Paulo Freirean Ideas at the Grassroots: From Problem Posing Education to Critical Consciousness

Abstract

This article aims to reflectively analyse the personal and organisational trajectory of a grassroots activist—researcher in translating abstract praxis-related theoretical ideas to practise through a two-way process of learning. It critically discuses an evolving process of collective actions and associated reflections that progressively brought clarity on the theoretical aspects of the Freirean concepts. The process of the application and usefulness of the problem posing education, conscientisation and critical consciousness in transforming the lives of women and communities is reflectively narrated. The author argues that Freire’s transformative conceptualisations not only have the impact on the ‘oppressed’, but also on the ‘privileged’ who chose to work with them. Despite some limitations, the author, as a community practitioner/activist, finds Freire’s ideas as a gift in the political purpose and politics of her work. These reflections will be of use to community practitioners and members working in similar contexts.

Keywords

Paulo Freire Freirean politics adult literacy learning grassroots movement women’s empowerment

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ayers

(1987). Review of a pedagogy for liberation. Teachers College Record , 89(1), 162–163.

Blackburn

(2000). Understanding Paulo Freire: Reflections on the origins, concepts, and possible pitfalls of his educational approach. Community Development Journal , 35(1), 3–15.

Boston

(1972). Paulo Freire. In Grabowski

(Ed.), Paulo Freire: A revolutionary dilemma for the adult educator (pp. 83–92). Syracuse University Publications in Continuing Education.

Bradshaw

(1972). Taxonomy of social need. In McLachlan

(Ed.), Problems and progress in medical care: Essays on current research, 7th series (pp.71–82). Oxford University Press.

Egerton

(1973, March). Searching for Freire . Saturday Review of Education, 32–35.

Fetterman

(1986). Review of the politics of education: Culture, power, and liberation. American Anthropologist , 88(1), 253–254.

Freire

(1993). Education for critical consciousness. Continuum.

Freire

(1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Penguin Books.

Giroux

(2017). Forward: Paulo Freire and the courage to be political. In Darder

(Ed.), Reinventing Paulo Freire: A pedagogy of love (pp. xi–xvii). Routledge.

10.

Hegar

(2012). Paulo Freire: Neglected mentor for social work. Journal of Progressive Human Services , 23(2), 159–177.

11.

Heron

(1996). Co-operative inquiry: Research into the human condition. SAGE Publications.

12.

Heron

Reason

(2001). The practice of co-operative inquiry: Research ‘with’ rather than ‘on’ people,’ In Reason

& Bradbury

(Eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (pp. 179–188). SAGE Publications.

13.

Hooks

(1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. Routledge.

14.

Melling

Pikington

(Eds.). (2018). Paulo Freire and transformative education: Changing lives and transforming communities. Palgrave Macmillan.

15.

Ramchandran

(2000). Literacy, development and empowerment: Conceptual issues. In Wazir

(Ed.), The gender gap in basic education: NGOs as change agents (pp. 115–149). SAGE Publications.

16.

Rege

(2000). ‘Real Feminism’ and Dalit women: Scripts of denial and accusation. Economic and Political Weekly , 35(6), 492–495.

17.

Shor

Freire

(1987). “What is the “Dialogical Method” of teaching?. Journal of Education , 169(3), 11–30.

18.

Stromquist

(1997). Literacy for citizenship: Gender and grassroots dynamics in Brazil. State University of New York Press.