The aim of this study was to understand perceptions among social work students regarding international/global practice, policy in the social work curriculum and international field internship experiences in their degree programmes. A survey of Bachelor of Social Work and Master of Social Work students was conducted in two social work programmes in the Southeastern United States (n = 218). The analysis showed that the students expressed consistent recognition that global content matters, yet there was an observed discrepancy between recognition of the relevance of global content and its expected impact on students’ own future direct practice. They also perceived limited opportunities to engage in international learning experiences during their academic programmes. Results are discussed with implications for further research, social work education and curriculum development.
BarnerJ. R., & OkechD. (2013). Teaching globalization to social work students: In and out of the classroom. Social Work Education, 32(8), 1061–1074. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2012.730514
2.
BernardW. T., & DominelliL. (2003). Broadening horizons in social work: International exchanges in social work. Taylor & Francis.
3.
BloomM., & FisherJ. (1982). Evaluating practice: Guidelines for the accountable professional. Prentice Hall.
4.
CleakH., AnandJ., & DasC. (2016). Asking the critical questions: An evaluation of social work students’ experiences in an international placement. British Journal of Social Work, 46(2), 389–408. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcu126
5.
Council on Social Work Education (CSWE). (2013). 2012 statistics on social work education in the United States. http://www.cswe.org/File.aspx?id=68977
6.
Council on Social Work Education (CSWE). (2015). Educational policy and accreditation standards. https://www.cswe.org/Accreditation/Accreditation-Process/2015EPAS_Web_FINAL.aspx
7.
Council on Social Work Education (CSWE). (2022). Educational policy and accreditation standards. https://www.cswe.org/Accreditation/Information/2022-EPAS/Draft-2-of-2022-EPAS
8.
DominelliL. (2014). Internationalizing professional practices: The place of social work in the international arena. International Social Work, 57(3), 258–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872814522671
9.
EdwardsB. L. (2011). Social work education and global issues: Implications for social work practice. Education, 131(3), 580–586.
10.
EstesR. J. (2010). United States-based conceptualization of international social work education. https://repository.upenn.edu/spp_papers/181
11.
FisherC. M., & GrettenbergerS. E. (2015). Community-based participatory study abroad: A proposed model for social work education. Journal of Social Work Education, 51(3), 566–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2015.1046342
12.
GangradeK. D. (1987). Development of voluntary action. In RengasamyS. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of social work in India (2nd ed., pp. 219–231). Ministry of Welfare, Government of India.
13.
GermainC. (1991). Human behavior in the social environment. Columbia University Press.
14.
GuoJ., MarshallS., GlasserJ., & SpillersJ. (2016). Learning global social conditions: A broader view for social work students. Social Work Education, 35(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2015.1109072
15.
HayK., LoweS., BarnesG., DentenerA., DoyleR., HiniiG., & MorrisH. (2018). ‘Times that by 100’: Students learning from international practicum. International Social Work, 61(6), 1187–1197. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872817702707
16.
HealyL. M. (2008). International social work: Professional action in an interdependent world (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
17.
HealyL. M., & WairierG. G. (2014). Educating for the global agenda: Internationally relevant conceptual frameworks and knowledge for social work education. International Social Work, 57(3), 235–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872813519463
18.
HurtadoS., & Guillermo-WannC. (2013). Diverse learning environments: Assessing and creating conditions for student success—Final report to the ford foundation. University of California, Higher Education Research Institute.
19.
International Federation of Social Workers (IFSW). (2020, July20). IFSW conference concludes: A new era for social work. https://www.ifsw.org/ifsw-conference-concludes-a-new-era-for-social-work/
20.
LagerP. B., LetaH. B., & RodgersM. (2007). Developing and sustaining international field education opportunities. In GodenziA. & DavidsonK. (Eds.), NADD task force report: International social work conference (pp. 49–68). National Association of Deans and Directors of Schools of Social Work.
21.
LalayantsM., DoelM., & KachkachishviliI. (2015). Students’ perceptions of international social work: A comparative study in the USA, UK, and Georgia. International Social Work, 58(1), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872812473140
22.
LinkR. J., & RamanathanC. S. (2011). Human behavior in a just world: Reaching for common ground. Rowman & Littlefield.
23.
LyonsK., & RamanathanC. S. (2004). Models of field practice in global settings. In RamanathanC. S., & LinkR. J. (2004). All our futures: Principles and resources for social work practice in a global Era (pp. 175–191).Brooks/Cole.
24.
MatthewL. E., & LoughB. J. (2017). Challenges social work students encounter in international field placements and recommendations for responsible management. Journal of Social Work Education, 53(1), 18–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2016.1246268
25.
Nuttman-SchwartzO., & BergerR. (2011). Field education in international social work: Where we are and where we should go. International Social Work, 55(2), 225–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872811414597
26.
OkechD., & BarnerJ. R. (2014). MSW students’ motivations for taking an international social work elective course. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 34(2), 167–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841233.2014.892051
27.
PawarM. (2016). Reflective learning and teaching in social work field education in international contexts. British Journal of Social Work, 201. http://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcw136
28.
RamanathanC. S., & CrawleyW. R. (2021). Conceptualizing disaster preparedness interventions and research: What does literature have to do with it?Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services. https://doi.org/10.1177/1044389420978115
29.
RamanathanC. S., & KondratM. E. (1994). Conceptualizing and implementing a social work overseas study in developing nations: Politics, realities, and strategies. Social Development Issues, 16(2), 69–85.
30.
RamanathanC. S., & LinkR. J. (2004). All our futures: Principles & resources for social work practice in a global era. Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
31.
SacchettiM. (2018, August31). Still separated: Nearly 500 migrant children taken from their parents remain in U.S. custody. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/immigration/still-separated-nearly-500-separated-migrant-children-remain-in-us-custody/2018/08/30/6dbd8278-aa09-11e8-8a0c-70b618c98d3c_story.html
32.
SullivanM. (1993). Social work’s legacy of peace echoes from the early 20th century. Journal of Social Work, 38(5), 513–520.
33.
ZubarogluP., & PopescuM. (2016). Preparing social work students for international interdisciplinary practice: A teaching model and its impact on self-efficacy. Advances in Social Work, 16(2), 214–232. https://doi.org/10.18060/18504
