. (2025). Safe, informed, supported: Reforming justice responses to sexual violence (ALRC Report 143). https://www.alrc.gov.au/publication/jrsv-report-143/
18.
Australian Parliament. (2018). Inquiry into justice reinvestment and Indigenous justice. House of Representatives Standing Committee on Indigenous Affairs.
19.
BraschJ. Q. C. (2021). Embracing different ways of doing justice. Speech delivered by Dr Jacoba Brasch QC, President, Law Council of Australia at the Sunshine Coast Bar Association’s Professional Development Day 2021, Alexandra Headland Surf Lifesaving Club, 28 August. https://lawcouncil.au/publicassets/d34ad02c-2409-ec11-9440-005056be13b5/2021%2008%2028%20-%20SP%20-%20The%20intersection%20between%20Indigenous%20cultures%20and%20Australian%20legal%20custom%20embracing%20different%20ways%20of%20doing%20justice.pdf
20.
ChoJ., JeonY., & Ha-neulY. (2023). Korean crime victim survey 2022. Korean Institute of Criminology and Justice. https://www.kicj.re.kr/board.es?mid=a20201000000&bid=0029&list_no=14279&act=view
21.
ChoK. S. (2008). Assistance for victims of crime in Korea. In ChanW. C. (Ed.), Support for victims of crime in Asia (pp. 174–193). Routledge.
22.
ChonD. S., ShodunkeA. O., & WaidC. A. (2025). Discrimination and fear of crime among immigrants in South Korea: An individual and neighborhood mixed-level analysis. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/01924036.2025.2529874
23.
ChristieN. (1986). The ideal victim. In FattahE. (Ed.), From crime policy to victim policy (pp. 17–30). Palgrave Macmillan.
24.
ClarkL., & LewisD. (1977). Rape: The price of coercive sexuality. Women’s Press.
25.
Code of Criminal Procedure (Act V of 1898), Pakistan. https://pakistancode.gov.pk/
26.
CohenL., & FelsonM. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 588–608. https://archive.org/details/cohen-social-change-crime-1979-1
27.
Committee on Reforms of Criminal Justice System. (2003). Report of the Committee on reforms of criminal justice system (Chair: Justice V. S. Malimath). Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India. https://www.mha.gov.in/sites/default/files/2022-08/criminal_justice_system%5B1%5D.pdf
28.
CresseyD. R. (1988). Research implications of conflicting conceptions of victimology. In ŠeparovićZ. P. (Ed.), Victimology: International action and study of victims (pp. 43–54). University of Zagreb.
29.
CresseyD. R. (1992). Research implications of conflicting conceptions of victimology. In FattahE. A. (Ed.), Towards a critical victimology (pp. 43–54). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22089-2_3
30.
Crime Victim Protection Act, Act No. 7626 of July 1, 2005, as amended by Act No. 16930 of February 4, 2020, Republic of Korea. Criminal Procedure Act of Korea, Articles 294-2 and 294-3 (as amended).
31.
CunneenC. (2001). Conflict, politics and crime: Aboriginal communities and the police. Allen & Unwin.
32.
DalyK. (2001). Restorative justice in diverse and unequal societies. Law in Context. https://search.informit.org/doi/pdf/10.3316/informit.145666290319638
33.
DalyK. (2002). Restorative justice: The real story. Punishment and Society, 4, 55–79.
34.
DalyK. (2014). Redressing institutional abuse of children. Palgrave Macmillan.
35.
DalyK., & HayesH. (2001). Restorative justice and conferencing in Australia. Trends and issues in crime and criminal justice no. 186. Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra
36.
DaviesS. G., & RobsonJ. (2016). Juvenile (in)justice: Children in conflict with the law in Indonesia. Asia Pacific Journal on Human Rights and the Law, 17(1), 119–147. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718158-01701009
37.
DeshmukhA. (2020). Victim rights in the Indian criminal justice system: A comparative study. Research Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 11(2), 157–163. https://rjhssonline.com/HTML_Papers/Research%20Journal%20of%20Humanities%20and%20Social%20Sciences__PID__2020-11-2-12.html
38.
DignanJ. (2005). Understanding victims and restorative justice. Open University Press.
39.
DussichJ. P. J. (1988). Social coping: A theoretical model for understanding victimization and recovery. In ŠeparovićZ. (Ed.), Victimology: International action and study of victims. Samobor.
40.
DussichJ. P. J. (2006). Psycho/social coping: A theoretical model for understanding general victimization and facilitating recovery. Presented at the American Society of Criminology’s 58th Annual Meeting, Los Angeles, CA, November 2.
41.
EliasR. (1986). The politics of victimization: Victims, victimology, and human rights. Oxford University Press.
42.
EliasR. (1996). Has victimology outlived its usefulness? In SumnerC., IsraelM., O’ConnellM., & SarreR. (Eds), International victimology: Selected papers from the 8th international symposium on victimology (pp. 9–34). Conference Proceedings 27. Australian Institute of Criminology.
43.
FatimaH., QadirT. F., HussainS. A., & MenezesR. G. (2017). Pakistan steps up to remove ‘honour’ from honour killing. The Lancet Global Health, 5(2), 145. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(16)30359-X
44.
FattahE. (2019). Victimology: A discipline in transition. Ezzat A. Fattah.
45.
FattahE. A. (1991). Understanding criminal victimization: An introduction to theoretical victimology. Prentice Hall.
46.
GoodeyJ. (2005). Victims and victimology: Research, policy and activism. Pearson Longman.
47.
GottfredsonM., & HindelangM. J. (1981). Sociological aspects of criminal victimisation. Annual Review of Sociology, 7, 107–128. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.07.080181.000543
48.
GroenhuisjenM. (1999). Victims’ rights in the criminal justice system: A call for more comprehensive implementation theory. In van DijkJ. J. M., van KaamR. G. H., & WemmersJ. (Eds), Caring for victims: Selected proceedings of the 9th international symposium on victimology (pp. 85–114). Criminal Justice Press.
49.
HanY. (2025). The impact of expert testimony and victim statements on evaluations of victimization statements and legal judgment: An introduction to Korea’s crime victimization assessment system and its utility. Victims & Offenders, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2025.2551183
50.
HansE. (2017). Triumph of equity: Laxim vs Union of India: A landmark case for acid attack survivors. Journal of Legal Research and Juridical Sciences, 3(3). https://jlrjs.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/22.-Esha-Hans.pdf
51.
HermanJ. L. (2003). Trauma and recovery: The aftermath of violence—From domestic abuse to political terror. Basic Books.
52.
HindelangM., GottfredsonM., & GarofaloJ. (1978). Victims of personal crime. Ballinger.
53.
Human Rights Commission of Pakistan. (2021). State of human rights in 2020. https://hrcp-web.org/hrcpweb/state-of-human-rights-in-2020/
54.
Human Rights Watch. (2017). Everyone blames me: Barriers to justice in India’s rape cases. https://www.hrw.org/report/2017/11/08/everyone-blames-me/barriers-justice-and-support-services-sexual-assault-survivors
55.
Human Rights Watch. (2018a). ‘Shall I feed my daughter, or educate her?’ Barriers to girls’ education in Pakistan. https://www.hrw.org/report/2018/11/12/shall-i-feed-my-daughter-or-educate-her/barriers-girls-education-pakistan
56.
Human Rights Watch. (2018b). Recurring injustice: Abuses against minorities in Sri Lanka.
57.
Institut Perempuan. (n.d.). Program overview: Legal and psychosocial support for women survivors, Bandung, Indonesia. IDLO, Indonesia Country Profile: Rule of Law and Access to Justice, Rome, Italy.
58.
International Commission of Jurists. (1999). Ruler’s law: Report of the ICJ mission to Indonesia, Geneva. https://www.icj.org/resource/rulers-law-the-report-of-the-international-commission-of-jurists-mission-to-indonesia/
59.
International Commission of Jurists. (2012). Authority without accountability: The crisis of impunity in Sri Lanka.
60.
International Commission of Jurists. (2013). Authority without accountability: The search for justice in Pakistan. https://www.icj.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/Pakistan-Authority-without-accountability-Report-2013.pdf
61.
International Commission of Jurists. (2024). Sri Lanka: ICJ webinar series highlights the importance of legal aid to ensure access to justice for women. https://www.icj.org/sri-lanka-icj-webinar-series-highlights-the-importance-of-legal-aid-to-ensure-access-to-justice-for-women/
62.
International Crisis Group. (2010). Reforming Pakistan’s criminal justice system (Asia Report No 196, 6 December 2010). https://www.refworld.org/docid/4cfd4bc82.html
63.
International Crisis Group. (2017). Sri Lanka’s conflict-affected women: Dealing with the Legacy of War. https://www.crisisgroup.org/rpt/asia-pacific/sri-lanka/289-sri-lankas-conflict-affected-women-dealing-legacy-war
64.
Jakarta Post. (2011). https://www.thejakartapost.com/indonesia/2024/08/01/lpsk-received-over-1000-witness-protection-requests-for-human-trafficking-last-year.html
65.
JaswalN., & SinghL. (2017). Judicial activism in India. Bharati Law Review. https://docs.manupatra.in/newsline/articles/Upload/0BD8AAF5-4031-484F-AB92-2B84EFE0ABCA.pdf
66.
JoM. J., & OhG. S. (2024). A Comparative study of victim support services: Focusing on the United States, United Kingdom, New Zealand, Germany, and Japan. Journal of Crime and Police Policy, 2(2), 101–140. https://doi.org/10.23238/JCPP.PUB.2.2.101
67.
KimM., AnD., & LimJ. (2021). Urban-rural gap of healthcare and cultural service accessibility in South Korea. In BatabyalA. A., HiganoY., & NijkampP. (Eds), Rural–urban dichotomies and spatial development in Asia. New frontiers in regional Science: Asian perspectives (vol. 48, pp. 91–126). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1232-9_5
68.
KirchengastT., IliadisM., & O’ConnellM. (2019). Developing charter rights through the office of commissioner of victims’ rights: Integrity, access and justice for vctims of crime. Monash University Law Review, 45(1), 1–28.
69.
KirchhoffG. (2003). A history of victimology. Presentation at Postgraduate Course on Victimology, Stellenbosch University, South Africa, July7–11.
70.
KirchhoffG. (2007). Theoretical victimology: An introduction. Presentation at Post graduate Course on Victimology, Tokiwa University, Japan.
71.
Komnas Perempuan. (2021). Laporan Tahunan Kerja Komnas Perempuan Tahun 2021, Jakarta, Indonesia. https://komnasperempuan.go.id/laporan-kelembagaan-detail/laporan-tahunan-kerja-komnas-perempuan-tahun-2021
72.
Korea Crime Victims Support Association (KCVSA), Annual report 2022. Seoul, South Korea. http://kcvc.or.kr/main/
73.
Korea Legal Aid Corporation. (2023). National report: Republic of Korea. International Forum on Legal Aid. https://www.laf.org.tw/ifla2023/upload/2023/11/National%20Report_Republic%20of%20Korea.pdf
74.
Korean Institute of Criminology and Justice (KICJ). (2020). Restorative justice in Korea: Trends and challenges. https://www.kicj.re.kr/board.es?mid=a20201000000&bid=0029&list_no=14279&act=view
75.
Law Commission of India. (2009). Compensation to victims of crime (Report No. 226).
76.
Law No. 13/2006 on witness and victim protection, as amended by Law No. 31/2014.
77.
LeeJ. (2023). The evolution and challenges of Korean participatory trials. Korea Legal Aid Corporation, paper presented at the International Forum on Legal Aid, 2023. 4–9. https://www.laf.org.tw/ifla2023/upload/2023/10/Panel%20Discussion%203A-5_Republic%20of%20Korea_Jiyoung%20Lee.pdf
78.
Legal Vidhiya. (2025). Victim blaming: A new guide to victimology in India. https://legalvidhiya.com/victim-blaming-a-new-guide-to-victimology-in-india/
79.
MaguireM. (1985). Victims’ needs and victim services: Indications from research. Victimology: An International Journal, 10, 539–559.
MawbyR. I., & GillM. L. (1987). Crime victims: Needs, services and the voluntary sector. Tavistock Publications.
82.
MendelsohnB. (1947a). New bio-psycho-social horizons: Victimology. Lecture to the Roumanian Society of Psychiatry. State Hospital Coltzea, Bucharest.
83.
MendelsohnB. (1947b). La victimologie. Revue Internationale de Criminologie et de Police Technique, 1(2), 95–109.
84.
MendelsohnB. (1956). Une nouvelle branche de la science bio-psycho-sociale: La victimologie. Revue Internationale de Criminologie et de Police Technique.
85.
MendelsohnB. (1958). La Victimologie Revue Francaise de Psychanalyse.
86.
MendelsohnB. (1963). The origin of the doctrine of victimology. Extrait de la Revue Internationale de Criminologie et de Police Technique.
87.
MendelsohnB. (1976). Victimology and contemporary society’s trends. Victimology, 1, 8–28.
88.
Ministry of Home Affairs. (2023). Victim-centric approach under BNSS. https://bprd.nic.in/uploads/pdf/202401250115570394628VictimCentricApproach.pdf
89.
MogheS. (2025). Victim participation in criminal trials under new criminal laws in India: Doctoral comments. IJLSI, 7(3), 230–243. https://doij.org/10.10000/IJLSI.112563
90.
National Legal Services Authority. (2018). Compensation scheme for women victims/survivors of sexual assault/other crimes. https://mpslsa.gov.in/mpslsa_portal/docs/schemes/NALSA%E2%80%99s_Compensation_Scheme_for_Women_Victims-2018.pdf
91.
News Desk. (2024). LPSK received over 1,000 witness protection requests for human trafficking last year. The Jakarta Post. https://www.thejakartapost.com/indonesia/2024/08/01/lpsk-received-over-1000-witness-protection-requests-for-human-trafficking-last-year.html
92.
O’ConnellM. (2008). Victimology: A social science in waiting?International Review of Victimology, 15(2), 91–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/026975800801500202
93.
O’ConnellM. (2015a). Victims of sex offences: Restorative justice a panacea? In TolfensonT. (Ed.), Victimological advances in theory, policy and services: A festschrift in honour of Prof Dr. John P. J. Dussich (pp. 165–186). World Society of Victimology.
94.
O’ConnellM. (2015b). The evolution of victims’ rights and services in Australia. In WilsonD. & RossS. (Eds), Crime, victims and policy: International contexts, local experiences (pp. 240–277). Palgrave Macmillan.
95.
O’ConnellM. (2017a). Victims’ rights: Integrating victims in criminal proceedings. Australian Institute of Judicial Administration. https://aija.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/OConnell2.pdf
96.
O’ConnellM. (2017b). UNODC expert meeting on restorative justice, November 2017 – Restorative justice: Better justice for victims of crime?Sponsored by the Government of Canada, Ottawa. https://consultingvictimologist.com/2018/12/27/restorative-justice-better-justice-for-victims-of-crime/
97.
O’ConnellM. (2020). Improving access to justice: Procedural justice through legal counsel for victims of crime. In JosephJ. & JergensonS. (Eds), An international perspective on contemporary developments in victimology: A festschrift in honor of Marc Groenhuijsen (pp. 207–223). Springer.
98.
O’ConnellM. (2021). The commissioner for victims’ rights, South Australia – Integral to strengthening the rights of victims of crime. In ShekharB.SahniS. P., PriyamvadaM., & NairV. V. (Eds), Global perspective of victims of crime & victim assistance: Best practices from across the globe. Bloomsbury Publishing.
99.
O’ConnellM. (2022). The commissioner for victims’ rghts, South Australia – Integral to strengthening the rights of victims of crime. In ShekharB., SahniS. P., & AkbarA. (Eds.), A global perspective on victims of crime and victim assistance: Best practices around the world (pp. 317–335). Bloomsbury Prime.
100.
O’ConnellM. (2023). Sustainable Development Goal 17: Its intersection with multi-lateral approaches to victim assistance: A technical report. Global Advances in Victimology and Psychological Studies, 2(2), 49–57. https://gavps.jibs.edu.in/index.php/gavps/article/view/50/31
101.
O’ConnellM. (2026, forthcoming). Crime victims’ access to justice: Bridging the gap – Independent legal representation. In BajpaiG. S., ShekharB., & PriyamvadaM. (Eds), Beyond the gavel: A paradigm shift in global criminal justice. Springer. https://books.google.com.au/books/about/Beyond_the_Gavel_A_Paradigm_Shift_in_Glo.html?id=Ry6c0QEACAAJ&redir_esc=y
102.
O’ConnellM., & HayesH. (2019). Victims, criminal justice and restorative justice. In HayesH. & PrenzlerT. (Eds.), An introduction to crime and criminology (5th ed., pp. 327–349). Pearson Australia.
Office of the Victims’ Commissioner Queensland. (2022). Better for us, better for you: A trauma-informed training framework. https://www.victimscommissioner.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/826440/Better-for-us-better-for-you.pdf
105.
OrthU. (2002). Secondary victimization of crime victims. Social Justice Research, 15(4), 313–325. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235912615
106.
Pakistan Penal Code. (Act XLV of 1860). https://pakistancode.gov.pk/
107.
PrathyushaK. (2019). Evolution of victim compensation in India. Supremo Amicus, 13, Article 17. https://superoamicus.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/A17.v13.pdf
108.
Press Information Bureau. (2024). BNSS §360 (hearing victim before withdrawal of prosecution). https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleaseIframePage.aspx?PRID=2042134
109.
Protection of Women Against Violence Act 2016. (Punjab, Pakistan). https://punjablaws.gov.pk/
RosenbergS., IliadisM., SatyenL., & O’ConnellM. (2024, May24). Submission to the Australian law reform commission issues paper 49: Justice responses to sexual violence. https://www.alrc.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/128.-S-Rosenberg-M-Iliadis-M-OConnell-and-L-Satyen.pdf
112.
Save the Children. (2012). Reforming Indonesia’s juvenile justice system: Lost cause or worth the investment?https://resourcecentre.savethechildren.net/document/reforming-indonesias-juvenile-justice-system-lost-cause-or-worth-investment
113.
SeokC. K. (2008). The current situation and challenges of measures for victims of crime in the Korean Criminal Justice System. https://www.unafei.or.jp/publications/pdf/RS_No81/No81_10VE_Seok.pdf
114.
SharmaS. (2024). Victimology and victims’ rights in Indian criminal justice system. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4789802
115.
South Korean Human Rights Organizations Network. (2019). Joint NGO submission to the human rights committee for lists of issues prior to reporting, Republic of Korea, 126th Session.
116.
SparkesR. F. (1982). Research on victims of crime: Accomplishments, issues and new directions. Crime and Delinquency Issues Monograph Series, U.S. Department of Health & Human Services.
117.
SubhradiptaS. (2010). The quest for victims’ justice in India. Human Rights Brief, 17(2), 16–20. https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1115&context=hrbrief
118.
SusetyoH. (2011). Towards victims of crime challenges and obstacles in its implementation in Indonesia. Victimology and Victims’ Rights. https://herususetyo.com/category/victimology-and-victims-rights/
119.
TylerT. R. (2006). Why people obey the law. Princeton University Press.
120.
TylerT. R., DegoeyP., & SmithH. (1996). Understanding why the justice of group procedures matters: A test of the psychological dynamics of the group value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(5), 913–930.
121.
UN Committee on the Rights of the Child. (2016a). Concluding observations on Indonesia.
122.
UN Committee on the Rights of the Child. (2016b). Concluding observations on the fifth periodic report of Pakistan (11 July) UN Doc CRC/C/PAK/CO/5https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/845413
123.
UNFPA. (2020). Sri Lanka, gender based violence in Sri Lanka: A review.
124.
UNFPA. (2025). Unlocking the gender dividend: Driving policy change through knowledge.
125.
UN Human Rights Committee. (2017). Concluding observations on the initial report of Pakistan (23 August 2017) UN Doc CCPR/C/PAK/CO/1https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/1307585
126.
UNICEF. (2020). Situation analysis of children in Pakistan: An update. https://www.unicef.org/pakistan/media/2826/file/Situation%20Analysis%20of%20Children%20in%20Pakistan.pdf
127.
UNICEF Indonesia. (2019). Reflections on CRC Article 37: Restorative justice in practice. https://www.unicef.org/indonesia/child-protection/stories/reflections-crc-article-37
128.
UN Women. (2015). Progress of the world’s women 2015–2016: Transforming economies, realizing rights, New York. https://knowledge.unwomen.org/en/digital-library/publications/2015/4/progress-of-the-worlds-women-2015
129.
Van DijkJ. (2009). Free the victim: A critique of the western conception of victimhood. International Review of Victimology, 16(1), 1–33. https://www.academia.edu/86075249
130.
Von HentigH. (1940). Remarks on the interaction of perpetrator and victim. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 31(3), 303–309.
131.
Von HentigH. (1948). The criminal and his victim: Studies in the sociobiology of crime. Yale University Press.
132.
WaheedM. A. (2010). Victims of crime in Pakistan. United Nations Asia and Far East Institute for the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders (UNAFEI). https://www.unafei.or.jp/publications/pdf/RS_No81/No81_14PA_Waheed.pdf
133.
WalklateS. (2007a). Imagining the victim of crime. Open University Press.
134.
WalklateS. (2007b). Perspectives on the victim and victimisation: Introduction. In WalklateS. (Ed.), Handbook of victims and victimology (pp. 11–16). Willan.
135.
War Against Rape (WAR), Case Documentation Reports. (2018). Summary via OHCHR CEDAW Working Paper. https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/HRBodies/CEDAW/WomenNGOs/Pakistan.pdf
136.
WemmersJ. (2012). Victims’ experiences of the criminal justice system. WODC/Kugler.
137.
WemmersJ. A. (2013). Victims’ experiences in the criminal justice system and their recovery from crime. International Review of Victimology, 19(3), 221–233.
138.
WerthemF. (1949). The show of violence. Doubleday.
139.
Witness and Victim Protection Agency. (LPSK) (2020). Annual report 2020, Jakarta, Indonesia. https://aseanactpartnershiphub.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Annual-Report-LPSK-2020-ENG_lowres.pdf
140.
WolfgangM. (1957). Patterns of homicide. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 48(1), 1–11.
141.
Yayasan Lembaga Bantuan Hukum Indonesia. (YLBHI) (n.d.). Legal aid and human rights advocacy in Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
142.
YiH. J., ShinY. J., MinY., JeongJ., JungJ., & KangY. (2023). Perception and experience of sexual and gender minority Korean youth in school counseling. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 45(2), 189–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10447-022-09490-0
143.
YounkyungE. (2022, December1). Citizen participatory trials in South Korea. Law Library of Congress, Custodia Legis Blog. https://blogs.loc.gov/law/2022/12/citizen-participatory-trials-in-south-korea/
144.
YousafF. N., & PurkayasthaB. (2016). Beyond saving faces: Survivors of acid attacks in Pakistan. Women’s Studies International Forum, 54, 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2015.10.003
